The U.S. military has begun to confront Trump? The North American Aerospace Defense Command's wording is subtle, completely disregarding the White House!\nOn January 20, 2026, the North American Aerospace Defense Command released a message that quickly attracted outside attention. The statement said that a U.S. military aircraft would arrive at the Thule Air Base in Greenland for deployment. Although this is a routine defense cooperation action, the statement emphasized that the U.S. and Canada are cooperating, coordinating with Denmark, notifying Greenland in advance, and all personnel hold diplomatic permits...\nTherefore, upon closer reading of this statement, one discovers an intriguing phenomenon: the entire text is calm, restrained, and procedural, barely containing a hint of domineering tone, let alone the “high-profile declarations” or “tough statements” that align with the White House style. The statement is filled with implications of respect for Denmark and Greenland's sovereignty, which is worlds apart from the White House's attitude.\nThis “low-key confrontation” undoubtedly reveals the military's dissatisfaction with the White House. On one hand, the military is effectively building a “systemic firewall” by strictly adhering to procedures and strengthening multilateral communication to prevent diplomatic fluctuations from impacting operational systems; on the other hand, this may also exacerbate tensions between the White House and the Pentagon. If the White House continues to pursue unilateral diplomatic policies, the future trajectory of military units like the North American Aerospace Defense Command is worth close attention.\nBrother Dao believes that with the White House's further pressure on Denmark, every deployment of the U.S. military in such sensitive areas is not just a military action, but also a multifaceted signal. The wording from the North American Aerospace Defense Command appears very polite and rigorous, completely lacking the tone of the White House, clearly expressing the military's dissatisfaction with Trump. After all, there is a precedent for this, as the former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, serves as an example.