While observing Walrus for extended periods, one can ascertain that the procedures Walrus employs are not designed with either visibility in mind or with a story in mind, but rather with the story of the procedures def warranting a lack of concern for having to endure hostile environments. Walrus sees failure, loss of nodes, and bad-actor behavior not as exceptions to the rule, but as def the rule itself. Walrus has incorporated the building of systems to replicate, verify, and rely on itself as a part of the core architecture of the Walrus system. In the end, the design itself determines to what extent the data has been maintained, to what extent the state of data has been maintained, and to what extent the processes have continued to execute despite the surrounding systems deteriorating. Unlike the appropriate designation for a digital currency such as $WAL as a digital currency, it is more appropriate to say that $WAL is a digital currency to facilitate a reward system that provides compensation to a participant in the economy for enduring the system. When observing the architecture over multiple time horizons, Walrus shows that its core function is the provision of support for agents, applications, and systems for which the loss of continuity is not an option, and whose weaker networks are designed to fail.

@Walrus 🦭/acc #walrus $WAL