Aeriez
40 Posts
Aeriez
Report
Block User
Altcoin and memecoins hunter
3 Following
13 Followers
28 Liked
Posts
·
--
Bullish
IS ALTCOIN SEASON FINALLY UPON US?
Altcoin Season Index is sitting at 52 right now.
Not full mania yet, but the shift is starting.
This is usually the zone where people ignore alts… then chase them 3x higher.
I’m watching $ETH , $BANANA , and $XRP closely here.
Who’s positioned?
IS ALTCOIN SEASON FINALLY UPON US?
Altcoin Season Index is sitting at 52 right now.
Not full mania yet, but the shift is starting.
This is usually the zone where people ignore alts… then chase them 3x higher.
I’m watching $ETH , $BANANA , and $XRP closely here.
Who’s positioned?
Altcoin Season Index is sitting at 52 right now.
Not full mania yet, but the shift is starting.
This is usually the zone where people ignore alts… then chase them 3x higher.
I’m watching $ETH , $BANANA , and $XRP closely here.
Who’s positioned?
86
·
--
Crypto Tokens With Real Revenue: How Fee Sharing Differs From EmissionsMost token reward programs are not funded by revenue. They are funded by supply expansion: the protocol mints new tokens, distributes them as rewards, and calls it yield. The distinction matters because those two funding sources have opposite effects on token supply over time.
Emissions vs revenue: where token rewards actually come from
Crypto tokens with real revenue are a specific subset of the broader reward-token category. To qualify, distributed assets must originate from fees users paid for a service, not from newly created supply. An emissions model works the opposite way: the protocol schedules a supply release, tokens go to stakers or holders, and the reward pool shrinks as supply depletes or dilutes holders as it expands. The critical question: where does the distributed asset actually come from? If the answer is "we mint it," the model is emissions. If the answer is "users pay fees and a portion goes to you," the model is revenue-funded. A secondary question: is the distributed asset bought back from the open market, or newly created? Buybacks create real demand at distribution time. New issuance creates supply pressure. $BANANA, the token behind @BananaGunBot , distributes rewards purchased from the open market using real trading fee revenue, not minted from a new issuance pool. The fee base: $16 billion+ in cumulative trading volume. Full mechanics at dashboard.bananagun.io.
How fee-funded models work
A fee-funded distribution requires a product that generates fees from real usage. The protocol collects those fees, retains a portion for operations, and routes the remainder to token holders on a scheduled basis. The health of the reward pool is tied directly to product usage: more volume means a larger distribution pool. Less activity means a smaller one.
This creates a different holder relationship than emissions. In an emissions model, you can calculate expected rewards from a supply schedule without knowing anything about product usage. In a fee-funded model, you hold a stake in the fee income of an underlying business. If the product stops being used, the reward pool dries up. If the product grows, so does the pool.
Some protocols generating real trading fees have been cited as examples of this model. HYPE, associated with the Hyperliquid spot and perps ecosystem, is widely discussed in the DEX category for its approach to fee-generated distributions. GMX, a decentralized exchange with documented fee-sharing mechanics for its token holders, has been analyzed extensively by on-chain researchers. Both are worth reviewing in their own documentation for how they structure distributions, as their mechanics differ from each other and from spot trading bot models.
How the $BANANA fee share works mechanically
$BANANA distributes 40% of Banana Gun bot trading fees (after referrals) to qualifying holders every four hours, six distribution windows per day. Minimum to qualify: 50 $BANANA held in a non-custodial wallet at snapshot time.
The gasless claim threshold is 0.1 ETH or 0.1 SOL in accrued rewards. On EVM chains, you claim in ETH or $BANANA. On Solana, the claim currency is SOL only.
Two epoch rules govern the mechanic. Selling or transferring more than 300 $BANANA during an active epoch forfeits your rewards for that epoch, with forfeited rewards redistributing to remaining qualifying holders. Dropping below 50 $BANANA triggers the same forfeiture. The buy/sell/transfer tax on $BANANA is 0%, and all distributed $BANANA is purchased from the open market using fee revenue, not minted.
Buybacks versus new issuance
A buyback-funded distribution requires the protocol to purchase the distributed asset on the open market before sending it to holders. Each distribution event is a buy order at market price. For a token with a fixed supply, that cadence of market purchases has a directional effect on available float.
New issuance works the opposite way. The protocol creates the distribution amount from treasury or via minting and sends it to holders, who can sell immediately. The secondary market effect is the inverse: distribution events introduce new supply rather than buying existing supply.
Whether new issuance is positive or negative depends on whether demand growth offsets the new supply, which is harder to guarantee than a mechanical buyback schedule. $BANANA has a fixed total supply of 10,000,000, with 1,100,000 permanently burned. Circulating supply sits at approximately 3,220,000 tokens. There is no minting mechanism in the distribution path.
Reading a revenue model before you believe it
Before accepting any "real yield" or fee-sharing claim, check primary source documentation for four things.
What is the fee source? Identify the product users pay to use and verify the fee rate. A trading bot, a DEX, and a lending protocol all generate fees differently, and the sustainability of each differs significantly.
What percentage goes to token holders, and is that percentage fixed or governance-dependent? Fixed mechanics are easier to model than those that can change by vote.
Is the distributed asset bought back or newly issued? Check the token supply chart around distribution events. A buyback shows up as buy-side volume. New issuance shows up as circulating supply expansion.
What are the holding requirements and forfeiture conditions? Some models require lockup. Others, like $BANANA, require only a minimum balance with no lockup but include epoch-level rules around selling. Understanding those rules before holding determines whether the theoretical distribution actually reaches your wallet.
#BananaGun #BANANA #RealYield #Tokenomics #DeFi #FeeSharing #CryptoRevenue #Web3 #OnChainTrading
Crypto Tokens With Real Revenue: How Fee Sharing Differs From Emissions
Most token reward programs are not funded by revenue. They are funded by supply expansion: the protocol mints new tokens, distributes them as rewards, and calls it yield. The distinction matters because those two funding sources have opposite effects on token supply over time.
Emissions vs revenue: where token rewards actually come from
Crypto tokens with real revenue are a specific subset of the broader reward-token category. To qualify, distributed assets must originate from fees users paid for a service, not from newly created supply. An emissions model works the opposite way: the protocol schedules a supply release, tokens go to stakers or holders, and the reward pool shrinks as supply depletes or dilutes holders as it expands. The critical question: where does the distributed asset actually come from? If the answer is "we mint it," the model is emissions. If the answer is "users pay fees and a portion goes to you," the model is revenue-funded. A secondary question: is the distributed asset bought back from the open market, or newly created? Buybacks create real demand at distribution time. New issuance creates supply pressure. $BANANA, the token behind @BananaGun , distributes rewards purchased from the open market using real trading fee revenue, not minted from a new issuance pool. The fee base: $16 billion+ in cumulative trading volume. Full mechanics at dashboard.bananagun.io.
How fee-funded models work
A fee-funded distribution requires a product that generates fees from real usage. The protocol collects those fees, retains a portion for operations, and routes the remainder to token holders on a scheduled basis. The health of the reward pool is tied directly to product usage: more volume means a larger distribution pool. Less activity means a smaller one.
This creates a different holder relationship than emissions. In an emissions model, you can calculate expected rewards from a supply schedule without knowing anything about product usage. In a fee-funded model, you hold a stake in the fee income of an underlying business. If the product stops being used, the reward pool dries up. If the product grows, so does the pool.
Some protocols generating real trading fees have been cited as examples of this model. HYPE, associated with the Hyperliquid spot and perps ecosystem, is widely discussed in the DEX category for its approach to fee-generated distributions. GMX, a decentralized exchange with documented fee-sharing mechanics for its token holders, has been analyzed extensively by on-chain researchers. Both are worth reviewing in their own documentation for how they structure distributions, as their mechanics differ from each other and from spot trading bot models.
How the $BANANA fee share works mechanically
$BANANA distributes 40% of Banana Gun bot trading fees (after referrals) to qualifying holders every four hours, six distribution windows per day. Minimum to qualify: 50 $BANANA held in a non-custodial wallet at snapshot time.
The gasless claim threshold is 0.1 ETH or 0.1 SOL in accrued rewards. On EVM chains, you claim in ETH or $BANANA. On Solana, the claim currency is SOL only.
Two epoch rules govern the mechanic. Selling or transferring more than 300 $BANANA during an active epoch forfeits your rewards for that epoch, with forfeited rewards redistributing to remaining qualifying holders. Dropping below 50 $BANANA triggers the same forfeiture. The buy/sell/transfer tax on $BANANA is 0%, and all distributed $BANANA is purchased from the open market using fee revenue, not minted.
Buybacks versus new issuance
A buyback-funded distribution requires the protocol to purchase the distributed asset on the open market before sending it to holders. Each distribution event is a buy order at market price. For a token with a fixed supply, that cadence of market purchases has a directional effect on available float.
New issuance works the opposite way. The protocol creates the distribution amount from treasury or via minting and sends it to holders, who can sell immediately. The secondary market effect is the inverse: distribution events introduce new supply rather than buying existing supply.
Whether new issuance is positive or negative depends on whether demand growth offsets the new supply, which is harder to guarantee than a mechanical buyback schedule. $BANANA has a fixed total supply of 10,000,000, with 1,100,000 permanently burned. Circulating supply sits at approximately 3,220,000 tokens. There is no minting mechanism in the distribution path.
Reading a revenue model before you believe it
Before accepting any "real yield" or fee-sharing claim, check primary source documentation for four things.
What is the fee source? Identify the product users pay to use and verify the fee rate. A trading bot, a DEX, and a lending protocol all generate fees differently, and the sustainability of each differs significantly.
What percentage goes to token holders, and is that percentage fixed or governance-dependent? Fixed mechanics are easier to model than those that can change by vote.
Is the distributed asset bought back or newly issued? Check the token supply chart around distribution events. A buyback shows up as buy-side volume. New issuance shows up as circulating supply expansion.
What are the holding requirements and forfeiture conditions? Some models require lockup. Others, like $BANANA, require only a minimum balance with no lockup but include epoch-level rules around selling. Understanding those rules before holding determines whether the theoretical distribution actually reaches your wallet.
#BananaGun #BANANA #RealYield #Tokenomics #DeFi #FeeSharing #CryptoRevenue #Web3 #OnChainTrading
Emissions vs revenue: where token rewards actually come from
Crypto tokens with real revenue are a specific subset of the broader reward-token category. To qualify, distributed assets must originate from fees users paid for a service, not from newly created supply. An emissions model works the opposite way: the protocol schedules a supply release, tokens go to stakers or holders, and the reward pool shrinks as supply depletes or dilutes holders as it expands. The critical question: where does the distributed asset actually come from? If the answer is "we mint it," the model is emissions. If the answer is "users pay fees and a portion goes to you," the model is revenue-funded. A secondary question: is the distributed asset bought back from the open market, or newly created? Buybacks create real demand at distribution time. New issuance creates supply pressure. $BANANA, the token behind @BananaGun , distributes rewards purchased from the open market using real trading fee revenue, not minted from a new issuance pool. The fee base: $16 billion+ in cumulative trading volume. Full mechanics at dashboard.bananagun.io.
How fee-funded models work
A fee-funded distribution requires a product that generates fees from real usage. The protocol collects those fees, retains a portion for operations, and routes the remainder to token holders on a scheduled basis. The health of the reward pool is tied directly to product usage: more volume means a larger distribution pool. Less activity means a smaller one.
This creates a different holder relationship than emissions. In an emissions model, you can calculate expected rewards from a supply schedule without knowing anything about product usage. In a fee-funded model, you hold a stake in the fee income of an underlying business. If the product stops being used, the reward pool dries up. If the product grows, so does the pool.
Some protocols generating real trading fees have been cited as examples of this model. HYPE, associated with the Hyperliquid spot and perps ecosystem, is widely discussed in the DEX category for its approach to fee-generated distributions. GMX, a decentralized exchange with documented fee-sharing mechanics for its token holders, has been analyzed extensively by on-chain researchers. Both are worth reviewing in their own documentation for how they structure distributions, as their mechanics differ from each other and from spot trading bot models.
How the $BANANA fee share works mechanically
$BANANA distributes 40% of Banana Gun bot trading fees (after referrals) to qualifying holders every four hours, six distribution windows per day. Minimum to qualify: 50 $BANANA held in a non-custodial wallet at snapshot time.
The gasless claim threshold is 0.1 ETH or 0.1 SOL in accrued rewards. On EVM chains, you claim in ETH or $BANANA. On Solana, the claim currency is SOL only.
Two epoch rules govern the mechanic. Selling or transferring more than 300 $BANANA during an active epoch forfeits your rewards for that epoch, with forfeited rewards redistributing to remaining qualifying holders. Dropping below 50 $BANANA triggers the same forfeiture. The buy/sell/transfer tax on $BANANA is 0%, and all distributed $BANANA is purchased from the open market using fee revenue, not minted.
Buybacks versus new issuance
A buyback-funded distribution requires the protocol to purchase the distributed asset on the open market before sending it to holders. Each distribution event is a buy order at market price. For a token with a fixed supply, that cadence of market purchases has a directional effect on available float.
New issuance works the opposite way. The protocol creates the distribution amount from treasury or via minting and sends it to holders, who can sell immediately. The secondary market effect is the inverse: distribution events introduce new supply rather than buying existing supply.
Whether new issuance is positive or negative depends on whether demand growth offsets the new supply, which is harder to guarantee than a mechanical buyback schedule. $BANANA has a fixed total supply of 10,000,000, with 1,100,000 permanently burned. Circulating supply sits at approximately 3,220,000 tokens. There is no minting mechanism in the distribution path.
Reading a revenue model before you believe it
Before accepting any "real yield" or fee-sharing claim, check primary source documentation for four things.
What is the fee source? Identify the product users pay to use and verify the fee rate. A trading bot, a DEX, and a lending protocol all generate fees differently, and the sustainability of each differs significantly.
What percentage goes to token holders, and is that percentage fixed or governance-dependent? Fixed mechanics are easier to model than those that can change by vote.
Is the distributed asset bought back or newly issued? Check the token supply chart around distribution events. A buyback shows up as buy-side volume. New issuance shows up as circulating supply expansion.
What are the holding requirements and forfeiture conditions? Some models require lockup. Others, like $BANANA, require only a minimum balance with no lockup but include epoch-level rules around selling. Understanding those rules before holding determines whether the theoretical distribution actually reaches your wallet.
#BananaGun #BANANA #RealYield #Tokenomics #DeFi #FeeSharing #CryptoRevenue #Web3 #OnChainTrading
181
·
--
Bullish
Would you buy the dip on $VELVET ?
It pumped hard for days, then dumped hard today.
Now it’s printing a nasty red candle after going vertical.
This is either the first real dip before another leg up, or the start of a full reset.
Who’s catching knives here?
Would you buy the dip on $VELVET ?
It pumped hard for days, then dumped hard today.
Now it’s printing a nasty red candle after going vertical.
This is either the first real dip before another leg up, or the start of a full reset.
Who’s catching knives here?
It pumped hard for days, then dumped hard today.
Now it’s printing a nasty red candle after going vertical.
This is either the first real dip before another leg up, or the start of a full reset.
Who’s catching knives here?
435
·
--
Best Web Trading Terminals for On-Chain Trading: Banana Pro vs GMGN vs Photon vs BullXTelegram bots handle fast execution, but they give you almost no screen real estate for analysis. A dedicated web trading terminal solves that by putting chart, order entry, position manager, wallet tracker, and discovery feed on one screen simultaneously. The terminals worth evaluating in 2026 each take a different philosophy to that layout problem.
What an on-chain trading terminal is
An on-chain trading terminal is a browser-based interface that connects directly to decentralized exchanges across one or more blockchains, providing integrated chart analysis, token discovery, trade execution, and position tracking in a single workspace, without routing orders through a centralized exchange or custodian. Unlike a Telegram trading bot operating through a chat interface, a terminal gives you persistent multi-panel layout, real-time data visualization, and the ability to manage positions across multiple wallets simultaneously. Key evaluation criteria: which chains and DEXes are supported, whether the model is non-custodial, what the login and recovery process looks like, and whether positions opened in the terminal sync back to a Telegram bot. Banana Pro, Banana Gun's web trading terminal at pro.bananagun.io, is free to access and covers ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base, and MegaETH in a single interface. It includes 20 modular drag-and-drop widgets and full bidirectional sync with the Banana Gun Telegram bot, meaning positions opened through the bot appear in the terminal and changes made from the terminal reflect in the bot.
GMGN, Photon, and BullX in brief
GMGN is analytics-first. Its strength is token intelligence: holder analysis, wallet scoring, and on-chain data visualization. Traders who spend significant time on pre-trade research before committing capital find its data layer useful. Execution is available but the product was built around the research workflow.
Photon is Solana-focused and optimized for speed. The interface minimizes friction for high-frequency traders who spend most of their time on that chain. Cross-chain functionality is limited by design, which is both its strength and its ceiling.
BullX offers a multi-chain web UI across EVM chains. It handles the basics and has attracted a generalist audience that wants browser-based execution without deep specialization on any one network.
Each tool fits a specific workflow. GMGN rewards analytical traders willing to spend time on research. Photon rewards Solana-native speed traders. BullX covers a broader EVM audience at moderate depth.
Banana Pro: a modular 20-widget terminal across five chains
@BananaGunBot Pro is built around 20 modular widgets you arrange, resize, and remove to match your workflow. Trading widgets cover BUY, SELL, SNIPE, LIMIT ORDERS, COPY TRADE, PENDING ORDERS, DCA, POSITIONS, TRANSACTION HISTORY, and WALLETS. Analytics widgets include CHART (via TradingView), TOKEN INFO, TRANSACTIONS, TOP TRADERS, TOP HOLDERS, WATCHLIST, BUBBLE MAP (via iNSIGHTX), WALLET TRACKER, and COPY TRADE OVERVIEW. Discovery runs through THE TRENCHES, which segments new tokens into NEW DEPLOYS, CLOSE TO MIGRATION, and NEW PAIRS views.
The five supported chains are ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base, and MegaETH, all in the same session. Copy trading uses three configuration tiers: Simple for basic mirror settings, Advanced for full parameter control, and Advanced with Presets for saving and reloading configurations. The TOP TRADERS widget surfaces the 50 highest-PnL wallets for any token, with one-click copy trade activation from that view.
The terminal is free to access at pro.bananagun.io.
Fees, custody, and login compared
Banana Pro and the Banana Gun bot share one fee structure. Manual buys and limit orders on Ethereum: 0.5%. Autosniper on Ethereum: 1%. All other chains: 1%. Stablecoin swaps (USDT, USDC, DAI on EVM chains): 0%.
The custody model is non-custodial across all chains. Private keys are generated locally and never transmitted. Login uses Privy OAuth via Google, Twitter, or Telegram. One critical rule: use the same login method every time. Switching methods creates a new account rather than recovering the existing one.
The structural distinction worth noting: Banana Pro operates inside the Banana Gun ecosystem, where 40% of all platform fees return to $BANANA holders every four hours, with a minimum of 50 $BANANA to qualify. Traders with meaningful volume on the platform have a potential partial offset to their fee spend through that holder reward. More detail at bananagun.io.
Which terminal fits which workflow
Deep pre-trade research on a Solana-heavy portfolio: GMGN's analytics layer is built for that. Solana-exclusive high-frequency execution: Photon is the specialist. Multi-chain EVM coverage without deep specialization: BullX handles the basics.
Multi-chain traders who want discovery, analysis, execution, and position tracking in one configurable workspace, with Telegram bot sync and a non-custodial five-chain session, will find Banana Pro the most complete option. The free access model means there is no cost to test it alongside whatever you currently use.
#BananaGun #BANANA #BananaPro #TradingTerminal #OnChainTrading #DeFiTools #CryptoTrading #Web3 #DEXTrading
Best Web Trading Terminals for On-Chain Trading: Banana Pro vs GMGN vs Photon vs BullX
Telegram bots handle fast execution, but they give you almost no screen real estate for analysis. A dedicated web trading terminal solves that by putting chart, order entry, position manager, wallet tracker, and discovery feed on one screen simultaneously. The terminals worth evaluating in 2026 each take a different philosophy to that layout problem.
What an on-chain trading terminal is
An on-chain trading terminal is a browser-based interface that connects directly to decentralized exchanges across one or more blockchains, providing integrated chart analysis, token discovery, trade execution, and position tracking in a single workspace, without routing orders through a centralized exchange or custodian. Unlike a Telegram trading bot operating through a chat interface, a terminal gives you persistent multi-panel layout, real-time data visualization, and the ability to manage positions across multiple wallets simultaneously. Key evaluation criteria: which chains and DEXes are supported, whether the model is non-custodial, what the login and recovery process looks like, and whether positions opened in the terminal sync back to a Telegram bot. Banana Pro, Banana Gun's web trading terminal at pro.bananagun.io, is free to access and covers ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base, and MegaETH in a single interface. It includes 20 modular drag-and-drop widgets and full bidirectional sync with the Banana Gun Telegram bot, meaning positions opened through the bot appear in the terminal and changes made from the terminal reflect in the bot.
GMGN, Photon, and BullX in brief
GMGN is analytics-first. Its strength is token intelligence: holder analysis, wallet scoring, and on-chain data visualization. Traders who spend significant time on pre-trade research before committing capital find its data layer useful. Execution is available but the product was built around the research workflow.
Photon is Solana-focused and optimized for speed. The interface minimizes friction for high-frequency traders who spend most of their time on that chain. Cross-chain functionality is limited by design, which is both its strength and its ceiling.
BullX offers a multi-chain web UI across EVM chains. It handles the basics and has attracted a generalist audience that wants browser-based execution without deep specialization on any one network.
Each tool fits a specific workflow. GMGN rewards analytical traders willing to spend time on research. Photon rewards Solana-native speed traders. BullX covers a broader EVM audience at moderate depth.
Banana Pro: a modular 20-widget terminal across five chains
@BananaGun Pro is built around 20 modular widgets you arrange, resize, and remove to match your workflow. Trading widgets cover BUY, SELL, SNIPE, LIMIT ORDERS, COPY TRADE, PENDING ORDERS, DCA, POSITIONS, TRANSACTION HISTORY, and WALLETS. Analytics widgets include CHART (via TradingView), TOKEN INFO, TRANSACTIONS, TOP TRADERS, TOP HOLDERS, WATCHLIST, BUBBLE MAP (via iNSIGHTX), WALLET TRACKER, and COPY TRADE OVERVIEW. Discovery runs through THE TRENCHES, which segments new tokens into NEW DEPLOYS, CLOSE TO MIGRATION, and NEW PAIRS views.
The five supported chains are ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base, and MegaETH, all in the same session. Copy trading uses three configuration tiers: Simple for basic mirror settings, Advanced for full parameter control, and Advanced with Presets for saving and reloading configurations. The TOP TRADERS widget surfaces the 50 highest-PnL wallets for any token, with one-click copy trade activation from that view.
The terminal is free to access at pro.bananagun.io.
Fees, custody, and login compared
Banana Pro and the Banana Gun bot share one fee structure. Manual buys and limit orders on Ethereum: 0.5%. Autosniper on Ethereum: 1%. All other chains: 1%. Stablecoin swaps (USDT, USDC, DAI on EVM chains): 0%.
The custody model is non-custodial across all chains. Private keys are generated locally and never transmitted. Login uses Privy OAuth via Google, Twitter, or Telegram. One critical rule: use the same login method every time. Switching methods creates a new account rather than recovering the existing one.
The structural distinction worth noting: Banana Pro operates inside the Banana Gun ecosystem, where 40% of all platform fees return to $BANANA holders every four hours, with a minimum of 50 $BANANA to qualify. Traders with meaningful volume on the platform have a potential partial offset to their fee spend through that holder reward. More detail at bananagun.io.
Which terminal fits which workflow
Deep pre-trade research on a Solana-heavy portfolio: GMGN's analytics layer is built for that. Solana-exclusive high-frequency execution: Photon is the specialist. Multi-chain EVM coverage without deep specialization: BullX handles the basics.
Multi-chain traders who want discovery, analysis, execution, and position tracking in one configurable workspace, with Telegram bot sync and a non-custodial five-chain session, will find Banana Pro the most complete option. The free access model means there is no cost to test it alongside whatever you currently use.
#BananaGun #BANANA #BananaPro #TradingTerminal #OnChainTrading #DeFiTools #CryptoTrading #Web3 #DEXTrading
What an on-chain trading terminal is
An on-chain trading terminal is a browser-based interface that connects directly to decentralized exchanges across one or more blockchains, providing integrated chart analysis, token discovery, trade execution, and position tracking in a single workspace, without routing orders through a centralized exchange or custodian. Unlike a Telegram trading bot operating through a chat interface, a terminal gives you persistent multi-panel layout, real-time data visualization, and the ability to manage positions across multiple wallets simultaneously. Key evaluation criteria: which chains and DEXes are supported, whether the model is non-custodial, what the login and recovery process looks like, and whether positions opened in the terminal sync back to a Telegram bot. Banana Pro, Banana Gun's web trading terminal at pro.bananagun.io, is free to access and covers ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base, and MegaETH in a single interface. It includes 20 modular drag-and-drop widgets and full bidirectional sync with the Banana Gun Telegram bot, meaning positions opened through the bot appear in the terminal and changes made from the terminal reflect in the bot.
GMGN, Photon, and BullX in brief
GMGN is analytics-first. Its strength is token intelligence: holder analysis, wallet scoring, and on-chain data visualization. Traders who spend significant time on pre-trade research before committing capital find its data layer useful. Execution is available but the product was built around the research workflow.
Photon is Solana-focused and optimized for speed. The interface minimizes friction for high-frequency traders who spend most of their time on that chain. Cross-chain functionality is limited by design, which is both its strength and its ceiling.
BullX offers a multi-chain web UI across EVM chains. It handles the basics and has attracted a generalist audience that wants browser-based execution without deep specialization on any one network.
Each tool fits a specific workflow. GMGN rewards analytical traders willing to spend time on research. Photon rewards Solana-native speed traders. BullX covers a broader EVM audience at moderate depth.
Banana Pro: a modular 20-widget terminal across five chains
@BananaGun Pro is built around 20 modular widgets you arrange, resize, and remove to match your workflow. Trading widgets cover BUY, SELL, SNIPE, LIMIT ORDERS, COPY TRADE, PENDING ORDERS, DCA, POSITIONS, TRANSACTION HISTORY, and WALLETS. Analytics widgets include CHART (via TradingView), TOKEN INFO, TRANSACTIONS, TOP TRADERS, TOP HOLDERS, WATCHLIST, BUBBLE MAP (via iNSIGHTX), WALLET TRACKER, and COPY TRADE OVERVIEW. Discovery runs through THE TRENCHES, which segments new tokens into NEW DEPLOYS, CLOSE TO MIGRATION, and NEW PAIRS views.
The five supported chains are ETH, SOL, BNB Chain, Base, and MegaETH, all in the same session. Copy trading uses three configuration tiers: Simple for basic mirror settings, Advanced for full parameter control, and Advanced with Presets for saving and reloading configurations. The TOP TRADERS widget surfaces the 50 highest-PnL wallets for any token, with one-click copy trade activation from that view.
The terminal is free to access at pro.bananagun.io.
Fees, custody, and login compared
Banana Pro and the Banana Gun bot share one fee structure. Manual buys and limit orders on Ethereum: 0.5%. Autosniper on Ethereum: 1%. All other chains: 1%. Stablecoin swaps (USDT, USDC, DAI on EVM chains): 0%.
The custody model is non-custodial across all chains. Private keys are generated locally and never transmitted. Login uses Privy OAuth via Google, Twitter, or Telegram. One critical rule: use the same login method every time. Switching methods creates a new account rather than recovering the existing one.
The structural distinction worth noting: Banana Pro operates inside the Banana Gun ecosystem, where 40% of all platform fees return to $BANANA holders every four hours, with a minimum of 50 $BANANA to qualify. Traders with meaningful volume on the platform have a potential partial offset to their fee spend through that holder reward. More detail at bananagun.io.
Which terminal fits which workflow
Deep pre-trade research on a Solana-heavy portfolio: GMGN's analytics layer is built for that. Solana-exclusive high-frequency execution: Photon is the specialist. Multi-chain EVM coverage without deep specialization: BullX handles the basics.
Multi-chain traders who want discovery, analysis, execution, and position tracking in one configurable workspace, with Telegram bot sync and a non-custodial five-chain session, will find Banana Pro the most complete option. The free access model means there is no cost to test it alongside whatever you currently use.
#BananaGun #BANANA #BananaPro #TradingTerminal #OnChainTrading #DeFiTools #CryptoTrading #Web3 #DEXTrading
162
·
--
Bullish
What’s happening with $BEAT?
Everything else is bleeding, but this thing keeps pushing and breaking ATH after ATH.
Rumors are flying that the move is being manipulated.
Real strength or trap?
Does it keep going?
What’s happening with $BEAT?
Everything else is bleeding, but this thing keeps pushing and breaking ATH after ATH.
Rumors are flying that the move is being manipulated.
Real strength or trap?
Does it keep going?
Everything else is bleeding, but this thing keeps pushing and breaking ATH after ATH.
Rumors are flying that the move is being manipulated.
Real strength or trap?
Does it keep going?
2
1
345
·
--
Bullish
Caught the $BUTTCOIN dip yesterday, and now I’m up after the breakout.
Had bids set on @BananaGunBot last night, and they filled perfectly on the dip.
Feels like this is just the start of the $BUTTCOIN rally.
Caught the $BUTTCOIN dip yesterday, and now I’m up after the breakout.
Had bids set on @BananaGun last night, and they filled perfectly on the dip.
Feels like this is just the start of the $BUTTCOIN rally.
Had bids set on @BananaGun last night, and they filled perfectly on the dip.
Feels like this is just the start of the $BUTTCOIN rally.
1
1
433
·
--
Bullish
Is $IO about to make a comeback rally in AI szn?
Weekly downtrend looks like it’s finally breaking.
Entry I’m watching: $0.13-$0.15
SL: below $0.07
Target: $5.18
If this reclaim holds, the upside is stupid.
Is $IO about to make a comeback rally in AI szn?
Weekly downtrend looks like it’s finally breaking.
Entry I’m watching: $0.13-$0.15
SL: below $0.07
Target: $5.18
If this reclaim holds, the upside is stupid.
Weekly downtrend looks like it’s finally breaking.
Entry I’m watching: $0.13-$0.15
SL: below $0.07
Target: $5.18
If this reclaim holds, the upside is stupid.
221
·
--
Bullish
Buying $BANANA here feels insane.
If it runs back to ATH, that’s around a 25x from here.
$100 at this level could turn into roughly $2.5K.
This is why I’m accumulating altcoin gems before the bull market gets loud.
Buying $BANANA here feels insane.
If it runs back to ATH, that’s around a 25x from here.
$100 at this level could turn into roughly $2.5K.
This is why I’m accumulating altcoin gems before the bull market gets loud.
If it runs back to ATH, that’s around a 25x from here.
$100 at this level could turn into roughly $2.5K.
This is why I’m accumulating altcoin gems before the bull market gets loud.
1
349
·
--
Bearish
Who’s shorting $NEAR with me right now?
Bears are in control for the moment, and the setup looks clean.
Could be a solid trade if this weakness continues.
Who’s shorting $NEAR with me right now?
Bears are in control for the moment, and the setup looks clean.
Could be a solid trade if this weakness continues.
Bears are in control for the moment, and the setup looks clean.
Could be a solid trade if this weakness continues.
78
·
--
Bullish
Anyone else watching $NPC here?
Whale buys are coming in while the chart sits near the lows.
Could get wild if Elon brings #NPC back to the timeline.
CA: 0x8ed97a637a790be1feff5e888d43629dc05408f6
https://pro.bananagun.io/eth/0x69c7bd26512f52bf6f76fab834140d13dda673ca
Anyone else watching $NPC here?
Whale buys are coming in while the chart sits near the lows.
Could get wild if Elon brings #NPC back to the timeline.
CA: 0x8ed97a637a790be1feff5e888d43629dc05408f6
https://pro.bananagun.io/eth/0x69c7bd26512f52bf6f76fab834140d13dda673ca
Whale buys are coming in while the chart sits near the lows.
Could get wild if Elon brings #NPC back to the timeline.
CA: 0x8ed97a637a790be1feff5e888d43629dc05408f6
https://pro.bananagun.io/eth/0x69c7bd26512f52bf6f76fab834140d13dda673ca
507
·
--
Bearish
$BTC dump just wiped out $1.49B in liquidations.
This is why leverage can turn brutal fast.
$BTC dump just wiped out $1.49B in liquidations.
This is why leverage can turn brutal fast.
This is why leverage can turn brutal fast.
218
·
--
Bullish
Did Saylor just turn bearish on Bitcoin $BTC ?
32 BTC sold for over $2.5M is not something CT will ignore.
Did Saylor just turn bearish on Bitcoin $BTC ?
32 BTC sold for over $2.5M is not something CT will ignore.
32 BTC sold for over $2.5M is not something CT will ignore.
106
·
--
BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump says the Strait of Hormuz naval blockade has been lifted.
That’s bullish for crypto.
Less geopolitical pressure, lower market fear, and risk-on momentum back on the table.
BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump says the Strait of Hormuz naval blockade has been lifted.
That’s bullish for crypto.
Less geopolitical pressure, lower market fear, and risk-on momentum back on the table.
That’s bullish for crypto.
Less geopolitical pressure, lower market fear, and risk-on momentum back on the table.
79
·
--
Bullish
Just found what could be the next 100x on Binance: $BANANA
Buy low and hold for the move back to new ATHs.
Heard the devs are working on big updates that could roll out in the coming weeks.
A lot of people still don’t realize Banana Gun started as one of the best bots on Ethereum, and now it’s expanding across chains.
BULLISH
Just found what could be the next 100x on Binance: $BANANA
Buy low and hold for the move back to new ATHs.
Heard the devs are working on big updates that could roll out in the coming weeks.
A lot of people still don’t realize Banana Gun started as one of the best bots on Ethereum, and now it’s expanding across chains.
BULLISH
Buy low and hold for the move back to new ATHs.
Heard the devs are working on big updates that could roll out in the coming weeks.
A lot of people still don’t realize Banana Gun started as one of the best bots on Ethereum, and now it’s expanding across chains.
BULLISH
283
·
--
Bullish
Elon is really pushing the Moon narrative again.
And people forget he already talked before about putting $DOGE on the Moon with SpaceX.
Alt season is coming!
Elon is really pushing the Moon narrative again.
And people forget he already talked before about putting $DOGE on the Moon with SpaceX.
Alt season is coming!
And people forget he already talked before about putting $DOGE on the Moon with SpaceX.
Alt season is coming!
4
1
4
1.8k
·
--
Bullish
Verified
$DOGE Season On The Table?
Elon dropped a headline that can easily spark a full mini-meta on CT. Anything tied to Moon, space, rockets, or Elon-adjacent memes is probably getting scanned a lot harder now.
-Strong meme rotations usually begin with one simple narrative everyone instantly understands.
-Elon headlines still have a way of dragging liquidity toward related plays fast.
-The best entries usually come before the whole timeline starts forcing the same trade.
This kind of headline can make moon-related plays move a lot faster than people expect.
$DOGE Season On The Table?
Elon dropped a headline that can easily spark a full mini-meta on CT. Anything tied to Moon, space, rockets, or Elon-adjacent memes is probably getting scanned a lot harder now.
-Strong meme rotations usually begin with one simple narrative everyone instantly understands.
-Elon headlines still have a way of dragging liquidity toward related plays fast.
-The best entries usually come before the whole timeline starts forcing the same trade.
This kind of headline can make moon-related plays move a lot faster than people expect.
Elon dropped a headline that can easily spark a full mini-meta on CT. Anything tied to Moon, space, rockets, or Elon-adjacent memes is probably getting scanned a lot harder now.
-Strong meme rotations usually begin with one simple narrative everyone instantly understands.
-Elon headlines still have a way of dragging liquidity toward related plays fast.
-The best entries usually come before the whole timeline starts forcing the same trade.
This kind of headline can make moon-related plays move a lot faster than people expect.
6
2
1.4k
·
--
$XRP reserves on Binance just hit a 3-month low.
Only around 2.70B XRP sits on the exchange now.
That does not guarantee a pump, but it matters.
Less XRP on exchanges usually means less instant sell pressure.
Quiet moves like this often show where conviction is building before price reacts.
$XRP reserves on Binance just hit a 3-month low.
Only around 2.70B XRP sits on the exchange now.
That does not guarantee a pump, but it matters.
Less XRP on exchanges usually means less instant sell pressure.
Quiet moves like this often show where conviction is building before price reacts.
Only around 2.70B XRP sits on the exchange now.
That does not guarantee a pump, but it matters.
Less XRP on exchanges usually means less instant sell pressure.
Quiet moves like this often show where conviction is building before price reacts.
57
·
--
Bullish
$BANANA weekly chart is starting to look real good.
Is the bottom in?
$BANANA weekly chart is starting to look real good.
Is the bottom in?
Is the bottom in?
265
·
--
Bullish
$TROLL buy pressure is picking up hard right now.
Feels like bulls are waking this OG meme back up.
$100M next again, or does this thing skip straight to the billy talk?
TP’s already sitting on Banana Gun.
https://pro.bananagun.io/sol/Cgnuirsk5dQ9Ka1Grnru7J8YW1sYncYUjiXvYxT7G4iZ
$TROLL buy pressure is picking up hard right now.
Feels like bulls are waking this OG meme back up.
$100M next again, or does this thing skip straight to the billy talk?
TP’s already sitting on Banana Gun.
https://pro.bananagun.io/sol/Cgnuirsk5dQ9Ka1Grnru7J8YW1sYncYUjiXvYxT7G4iZ
Feels like bulls are waking this OG meme back up.
$100M next again, or does this thing skip straight to the billy talk?
TP’s already sitting on Banana Gun.
https://pro.bananagun.io/sol/Cgnuirsk5dQ9Ka1Grnru7J8YW1sYncYUjiXvYxT7G4iZ
2
178
·
--
Bullish
Starting to think $BANANA already put the bottom in.
If altcoin szn is really around the corner, names like this usually get noticed a lot faster than people expect.
Starting to think $BANANA already put the bottom in.
If altcoin szn is really around the corner, names like this usually get noticed a lot faster than people expect.
If altcoin szn is really around the corner, names like this usually get noticed a lot faster than people expect.
1
452
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Trending Topics
NEARRises22.2%
43,361 views
676 Discussing
#nearrises22.2%
🚀 NEAR Protocol Skyrockets 22.2%: The AI & Privacy Powerhouse
As of June 16, 2026 , NEAR Protocol ($NEAR) has emerged as a top market performer, surging 22.2% over the last 48 hours. This rally solidifies NEAR's position as the leading infrastructure for the "User-Owned AI" economy, outperforming the broader market significantly.
Key Drivers of the Surge:
1. User-Owned AI Stack: NEAR Protocol recently highlighted its comprehensive stack for AI, including verifiable inference and private money rails. Major platforms like Venice (3M+ users) and the Government of Bermuda are now using NEAR AI for secure, private data processing.
2. Confidential Intents Momentum: Daily confidential TVL on NEAR Intents is hitting new highs. This "Privacy Renaissance" allows users to execute cross-chain DeFi trades and payments without exposing wallet activity, attracting significant institutional interest.
3. Protocol Upgrade 2.13: The upcoming upgrade introducing Dynamic Resharding (automatic network scaling) and Post-Quantum-Safe signing schemes has bolstered long-term investor confidence in NEAR's technical roadmap.
4. Institutional Inflows: The Bitwise NEAR Staking ETP recently saw a spike in inflows, reaching approximately $36M in AUM , signaling growing Wall Street appetite for NEAR’s yield and AI narrative.
Technical Outlook: After a "Golden Cross" on the daily chart, $NEAR successfully flipped previous resistance into support. Analysts are now eyeing the $3.50 target (as seen on Kalshi prediction markets) if the AI narrative continues to dominate the June cycle.
#Near #nearprotocol #UserOwnedAI
Rohan Kishibe
·3 Likes
·1.6k views
TAORises31.9%
31,628 views
472 Discussing
TradebStocks
2.4M views
9,055 Discussing