DUSK SOLVES BRIDGE FAILURES. NO MORE ALIBIS.
Dusk is launching a native validator-operated bridge. This isn't another layer to blame. The same validators that finalize DuskDS state will attest to cross-chain movements. If an attestation is wrong, the validator set owns it. No more pointing fingers at relayer configs or guardian thresholds. The responsibility is on-chain, with slashing consequences for errors. This eliminates the "bridge issue" excuse. When a Dusk validator signs a bridge event, it's consensus responsibility. Failure means immediate accountability, not a post-mortem shrug. The trust graph won't grow another unmapped limb. The mess comes home to the operators. No more escape hatches or rerouting blame. The accountability loop IS the chain. The question is: whose signature made the move real, and are you comfortable seeing those names again?