XaliCoin
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
Open Trade
High-Frequency Trader
11.2 Months
199 Following
618 Followers
1.6K+ Liked
32 Shared
Posts
Portfolio
All
Quotes
Live
There's been a zero-day bug in Ada that was used for a DoS attack and transaction manipulation.
The network had to rollback 13 blocks to revert the transactions.
What this means:
#Blockchain turns out is not completely "immutable" (can be altered in emergency conditions).
This has shaken the trust of some investors.
But on the bright side:
User funds are safe.
The team responded quickly - this shows the network is still active and secured.
Major Update
@Litecoin is currently developing LitVM (Layer-2) → can run smart contracts similar to Ethereum.
Target: #DeFi , #NFT , #dApps to enter the ecosystem $LTC .
The network had to rollback 13 blocks to revert the transactions.
What this means:
#Blockchain turns out is not completely "immutable" (can be altered in emergency conditions).
This has shaken the trust of some investors.
But on the bright side:
User funds are safe.
The team responded quickly - this shows the network is still active and secured.
Major Update
@Litecoin is currently developing LitVM (Layer-2) → can run smart contracts similar to Ethereum.
Target: #DeFi , #NFT , #dApps to enter the ecosystem $LTC .
$LTC responded to criticism on Sunday, a day after a 13-block reorg that reportedly exposed vulnerabilities in the privacy layer of Mimblewimble Extension Blocks, raising new questions about the project's info disclosure practices.
Key Points:
The Litecoin network experienced a 13-block reorg on April 25, 2026, due to the reported exploitation of a zero-day bug in MWEB, according to the team's testimony.
Github commits show that Litecoin developers privately patched the MWEB vulnerability back in March 2026, 37 days before the exploit occurred.
@Litecoin advised critics to "stay in the shallow end," which sparked hundreds of unfriendly replies.
#ShootingIncidentAtWhiteHouseCorrespondentsDinner #OpenAILaunchesGPT-5.5
#BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
#LTC
{future}(LTCUSDT)
Key Points:
The Litecoin network experienced a 13-block reorg on April 25, 2026, due to the reported exploitation of a zero-day bug in MWEB, according to the team's testimony.
Github commits show that Litecoin developers privately patched the MWEB vulnerability back in March 2026, 37 days before the exploit occurred.
@Litecoin advised critics to "stay in the shallow end," which sparked hundreds of unfriendly replies.
#ShootingIncidentAtWhiteHouseCorrespondentsDinner #OpenAILaunchesGPT-5.5
#BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
#LTC
{future}(LTCUSDT)
The gist:
1. This is more of an experiment / ideological idea, not an official Bitcoin roadmap.
2. It’s almost certainly going to be a new altcoin, not a replacement for Bitcoin.
3. Philosophically, this contradicts the core values of Bitcoin.
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase
$BTC @Bitcoin #bitcoin
1. This is more of an experiment / ideological idea, not an official Bitcoin roadmap.
2. It’s almost certainly going to be a new altcoin, not a replacement for Bitcoin.
3. Philosophically, this contradicts the core values of Bitcoin.
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase
$BTC @Bitcoin #bitcoin
This proposed fork is super controversial and is unlikely to gain acceptance from the majority of the Bitcoin community.
Key points:
1. This isn't just a regular upgrade - it's a change in ownership rules.
Bitcoin is built on the principle: “whoever has the private key, they are the owner.”
If coins can be seized for being deemed “inactive,” then:
Ownership becomes debatable.
Trust in the system plummets.
2. This fork is likely to become an alternative chain, not a replacement for Bitcoin.
Similar to occurrences like:
Bitcoin Cash,
Bitcoin SV.
The result?
- The original Bitcoin remains dominant.
- The fork becomes a new asset with its own community (often much smaller).
3. The narrative of “reviving dead coins” is a long debate.
Pros:
Supply becomes more “active.”
Could improve liquidity.
Cons (this one's heavier):
It’s not a lost coin — just dormant.
Includes holdings of Satoshi Nakamoto.
Changing it = violating the fundamental principle of decentralization.
4. The biggest risk: a dangerous precedent.
If today inactive coins can be seized,
Tomorrow new rules could emerge:
Old coins subjected to forced taxation,
Certain wallets restricted,
Rules changing according to majority interests.
This is what hardcore Bitcoin community fears the most.
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase
$BTC @Bitcoin #bitcoin
{future}(BTCUSDT)
Key points:
1. This isn't just a regular upgrade - it's a change in ownership rules.
Bitcoin is built on the principle: “whoever has the private key, they are the owner.”
If coins can be seized for being deemed “inactive,” then:
Ownership becomes debatable.
Trust in the system plummets.
2. This fork is likely to become an alternative chain, not a replacement for Bitcoin.
Similar to occurrences like:
Bitcoin Cash,
Bitcoin SV.
The result?
- The original Bitcoin remains dominant.
- The fork becomes a new asset with its own community (often much smaller).
3. The narrative of “reviving dead coins” is a long debate.
Pros:
Supply becomes more “active.”
Could improve liquidity.
Cons (this one's heavier):
It’s not a lost coin — just dormant.
Includes holdings of Satoshi Nakamoto.
Changing it = violating the fundamental principle of decentralization.
4. The biggest risk: a dangerous precedent.
If today inactive coins can be seized,
Tomorrow new rules could emerge:
Old coins subjected to forced taxation,
Certain wallets restricted,
Rules changing according to majority interests.
This is what hardcore Bitcoin community fears the most.
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase
$BTC @Bitcoin #bitcoin
{future}(BTCUSDT)
This proposed fork is super controversial and is unlikely to gain acceptance from the majority of the Bitcoin community.
Key points:
1. This isn't just a regular upgrade - it's a change in ownership rules.
Bitcoin is built on the principle: “whoever has the private key, they are the owner.”
If coins can be seized for being deemed “inactive,” then:
Ownership becomes debatable.
Trust in the system plummets.
2. This fork is likely to become an alternative chain, not a replacement for Bitcoin.
Similar to occurrences like:
Bitcoin Cash,
Bitcoin SV.
The result?
- The original Bitcoin remains dominant.
- The fork becomes a new asset with its own community (often much smaller).
3. The narrative of “reviving dead coins” is a long debate.
Pros:
Supply becomes more “active.”
Could improve liquidity.
Cons (this one's heavier):
It’s not a lost coin — just dormant.
Includes holdings of Satoshi Nakamoto.
Changing it = violating the fundamental principle of decentralization.
4. The biggest risk: a dangerous precedent.
If today inactive coins can be seized,
Tomorrow new rules could emerge:
Old coins subjected to forced taxation,
Certain wallets restricted,
Rules changing according to majority interests.
This is what hardcore Bitcoin community fears the most.
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase
$BTC @Bitcoin #bitcoin
Key points:
1. This isn't just a regular upgrade - it's a change in ownership rules.
Bitcoin is built on the principle: “whoever has the private key, they are the owner.”
If coins can be seized for being deemed “inactive,” then:
Ownership becomes debatable.
Trust in the system plummets.
2. This fork is likely to become an alternative chain, not a replacement for Bitcoin.
Similar to occurrences like:
Bitcoin Cash,
Bitcoin SV.
The result?
- The original Bitcoin remains dominant.
- The fork becomes a new asset with its own community (often much smaller).
3. The narrative of “reviving dead coins” is a long debate.
Pros:
Supply becomes more “active.”
Could improve liquidity.
Cons (this one's heavier):
It’s not a lost coin — just dormant.
Includes holdings of Satoshi Nakamoto.
Changing it = violating the fundamental principle of decentralization.
4. The biggest risk: a dangerous precedent.
If today inactive coins can be seized,
Tomorrow new rules could emerge:
Old coins subjected to forced taxation,
Certain wallets restricted,
Rules changing according to majority interests.
This is what hardcore Bitcoin community fears the most.
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase
$BTC @Bitcoin #bitcoin
This fork proposal is super controversial and is unlikely to be accepted by the majority of the Bitcoin community.
Key points:
1. This isn't just a standard upgrade - it's a change in ownership rules.
Bitcoin stands on the principle: 'whoever holds the private key is the owner.'
If coins can be seized because they are deemed 'inactive', then:
Ownership becomes debatable
Trust in the system drops like a rock.
2. This fork is likely to create an alternative chain, not a replacement for Bitcoin.
Like what happened with:
Bitcoin Cash
Bitcoin SV
The result?
- The original Bitcoin remains dominant
- The fork becomes a new asset with its own community (often much smaller).
3. The narrative of 'reviving dead coins' is a long debate.
Pros:
Supply becomes more 'active'
Can boost liquidity.
Cons (and this is heavier):
It's not a lost coin — it just isn't moving.
Includes coins owned by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Changing this = violating the fundamental principles of decentralization.
4. The biggest risk: a dangerous precedent.
If today 'inactive' coins can be seized,
Tomorrow we could see rules like:
Old coins facing forced taxation
Certain wallets being restricted
Rules changing based on the interests of the majority.
This is what hardcore Bitcoin enthusiasts fear the most.
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase
$BTC @Bitcoin #bitcoin
Key points:
1. This isn't just a standard upgrade - it's a change in ownership rules.
Bitcoin stands on the principle: 'whoever holds the private key is the owner.'
If coins can be seized because they are deemed 'inactive', then:
Ownership becomes debatable
Trust in the system drops like a rock.
2. This fork is likely to create an alternative chain, not a replacement for Bitcoin.
Like what happened with:
Bitcoin Cash
Bitcoin SV
The result?
- The original Bitcoin remains dominant
- The fork becomes a new asset with its own community (often much smaller).
3. The narrative of 'reviving dead coins' is a long debate.
Pros:
Supply becomes more 'active'
Can boost liquidity.
Cons (and this is heavier):
It's not a lost coin — it just isn't moving.
Includes coins owned by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Changing this = violating the fundamental principles of decentralization.
4. The biggest risk: a dangerous precedent.
If today 'inactive' coins can be seized,
Tomorrow we could see rules like:
Old coins facing forced taxation
Certain wallets being restricted
Rules changing based on the interests of the majority.
This is what hardcore Bitcoin enthusiasts fear the most.
#MarketRebound #StrategyBTCPurchase
$BTC @Bitcoin #bitcoin
Trump Says the US Dollar is Under Pressure as Investors Shift to Safe and Comfortable Assets
Indicating a BULLISH sentiment in Crypto
$TRUMP
Indicating a BULLISH sentiment in Crypto
$TRUMP
Bank digital #KoreaSelatan KBank partners with Ripple Labs
Focus: cross-border payments
Currently in proof-of-concept (PoC) phase
Goal: faster, cheaper, and more transparent transactions compared to legacy systems
South Korea is utilizing the #RippleNet network specifically designed for global money transfers without many bank intermediaries.
#MarketRebound #Ripple #blockchain
$XRP
Focus: cross-border payments
Currently in proof-of-concept (PoC) phase
Goal: faster, cheaper, and more transparent transactions compared to legacy systems
South Korea is utilizing the #RippleNet network specifically designed for global money transfers without many bank intermediaries.
#MarketRebound #Ripple #blockchain
$XRP
Action $3 Million USDT
Aspects and details
Amount: $3 million USDT
Mechanism: Deposit into Aave (not a direct grant/donation)
Return: All interest → returned to the Aave ecosystem
Nature: Liquidity support, not equity or bailout
Comparison: Stani Kulechov: 5,000 ETH (~$11M), Mantle: up to 30,000 ETH, Lido: 2,500 stETH
Why deposit USDT, not ETH?
Post-exploit, the USDT and USDC pools in Aave hit 100% utilization — meaning there was no liquidity left for withdrawals. Users caught in this mess had to borrow ~$300 million using their own stablecoin deposits as collateral, incurring significant losses.
The USDT deposit from Babylon directly targets the most critical point — the stablecoin pool that is most needed for withdrawal normalization.
#MarketRebound #AaveAnnouncesDeFiUnitedReliefFund
#CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit?
$ZEC
Aspects and details
Amount: $3 million USDT
Mechanism: Deposit into Aave (not a direct grant/donation)
Return: All interest → returned to the Aave ecosystem
Nature: Liquidity support, not equity or bailout
Comparison: Stani Kulechov: 5,000 ETH (~$11M), Mantle: up to 30,000 ETH, Lido: 2,500 stETH
Why deposit USDT, not ETH?
Post-exploit, the USDT and USDC pools in Aave hit 100% utilization — meaning there was no liquidity left for withdrawals. Users caught in this mess had to borrow ~$300 million using their own stablecoin deposits as collateral, incurring significant losses.
The USDT deposit from Babylon directly targets the most critical point — the stablecoin pool that is most needed for withdrawal normalization.
#MarketRebound #AaveAnnouncesDeFiUnitedReliefFund
#CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit?
$ZEC
Babylon Foundation #Aave : $3M USDT
Context: What Went Down Earlier?
On April 18, 2026, an attacker exploited the KelpDAO–LayerZero bridge and minted 116,500 fake rsETH (without backing) worth ~$292 million. This token was immediately deposited into Aave as collateral, then used to borrow ~$190 million in ETH and other assets on Ethereum and Arbitrum — leaving Aave with worthless collateral.
In just 3.5 days, Aave lost $15.1 billion in deposits - dropping from $48.5 billion to $30.7 billion, wiping out about a third of the platform's capital almost overnight.
Who is #BabylonProtocol & Why Are They Involved?
Babylon Foundation isn’t just some random name here. There’s a deep strategic connection with Aave:
Babylon partnered with Aave Labs in December 2025 aiming to introduce Bitcoin-backed lending on Aave V4 without wrappers or custodians. Target launch: April 2026 — right at the time of the rsETH exploit.
The company plans to integrate its technology with Aave in Q2 2026 and hasn't generated revenue yet — but hopes to start right after the launch alongside $AAVE .
This means: #Babylon has a significant skin in the game. If Aave collapses due to the rsETH crisis, years of research collaboration and hundreds of millions in funding could be dragged down with it.
#CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit?
#AaveAnnouncesDeFiUnitedReliefFund
$AAVE
{future}(AAVEUSDT)
Context: What Went Down Earlier?
On April 18, 2026, an attacker exploited the KelpDAO–LayerZero bridge and minted 116,500 fake rsETH (without backing) worth ~$292 million. This token was immediately deposited into Aave as collateral, then used to borrow ~$190 million in ETH and other assets on Ethereum and Arbitrum — leaving Aave with worthless collateral.
In just 3.5 days, Aave lost $15.1 billion in deposits - dropping from $48.5 billion to $30.7 billion, wiping out about a third of the platform's capital almost overnight.
Who is #BabylonProtocol & Why Are They Involved?
Babylon Foundation isn’t just some random name here. There’s a deep strategic connection with Aave:
Babylon partnered with Aave Labs in December 2025 aiming to introduce Bitcoin-backed lending on Aave V4 without wrappers or custodians. Target launch: April 2026 — right at the time of the rsETH exploit.
The company plans to integrate its technology with Aave in Q2 2026 and hasn't generated revenue yet — but hopes to start right after the launch alongside $AAVE .
This means: #Babylon has a significant skin in the game. If Aave collapses due to the rsETH crisis, years of research collaboration and hundreds of millions in funding could be dragged down with it.
#CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit?
#AaveAnnouncesDeFiUnitedReliefFund
$AAVE
{future}(AAVEUSDT)
Babylon Foundation #Aave : $3M USDT
Context: What Went Down Earlier?
On April 18, 2026, an attacker exploited the KelpDAO–LayerZero bridge and minted 116,500 fake rsETH (without backing) worth ~$292 million. This token was immediately deposited into Aave as collateral, then used to borrow ~$190 million in ETH and other assets on Ethereum and Arbitrum — leaving Aave with worthless collateral.
In just 3.5 days, Aave lost $15.1 billion in deposits - dropping from $48.5 billion to $30.7 billion, wiping out about a third of the platform's capital almost overnight.
Who is #BabylonProtocol & Why Are They Involved?
Babylon Foundation isn’t just some random name here. There’s a deep strategic connection with Aave:
Babylon partnered with Aave Labs in December 2025 aiming to introduce Bitcoin-backed lending on Aave V4 without wrappers or custodians. Target launch: April 2026 — right at the time of the rsETH exploit.
The company plans to integrate its technology with Aave in Q2 2026 and hasn't generated revenue yet — but hopes to start right after the launch alongside $AAVE .
This means: #Babylon has a significant skin in the game. If Aave collapses due to the rsETH crisis, years of research collaboration and hundreds of millions in funding could be dragged down with it.
#CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit?
#AaveAnnouncesDeFiUnitedReliefFund
$AAVE
Context: What Went Down Earlier?
On April 18, 2026, an attacker exploited the KelpDAO–LayerZero bridge and minted 116,500 fake rsETH (without backing) worth ~$292 million. This token was immediately deposited into Aave as collateral, then used to borrow ~$190 million in ETH and other assets on Ethereum and Arbitrum — leaving Aave with worthless collateral.
In just 3.5 days, Aave lost $15.1 billion in deposits - dropping from $48.5 billion to $30.7 billion, wiping out about a third of the platform's capital almost overnight.
Who is #BabylonProtocol & Why Are They Involved?
Babylon Foundation isn’t just some random name here. There’s a deep strategic connection with Aave:
Babylon partnered with Aave Labs in December 2025 aiming to introduce Bitcoin-backed lending on Aave V4 without wrappers or custodians. Target launch: April 2026 — right at the time of the rsETH exploit.
The company plans to integrate its technology with Aave in Q2 2026 and hasn't generated revenue yet — but hopes to start right after the launch alongside $AAVE .
This means: #Babylon has a significant skin in the game. If Aave collapses due to the rsETH crisis, years of research collaboration and hundreds of millions in funding could be dragged down with it.
#CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit?
#AaveAnnouncesDeFiUnitedReliefFund
$AAVE
$LTC responded to criticism on Sunday, a day after a 13-block reorg that reportedly exposed vulnerabilities in the privacy layer of Mimblewimble Extension Blocks, raising new questions about the project's info disclosure practices.
Key Points:
The Litecoin network experienced a 13-block reorg on April 25, 2026, due to the reported exploitation of a zero-day bug in MWEB, according to the team's testimony.
Github commits show that Litecoin developers privately patched the MWEB vulnerability back in March 2026, 37 days before the exploit occurred.
@Litecoin advised critics to "stay in the shallow end," which sparked hundreds of unfriendly replies.
#ShootingIncidentAtWhiteHouseCorrespondentsDinner #OpenAILaunchesGPT-5.5
#BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
#LTC
Key Points:
The Litecoin network experienced a 13-block reorg on April 25, 2026, due to the reported exploitation of a zero-day bug in MWEB, according to the team's testimony.
Github commits show that Litecoin developers privately patched the MWEB vulnerability back in March 2026, 37 days before the exploit occurred.
@Litecoin advised critics to "stay in the shallow end," which sparked hundreds of unfriendly replies.
#ShootingIncidentAtWhiteHouseCorrespondentsDinner #OpenAILaunchesGPT-5.5
#BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
#LTC
Financial data from Q1 in 2025
$MSFT
$GOOGL
$META
$MSFT
$GOOGL
$META
Amazon, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and others are set to drop their Q1 earnings reports on April 29.
#SoldierChargedWithInsiderTradingonPolymarket #CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit? #BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
$MSFT
{future}(MSFTUSDT)
$META
{future}(METAUSDT)
$GOOGL
{future}(GOOGLUSDT)
#SoldierChargedWithInsiderTradingonPolymarket #CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit? #BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
$MSFT
{future}(MSFTUSDT)
$META
{future}(METAUSDT)
$GOOGL
{future}(GOOGLUSDT)
Amazon, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and others are set to drop their Q1 earnings reports on April 29.
#SoldierChargedWithInsiderTradingonPolymarket #CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit? #BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
$MSFT
$META
$GOOGL
#SoldierChargedWithInsiderTradingonPolymarket #CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit? #BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
$MSFT
$META
$GOOGL
Euro Stablecoin Soars 1,200% Amidst Recovery in Global Crypto Adoption
Despite a global downturn in crypto adoption during Q1 2026, euro-based stablecoins have surged by 1,200% over the past 15 months, reaching a transaction volume of $777 million.
Key Points:
Euro stablecoins have grown 1,200% since 2025 as the MiCA framework provides legal clarity for issuers in Europe.
TRM Labs reported that retail USD stablecoin volume has dropped to $274 billion in 2026 amid global macro pressures.
Ari Redbord noted that the rise in EUR assets signals a risk shift that will impact compliance teams in the future.
#BalancerAttackerResurfacesAfter5Months
#SoldierChargedWithInsiderTradingonPolymarket
#BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
$XRP
Despite a global downturn in crypto adoption during Q1 2026, euro-based stablecoins have surged by 1,200% over the past 15 months, reaching a transaction volume of $777 million.
Key Points:
Euro stablecoins have grown 1,200% since 2025 as the MiCA framework provides legal clarity for issuers in Europe.
TRM Labs reported that retail USD stablecoin volume has dropped to $274 billion in 2026 amid global macro pressures.
Ari Redbord noted that the rise in EUR assets signals a risk shift that will impact compliance teams in the future.
#BalancerAttackerResurfacesAfter5Months
#SoldierChargedWithInsiderTradingonPolymarket
#BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition
$XRP
The CLARITY Bill Gains New Urgency as Over 100 Crypto Organizations Urge Senate Action.
Faster movement on the CLARITY Bill could shape regulations, investments, and America's position in the digital finance space.
Key Points:
Over 100 organizations back the CLARITY Act, pushing for accelerated crypto legislation in the US.
Coinbase, Ripple, and Circle are among the signatories warning that delays risk weakening US competitiveness.
Congressional action regarding market structure could safeguard capital and innovation in the US.
EthereumFoundationUnstakes$48.9MillionWorthofETH#ShootingIncidentAtWhiteHouseCorrespondentsDinner
#CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit?
TetherFreezes$344MUSDTatUSLawEnforcementRequest
$BTC
Faster movement on the CLARITY Bill could shape regulations, investments, and America's position in the digital finance space.
Key Points:
Over 100 organizations back the CLARITY Act, pushing for accelerated crypto legislation in the US.
Coinbase, Ripple, and Circle are among the signatories warning that delays risk weakening US competitiveness.
Congressional action regarding market structure could safeguard capital and innovation in the US.
EthereumFoundationUnstakes$48.9MillionWorthofETH#ShootingIncidentAtWhiteHouseCorrespondentsDinner
#CanTheDeFiIndustryRecoverQuicklyFromAaveExploit?
TetherFreezes$344MUSDTatUSLawEnforcementRequest
$BTC
TRANSACTION 2026
1. MASTERCARD
2. VISA
3. BITCOIN
#bitcoin #visa #mastercard
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
1. MASTERCARD
2. VISA
3. BITCOIN
#bitcoin #visa #mastercard
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
Visa
Still the king with $14.5T in volume & 52.2% global card market share. 260 billion transactions a year, no one can match its scale.
@Solana Official #Solana $SOL
Still the king with $14.5T in volume & 52.2% global card market share. 260 billion transactions a year, no one can match its scale.
@Solana Official #Solana $SOL
TRANSACTION 2026
1. MASTERCARD
2. VISA
3. BITCOIN
#bitcoin #visa #mastercard
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
1. MASTERCARD
2. VISA
3. BITCOIN
#bitcoin #visa #mastercard
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
Mastercard
Aggressive growth with +17% revenue, $9.2T volume. Actively pushing crypto-linked cards to 60M+ merchants.
$ETH
Aggressive growth with +17% revenue, $9.2T volume. Actively pushing crypto-linked cards to 60M+ merchants.
$ETH
TRANSACTION 2026
1. MASTERCARD
2. VISA
3. BITCOIN
#bitcoin #visa #mastercard
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
1. MASTERCARD
2. VISA
3. BITCOIN
#bitcoin #visa #mastercard
$BTC
{future}(BTCUSDT)
#MoneyGram × #Stellar - Partnership Extension
On April 22, 2026, MoneyGram and Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) announced a multi-year partnership extension, marking over 5 years of collaboration in turning stablecoin potential into real utility.
Expansion
The stablecoin balance feature in the MoneyGram app is now live in El Salvador, following its earlier launch in Colombia. The next target is other markets in Central and South America throughout 2026, with plans for global expansion thereafter.
What's the Tech Stack?
Powered by Stellar blockchain + Crossmint + Circle's USDC. Users can:
Receive funds instantly to their USD balance
Store digital dollars
Cash out at the nearest MoneyGram location.
..$XLM
On April 22, 2026, MoneyGram and Stellar Development Foundation (SDF) announced a multi-year partnership extension, marking over 5 years of collaboration in turning stablecoin potential into real utility.
Expansion
The stablecoin balance feature in the MoneyGram app is now live in El Salvador, following its earlier launch in Colombia. The next target is other markets in Central and South America throughout 2026, with plans for global expansion thereafter.
What's the Tech Stack?
Powered by Stellar blockchain + Crossmint + Circle's USDC. Users can:
Receive funds instantly to their USD balance
Store digital dollars
Cash out at the nearest MoneyGram location.
..$XLM
After identifying an exploit affecting the side contract related to the sSUI Scallop prize pool, which resulted in a loss of approximately 150,000 @Sui
The impacted contract has been frozen. Our core contract remains secure, and only the prize pool $SUI I was affected. All other pools are safe.
#Scallop will cover 100% of the losses.
$SUI
The impacted contract has been frozen. Our core contract remains secure, and only the prize pool $SUI I was affected. All other pools are safe.
#Scallop will cover 100% of the losses.
$SUI
Login to explore more contents