To be honest with you all, I am really tired of projects that promise a plethora of features that sound like a ringing bell but collapse into a "stroke" at the slightest change. In the cryptocurrency world, people often go crazy over speed or flashy numbers, but I am starting to appreciate the "boring" nature of Vanar. The recent V23 update was truly a major overhaul of the "network hygiene" rather than empty promises.
Why do I say this is a win-win model? Look at how Vanar borrows ideas from Stellar's SCP model based on FBA consensus. It may sound academic, but simply put, instead of only caring about who has the most money, Vanar focuses on reliable agreements so the network runs smoothly even when some "nodes" fail or are sabotaged by bad actors. When the network is as stable as a real payment system, the end users – that is, us – are the ones who benefit the most because we don't have to worry about network congestion or transaction errors when urgent.
The point I like the most is the open gate verification strategy to eliminate rogue nodes. Normally, many projects let "ghost" nodes sprout like mushrooms to collect rewards without contributing anything, slowing the network down while the rewards of real node operators are eroded. Vanar says "no" to that. To earn rewards, your node must prove that it is actually active and contributing to the system. This is fairness. Those who really work benefit, the network is clean, and the entire community enjoys a solid infrastructure like cement.
A truly win-win system doesn't need to have viral tweets every day. The success of Vanar will be quieter: that's when a developer says they launched an application without any issues, or a user finds that transactions "just work". As system risks decrease, the intrinsic value of assets will be more sustainable. Do you choose to stand with flashy yet fragile projects, or do you choose to accompany a "reliable machine" for long-term mutual benefits? I choose the latter to keep my wallet "safe".@Vanarchain $VANRY #Vanar
