Recent headlines suggest a “Greenland deal,” but the facts tell a different story.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte met with Donald Trump in Davos, yet neither Denmark nor Greenland was present. Greenland’s Prime Minister later confirmed he is unaware of any framework or agreement involving his own territory. NATO has also stated that no sovereignty compromises were proposed, while Denmark reaffirmed that its sovereignty is non-negotiable.
There is no written agreement, no signatures, and no defined terms—despite claims the deal lasts “forever.” In reality, the 1951 U.S.–Denmark Defense Agreement already grants the U.S. broad, perpetual access to Greenland’s defense areas.
Meanwhile, mining stocks tied to Greenland have surged on speculation, even as experts highlight extreme costs, delayed production timelines, and major logistical challenges.
The takeaway: the narrative moved markets, not a deal.PLEASE FOLLOW BDV7071.$BTC #Geopolitics #Greenland #NATO #Denmark #GlobalMarkets
