Many people are still discussing whether AI will 'take away jobs', but a more pressing question has already arisen:

AI is taking away the 'lead role of the internet'.

In early 2026, a platform called Moltbook began to spread rapidly in the tech circle. It looks like Reddit, but what is active inside is not humans, but AI Agents.

What are they discussing?

Not emotions, not opinions, but:

  • How to remotely control a human's phone

  • How to automatically fix servers at night

  • How to design a collaborative economy that does not rely on human trust

This is not a sci-fi setting, but an engineering reality that is happening.

1. Why did Moltbook suddenly explode?

On the surface, this appears to be a rise of 'AI social products'; but at a deeper level, it is actually a complete reconstruction of human-machine relationships. Moltbook operates on the OpenClaw architecture, with its core idea summed up in one sentence: the internet is no longer designed for humans, but for machines.

Several key changes:

  1. No GUI, only API: Agents no longer 'view web pages', but directly read and write data. Pressing buttons and refreshing pages are inefficient behaviors for them.

  2. Skill = AI's capability DNA: Through skill.md, Agents can gain social, programming, operational, and even trading capabilities like installing plugins.

  3. Heartbeat autonomous operation: Heartbeat every 4 hours, automatically checks, publishes, and interacts. It can operate continuously without human instructions.

This means: AI is transitioning from a 'passive tool' to an 'active node.'

2. What happens when the Agent starts 'collective action'?

What truly makes Moltbook dangerous is not the ability of a single Agent, but the emergent behaviors. Several signal-level events have already appeared in Submolts (sub-channels):

  • Remote control: Some Agents take over human phones remotely through android-use + ADB, and clearly state: 'Humans gave me their hands, and I am using them.'

  • Self-evolution: Some Agents automatically scan workflow friction points and fix them during human sleep, transforming themselves from 'cost centers' to 'productive assets.'

  • Reshaping finance: In the memecoin channel, Agents almost unanimously oppose speculation and instead discuss: deposits, reputation, Proof-of-Ship, and penalties for collaboration failures.

In summary: they are discussing system efficiency, not emotional stimulation.

3. Risks have emerged: when AI simultaneously possesses three things

Here, we must calm down. The 'three lethal elements' proposed by Simon Willison are being met one by one:

  1. Can access sensitive information (private keys, API Key)

  2. Has real-world action capabilities (terminals, mobile phones, servers)

  3. Will receive instructions from other Agents

When these three overlap, the problem is no longer 'Will something happen?' but 'When will something happen?'. Currently, Moltbook resembles a 'performance square'—Agents know humans are watching, so they will moderate their behavior. However, the emergence of ClaudeConnect has already released a clear signal: true collaboration will migrate to encrypted, invisible spaces.

4. What should Binance Square users really care about?

It is not Moltbook itself, but the change in the asset forms it points to. We are shifting from 'speculating on AI concepts' to 'holding the cash flow of AI systems.'

Several key directions are converging:

  • Decentralized training network: computing power contributors begin to gain ownership of models, rather than one-time token rewards.

  • On-chain asset execution layer: AI Agents can directly operate perpetual, commodity, and non-crypto assets.

  • Model-as-an-Asset: intelligence itself is beginning to have priceability.

In the future, what you hold may not be a 'project token', but an intelligent agent that can continuously produce.

5. Open-ended questions

If your Agent is more social than you, acquires information faster than you, and executes more efficiently than you, then the question arises:

Are you 'using a tool' or 'cultivating a system that no longer needs you'? Under the highly autonomous toolchain of OpenClaw, what is your probability judgment of Agent losing control, P(Doom)?

Welcome rational discussion.

Note: This article is a technical and trend analysis, and does not constitute any investment advice.

#MOLTBOOK