$HIPPO

Why do info-gypsies always give signals with three take-profits?

In most paid and free "crypto signals," the same scheme is used: entry, stop-loss, and three take-profits. This is presented as a sign of professionalism and a well-thought-out strategy. In reality, this approach is a marketing trick.

Three take-profits create the illusion of a complex plan. One take looks simple and honest, while three inspire confidence: it seems that the author has considered different market scenarios. The levels are often set formally—based on a grid or the nearest extremes.

The main reason is the inability to admit a mistake. If the price reaches at least TP1, the author can always say that the signal worked. If it didn't reach TP2 and TP3—"the market was complicated." Formally, there is no failure.

Moreover, the first take is usually very close. It is often hit, giving the trader a quick dopamine "profit" and the feeling that the system works. This keeps subscribers engaged better than rare but honest trades.

The conclusion is simple: three take-profits are not needed for the subscriber's earnings, but to ensure that the signal's author always appears right. In real trading, what matters is not the number of takes, but the mathematical expectation and discipline.