“Here’s why $TRX barely flinches when the rest of the market shakes — the answer is structural, not speculative.”

TRON has quietly crossed a threshold most L1s never reach. It’s no longer competing on narratives or promises. It’s operating as a global financial settlement network, and the data makes that clear.

Here’s the framework behind TRON’s dominance:

1) Protocol revenue at an entirely different scale

Sustainability starts with cash flow — and TRON is in a league of its own. – 24h revenue: $1.03M

– Base: $104K | Solana: $79K

– 30-day revenue: $29.36M

To put this into perspective: the combined monthly revenue of Base, Solana, BSC, and Polygon is only ~$7.13M. TRON alone generates over 4× more than all four combined.

When a protocol earns like this, token stability stops being a theory and becomes math.

2) Stablecoin dominance that refuses to budge

Many chains launched claiming to be “stablecoin-native.” TRON already won that race. – Since 2018, TRON has consistently held ~25% of global stablecoin market share

– Ethereum’s share evolved. New L1s emerged. TRON held its ground.

That persistence creates a liquidity moat that can’t be copied. You can deploy code quickly — you can’t deploy trust, depth, and global usage overnight.

3) User growth powered by real demand, not incentives

TRON isn’t just stable — it’s accelerating. – Total accounts: 354.8M+

– New users added in 2025 alone: 73.39M

– User growth rate now outpacing Ethereum by 8%+

This isn’t speculative onboarding. It’s driven by payments, remittances, and high-frequency transfers. TRON has become the default rail for moving value, not just experimenting with it.

$TRX isn’t stable because of market luck.

It’s stable because it sits at the center of one of the most profitable, liquid, and widely used blockchain ecosystems in the world.

That’s not a token story.

That’s infrastructure.

@Justin Sun孙宇晨 #TRON #TRX #TRONEcoStar