Cross-chain is not a narrative: What does Vanar Chain landing on Base mean for the scale of AI usage?
In many projects, cross-chain is often seen as a form of 'exposure'—engaging with multiple ecosystems and drawing traffic. However, in an AI-first context, the significance of cross-chain is entirely different. AI systems inherently do not belong to any single chain; they pursue reach and scale.
Vanar Chain chooses to start expanding technical availability from Base, which is essentially not about establishing a 'multi-chain presence', but about solving a very real problem: if AI can only operate within a single network, its usage limit will be greatly constrained.
Once foundational capabilities can be called across ecosystems, intelligent systems can play a role in a much larger application space.
This step is more like 'opening a channel' for Vanar. Behind Base lies a more mature application environment, richer user entry points, and more real scenarios that could be directly invoked by AI. All of these will, in turn, increase the probability of Vanar's technology being actually used, rather than remaining in a self-circulating native network.
From a usage logic perspective, this kind of cross-chain does not dilute Vanar's core positioning. On the contrary, it reinforces a judgment: AI-first infrastructure cannot be isolated on a single chain.
Only when intelligent capabilities can be repeatedly called by different ecosystems will the value of the infrastructure truly be amplified.
Corresponding to $VANRY, this expansion is not simply about 'adding another application scenario', but rather increasing the potential frequency and depth of usage. When technology is relied upon by more systems, assets will naturally flow with usage, rather than being sustained by narrative.
Vanar Chain's approach to cross-chain is not loud, but the logic is clear: it's not about making more people aware of it, but about enabling more AIs to use it.
$VANRY