American banks rush into Bitcoin: Is it a real game or just a facade?
While the figure of 60% sounds very encouraging, you need to keep a cool head. The story is that banks are primarily participating to collect service fees from ultra-wealthy clients and organizations, rather than to support the decentralized spirit of Crypto. Just look at their attitude towards Stablecoins: they are extremely opposed to interest-bearing stablecoins for fear of losing $500 billion in deposits. This shows that banks only want to control the game in the way that benefits them the most. #anhbacong
In addition, there are still "stubborn" names like Bank of America or Capital One standing outside the game. This polarization indicates that the legal framework is still not truly complete for everyone to "jump on board." Investors with 1-3 years of experience should be cautious: the banks' involvement helps boost BTC's credibility, but it can also come with tighter regulations. Don't rush into excessive FOMO just because you see news of bank participation; observe how far the actual infrastructure they are building goes instead of just listening to statements made at Davos. $BTC
