COMPARE VALUES, MECHANISMS AND BURNING OF JAGER AND SAFEBSC 🔥🔥🔥
Jager and SafeBSC both charge a 5% transaction fee, but their operations are completely different:
1) Create Value
Jager: 5% fee is immediately distributed to traders/liquidity providers/burners → completely depends on transaction volume.
SafeBSC: 70% of the fee is used to build a profitable treasury, 30% is used to invest in BTC → has income outside of transaction volume.
2) Burning 🔥
Jager: High transaction volume leads to large burning; low transaction volume → burning amount decreases significantly.
SafeBSC: Daily token burning based on profits, even in a bear market can maintain the stability of token burning.
3) Sample Data (based on real assumptions):
If transaction volume in the market decreases significantly over 30 days:
Jager: The amount of burning and rewards may decrease by about 70% (due to no transactions).
SafeBSC: Due to profits from the treasury and BTC, the amount of burning remains at about 80-90%.
4) Conclusion
Jager: Suitable for high transaction volume markets, but vulnerable in bear markets.
SafeBSC: More stable, as the burning mechanism does not depend on transaction volume, but rather on profit margins plus the amount of Bitcoin. 🔥🔥🔥
