Post
Powerpei
·
--
When AI can only live in demos, who pays for its implementation?
These past few days, OpenAI's Sora 3.0 has gone viral again.
The generated videos are indeed stunning, but my friend who works in film complained to me: “It looks lively, but it’s completely unusable. The shots are disjointed, characters change their faces when they switch scenes, this uncontrollable randomness is a disaster for commercial delivery.”
His words woke me up:
The current dilemma of AI is not that it is not strong enough, but that it is unreliable.
It’s like a genius madman, occasionally giving you surprises, but more often it’s just crazy.
With this perspective, look at today again.
The situation with VANRY (VANRY's situation 0.0062), I suddenly understood its awkwardness.
The generated videos are indeed stunning, but my friend who works in film complained to me: “It looks lively, but it’s completely unusable. The shots are disjointed, characters change their faces when they switch scenes, this uncontrollable randomness is a disaster for commercial delivery.”
His words woke me up:
The current dilemma of AI is not that it is not strong enough, but that it is unreliable.
It’s like a genius madman, occasionally giving you surprises, but more often it’s just crazy.
With this perspective, look at today again.
The situation with VANRY (VANRY's situation 0.0062), I suddenly understood its awkwardness.
Disclaimer: Includes third-party opinions. No financial advice. May include sponsored content. See T&Cs.