Post
Cas Abbé
·
--
Lets Explore Plasma and $XPL Supremacy
The crypto world is never the same. Plasma is one of many chains and tokens that have attracted my attention as it addresses a legitimate issue, trust-free data storage and effective cross-chain communication. In this article I will give what I have observed regarding Plasma and its token, XPL. I want to make the explanation of the project as simple as possible and demonstrate, that I did the research to understand, where the project belongs in the perspective of the greater market.
What Plasma Is
Since the name Plasma was new to me, I initially associated this with the old Plasma scaling concept of Ethereum. But here Plasma is an independent blockchain of layer-1. It is constructed as a decentralised physical-infrastructure network of storing all types of data.
There are three major features of the network.
To begin with, the storage of universal data. Plasma operates a chain of validating nodes which serve and store files in numerous chains. It relies on proof-of-stake to maintain integrity of data and to compensate node operators. The developers will be able to store data on Plasma and then access it in any chain.
Second, proof of spacetime. Validators often give cryptographic evidence that they still possess the information they were paid to archive. These evidences are documented in the books of accounts of Plasma which forms a publicly available record that anyone can audit.
Third, interoperability. Plasma is chain‑agnostic. Customers can save information in one chain and retrieve on the other. An example is an application made using Ethereum that may store user profiles in the Plasma and then retrieve them later in a different blockchain. This minimizes the storage of data in silos and duplication.
The Process of My Reflections on the Problem Under Solution.
The issue with many decentralised applications is that it is difficult to store large volumes of data on-chain due to the high fees charged by the major networks to store and retrieve data. There are off-chain solutions though they become complicated during the time data have to cross chains.
The potential of the plasma as both cost and interoperability-driving is unique as it addresses both cost and interoperability. Personally, I believe this can make the app-building simpler, and reduce the redundancy that occurs across the ecosystems.
Supply and Tokenomics What the Numbers Tell.
The concept of any crypto project is inseparable without the knowledge of its tokens. The total number of XPL tokens is 10 billion; however, a very limited number of its tokens are in circulation during the early years. The remaining is in lock-up or set aside.
The network has a definite issuance plan. The first three years will have no inflation. The supply that was in circulation remains unchanged and the network is concerned with adoption during this period. This is followed by the onset of inflation at a very gradual pace which ultimately stabilises at a low rate per year. New tokens are given to those who store data and keep the network.
Plasma is another system that employs a mechanism of fee that burns part of the transaction fees. This decreases supply in the long term and equalizes inflation.
Allocation Breakdown
The overall supply of XPL is divided into a number of groups.
Some of it is paid to first-time investors and strategic stakeholders who assisted to initiate and expand the network. A minor portion will be allocated to the core team and contributors and lock-up timelines will be implemented to balance long-term incentives and reduce the pressure to sell early. The other section is the investors who can offer capital and direction. The biggest portion is allocated to grants and ecosystem funding, which serve to support developers, community projects, and future partnerships.
These lock‑ups matter. Selling pressure can be decreased in the initial years because the small supply of circulating can lower selling pressure. As the locked tokens will unlock, the market will have to soak in more supply. As an investor, it is necessary to follow unlock schedules.
Circulating vs Total Supply
Market data indicate that XPL is only circulating in a certain percentage of the entire supply. A majority of the tokens are locked or reserved.
There are two impacts of this structure. On the one hand, it inhibits instant dilution. On the other hand, supply may rise with time and inflation may unlock future. Any person considering the token must consider this as a long-term consideration.
Network Economics and legitimizers.
Plasma is based on a proof-of-stake. Validators store data, answer queries of retrieval, and store XPL tokens and execute nodes. They in turn get rewarded by inflation and transaction fee percentage. Part of the collected fees are burnt by the fee structure and the rest are allocated to validators. Such a design ensures the protection of network security and limits the supply of tokens. Part of the benefits can be directed to a community treasury that funds growth and development of eco-systems.
The degree of decentralisation relies on the ease with which one can become a validator. Participation is affected by hardware requirements, bandwidth requirements and staking requirements.
Investors and Backers
There are a number of well-known crypto-oriented investment funds that have aided plasma. These supporters will include capital, credibility, and industry contacts. Although that is not the case, strong investors can boost a project to overcome the initial challenges and climb higher.
The Broader Market Context
The use of crypto is increasing across the world. Millions of users now possess digital assets and the usage has increased at a higher rate than the traditional payment systems over the past years. The rates of adoption are high in emerging markets, especially.
This is an advantage to the Plasma since the decentralised storage will gain demand with the increase in applications migrating to the blockchain. Networks such as Plasma can become more popular when the developers require trustworthy, cross-chain data storage.
Risks and Considerations
There are a number of risks that should be addressed. The supply may be increased in the long run due to token unlocks and inflation. There is a high level of rivalry, as there are other decentralised storage networks, and even centralised cloud providers who provide alternatives. There are execution risk, the network needs to demonstrate that it can scale safely. The same applies to regulatory uncertainty and market volatility since they apply to all crypto assets.
Plasma is an idealistic infrastructure initiative that will resolve a crypto issue. I like the fact that its token system is well explained and concentrates on long-term rewards. The design, storage proofs, staking and burning of fees depict careful economic planning.
It will only succeed when adopted in reality. Plasma not only has to lure developers but also provide a robust infrastructure and demonstrate that its vision of cross-chain is practical. Plasma is a project to monitor to all those researching infrastructure-related crypto projects. Nevertheless, there has to be a clear picture of both its potential as well as its risks.
#plasma @Plasma
$XPL
What Plasma Is
Since the name Plasma was new to me, I initially associated this with the old Plasma scaling concept of Ethereum. But here Plasma is an independent blockchain of layer-1. It is constructed as a decentralised physical-infrastructure network of storing all types of data.
There are three major features of the network.
To begin with, the storage of universal data. Plasma operates a chain of validating nodes which serve and store files in numerous chains. It relies on proof-of-stake to maintain integrity of data and to compensate node operators. The developers will be able to store data on Plasma and then access it in any chain.
Second, proof of spacetime. Validators often give cryptographic evidence that they still possess the information they were paid to archive. These evidences are documented in the books of accounts of Plasma which forms a publicly available record that anyone can audit.
Third, interoperability. Plasma is chain‑agnostic. Customers can save information in one chain and retrieve on the other. An example is an application made using Ethereum that may store user profiles in the Plasma and then retrieve them later in a different blockchain. This minimizes the storage of data in silos and duplication.
The Process of My Reflections on the Problem Under Solution.
The issue with many decentralised applications is that it is difficult to store large volumes of data on-chain due to the high fees charged by the major networks to store and retrieve data. There are off-chain solutions though they become complicated during the time data have to cross chains.
The potential of the plasma as both cost and interoperability-driving is unique as it addresses both cost and interoperability. Personally, I believe this can make the app-building simpler, and reduce the redundancy that occurs across the ecosystems.
Supply and Tokenomics What the Numbers Tell.
The concept of any crypto project is inseparable without the knowledge of its tokens. The total number of XPL tokens is 10 billion; however, a very limited number of its tokens are in circulation during the early years. The remaining is in lock-up or set aside.
The network has a definite issuance plan. The first three years will have no inflation. The supply that was in circulation remains unchanged and the network is concerned with adoption during this period. This is followed by the onset of inflation at a very gradual pace which ultimately stabilises at a low rate per year. New tokens are given to those who store data and keep the network.
Plasma is another system that employs a mechanism of fee that burns part of the transaction fees. This decreases supply in the long term and equalizes inflation.
Allocation Breakdown
The overall supply of XPL is divided into a number of groups.
Some of it is paid to first-time investors and strategic stakeholders who assisted to initiate and expand the network. A minor portion will be allocated to the core team and contributors and lock-up timelines will be implemented to balance long-term incentives and reduce the pressure to sell early. The other section is the investors who can offer capital and direction. The biggest portion is allocated to grants and ecosystem funding, which serve to support developers, community projects, and future partnerships.
These lock‑ups matter. Selling pressure can be decreased in the initial years because the small supply of circulating can lower selling pressure. As the locked tokens will unlock, the market will have to soak in more supply. As an investor, it is necessary to follow unlock schedules.
Circulating vs Total Supply
Market data indicate that XPL is only circulating in a certain percentage of the entire supply. A majority of the tokens are locked or reserved.
There are two impacts of this structure. On the one hand, it inhibits instant dilution. On the other hand, supply may rise with time and inflation may unlock future. Any person considering the token must consider this as a long-term consideration.
Network Economics and legitimizers.
Plasma is based on a proof-of-stake. Validators store data, answer queries of retrieval, and store XPL tokens and execute nodes. They in turn get rewarded by inflation and transaction fee percentage. Part of the collected fees are burnt by the fee structure and the rest are allocated to validators. Such a design ensures the protection of network security and limits the supply of tokens. Part of the benefits can be directed to a community treasury that funds growth and development of eco-systems.
The degree of decentralisation relies on the ease with which one can become a validator. Participation is affected by hardware requirements, bandwidth requirements and staking requirements.
Investors and Backers
There are a number of well-known crypto-oriented investment funds that have aided plasma. These supporters will include capital, credibility, and industry contacts. Although that is not the case, strong investors can boost a project to overcome the initial challenges and climb higher.
The Broader Market Context
The use of crypto is increasing across the world. Millions of users now possess digital assets and the usage has increased at a higher rate than the traditional payment systems over the past years. The rates of adoption are high in emerging markets, especially.
This is an advantage to the Plasma since the decentralised storage will gain demand with the increase in applications migrating to the blockchain. Networks such as Plasma can become more popular when the developers require trustworthy, cross-chain data storage.
Risks and Considerations
There are a number of risks that should be addressed. The supply may be increased in the long run due to token unlocks and inflation. There is a high level of rivalry, as there are other decentralised storage networks, and even centralised cloud providers who provide alternatives. There are execution risk, the network needs to demonstrate that it can scale safely. The same applies to regulatory uncertainty and market volatility since they apply to all crypto assets.
Plasma is an idealistic infrastructure initiative that will resolve a crypto issue. I like the fact that its token system is well explained and concentrates on long-term rewards. The design, storage proofs, staking and burning of fees depict careful economic planning.
It will only succeed when adopted in reality. Plasma not only has to lure developers but also provide a robust infrastructure and demonstrate that its vision of cross-chain is practical. Plasma is a project to monitor to all those researching infrastructure-related crypto projects. Nevertheless, there has to be a clear picture of both its potential as well as its risks.
#plasma @Plasma
$XPL
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.