There are people in Japan who want nuclear weapons

According to a report from China National Radio, a senior official responsible for security policy at the Prime Minister's Office suddenly expressed to the media that he believes Japan should possess nuclear weapons. The statement from the official does not represent an official position, but the person who made the statement is indeed an official, which means that North Korea's technology is not patented, and everyone can learn from it. North Korea's statement to sanction Japan is said by a researcher in international politics and does not represent the official stance of North Korea, but the person is an official person. After the statement, there is room for both advance and retreat; this technology is open-source, and Japan can learn it too, which means that the person does not represent Takashita Sanae, but the person is someone related to Takashita Sanae.

After this person spoke, Japan's Minister of Defense also spoke, saying that when discussing the promotion of the so-called three non-nuclear principles, no options are ruled out. It did not say it wants nuclear weapons, nor did it say it does not want nuclear weapons; it only said that no options are ruled out, which still leaves room for maneuvering. I suggest that this master of Tai Chi directly perform Tai Chi as Zhang Sanfeng. The current geopolitical environment of East Asia is no longer the old version of slicing sausage, but rather a new version of Tai Chi, where the East has consistently demonstrated extreme progress in learning from and surpassing the West.

The West slices the sausage clearly, without making explicit statements, but constantly tests the waters, which seems very disgusting. However, the East immediately came up with a more disgusting method, which is not to say anything clearly; you guess. Shibo Shigeo said well that possessing nuclear weapons is not beneficial for Japan. Once Japan possesses nuclear weapons, it must withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons and the International Atomic Energy Agency, and immediately the supply of nuclear materials to Japan from the international community will be cut off, causing problems for Japan's nuclear energy policy. Shibo Shigeo understands that Japan can develop nuclear weapons; although it has the technology, it lacks the capability. It's like having the ability to cook but not having the rice to cook with. However, people like Shibo Shigeo, who speak clearly, are already politicians of the old era; the current trend is to speak ambiguously.

The Americans were greatly startled and quickly praised Japan, saying that Japan is a leader in nuclear non-proliferation and a major force for international peace. The Americans do not say this to put a bridle on Japan but because they truly know who has dropped nuclear bombs on Japan's homeland. We need not be anxious about this matter because while Japan's nuclear possession is a question worth opposing, the most anxious should clearly not be us. The United States has always regarded itself as the maintainer of global order. If it cannot manage Japan's nuclear possession, then how can it manage Iran?

As a country that fought the entire World War II against Japan, the United States is most clearly aware that Japan does not have nuclear bombs. It will contemplate the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, it will contemplate denying the Nanjing Massacre, and it will contemplate standing with the United States to confront China. However, once Japan truly possesses nuclear bombs, it will first need to contemplate the issue of revenge. Japan could throw nuclear bombs at the United States because historically, the United States has dropped nuclear bombs on Japan.

When a person is the perpetrator, they will try to deny that this issue occurred because of their lack of quality. However, if a person is a victim, they will definitely keep bringing this matter up until they feel satisfied with their revenge. The US and Japan can be allies, but the premise of the alliance must be that they can advance and retreat together, or that there is a more powerful common enemy that can unite the enemies. The UK and Russia can ally under the pressure of Germany, and the US can also ally with a nuclear Japan, but the premise is that there must be a greater common enemy that can simultaneously threaten both the US and Japan.

If there are no such allies, only a peace-loving Eastern power that does not threaten their existence, it is impossible for them to continue their close relationship without any suspicion. Any alliance, once there is suspicion, will not go far. Japan understands this principle better than we do, so it is cautious and does not dare to state anything clearly.