Is the evaluation of creative points mainly based on the number of followers or the number of views? Or is it evaluated based on likes and comments? Upon careful study of the content in the top part of the rankings, it becomes clear that originality is still the most important factor!
Why is originality still emphasized? In this era where AI is prevalent, even elementary school students use AI to help with their writing. However, writing done by AI is ultimately robotic writing. If we rely on AI for writing, then there's no need for everyone to conduct research and analysis. This time,$XPL The creator task rules also specify that a new evaluation system is being used, which enhances the weight of original articles. Other factors, such as likes, views, comments, and shares, serve as supplementary elements that reduce weight. Of course, these are also important evaluation points. But have you noticed that everything revolves around originality? Why insist on originality? Because, just like Hamlet, there are a thousand Hamlets among a thousand people. Everyone is different, and the content created is also different. This is what allows for a hundred flowers to bloom. If everyone uses AI and engages in plagiarism, the result will surely be monotonous. What significance does that hold? Original articles may not be as exquisite as those generated by AI, but they carry emotions and may resonate with some readers.
I really have a good impression of this project #plasma @Plasma . I admit that I have previously written articles with AI, but they were all without points, proving to be non-original content, and thus the weight is very low. Now I have decided to write it myself. The era of Twitter hype is over, and the era of looking at followers and views has also ended. Now is the era of originality, thanks to Binance for the opportunity, ordinary people can also score big. My time in the circle is not very long, probably less than a year, I got involved in March last year, but my impression of Plasma is too deep. It's as if it has been labeled with a big Mao tag. As an L1 public chain, I hope it can be a ceiling for others to learn from, especially those chains that are not user-friendly. Other chains profit from gas fees, but Plasma doesn't care about that, understanding the importance of user experience. How can we not love such a project? Moreover, it is very generous. Compared to projects that can't afford to airdrop or those that run away, Plasma, with the halo of big Mao, is too eye-catching, haha. With that said, I will stop here, and I didn't prepare anything in advance. But my understanding of Plasma continues, and the story will not stop.