The Rationale of the Existence of $VANRY as an Implementation Requirement within the AI-First Infrastructure of @Vanarchain .
There is no graceful failure of AI systems when it is not clear how it will run. They demand assurances--not after, but before, computation is to be done. Here is where Vanar can fit in the architecture of $VANRY.
Vanar is an executioner, who does not consider best-effort results but execution as a requirement. AI processes depend on long-term memory, autopilot activities and processes. They cannot rely on post-hoc payments or fluctuating network circumstances. $VANRY will have to make payment in advance to reserve resources and make completion obligatory, so that once it begins, the infrastructure becomes economically bound to complete it.
This model puts the blame on the network rather than users and agents. Failure to complete a task is not ambiguous but detectable and responsible. The economic layer is resilient, dependable, and tolerant to failure.
$VANRY is not a narrative format. It is there to ensure that AI implementation can be predictable, enforceable, and non-innovative to final users, silently driving the existence of infrastructure that must operate consistently, not only when circumstances are favorable.
