Everyone's complaints about o1 are mostly about the

Post

Everyone's complaints about o1 are mostly about the excessive loss, which is actually unnecessary～
The ratio of loss to points is the key; no loss but unable to obtain points is meaningless! 
Additionally, although many cryptocurrencies on o1 have very low trading fees, it is said that only the cryptocurrencies under the o1 Alpha category have a high points coefficient, which is why everyone is刷 LMTS.
However, I haven't found any definitive documents or explanations for this claim, but the official documentation clearly mentions the existence of a points coefficient.

BitHappy

Regarding the low loss and fast scoring of o1, this matter~

With the rise of Genius, it has also boosted o1, which belongs to the same Terminal track. Therefore, the same question arises: how can we score more efficiently?
Below are personal thoughts and a beginner-friendly tutorial 👇
Personal thoughts:
Popular tracks will inevitably become the focal point of competition among various forces, and it is impossible to let competitors enjoy the benefits alone.
Currently, o1 is still in its early stages, and based on trends, the subsequent competition will only become more intense.
The Base chain ecosystem where o1 is located has abundant funds, high TVL, and strong user activity. In the past one or two years, several heavyweight projects have emerged. Some DEX and Points systems have also provided generous returns.

Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.

.css-1iqe90x{box-sizing:border-box;margin:0;min-width:0;color:#EAECEF;}Everyone's complaints about o1 are mostly about the excessive loss, which is actually unnecessary～

Latest News

Everyone's complaints about o1 are mostly about the excessive loss, which is actually unnecessary～