Hedger turns EVM transactions into 'compliant confidential documents', this is the hard narrative of $DUSK

I am Azu, let me be straightforward: on-chain privacy, if it is just 'hidden', will never enter regulated finance; what is truly valuable is 'keeping secrets from the market while being auditable by regulators'. Dusk's core logic in the white paper is very clear - privacy and compliance are not either/or, but should be engineered into the same set of default capabilities: what should be public is public, what should be confidential is confidential, but at the same time, it must be able to provide verifiable explanations and evidence when needed.

This is also why I am more focused on Hedger: it is not a tool for you to 'avoid regulation', but rather a compliance privacy engine for DuskEVM, using homomorphic encryption + zero-knowledge proof to pull sensitive information like transaction amounts, balances, and intentions back from 'broadcasting across the entire network' to a state of 'confidential but auditable'. For institutions, this means a closer experience to dark pools/market making: order intentions are no longer exposed, reducing the risk of being targeted and front-run; but when rules require it, evidence can be provided, and accountability can be established, meeting the hard requirements of compliance auditing.

More importantly, it has already started to run: Hedger Alpha has launched and is open for testing (official information), during the testnet phase, key actions like Shield/Unshield and confidential transfers have been integrated first, and testing has been advanced under controlled conditions through an allowlist - this is closer to real implementation than simply shouting 'privacy sector'. Moving forward, I will continue to monitor the iteration pace of @Dusk 's DuskEVM and Hedger: only chains that can successfully implement 'compliant confidentiality' deserve to take on the increment of RWA and compliant DeFi.

$DUSK #Dusk