There is a simple test for the mass adoption of any technology.
Try to explain it to her friend without slides and jargon.
“I just want to transfer money to you.”
Do not invest.
Do not farm.
Just transfer.
And it is at this point that most crypto products start to "fall apart."
Because instead of “sent - received” clarifications appear. Many clarifications.
In which network?
How to pay the fee?
Why isn't it arriving?
Why does the address seem the same, but isn't?
P2P transfers are the simplest scenario.
And at the same time the harshest for UX.
Why P2P is the mass case
Because it doesn't require explanations.
People already know how to transfer money to each other.
They just want it to work reliably and without surprises.
Stablecoins make sense here.
You don't think about the exchange rate.
You don't calculate 'how much will it be in 10 minutes'.
You just send the amount.
Where is Plasma here
@Plasma looks at P2P not as 'just another function', but as a basic scenario.
The same one that should work without instructions.
The idea is simple to the point of banality:
If a person sends a stablecoin, they shouldn't feel like they're going through a quest.
Without separate tokens 'for the service'.
Without guessing whether it has arrived.
Without fear of making mistakes in the details.
👉 It's not about revolution. It's about normality.
A small but important note
Does Plasma solve all P2P problems once and for all?
I wouldn't phrase it like that.
But the trick is to make a simple scenario truly simple - it looks great.
Especially against the backdrop of an industry that has been complicating the obvious for years.
And perhaps it is from such 'boring' transfers between people that real Web3 usage begins.
