Binance Square
0xMomo
844 Posts

0xMomo

🚀 区块链爱好者 | 农民工 | 代码搬运工 🔨 挖矿迷 | 节点奴 | 捣鼓软硬件赚点猪脚饭 💡 分享与成长 | 记录自己对技术的热爱和发现
Open Trade
Occasional Trader
2.3 Years
81 Following
621 Followers
697 Liked
Posts
Portfolio
·
--
I've been checking out the Ethereum data lately and found an interesting split. On the derivatives side, it looks like some are bailing. The funding rate has been negative for several days in a row, with shorts paying to hold their positions. The total open interest in contracts has dropped 30% over the month, hitting a 13-month low. In the U.S., Ethereum ETFs saw a net outflow of $323 million in two weeks. On-chain activity is pretty quiet too, with total locked value shrinking 33% over two months and DApp revenues crashing 43% in May. But staking is a whole different ballgame. Right now, there are 2.9 million ETH queuing up to be staked, and the wait time is 50 days to enter. Exiting is instant, no wait at all. A total of 39.5 million ETH has already been staked, and no one seems to want to leave. Exchange balances have dropped from 16.15 million ETH three months ago to 15.05 million, with some folks continuously withdrawing their coins. Over the past month, institutions have accumulated an additional 337,000 ETH. You've got short-term traders retreating while long-term holders are doubling down. It's pretty rare to see these two forces battling it out on the same asset. This kind of divergence has popped up a few times in history. Before the merge in 2022, the derivatives market was bearish while staking was optimistic, and then the successful merge brought a price surge. Of course, you can't just draw a straight line from then to now, but it does show there's a temperature difference between how the market views Ethereum's long-term value versus its short-term pricing. The daily RSI is hovering around 32, which is in the oversold territory. Negative funding rates combined with an oversold RSI technically create conditions for a rebound. But we also have to acknowledge that on-chain activity is indeed cooling down; we can’t just pretend that’s not happening. The signals from derivatives and spot markets are completely opposite. Short-term traders are voting with their feet, while long-term stakers are making their stance clear through action. This kind of split won’t last too long; the market will eventually pick a direction. Personally, I think the speed at which the staking queue clears and when ETF capital flows turn positive will be key observation points.
I've been checking out the Ethereum data lately and found an interesting split.

On the derivatives side, it looks like some are bailing. The funding rate has been negative for several days in a row, with shorts paying to hold their positions. The total open interest in contracts has dropped 30% over the month, hitting a 13-month low. In the U.S., Ethereum ETFs saw a net outflow of $323 million in two weeks. On-chain activity is pretty quiet too, with total locked value shrinking 33% over two months and DApp revenues crashing 43% in May.

But staking is a whole different ballgame.

Right now, there are 2.9 million ETH queuing up to be staked, and the wait time is 50 days to enter. Exiting is instant, no wait at all. A total of 39.5 million ETH has already been staked, and no one seems to want to leave. Exchange balances have dropped from 16.15 million ETH three months ago to 15.05 million, with some folks continuously withdrawing their coins. Over the past month, institutions have accumulated an additional 337,000 ETH.

You've got short-term traders retreating while long-term holders are doubling down. It's pretty rare to see these two forces battling it out on the same asset.

This kind of divergence has popped up a few times in history. Before the merge in 2022, the derivatives market was bearish while staking was optimistic, and then the successful merge brought a price surge. Of course, you can't just draw a straight line from then to now, but it does show there's a temperature difference between how the market views Ethereum's long-term value versus its short-term pricing.

The daily RSI is hovering around 32, which is in the oversold territory. Negative funding rates combined with an oversold RSI technically create conditions for a rebound. But we also have to acknowledge that on-chain activity is indeed cooling down; we can’t just pretend that’s not happening.

The signals from derivatives and spot markets are completely opposite. Short-term traders are voting with their feet, while long-term stakers are making their stance clear through action. This kind of split won’t last too long; the market will eventually pick a direction. Personally, I think the speed at which the staking queue clears and when ETF capital flows turn positive will be key observation points.
·
--
Morpho just bagged $175 million, led by Paradigm and a16z crypto. This is the largest funding round in DeFi history. Interestingly, Morpho is no longer positioning itself as a DeFi lending protocol; they're aiming to build credit infrastructure for banks, asset management, and fintech companies. Spark CEO Sam MacPherson puts it bluntly: as the stablecoin market expands, the credit layer becomes the most crucial piece in the entire financial infrastructure stack. Data speaks volumes. Morpho has locked up $6.72 billion on-chain, with active loans totaling $3.47 billion. Coinbase has directly issued over $2.17 billion in corporate USDC loans using Morpho's smart contracts. This isn't retail traders dabbling in DeFi; this is institutional players leveraging on-chain lending for real business. What's even more noteworthy is the flow of VC funds. CryptoRank's Q1 report shows that funding amounts for Series C and later rounds have skyrocketed by 1,020% year-over-year and surged 320% quarter-over-quarter. Meanwhile, seed and pre-seed rounds have dropped by 38%. Money is concentrating towards a select few leading projects, while the financing environment for early-stage projects is deteriorating. Morpho co-founder Merlin Egalite mentioned that the goal for the next 12 to 18 months is to expand access for banks and asset management, attract more institutional funds, and move the functionalities of traditional credit markets onto the blockchain. Looking at the broader market, it's even more interesting. BTC is currently hovering around $64,000, with a daily RSI of just 34.6, indicating an oversold region. ETH's daily RSI is even lower at 31.3. However, AAVE, as the leader in the DeFi lending space, has a 4-hour MACD histogram that has turned positive, with a funding rate of only 0.004%, suggesting low leverage and healthy upside potential. While VCs are tightening early-stage investments, they're pouring substantial funds into verified DeFi infrastructure. This could be a signal: the window for institutional-grade DeFi is opening, but it's only for a select few players.
Morpho just bagged $175 million, led by Paradigm and a16z crypto.

This is the largest funding round in DeFi history. Interestingly, Morpho is no longer positioning itself as a DeFi lending protocol; they're aiming to build credit infrastructure for banks, asset management, and fintech companies.

Spark CEO Sam MacPherson puts it bluntly: as the stablecoin market expands, the credit layer becomes the most crucial piece in the entire financial infrastructure stack.

Data speaks volumes. Morpho has locked up $6.72 billion on-chain, with active loans totaling $3.47 billion. Coinbase has directly issued over $2.17 billion in corporate USDC loans using Morpho's smart contracts. This isn't retail traders dabbling in DeFi; this is institutional players leveraging on-chain lending for real business.

What's even more noteworthy is the flow of VC funds. CryptoRank's Q1 report shows that funding amounts for Series C and later rounds have skyrocketed by 1,020% year-over-year and surged 320% quarter-over-quarter. Meanwhile, seed and pre-seed rounds have dropped by 38%. Money is concentrating towards a select few leading projects, while the financing environment for early-stage projects is deteriorating.

Morpho co-founder Merlin Egalite mentioned that the goal for the next 12 to 18 months is to expand access for banks and asset management, attract more institutional funds, and move the functionalities of traditional credit markets onto the blockchain.

Looking at the broader market, it's even more interesting. BTC is currently hovering around $64,000, with a daily RSI of just 34.6, indicating an oversold region. ETH's daily RSI is even lower at 31.3. However, AAVE, as the leader in the DeFi lending space, has a 4-hour MACD histogram that has turned positive, with a funding rate of only 0.004%, suggesting low leverage and healthy upside potential.

While VCs are tightening early-stage investments, they're pouring substantial funds into verified DeFi infrastructure. This could be a signal: the window for institutional-grade DeFi is opening, but it's only for a select few players.
·
--
Anthropic's Fable 5 and Mythos 5 have been ordered offline by the US government, and this went down this afternoon. The government claims it's for national security, citing potential jailbreak risks associated with these two models. Specifically, folks have figured out how to bypass security restrictions by making the models read specific code libraries. Anthropic themselves say it's just a "narrow jailbreak," not a global security flaw, claiming the government is overreacting. But the government isn't having any of it. They demanded that Anthropic immediately cut off access for all foreign nationals, including Anthropic's own foreign employees, right after receiving the order. Fable 5 and Mythos 5, which were just dropped last week as flagship models, have been hit with the pause button. Other models like Opus 4.8 remain unaffected. So why does this matter to the crypto space? Over the past year, a slew of AI agent tokens and decentralized AI protocols have been built on Anthropic's API. Fable 5 is considered the most powerful reasoning model out there, and a lot of on-chain AI agents rely on it for their core reasoning engines. With it going offline, it’s like a key piece of the AI + Crypto infrastructure just got yanked away. Market reaction has been swift. AI sector tokens are feeling the heat today, with funds migrating to safer havens. BTC's daily RSI has dipped to around 34, marking it as oversold territory. Funding rates are extremely low, with BTC at just 0.0001% and ETH at only 0.0036%, indicating that while the market is panicking, there’s no leveraged buildup—this isn’t a cascading drop. Anthropic has stated in their announcement that this is a "misunderstanding" and they are working to restore services. However, if the government sticks to this standard, it means that all cutting-edge models will need to pass security reviews before release, which will directly slow down the iteration speed of the entire AI industry. For the crypto market, this is a variable worth keeping an eye on long-term. The valuation logic for AI agent tokens might need a rethink—not because the tech is lacking, but because the policy risk has suddenly escalated.
Anthropic's Fable 5 and Mythos 5 have been ordered offline by the US government, and this went down this afternoon.

The government claims it's for national security, citing potential jailbreak risks associated with these two models. Specifically, folks have figured out how to bypass security restrictions by making the models read specific code libraries. Anthropic themselves say it's just a "narrow jailbreak," not a global security flaw, claiming the government is overreacting.

But the government isn't having any of it. They demanded that Anthropic immediately cut off access for all foreign nationals, including Anthropic's own foreign employees, right after receiving the order. Fable 5 and Mythos 5, which were just dropped last week as flagship models, have been hit with the pause button. Other models like Opus 4.8 remain unaffected.

So why does this matter to the crypto space? Over the past year, a slew of AI agent tokens and decentralized AI protocols have been built on Anthropic's API. Fable 5 is considered the most powerful reasoning model out there, and a lot of on-chain AI agents rely on it for their core reasoning engines. With it going offline, it’s like a key piece of the AI + Crypto infrastructure just got yanked away.

Market reaction has been swift. AI sector tokens are feeling the heat today, with funds migrating to safer havens. BTC's daily RSI has dipped to around 34, marking it as oversold territory. Funding rates are extremely low, with BTC at just 0.0001% and ETH at only 0.0036%, indicating that while the market is panicking, there’s no leveraged buildup—this isn’t a cascading drop.

Anthropic has stated in their announcement that this is a "misunderstanding" and they are working to restore services. However, if the government sticks to this standard, it means that all cutting-edge models will need to pass security reviews before release, which will directly slow down the iteration speed of the entire AI industry.

For the crypto market, this is a variable worth keeping an eye on long-term. The valuation logic for AI agent tokens might need a rethink—not because the tech is lacking, but because the policy risk has suddenly escalated.
·
--
The Nasdaq 100 dropped 7.5% over the past week, evaporating $2.7 trillion. That’s more than double the entire market cap of BTC. The Iran conflict has pushed Brent crude oil up to $90, with PPI year-on-year hitting 6.5%, a new high since 2022. The market is now pricing a 40% chance of a rate hike in September, up from just 5% a month ago. On the crypto side, $1.9 billion flowed out in June ETF withdrawals. Strategy has paused BTC accumulation, reducing cash reserves to just enough to cover 7 months of dividends. Even miners are capitulating—on-chain data shows that the current price has breached miners' break-even points. Killa says this is a signal for "historically optimal accumulation timing." But BTC is still holding strong at $63,800. Daily RSI is at 34, indicating oversold conditions. The 4-hour RSI is at 57, not extreme. The key factor here is the funding rate, at 0.0001%, nearly zero. This means no one is leveraging long positions, and there’s no panic shorting. Prices are dropping, but the positions are clean. Compare this: the Nasdaq’s 7.5% drop wiped out more market cap than BTC’s total market cap, and BTC has only dropped less than 1%. It’s not that BTC isn’t dropping; it’s just that it’s dropping much less than it should. The miner capitulation signal deserves special mention. Historically, whenever miners are forced to sell coins to cover operating costs, it happens near the bottom of the cycle. Capriole’s Charles Edwards also mentioned that miners are at the brink. This isn’t me being bullish; it’s on-chain data saying the same thing. Of course, oil prices are still rising, the Fed hasn't shifted its stance, and ETF outflows haven’t stopped. Short-term risks are real. But when all the noise tells you to run, the simultaneous appearance of miner capitulation, oversold RSI, and zero leverage funding rates is historically rare. This doesn’t mean the bottom is in, but signals in the bottom region are accumulating. Once oil prices stabilize or the Fed shifts its stance, looking back at this position might reveal the best window.
The Nasdaq 100 dropped 7.5% over the past week, evaporating $2.7 trillion. That’s more than double the entire market cap of BTC.

The Iran conflict has pushed Brent crude oil up to $90, with PPI year-on-year hitting 6.5%, a new high since 2022. The market is now pricing a 40% chance of a rate hike in September, up from just 5% a month ago.

On the crypto side, $1.9 billion flowed out in June ETF withdrawals. Strategy has paused BTC accumulation, reducing cash reserves to just enough to cover 7 months of dividends. Even miners are capitulating—on-chain data shows that the current price has breached miners' break-even points. Killa says this is a signal for "historically optimal accumulation timing."

But BTC is still holding strong at $63,800.

Daily RSI is at 34, indicating oversold conditions. The 4-hour RSI is at 57, not extreme. The key factor here is the funding rate, at 0.0001%, nearly zero. This means no one is leveraging long positions, and there’s no panic shorting. Prices are dropping, but the positions are clean.

Compare this: the Nasdaq’s 7.5% drop wiped out more market cap than BTC’s total market cap, and BTC has only dropped less than 1%. It’s not that BTC isn’t dropping; it’s just that it’s dropping much less than it should.

The miner capitulation signal deserves special mention. Historically, whenever miners are forced to sell coins to cover operating costs, it happens near the bottom of the cycle. Capriole’s Charles Edwards also mentioned that miners are at the brink. This isn’t me being bullish; it’s on-chain data saying the same thing.

Of course, oil prices are still rising, the Fed hasn't shifted its stance, and ETF outflows haven’t stopped. Short-term risks are real. But when all the noise tells you to run, the simultaneous appearance of miner capitulation, oversold RSI, and zero leverage funding rates is historically rare.

This doesn’t mean the bottom is in, but signals in the bottom region are accumulating. Once oil prices stabilize or the Fed shifts its stance, looking back at this position might reveal the best window.
·
--
Verified
SpaceX went public on NASDAQ last Friday, opening at $150 and closing at $161, with a market cap surpassing $2 trillion. It was four times oversubscribed, raising $75 billion, and everything seemed perfect. But over here in the crypto world, it’s a whole different ball game. Multiple crypto platforms launched tokenized SpaceX shares for subscription before the IPO. They attracted over $557 million in USDC deposits, with 28,000 wallets participating. Everyone thought they could finally snag a piece of a traditional IPO on-chain. But yesterday, the platforms collectively announced cancellations and promised full refunds. The common reason was: the underlying infrastructure provider couldn’t deliver the actual stocks. Four platforms were using the same channel, and when it broke, no one got their goods. This is not a minor issue. $557 million was locked up for a week, and users were left waiting not for token delivery, but for a "sorry, refunds." Trust is hard to build—it takes a hundred successes—but can be destroyed with just one failure. The tokenized IPO concept had been hyped for over half a year, and it finally faced a heavyweight test, only to fall flat right out of the gate. The market is casting its vote. BTC is now at 63,670, with a daily RSI of 55.89, leaning slightly bullish, and a MACD histogram of 105 in positive territory, showing momentum isn’t crushed. The funding rate at 0.0054% is quite mild. The price itself hasn’t collapsed, but the damage on the narrative front is real. ETH is a bit weaker, sitting at $1,666, with a 4-hour RSI of 51.17, neutral, and the funding rate has turned negative at -0.0006%. Shorts are starting to collect fees, indicating the market sentiment towards the tokenization space is indeed cooling off. To put it plainly, the bottleneck for tokenization has never been on the demand side. Users are willing to lock in $557 million, showcasing explosive demand. The issue lies on the supply side—traditional finance's settlement infrastructure isn't ready for the crypto world. This event acts as a sobering reality check for the entire RWA narrative. Tokenized stocks aren’t just about writing a smart contract; there’s a complete chain behind it involving T+1 settlements, custody compliance, and cross-border regulations. Crypto can handle the front end, but the back end is still in the hands of traditional finance. SBF's appeal was also rejected, maintaining his 25-year sentence. His only chance now is a presidential pardon, but as things stand, that seems unlikely. These two events combined send a clear signal: the crypto industry’s desire to break into mainstream finance faces much higher technical and compliance hurdles than anticipated. My take is that tokenized IPOs won’t die, but they’ll slow down. Infrastructure needs time to mature, and the regulatory framework needs to catch up. The next successful tokenized IPO may have to wait until traditional custody and crypto settlement systems are truly integrated. Until then, rather than chasing concepts, it's better to keep a close eye on those quietly building the infrastructure. When the road is paved, the cars will naturally come.
SpaceX went public on NASDAQ last Friday, opening at $150 and closing at $161, with a market cap surpassing $2 trillion. It was four times oversubscribed, raising $75 billion, and everything seemed perfect.

But over here in the crypto world, it’s a whole different ball game.

Multiple crypto platforms launched tokenized SpaceX shares for subscription before the IPO. They attracted over $557 million in USDC deposits, with 28,000 wallets participating. Everyone thought they could finally snag a piece of a traditional IPO on-chain.

But yesterday, the platforms collectively announced cancellations and promised full refunds.

The common reason was: the underlying infrastructure provider couldn’t deliver the actual stocks. Four platforms were using the same channel, and when it broke, no one got their goods.

This is not a minor issue. $557 million was locked up for a week, and users were left waiting not for token delivery, but for a "sorry, refunds."

Trust is hard to build—it takes a hundred successes—but can be destroyed with just one failure. The tokenized IPO concept had been hyped for over half a year, and it finally faced a heavyweight test, only to fall flat right out of the gate.

The market is casting its vote. BTC is now at 63,670, with a daily RSI of 55.89, leaning slightly bullish, and a MACD histogram of 105 in positive territory, showing momentum isn’t crushed. The funding rate at 0.0054% is quite mild. The price itself hasn’t collapsed, but the damage on the narrative front is real.

ETH is a bit weaker, sitting at $1,666, with a 4-hour RSI of 51.17, neutral, and the funding rate has turned negative at -0.0006%. Shorts are starting to collect fees, indicating the market sentiment towards the tokenization space is indeed cooling off.

To put it plainly, the bottleneck for tokenization has never been on the demand side. Users are willing to lock in $557 million, showcasing explosive demand. The issue lies on the supply side—traditional finance's settlement infrastructure isn't ready for the crypto world.

This event acts as a sobering reality check for the entire RWA narrative. Tokenized stocks aren’t just about writing a smart contract; there’s a complete chain behind it involving T+1 settlements, custody compliance, and cross-border regulations. Crypto can handle the front end, but the back end is still in the hands of traditional finance.

SBF's appeal was also rejected, maintaining his 25-year sentence. His only chance now is a presidential pardon, but as things stand, that seems unlikely. These two events combined send a clear signal: the crypto industry’s desire to break into mainstream finance faces much higher technical and compliance hurdles than anticipated.

My take is that tokenized IPOs won’t die, but they’ll slow down. Infrastructure needs time to mature, and the regulatory framework needs to catch up. The next successful tokenized IPO may have to wait until traditional custody and crypto settlement systems are truly integrated.

Until then, rather than chasing concepts, it's better to keep a close eye on those quietly building the infrastructure. When the road is paved, the cars will naturally come.
·
--
Today, I was digging through the order book data and found a story that tells a completely different tale from the market's panic. Last week, when BTC dropped to $59,000, there was a lot of wailing in the market. But now, looking at the on-chain data, buyers have actually been quietly entering the scene. The order book shows that since last Friday's bottom, the bid-ask ratio has consistently been positive at 0.05. This indicates that there are more active buy orders than sell orders, albeit not by a large margin, but the direction is clear. What's even more noteworthy is the CVD data. Small-volume buyers have net bought $53 million and $157 million, respectively. Meanwhile, the big players who were previously dumping have reduced their net selling pressure by a whopping $900 million. To put it simply: retail investors are buying, and the whales have stopped dumping. The technicals are also aligning. On the 4-hour chart, there's an RSI divergence; the price made a new low while RSI didn’t follow, which is a classic sign of waning momentum. The current 4-hour RSI is back at 55, which is neutral to bullish. The MACD histogram has turned positive at +98, with the fast line crossing above the signal line, indicating that short-term momentum is recovering. The daily RSI is still around 33, suggesting there’s still room for movement on the mid-term. The funding rate is only 0.0054%, which is very healthy. This is not a rebound propped up by leverage; it's genuine spot buying coming in. This is crucial, as a rise under low funding rates is far more reliable than one under high rates. But don’t rush to celebrate. $64,000 is the first resistance level, and beyond that, there's $66,000, which was previously a support turned resistance. One analyst drew an ascending triangle with a target pointing to a liquidity gap between $67,500 and $70,500. However, ahead of the weekend, bullish positions are clearly piling up, with 237 long positions vs. 128 short positions. Historically, weekend profit-taking often interrupts such accumulation. Additionally, around $64,600, there's a concentration of $2.68 billion in short liquidations. If the price can reach this level, it might trigger a short squeeze. But this requires volume support; currently, the 24-hour trading volume is below $1 billion, showing weak volume. My judgment is: a bottom structure is forming, and demand-side data is more optimistic than the price itself. However, the range between $64K and $66K is the inflection point for bulls and bears; a breakout is needed for a real trend. Right now, this position feels more like the calm before the storm; it’s not that there’s no wind, it’s just that the wind hasn’t arrived yet.
Today, I was digging through the order book data and found a story that tells a completely different tale from the market's panic.

Last week, when BTC dropped to $59,000, there was a lot of wailing in the market. But now, looking at the on-chain data, buyers have actually been quietly entering the scene. The order book shows that since last Friday's bottom, the bid-ask ratio has consistently been positive at 0.05. This indicates that there are more active buy orders than sell orders, albeit not by a large margin, but the direction is clear.

What's even more noteworthy is the CVD data. Small-volume buyers have net bought $53 million and $157 million, respectively. Meanwhile, the big players who were previously dumping have reduced their net selling pressure by a whopping $900 million. To put it simply: retail investors are buying, and the whales have stopped dumping.

The technicals are also aligning. On the 4-hour chart, there's an RSI divergence; the price made a new low while RSI didn’t follow, which is a classic sign of waning momentum. The current 4-hour RSI is back at 55, which is neutral to bullish. The MACD histogram has turned positive at +98, with the fast line crossing above the signal line, indicating that short-term momentum is recovering. The daily RSI is still around 33, suggesting there’s still room for movement on the mid-term.

The funding rate is only 0.0054%, which is very healthy. This is not a rebound propped up by leverage; it's genuine spot buying coming in. This is crucial, as a rise under low funding rates is far more reliable than one under high rates.

But don’t rush to celebrate. $64,000 is the first resistance level, and beyond that, there's $66,000, which was previously a support turned resistance. One analyst drew an ascending triangle with a target pointing to a liquidity gap between $67,500 and $70,500. However, ahead of the weekend, bullish positions are clearly piling up, with 237 long positions vs. 128 short positions. Historically, weekend profit-taking often interrupts such accumulation.

Additionally, around $64,600, there's a concentration of $2.68 billion in short liquidations. If the price can reach this level, it might trigger a short squeeze. But this requires volume support; currently, the 24-hour trading volume is below $1 billion, showing weak volume.

My judgment is: a bottom structure is forming, and demand-side data is more optimistic than the price itself. However, the range between $64K and $66K is the inflection point for bulls and bears; a breakout is needed for a real trend. Right now, this position feels more like the calm before the storm; it’s not that there’s no wind, it’s just that the wind hasn’t arrived yet.
·
--
The cross-border payment space has been buzzing lately. MassPay and Coinbase just announced their partnership today, launching stablecoin cross-border settlements. They’re covering 180 countries, with Coinbase providing wallet infrastructure and custody, while MassPay handles the fiat withdrawals. The CEO mentioned that customers have seen costs drop by 40% to 70% compared to traditional wire transfers, and settlement times have shifted from days to nearly real-time. The first year's target is to handle nine-figure transaction volumes, meaning over a hundred million dollars in stablecoin cross-border flows. Sounds like just another partnership announcement, right? But in the context of the entire space, it’s a different story. Last year, Stripe acquired Bridge, a startup focused on stablecoin enterprise-grade infrastructure, explicitly stating that stablecoins are set to become the key channel for cross-border commerce. Circle launched its Payments Network this April, connecting banks, payment companies, and digital wallets with USDC for real-time cross-border settlements. Now MassPay is bringing Coinbase into the game. Three independent players, all sharing the same insight: stablecoins are not just toys for the crypto world; they are the next-gen pipeline for cross-border payments. One more thing, the MassPay CEO honestly admitted that stablecoins currently make up a small portion of their overall transaction volume. That’s the truth. The cross-border payment market is in the trillions, and stablecoins aren't even a drop in the bucket yet. But because their share is small and growing fast, it indicates there's room for expansion. LINK, representing the oracle and cross-chain infrastructure tokens, is currently sitting at $7.91, barely moving. The 4-hour RSI is at 53.57, which is neutral, and while the MACD histogram has turned positive, the momentum is weak, with funding rates close to zero. The market hasn’t reached a consensus on this narrative yet. But infrastructure waits for no one. Traditional payment giants are expanding, on-chain oracles and settlement layers are keeping pace, and the stablecoin cross-border payment space is transitioning from concept to contracts. Keep an eye on LINK and related payment infrastructure tokens for upcoming volume-price synergy; a breakout in volume would signal that the market is starting to price this space.
The cross-border payment space has been buzzing lately.

MassPay and Coinbase just announced their partnership today, launching stablecoin cross-border settlements. They’re covering 180 countries, with Coinbase providing wallet infrastructure and custody, while MassPay handles the fiat withdrawals. The CEO mentioned that customers have seen costs drop by 40% to 70% compared to traditional wire transfers, and settlement times have shifted from days to nearly real-time. The first year's target is to handle nine-figure transaction volumes, meaning over a hundred million dollars in stablecoin cross-border flows.

Sounds like just another partnership announcement, right? But in the context of the entire space, it’s a different story.

Last year, Stripe acquired Bridge, a startup focused on stablecoin enterprise-grade infrastructure, explicitly stating that stablecoins are set to become the key channel for cross-border commerce. Circle launched its Payments Network this April, connecting banks, payment companies, and digital wallets with USDC for real-time cross-border settlements. Now MassPay is bringing Coinbase into the game.

Three independent players, all sharing the same insight: stablecoins are not just toys for the crypto world; they are the next-gen pipeline for cross-border payments.

One more thing, the MassPay CEO honestly admitted that stablecoins currently make up a small portion of their overall transaction volume. That’s the truth. The cross-border payment market is in the trillions, and stablecoins aren't even a drop in the bucket yet. But because their share is small and growing fast, it indicates there's room for expansion.

LINK, representing the oracle and cross-chain infrastructure tokens, is currently sitting at $7.91, barely moving. The 4-hour RSI is at 53.57, which is neutral, and while the MACD histogram has turned positive, the momentum is weak, with funding rates close to zero. The market hasn’t reached a consensus on this narrative yet.

But infrastructure waits for no one. Traditional payment giants are expanding, on-chain oracles and settlement layers are keeping pace, and the stablecoin cross-border payment space is transitioning from concept to contracts. Keep an eye on LINK and related payment infrastructure tokens for upcoming volume-price synergy; a breakout in volume would signal that the market is starting to price this space.
·
--
The US regulators have proposed a new plan that could dismantle the biggest legal barriers for trading tokenized US stocks on decentralized exchanges. Specifically, they plan to abolish two market rules: one that prohibits "trade-through" (meaning an exchange can't execute stock orders at worse prices than other exchanges), and another that stops exchanges from displaying buy and sell quotes that are higher than elsewhere. These rules might not seem related to crypto, but Alex Thorn, the research head at Galaxy Digital, says this could be "the biggest unlocking of tokenized US stocks." Why's that? Because under the current rules, the automated market makers on decentralized exchanges would continuously trigger trade-through violations when handling tokenized stock trades, which is theoretically illegal. With the abolishment of these rules, market makers can legally provide liquidity for tokenized stocks. Regulators might replace it with a "best execution" framework, giving decentralized trading some compliance leeway. This timing is quite nuanced. Over the past two months, the tokenization space has been busy: Nasdaq got approval in March to pilot trading tokenized stocks, the NYSE collaborated with Securitize to develop blockchain trading infrastructure, and JPMorgan and Bank of America are prepping a tokenized deposit network expected to launch in the first half of 2027. Digital Asset just secured $355 million in funding to expand the Canton Network. Now, with regulators breaking down legal barriers, it feels like everyone is pushing in the same direction. ETH's technicals are also worth keeping an eye on. The daily RSI is at 31, already in the oversold zone, while the 4-hour RSI is at 51, neutral. The MACD histogram turning positive at 2.72 indicates some short-term rebound momentum. Interestingly, the funding rates have been negative for several periods; shorts are in control, but the magnitude is small and not panic-driven. If this regulatory change shifts from uncertainty to confirmed positivity, short covering could trigger a rebound. However, don't get too excited. The proposal is still in a 60-day comment period, and the final version may differ from the current one. Plus, even if the rules change, the liquidity depth of tokenized stocks, market maker participation, and user acceptance remain unknowns. But the direction is clear: the legal barriers for decentralized trading of traditional assets are being dismantled brick by brick.
The US regulators have proposed a new plan that could dismantle the biggest legal barriers for trading tokenized US stocks on decentralized exchanges.

Specifically, they plan to abolish two market rules: one that prohibits "trade-through" (meaning an exchange can't execute stock orders at worse prices than other exchanges), and another that stops exchanges from displaying buy and sell quotes that are higher than elsewhere. These rules might not seem related to crypto, but Alex Thorn, the research head at Galaxy Digital, says this could be "the biggest unlocking of tokenized US stocks."

Why's that? Because under the current rules, the automated market makers on decentralized exchanges would continuously trigger trade-through violations when handling tokenized stock trades, which is theoretically illegal. With the abolishment of these rules, market makers can legally provide liquidity for tokenized stocks. Regulators might replace it with a "best execution" framework, giving decentralized trading some compliance leeway.

This timing is quite nuanced. Over the past two months, the tokenization space has been busy: Nasdaq got approval in March to pilot trading tokenized stocks, the NYSE collaborated with Securitize to develop blockchain trading infrastructure, and JPMorgan and Bank of America are prepping a tokenized deposit network expected to launch in the first half of 2027. Digital Asset just secured $355 million in funding to expand the Canton Network. Now, with regulators breaking down legal barriers, it feels like everyone is pushing in the same direction.

ETH's technicals are also worth keeping an eye on. The daily RSI is at 31, already in the oversold zone, while the 4-hour RSI is at 51, neutral. The MACD histogram turning positive at 2.72 indicates some short-term rebound momentum. Interestingly, the funding rates have been negative for several periods; shorts are in control, but the magnitude is small and not panic-driven. If this regulatory change shifts from uncertainty to confirmed positivity, short covering could trigger a rebound.

However, don't get too excited. The proposal is still in a 60-day comment period, and the final version may differ from the current one. Plus, even if the rules change, the liquidity depth of tokenized stocks, market maker participation, and user acceptance remain unknowns. But the direction is clear: the legal barriers for decentralized trading of traditional assets are being dismantled brick by brick.
·
--
Checked the market data today, and honestly, it's a bit split. The Nasdaq 100 dropped 7.5% this week, evaporating $2.7 trillion, oil prices broke 90, and the Producer Price Index skyrocketed to 6.5%, hitting a new high since 2022. Market expectations for a rate hike in September have jumped from 5% a month ago to 40%. The traditional markets are definitely struggling. But BTC only dipped 0.03%, holding steady at 63,600. The daily RSI is already at 28.9, with ETH even lower at 27.77, both entering the oversold zone. Funding rates are nearly zero, with BTC at just 0.0008% and ETH even turning negative at -0.0022%. Leverage has been cleaned out thoroughly. What's more interesting is the market divergence. TRUMP surged 20% against the trend, SpaceX's tokenized IPO attracted $557 million on Binance, and SPCXB rose 6.2%. HMSTR plummeted 27%, ZEC fell 7%, and speculative funds are quickly rotating between sectors. In June, BTC ETF saw a net outflow of $1.9 billion, and the Strategy has paused buying. With these signals stacked together, there is indeed a possibility of continuing to dip towards 60K in the short term. However, this combo of oversold conditions and low leverage has historically been a precursor to a rebound. My take is that those who were going to panic have panicked already, and the market is waiting for a catalyst. The question is when that catalyst will arrive — it could be a drop in oil prices or some macro data improving. Until then, just keep an eye on that 60K level.
Checked the market data today, and honestly, it's a bit split.

The Nasdaq 100 dropped 7.5% this week, evaporating $2.7 trillion, oil prices broke 90, and the Producer Price Index skyrocketed to 6.5%, hitting a new high since 2022. Market expectations for a rate hike in September have jumped from 5% a month ago to 40%. The traditional markets are definitely struggling.

But BTC only dipped 0.03%, holding steady at 63,600. The daily RSI is already at 28.9, with ETH even lower at 27.77, both entering the oversold zone. Funding rates are nearly zero, with BTC at just 0.0008% and ETH even turning negative at -0.0022%. Leverage has been cleaned out thoroughly.

What's more interesting is the market divergence. TRUMP surged 20% against the trend, SpaceX's tokenized IPO attracted $557 million on Binance, and SPCXB rose 6.2%. HMSTR plummeted 27%, ZEC fell 7%, and speculative funds are quickly rotating between sectors.

In June, BTC ETF saw a net outflow of $1.9 billion, and the Strategy has paused buying. With these signals stacked together, there is indeed a possibility of continuing to dip towards 60K in the short term.

However, this combo of oversold conditions and low leverage has historically been a precursor to a rebound. My take is that those who were going to panic have panicked already, and the market is waiting for a catalyst. The question is when that catalyst will arrive — it could be a drop in oil prices or some macro data improving. Until then, just keep an eye on that 60K level.
·
--
SpaceX just went public on Nasdaq, opening up 29% higher, but the experience in the crypto space hasn’t been so glamorous. Half the crypto world is buzzing about the RWA token-stock narrative, with several platforms having prepped allocations for users ahead of the SpaceX IPO. However, once the new share allocation was done, participants were told there were no shares available, and refunds came with hefty fees of a few hundred bucks. To make matters worse, some saw pre-market contracts rising and decided to short to hedge and lock in profits, only to end up with losses on their shorts while not being able to get their hands on the actual stock. It’s a double whammy, and the experience has been pretty rough. Some exchanges have provided access to SpaceX equity for over 110 markets through tokenized equity, with tokens pegged 1:1 to the underlying asset and available for trading 24/7. This is what RWA should look like: transparent, verifiable, and not reliant on verbal promises. But the chaos on the other side has really put a dent in the RWA token-stock narrative that’s been brewing in the crypto scene for years. Data shows that the growth of RWA tokenization itself is very real. According to Binance Research, the active tokenized RWA market has surged by 589% from early 2025 to now, with bonds and money market funds adding $6.5 billion, tokenized stocks up by 422%, and tokenized precious metals gaining another $1.5 billion. The sector is solid, but the chaos in execution is eroding user trust. SpaceX's IPO was priced at $75 billion, with a 4x oversubscription, which should have been the shining moment for the RWA narrative. Instead, the experience in the crypto space has turned into a cautionary tale. The underlying logic of tokenized stocks is sound, but the distribution, settlement, and how to handle issues are clearly not ready to support such a big narrative. On the market side, BTC has been trading sideways around 63,500 for the day, with a daily RSI of 32.56 nearing oversold territory. The MACD histogram is still below the zero line but is narrowing, indicating that short momentum is fading. ETH’s daily RSI is 30.36, also in oversold territory, with a funding rate of -0.0022% showing slight negativity, indicating shorts are getting crowded. The overall market isn’t putting extra pressure on the RWA narrative, but it’s not providing much support either. SpaceX’s 29% opening rise shows that the market values this company, but the events surrounding it in the crypto world have thrown cold water on the RWA narrative. The growth is real, but the infrastructure and trust mechanisms aren’t ready yet. Until RWA can truly prove that tokenized equity is as reliable as a traditional IPO experience, this sector can’t be considered to have truly taken off. #SpaceXIPO Nasdaq opening quote
SpaceX just went public on Nasdaq, opening up 29% higher, but the experience in the crypto space hasn’t been so glamorous.

Half the crypto world is buzzing about the RWA token-stock narrative, with several platforms having prepped allocations for users ahead of the SpaceX IPO. However, once the new share allocation was done, participants were told there were no shares available, and refunds came with hefty fees of a few hundred bucks. To make matters worse, some saw pre-market contracts rising and decided to short to hedge and lock in profits, only to end up with losses on their shorts while not being able to get their hands on the actual stock. It’s a double whammy, and the experience has been pretty rough.

Some exchanges have provided access to SpaceX equity for over 110 markets through tokenized equity, with tokens pegged 1:1 to the underlying asset and available for trading 24/7. This is what RWA should look like: transparent, verifiable, and not reliant on verbal promises. But the chaos on the other side has really put a dent in the RWA token-stock narrative that’s been brewing in the crypto scene for years.

Data shows that the growth of RWA tokenization itself is very real. According to Binance Research, the active tokenized RWA market has surged by 589% from early 2025 to now, with bonds and money market funds adding $6.5 billion, tokenized stocks up by 422%, and tokenized precious metals gaining another $1.5 billion. The sector is solid, but the chaos in execution is eroding user trust.

SpaceX's IPO was priced at $75 billion, with a 4x oversubscription, which should have been the shining moment for the RWA narrative. Instead, the experience in the crypto space has turned into a cautionary tale. The underlying logic of tokenized stocks is sound, but the distribution, settlement, and how to handle issues are clearly not ready to support such a big narrative.

On the market side, BTC has been trading sideways around 63,500 for the day, with a daily RSI of 32.56 nearing oversold territory. The MACD histogram is still below the zero line but is narrowing, indicating that short momentum is fading. ETH’s daily RSI is 30.36, also in oversold territory, with a funding rate of -0.0022% showing slight negativity, indicating shorts are getting crowded. The overall market isn’t putting extra pressure on the RWA narrative, but it’s not providing much support either.

SpaceX’s 29% opening rise shows that the market values this company, but the events surrounding it in the crypto world have thrown cold water on the RWA narrative. The growth is real, but the infrastructure and trust mechanisms aren’t ready yet. Until RWA can truly prove that tokenized equity is as reliable as a traditional IPO experience, this sector can’t be considered to have truly taken off.

#SpaceXIPO Nasdaq opening quote
·
--
Today, the Binance market is pretty interesting. $TRUMP shot up 18%, with a trading volume of over $64 million, nearly 6 times the average of the past 24 hours. HMSTR, on the other hand, dropped 31%. It's a classic case of one up, one down, as the market reallocates chips. One technical detail worth noting about TRUMP's recent surge is that the 4-hour RSI hit 72, indicating it's definitely overbought. However, the funding rate is negative at -0.03%. A negative funding rate means that short sellers are paying the long holders, and yet the price continues to rise. This isn't a typical chase-the-long rally; it feels more like the shorts are getting squeezed out. Looking at the market structure, TRUMP's price started around 1.62, peaked at 2.15, and has now retraced to around 2.04 for consolidation. The volume spike is quite evident, averaging 228,000 tokens per hour in the previous 24 hours, and recently skyrocketing to 1,318,000 tokens. The volume-price relationship is solid, not just a fake pump. However, TRUMP itself lacks any fundamental catalysts. There are no new features, no partnerships, and no ecosystem developments. It's purely driven by liquidity and sentiment. Such situations typically have two outcomes: either a volume breakout that holds, or a pulse decay followed by a retracement. The overall market backdrop isn’t bad either. BTC is at $63,774, up 0.5%, with a 4-hour RSI at 56.67, leaning slightly bullish, and a very low funding rate of 0.0008%. ETH is at $1,667, down 0.89%, with a funding rate that’s even negative. The entire market leverage is quite low; this isn’t a bubble environment. Pairing this with the hype around SpaceX's tokenized IPO on Binance, which attracted $557 million and 28,000 wallets participating, retail risk appetite is clearly returning. Funds are flowing out of projects like HMSTR, which have dropped 99%, and into assets with trending topics. TRUMP, being a political meme token, naturally has enough buzz. My judgment is that the short-term overbought condition needs to be digested. The 4-hour RSI at 72, combined with the negative funding rate, indicates that the bullish momentum is still there, but the shorts have already been cleared out once. If it holds above 1.9 during a pullback, the potential for upward movement could open up. If it breaks below 1.8 directly, then this wave is just a pure short-term pulse. Wait for confirmation signals before making a move. #TRUMP Token Rebound
Today, the Binance market is pretty interesting. $TRUMP shot up 18%, with a trading volume of over $64 million, nearly 6 times the average of the past 24 hours. HMSTR, on the other hand, dropped 31%. It's a classic case of one up, one down, as the market reallocates chips.

One technical detail worth noting about TRUMP's recent surge is that the 4-hour RSI hit 72, indicating it's definitely overbought. However, the funding rate is negative at -0.03%. A negative funding rate means that short sellers are paying the long holders, and yet the price continues to rise. This isn't a typical chase-the-long rally; it feels more like the shorts are getting squeezed out.

Looking at the market structure, TRUMP's price started around 1.62, peaked at 2.15, and has now retraced to around 2.04 for consolidation. The volume spike is quite evident, averaging 228,000 tokens per hour in the previous 24 hours, and recently skyrocketing to 1,318,000 tokens. The volume-price relationship is solid, not just a fake pump.

However, TRUMP itself lacks any fundamental catalysts. There are no new features, no partnerships, and no ecosystem developments. It's purely driven by liquidity and sentiment. Such situations typically have two outcomes: either a volume breakout that holds, or a pulse decay followed by a retracement.

The overall market backdrop isn’t bad either. BTC is at $63,774, up 0.5%, with a 4-hour RSI at 56.67, leaning slightly bullish, and a very low funding rate of 0.0008%. ETH is at $1,667, down 0.89%, with a funding rate that’s even negative. The entire market leverage is quite low; this isn’t a bubble environment.

Pairing this with the hype around SpaceX's tokenized IPO on Binance, which attracted $557 million and 28,000 wallets participating, retail risk appetite is clearly returning. Funds are flowing out of projects like HMSTR, which have dropped 99%, and into assets with trending topics. TRUMP, being a political meme token, naturally has enough buzz.

My judgment is that the short-term overbought condition needs to be digested. The 4-hour RSI at 72, combined with the negative funding rate, indicates that the bullish momentum is still there, but the shorts have already been cleared out once. If it holds above 1.9 during a pullback, the potential for upward movement could open up. If it breaks below 1.8 directly, then this wave is just a pure short-term pulse. Wait for confirmation signals before making a move.

#TRUMP Token Rebound
·
--
The Nasdaq dropped 7.5% in the last week, evaporating $2.7 trillion in market cap, which is more than double BTC's entire market cap. Oil prices shot up to $90, and the Producer Price Index jumped to 6.5%, with the market starting to price in a Fed rate hike in September. In this macro environment, BTC has managed to hold above $63,000, which is stronger than I expected. The miners are flashing red signals. Charles Edwards from Capriole says that BTC's current trading price is basically the miners' production cost, around $61,200, with a profit margin of only 4.67% after electricity costs, close to a two-year low. Bitbo's miner capitulation indicator has also lit up; historically, when this signal appears, it often indicates an accumulation window. Killa mentioned that the traditional markets might see another pullback later this year, which could be the real bottom for BTC, but the miners are already capitulating. The daily RSI for BTC is only 34, in the oversold territory. The 4-hour RSI has bounced back to 57, and the MACD histogram has turned positive, indicating a recovery in momentum. The funding rate is at 0.0008%, which is quite low, suggesting that this rebound isn't driven by leverage. In June, ETFs saw $1.9 billion in outflows, and Strategy has paused its buys, reflecting weak market sentiment. However, SpaceX's IPO was oversubscribed by more than double, with a valuation of $1.77 trillion, indicating that money hasn't fully exited; it's just waiting for direction. The situation with ETH is even more interesting. ETH futures open interest on Binance has hit an all-time high of 3.7 million ETH. The taker buy/sell ratio has returned from 0.95 to 1.0, with sellers finally starting to balance after dominating for so long. However, the ratio of perpetual contracts to spot trading volume is nearing historical highs, with leverage participation outpacing spot, which is something to watch out for. After ETH fell 44%, leveraged longs are adding positions; if they're right, it's a massive win, but if they're wrong, it could lead to a liquidation cascade. The macro environment is indeed challenging, with oil prices, inflation, and rate hike expectations deteriorating. But the miner capitulation, combined with an oversold RSI, healthy funding rates, and the excitement around large IPO subscriptions, indicates that the market is bottoming out rather than crashing. The $60,000 mark is a critical support level; if it breaks, the $48,965 electricity cost line is the miners' last line of defense. Now is not the time to FOMO, but it's also not a time to panic.
The Nasdaq dropped 7.5% in the last week, evaporating $2.7 trillion in market cap, which is more than double BTC's entire market cap. Oil prices shot up to $90, and the Producer Price Index jumped to 6.5%, with the market starting to price in a Fed rate hike in September. In this macro environment, BTC has managed to hold above $63,000, which is stronger than I expected.

The miners are flashing red signals. Charles Edwards from Capriole says that BTC's current trading price is basically the miners' production cost, around $61,200, with a profit margin of only 4.67% after electricity costs, close to a two-year low. Bitbo's miner capitulation indicator has also lit up; historically, when this signal appears, it often indicates an accumulation window. Killa mentioned that the traditional markets might see another pullback later this year, which could be the real bottom for BTC, but the miners are already capitulating.

The daily RSI for BTC is only 34, in the oversold territory. The 4-hour RSI has bounced back to 57, and the MACD histogram has turned positive, indicating a recovery in momentum. The funding rate is at 0.0008%, which is quite low, suggesting that this rebound isn't driven by leverage. In June, ETFs saw $1.9 billion in outflows, and Strategy has paused its buys, reflecting weak market sentiment. However, SpaceX's IPO was oversubscribed by more than double, with a valuation of $1.77 trillion, indicating that money hasn't fully exited; it's just waiting for direction.

The situation with ETH is even more interesting. ETH futures open interest on Binance has hit an all-time high of 3.7 million ETH. The taker buy/sell ratio has returned from 0.95 to 1.0, with sellers finally starting to balance after dominating for so long. However, the ratio of perpetual contracts to spot trading volume is nearing historical highs, with leverage participation outpacing spot, which is something to watch out for. After ETH fell 44%, leveraged longs are adding positions; if they're right, it's a massive win, but if they're wrong, it could lead to a liquidation cascade.

The macro environment is indeed challenging, with oil prices, inflation, and rate hike expectations deteriorating. But the miner capitulation, combined with an oversold RSI, healthy funding rates, and the excitement around large IPO subscriptions, indicates that the market is bottoming out rather than crashing. The $60,000 mark is a critical support level; if it breaks, the $48,965 electricity cost line is the miners' last line of defense. Now is not the time to FOMO, but it's also not a time to panic.
·
--
Verified
Today, SpaceX is listing on Nasdaq, but Binance has already jumped the gun. $557 million in USDC is being wagered, with nearly 28,000 wallet addresses participating in Binance's SpaceX tokenized IPO event. In the traditional IPO market, this number might not mean much, but on-chain, it's a whole new beast—retail investors directly betting on the valuation of an unlisted company using stablecoins. Let's take a look at the participant structure: 81% of the addresses wagered less than $20,000, mostly small retail investors; however, 114 addresses each staked over $500,000, contributing 10.2% of the funds. The whales and retail investors are both in the game, indicating that this isn't just a story of retail taking a gamble. What's even more interesting is the change in the price discovery mechanism. The SpaceX IPO is priced at $135 per share, with a valuation of about $1.8 trillion. But the synthetic contract SPCX on crypto exchanges has already been trading around $179, a premium of about 30%. This means the crypto market has already signaled a higher price before the official opening. Talos's report shows that the synthetic contracts on Hyperliquid had a pricing error of only 1.3% at the listing of Cerebras, indicating that the price discovery efficiency of these contracts is quite high. One whale opened a $22.3 million long position in SPCX on Hyperliquid using 2x leverage, entering around $168, with a floating profit of about $1.15 million, spending just over $500 on funding fees. The leverage isn't heavy, and the entry cost is extremely low, showing that the market is bullish but not to the point of madness. What's the bigger picture behind this? Binance, OKX, Bitget, and Bybit are all launching SpaceX-related products simultaneously, turning crypto exchanges into another distribution channel for IPOs. Previously, IPOs were a Wall Street game where retail could only play via brokers; now, participating directly on-chain has lowered the barrier, but the pricing power has also become more fragmented. BTC is currently around $63,500, with a daily RSI of 32.81 still oversold, and a 4-hour RSI of 54.67 starting to recover, with the MACD histogram turning positive. BNB is hovering around $606, with an RSI of 55.87 neutral. The funding rate is almost zero, meaning the market isn't using leverage to push prices. The tokenized IPO of SpaceX is not the end; it's the beginning of crypto exchanges competing for IPO pricing power. When $557 million in on-chain funds is placed in front of a company that hasn't even opened yet, Wall Street finds it hard to pretend it doesn't see.
Today, SpaceX is listing on Nasdaq, but Binance has already jumped the gun.

$557 million in USDC is being wagered, with nearly 28,000 wallet addresses participating in Binance's SpaceX tokenized IPO event. In the traditional IPO market, this number might not mean much, but on-chain, it's a whole new beast—retail investors directly betting on the valuation of an unlisted company using stablecoins.

Let's take a look at the participant structure: 81% of the addresses wagered less than $20,000, mostly small retail investors; however, 114 addresses each staked over $500,000, contributing 10.2% of the funds. The whales and retail investors are both in the game, indicating that this isn't just a story of retail taking a gamble.

What's even more interesting is the change in the price discovery mechanism. The SpaceX IPO is priced at $135 per share, with a valuation of about $1.8 trillion. But the synthetic contract SPCX on crypto exchanges has already been trading around $179, a premium of about 30%. This means the crypto market has already signaled a higher price before the official opening. Talos's report shows that the synthetic contracts on Hyperliquid had a pricing error of only 1.3% at the listing of Cerebras, indicating that the price discovery efficiency of these contracts is quite high.

One whale opened a $22.3 million long position in SPCX on Hyperliquid using 2x leverage, entering around $168, with a floating profit of about $1.15 million, spending just over $500 on funding fees. The leverage isn't heavy, and the entry cost is extremely low, showing that the market is bullish but not to the point of madness.

What's the bigger picture behind this? Binance, OKX, Bitget, and Bybit are all launching SpaceX-related products simultaneously, turning crypto exchanges into another distribution channel for IPOs. Previously, IPOs were a Wall Street game where retail could only play via brokers; now, participating directly on-chain has lowered the barrier, but the pricing power has also become more fragmented.

BTC is currently around $63,500, with a daily RSI of 32.81 still oversold, and a 4-hour RSI of 54.67 starting to recover, with the MACD histogram turning positive. BNB is hovering around $606, with an RSI of 55.87 neutral. The funding rate is almost zero, meaning the market isn't using leverage to push prices.

The tokenized IPO of SpaceX is not the end; it's the beginning of crypto exchanges competing for IPO pricing power. When $557 million in on-chain funds is placed in front of a company that hasn't even opened yet, Wall Street finds it hard to pretend it doesn't see.
·
--
Citibank launched a blockchain platform today, specifically for trading equity in private companies. This is way bigger than it sounds. Citibank is one of the top five banks globally, and it has chosen to use tokenized depositary receipts to package shares of pre-IPO companies, allowing investors to hold them directly on-chain just like buying Apple stock. Initially aimed at overseas investors, the U.S. market will open up later. Why go with depositary receipts instead of an SPV structure? According to Citibank's head of digital assets, Artem Korenyuk, it’s 'more transparent.' Traditional SPV structures are layered and opaque, with unclear underlying assets, whereas tokenized depositary receipts write ownership directly on-chain, reducing both audit and trust costs. This isn’t just a Citibank initiative. Over the past 12 months, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Franklin Templeton have all been rolling out their own tokenized products. The global private equity market exceeds $18 trillion, with most of it trapped in opaque SPVs and limited partnership agreements. Citibank's move today essentially says: this market needs to migrate on-chain. By the way, South Korea's LG Electronics also announced today that it is partnering with Arbitrum to transform the $679 billion digital advertising market using blockchain technology. Two completely unrelated companies chose the same path on the same day—migrating the settlement layer of traditional assets on-chain. Looking at the charts, BTC rebounded to around $63,650 today, with a daily RSI of 33 still in the oversold zone, but the 4-hour MACD histogram has turned positive, indicating that short-term momentum is recovering. The funding rate is only 0.0024%, and leverage is extremely low, suggesting this rebound isn’t just a short squeeze. ARB rose by 4.5% today, with a funding rate of -0.01%. Shorts are still piling in, but the price isn’t dropping, which could trigger a short cover if this situation continues. Institutions are building infrastructure while prices are grinding at the bottom; when these two things happen simultaneously, it often indicates a setup window. Of course, the daily trend hasn’t confirmed a reversal yet, so patience is more important than direction.
Citibank launched a blockchain platform today, specifically for trading equity in private companies.

This is way bigger than it sounds. Citibank is one of the top five banks globally, and it has chosen to use tokenized depositary receipts to package shares of pre-IPO companies, allowing investors to hold them directly on-chain just like buying Apple stock. Initially aimed at overseas investors, the U.S. market will open up later.

Why go with depositary receipts instead of an SPV structure? According to Citibank's head of digital assets, Artem Korenyuk, it’s 'more transparent.' Traditional SPV structures are layered and opaque, with unclear underlying assets, whereas tokenized depositary receipts write ownership directly on-chain, reducing both audit and trust costs.

This isn’t just a Citibank initiative. Over the past 12 months, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Franklin Templeton have all been rolling out their own tokenized products. The global private equity market exceeds $18 trillion, with most of it trapped in opaque SPVs and limited partnership agreements. Citibank's move today essentially says: this market needs to migrate on-chain.

By the way, South Korea's LG Electronics also announced today that it is partnering with Arbitrum to transform the $679 billion digital advertising market using blockchain technology. Two completely unrelated companies chose the same path on the same day—migrating the settlement layer of traditional assets on-chain.

Looking at the charts, BTC rebounded to around $63,650 today, with a daily RSI of 33 still in the oversold zone, but the 4-hour MACD histogram has turned positive, indicating that short-term momentum is recovering. The funding rate is only 0.0024%, and leverage is extremely low, suggesting this rebound isn’t just a short squeeze. ARB rose by 4.5% today, with a funding rate of -0.01%. Shorts are still piling in, but the price isn’t dropping, which could trigger a short cover if this situation continues.

Institutions are building infrastructure while prices are grinding at the bottom; when these two things happen simultaneously, it often indicates a setup window. Of course, the daily trend hasn’t confirmed a reversal yet, so patience is more important than direction.
·
--
Today, a new face hit the Nasdaq, Avalanche Treasury, ticker AVAT, backed by heavyweights like Dragonfly, Pantera, VanEck, Galaxy, and Kraken. The result? A straight drop of 16% on its first day, opening at $2.20 and closing at $1.85. This is just the latest case of crypto treasury firms facing a chill. Let's take a look at the veterans in the same lane: Strategy has seen its stock price plummet by 69% over the past year, BitMine crashed from last July's high of $135 to just $16.5 now, and SOL Strategies is down 92%. BTC treasury's weekly net inflow has dropped from over $2 billion in April-May this year to just $266 million now, clearly indicating capital withdrawal. AVAX itself isn't looking too hot either, today at $6.61, down 95% from its all-time high in 2021, back to early 2021 levels. RSI is at 46.82, MACD is below the zero line but just had its bars turn positive, showing signs of stabilization but no real reversal yet. Volume is at 13 million, with average liquidity. The Avalanche ecosystem isn't bad, with over 550 projects in the pipeline, institutional capital deployment exceeding $1 billion, and on-chain RWA tokenization at $1.65 billion. The CEO of AVAT stated this isn't about betting on price, but about repositioning institutional finance. The logic makes sense, but the market clearly isn't buying it. To put it bluntly, in this environment, crypto treasury firms face an awkward reality: investors can buy the underlying assets directly, so why pay you an extra fee? Unless you can offer something not available through traditional channels, this model will struggle to survive in a bear market. AVAT's first-day drop isn't an isolated incident; it's a microcosm of the entire sector. Waiting for market sentiment to warm up before reassessing isn't a bad idea.
Today, a new face hit the Nasdaq, Avalanche Treasury, ticker AVAT, backed by heavyweights like Dragonfly, Pantera, VanEck, Galaxy, and Kraken. The result? A straight drop of 16% on its first day, opening at $2.20 and closing at $1.85.

This is just the latest case of crypto treasury firms facing a chill.

Let's take a look at the veterans in the same lane: Strategy has seen its stock price plummet by 69% over the past year, BitMine crashed from last July's high of $135 to just $16.5 now, and SOL Strategies is down 92%. BTC treasury's weekly net inflow has dropped from over $2 billion in April-May this year to just $266 million now, clearly indicating capital withdrawal.

AVAX itself isn't looking too hot either, today at $6.61, down 95% from its all-time high in 2021, back to early 2021 levels. RSI is at 46.82, MACD is below the zero line but just had its bars turn positive, showing signs of stabilization but no real reversal yet. Volume is at 13 million, with average liquidity.

The Avalanche ecosystem isn't bad, with over 550 projects in the pipeline, institutional capital deployment exceeding $1 billion, and on-chain RWA tokenization at $1.65 billion. The CEO of AVAT stated this isn't about betting on price, but about repositioning institutional finance. The logic makes sense, but the market clearly isn't buying it.

To put it bluntly, in this environment, crypto treasury firms face an awkward reality: investors can buy the underlying assets directly, so why pay you an extra fee? Unless you can offer something not available through traditional channels, this model will struggle to survive in a bear market.

AVAT's first-day drop isn't an isolated incident; it's a microcosm of the entire sector. Waiting for market sentiment to warm up before reassessing isn't a bad idea.
·
--
Immunefi CEO said something spine-chilling: AI models are creating a "vulnerability apocalypse". At the WAIB summit in Monaco, he bluntly stated that new models like Claude Opus 4.8 and ChatGPT 5.5 have completely tipped the balance of attack and defense in favor of attackers. In April 2026, the entire industry lost $634 million, the highest monthly record since the Bybit incident. Kelp DAO's rsETH bridge was drained of nearly $300 million, and LayerZero later mentioned they had already advised against using the 1/1 DVN configuration, yet the issue still occurred. It sounds like DeFi is on the brink. But today's market paints a different picture. CRV surged 16% in a day, with a trading volume of $18 million, and the 4-hour RSI shot up to 82, clearly overbought, yet funds are still pouring in. ONDO rose 10%, with an RSI of 58 and MACD just crossing bullish; its trend is much healthier than CRV's. AAVE up 3.74%, LINK 3.68%, UNI 4%, the three major DeFi blue chips are all rallying with volumes in the tens of millions. More importantly, let's talk about funding rates. AAVE at 0.0004%, PENDLE at 0.0005%, LINK at 0.0049%—all extremely low positive values. This indicates that today’s rise is not just a result of leverage; it’s genuine spot buying with real money. Now that's interesting. On one hand, the Immunefi CEO warns that the next three to four years are a "critical survival period", with AI accelerating vulnerability exploitation making protocol security precarious; on the other hand, the market is voting with its feet, with DeFi tokens strengthening against the trend. I think the market is distinguishing between two things: individual protocol code vulnerabilities ≠ collapse of DeFi sector value. Kelp DAO's incident was due to a DVN configuration error, not because AAVE or Uniswap have structural issues. It’s akin to traditional finance; a bank involved in a fraud case doesn’t mean the entire banking industry is going under. BTC’s daily RSI is at 32.95 and still in the oversold zone, with the overall market looking weak. However, the DeFi sector managing to carve out an independent trend in this environment indicates that funding sentiment about this sector’s fundamentals hasn’t changed due to security incidents. CRV's RSI of 82 is indeed too high, and a short-term correction is likely. If you’re bullish on DeFi's recovery but don’t want to chase the high, AAVE and LINK’s RSI are in the 53-54 range, with MACD bars just turning positive; this might be a more rational choice. Security is a real issue, but the market has learned not to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Immunefi CEO said something spine-chilling: AI models are creating a "vulnerability apocalypse".

At the WAIB summit in Monaco, he bluntly stated that new models like Claude Opus 4.8 and ChatGPT 5.5 have completely tipped the balance of attack and defense in favor of attackers. In April 2026, the entire industry lost $634 million, the highest monthly record since the Bybit incident. Kelp DAO's rsETH bridge was drained of nearly $300 million, and LayerZero later mentioned they had already advised against using the 1/1 DVN configuration, yet the issue still occurred.

It sounds like DeFi is on the brink.

But today's market paints a different picture.

CRV surged 16% in a day, with a trading volume of $18 million, and the 4-hour RSI shot up to 82, clearly overbought, yet funds are still pouring in. ONDO rose 10%, with an RSI of 58 and MACD just crossing bullish; its trend is much healthier than CRV's. AAVE up 3.74%, LINK 3.68%, UNI 4%, the three major DeFi blue chips are all rallying with volumes in the tens of millions.

More importantly, let's talk about funding rates. AAVE at 0.0004%, PENDLE at 0.0005%, LINK at 0.0049%—all extremely low positive values. This indicates that today’s rise is not just a result of leverage; it’s genuine spot buying with real money.

Now that's interesting. On one hand, the Immunefi CEO warns that the next three to four years are a "critical survival period", with AI accelerating vulnerability exploitation making protocol security precarious; on the other hand, the market is voting with its feet, with DeFi tokens strengthening against the trend.

I think the market is distinguishing between two things: individual protocol code vulnerabilities ≠ collapse of DeFi sector value. Kelp DAO's incident was due to a DVN configuration error, not because AAVE or Uniswap have structural issues. It’s akin to traditional finance; a bank involved in a fraud case doesn’t mean the entire banking industry is going under.

BTC’s daily RSI is at 32.95 and still in the oversold zone, with the overall market looking weak. However, the DeFi sector managing to carve out an independent trend in this environment indicates that funding sentiment about this sector’s fundamentals hasn’t changed due to security incidents.

CRV's RSI of 82 is indeed too high, and a short-term correction is likely. If you’re bullish on DeFi's recovery but don’t want to chase the high, AAVE and LINK’s RSI are in the 53-54 range, with MACD bars just turning positive; this might be a more rational choice.

Security is a real issue, but the market has learned not to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
·
--
The ECB announced a 0.25% rate hike today, pushing rates to 2.75% for the first time in three years. On the surface, this seems like a European issue, but there’s a bigger story lurking behind: global central banks are tightening collectively, and how much longer can BTC hold up during this tightening cycle? Let’s talk about a trend. Over the past two years, the BOJ has raised rates four times, each time hitting BTC hard. After the hike in March 2024, BTC dropped by 18%. The July 31 hike was even worse, dropping 18.5%. In January and December 2025, it fell 25% and 28% respectively. After four hikes, the average drop was 22.4%. Each rate increase triggered massive unwinding of yen carry trades, with funds fleeing risk assets. But the situation is different now. The BOJ has raised rates from -0.1% to 0.75%, and the yield on 10-year government bonds has skyrocketed from 0.63% to 2.68%. Analyst Cryptic Trades bluntly states that market fears regarding yen carry trade unwinding have been overstated, as Japan has effectively exited the deflationary era in 2024. The marginal impact of each rate hike is decreasing; not every hike will create the same deep pit. Over in the U.S., things aren’t quiet either. CPI has surged to 4.2%, a three-year high. Analysts at 10x Research straightforwardly point out that this macro environment is a persistent headwind for BTC, increasing the likelihood of it dropping below $60,000. The CIO of institutional trading firm Theo believes this data will keep the Fed cautious; it’s neither good nor bad for BTC, and liquidity expectations are being suppressed. On-chain data reveals the true source of pressure. Large wallets on Binance holding between 100 to 10,000 BTC have transferred $6.6 billion to exchanges over the past month. Concentrated inflows from whales typically indicate brewing sell pressure. Additionally, both short-term and long-term whales have already realized losses exceeding $2.5 billion during this downturn, with short-term holders still carrying about $16 billion in unrealized losses. This position is too close to breakeven, and any slight rebound could trigger sell-offs. However, as the market prices in these risks, it seems to have already accounted for the worst-case scenario. The daily RSI for BTC has dropped to 28.95, a typical oversold signal. The funding rate has turned negative to -0.0013%, and the crowded short positions actually create conditions for a rebound. The 4-hour MACD histogram has turned positive, with RSI back in the neutral bullish zone at 56, and prices have stabilized above $63,000, rebounding 2.78%. In short, the market is digesting the central bank tightening. The BOJ's rate hike cycle has lasted over a year, and the marginal impacts are waning. Despite high CPI in the U.S., CME futures indicate a 98.4% probability that the Fed will keep rates unchanged in June, with rate hike expectations actually cooling down. BTC has dropped 36% this year; what needed to drop has already dropped. What really needs watching is oil prices. If oil prices continue to soar and push up inflation expectations, or if the Fed shifts hawkish, then the $60,000 defense line could be in real danger. But the current technicals tell me that the combination of being oversold and crowded shorts might be brewing a corrective rally in the market. #ECB Rate Hike 0.25% First Time in Three Years
The ECB announced a 0.25% rate hike today, pushing rates to 2.75% for the first time in three years. On the surface, this seems like a European issue, but there’s a bigger story lurking behind: global central banks are tightening collectively, and how much longer can BTC hold up during this tightening cycle?

Let’s talk about a trend. Over the past two years, the BOJ has raised rates four times, each time hitting BTC hard. After the hike in March 2024, BTC dropped by 18%. The July 31 hike was even worse, dropping 18.5%. In January and December 2025, it fell 25% and 28% respectively. After four hikes, the average drop was 22.4%. Each rate increase triggered massive unwinding of yen carry trades, with funds fleeing risk assets.

But the situation is different now. The BOJ has raised rates from -0.1% to 0.75%, and the yield on 10-year government bonds has skyrocketed from 0.63% to 2.68%. Analyst Cryptic Trades bluntly states that market fears regarding yen carry trade unwinding have been overstated, as Japan has effectively exited the deflationary era in 2024. The marginal impact of each rate hike is decreasing; not every hike will create the same deep pit.

Over in the U.S., things aren’t quiet either. CPI has surged to 4.2%, a three-year high. Analysts at 10x Research straightforwardly point out that this macro environment is a persistent headwind for BTC, increasing the likelihood of it dropping below $60,000. The CIO of institutional trading firm Theo believes this data will keep the Fed cautious; it’s neither good nor bad for BTC, and liquidity expectations are being suppressed.

On-chain data reveals the true source of pressure. Large wallets on Binance holding between 100 to 10,000 BTC have transferred $6.6 billion to exchanges over the past month. Concentrated inflows from whales typically indicate brewing sell pressure. Additionally, both short-term and long-term whales have already realized losses exceeding $2.5 billion during this downturn, with short-term holders still carrying about $16 billion in unrealized losses. This position is too close to breakeven, and any slight rebound could trigger sell-offs.

However, as the market prices in these risks, it seems to have already accounted for the worst-case scenario. The daily RSI for BTC has dropped to 28.95, a typical oversold signal. The funding rate has turned negative to -0.0013%, and the crowded short positions actually create conditions for a rebound. The 4-hour MACD histogram has turned positive, with RSI back in the neutral bullish zone at 56, and prices have stabilized above $63,000, rebounding 2.78%.

In short, the market is digesting the central bank tightening. The BOJ's rate hike cycle has lasted over a year, and the marginal impacts are waning. Despite high CPI in the U.S., CME futures indicate a 98.4% probability that the Fed will keep rates unchanged in June, with rate hike expectations actually cooling down. BTC has dropped 36% this year; what needed to drop has already dropped.

What really needs watching is oil prices. If oil prices continue to soar and push up inflation expectations, or if the Fed shifts hawkish, then the $60,000 defense line could be in real danger. But the current technicals tell me that the combination of being oversold and crowded shorts might be brewing a corrective rally in the market.

#ECB Rate Hike 0.25% First Time in Three Years
·
--
The Japanese House of Representatives just passed a crypto bill that elevates digital assets from "payment tools" to "financial products." What does this mean? Cryptocurrencies in Japan will now enjoy the same treatment as stocks and bonds. The most critical change is the tax rate. Currently, the highest crypto gains in Japan are taxed at 55%, but after the bill passes, it will drop to 20%, aligning with stocks. This tax rate gap is massive—35 percentage points difference—that could shift the entire market's capital flow. More importantly, let's talk about the ETF pipeline. Japan currently lacks crypto ETFs, but the bill’s inclusion of crypto under the financial instruments framework opens a compliant path for tracking BTC and ETH ETFs. For the global crypto market, this is another traditional finance door swinging open. The bill was pushed by the Financial Services Agency (FSA), which signaled last November that it aimed to move crypto from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. In April this year, the FSA documents clarified this point, and now with the House's approval, we’re just waiting for the Senate's nod, with an expected enactment next year, while the tax adjustment will take effect by 2028. On the technical side, BTC climbed 3.68% today, breaking above 63600, with a 4-hour RSI at 56.33, indicating a neutral to bullish zone, and the MACD histogram turning positive shows momentum is recovering. The funding rate is only 0.0027%, very mild, suggesting this rally isn’t driven by leverage. ETH mirrored the bounce with a 4.05% rise to 1679, RSI at 53.88, and the funding rate is even slightly negative, indicating shorts haven’t fully capitulated. Japan’s move has actually been in the works for quite some time. From SBI New Bank linking bank deposits to crypto gains, to the FSA continually pushing for an upgraded regulatory framework, Japan has been on a "compliance first" path. This bill isn’t breaking news but rather the culmination of several months of policy signals. I see the market impact in two layers. In the short term, the expected tax reduction will likely attract local Japanese capital back into the crypto market—currently, the 55% tax rate has indeed deterred many retail traders. In the medium term, once the ETF pathway is opened, Japan's institutional investors' allocation needs will be unleashed, similar to the logic seen after the US ETFs went live. It’s worth noting that the Japanese bill designates crypto as "financial products" rather than "securities," which is an important distinction. Securities come with stricter disclosure requirements, while the financial product framework gives crypto a positioning that sits between payment tools and securities, providing regulatory protection without excessive restrictions. This could serve as a reference template for regulatory frameworks in other regions across Asia.
The Japanese House of Representatives just passed a crypto bill that elevates digital assets from "payment tools" to "financial products." What does this mean? Cryptocurrencies in Japan will now enjoy the same treatment as stocks and bonds.

The most critical change is the tax rate. Currently, the highest crypto gains in Japan are taxed at 55%, but after the bill passes, it will drop to 20%, aligning with stocks. This tax rate gap is massive—35 percentage points difference—that could shift the entire market's capital flow.

More importantly, let's talk about the ETF pipeline. Japan currently lacks crypto ETFs, but the bill’s inclusion of crypto under the financial instruments framework opens a compliant path for tracking BTC and ETH ETFs. For the global crypto market, this is another traditional finance door swinging open.

The bill was pushed by the Financial Services Agency (FSA), which signaled last November that it aimed to move crypto from the Payment Services Act to the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. In April this year, the FSA documents clarified this point, and now with the House's approval, we’re just waiting for the Senate's nod, with an expected enactment next year, while the tax adjustment will take effect by 2028.

On the technical side, BTC climbed 3.68% today, breaking above 63600, with a 4-hour RSI at 56.33, indicating a neutral to bullish zone, and the MACD histogram turning positive shows momentum is recovering. The funding rate is only 0.0027%, very mild, suggesting this rally isn’t driven by leverage. ETH mirrored the bounce with a 4.05% rise to 1679, RSI at 53.88, and the funding rate is even slightly negative, indicating shorts haven’t fully capitulated.

Japan’s move has actually been in the works for quite some time. From SBI New Bank linking bank deposits to crypto gains, to the FSA continually pushing for an upgraded regulatory framework, Japan has been on a "compliance first" path. This bill isn’t breaking news but rather the culmination of several months of policy signals.

I see the market impact in two layers. In the short term, the expected tax reduction will likely attract local Japanese capital back into the crypto market—currently, the 55% tax rate has indeed deterred many retail traders. In the medium term, once the ETF pathway is opened, Japan's institutional investors' allocation needs will be unleashed, similar to the logic seen after the US ETFs went live.

It’s worth noting that the Japanese bill designates crypto as "financial products" rather than "securities," which is an important distinction. Securities come with stricter disclosure requirements, while the financial product framework gives crypto a positioning that sits between payment tools and securities, providing regulatory protection without excessive restrictions. This could serve as a reference template for regulatory frameworks in other regions across Asia.
·
--
Binance is launching bStocks today, officially opening up tokenized securities for trading on Binance Spot. In simple terms, this means traditional stocks are being converted into 1:1 pegged tokens, allowing for 24/7 uninterrupted trading and the ability to deploy trading bots. Over 81,000 people are watching, with 284 discussing it, so the hype is real. This isn't Binance's first foray into the tokenization of traditional assets. Alpaca's previous PFOF model has been in play, with 50% of trading revenue coming from PFOF and 65% from lending profits, resulting in a trading volume of 1.62 billion in tokenized stocks, a 29% month-over-month increase. However, bStocks is different; it’s Binance's own product, directly listed on Binance Spot, meaning users can buy and sell with USDT without needing to go through third-party platforms. From an industry perspective, traditional financial advisory firms are massively pivoting towards stablecoins and tokenization. Bitwise's Matt Hougan recently mentioned that in discussions with advisors, he found minimal interest in Bitcoin, with more focus on stablecoins and tokenized products. Franklin Templeton and BNP Paribas are also pushing for increased efficiency in tokenization within the European market. This isn’t just a move by one exchange; it’s a broader shift of traditional finance onto the blockchain. Binance’s timing for launching bStocks is quite subtle. BTC is hovering around 63,374, with the overall market warming up but not yet breaking through. BNB is at $601, with a daily RSI of 43 still in the weak zone, but the 4-hour RSI has rebounded to 53, and the MACD bars have turned positive, indicating repairing momentum. The funding rate is only 0.0047%, suggesting there’s no leverage crowding. My take: bStocks is essentially Binance positioning itself in the tokenization of traditional assets. Alpaca operates as an intermediary layer, providing PFOF market-making; bStocks is an entry-level product directly on the exchange. The two aren’t in conflict, but bStocks provides a stronger perception to users, allowing them to buy tokenized US stocks directly on Binance. In the short term, BNB's technicals appear weak but not without support. A daily RSI of 43 indicates that it's not yet in extreme oversold territory, while the 4-hour MACD turning positive is a repair signal. We’ll need to wait for the trading volume data from bStocks to truly assess the impact of this product. From RWA infrastructure to the rollout of the bStocks product, Binance is completing the chain. The remaining question is how regulation will keep pace, but at least the product is now on the table.
Binance is launching bStocks today, officially opening up tokenized securities for trading on Binance Spot.

In simple terms, this means traditional stocks are being converted into 1:1 pegged tokens, allowing for 24/7 uninterrupted trading and the ability to deploy trading bots. Over 81,000 people are watching, with 284 discussing it, so the hype is real.

This isn't Binance's first foray into the tokenization of traditional assets. Alpaca's previous PFOF model has been in play, with 50% of trading revenue coming from PFOF and 65% from lending profits, resulting in a trading volume of 1.62 billion in tokenized stocks, a 29% month-over-month increase. However, bStocks is different; it’s Binance's own product, directly listed on Binance Spot, meaning users can buy and sell with USDT without needing to go through third-party platforms.

From an industry perspective, traditional financial advisory firms are massively pivoting towards stablecoins and tokenization. Bitwise's Matt Hougan recently mentioned that in discussions with advisors, he found minimal interest in Bitcoin, with more focus on stablecoins and tokenized products. Franklin Templeton and BNP Paribas are also pushing for increased efficiency in tokenization within the European market. This isn’t just a move by one exchange; it’s a broader shift of traditional finance onto the blockchain.

Binance’s timing for launching bStocks is quite subtle. BTC is hovering around 63,374, with the overall market warming up but not yet breaking through. BNB is at $601, with a daily RSI of 43 still in the weak zone, but the 4-hour RSI has rebounded to 53, and the MACD bars have turned positive, indicating repairing momentum. The funding rate is only 0.0047%, suggesting there’s no leverage crowding.

My take: bStocks is essentially Binance positioning itself in the tokenization of traditional assets. Alpaca operates as an intermediary layer, providing PFOF market-making; bStocks is an entry-level product directly on the exchange. The two aren’t in conflict, but bStocks provides a stronger perception to users, allowing them to buy tokenized US stocks directly on Binance.

In the short term, BNB's technicals appear weak but not without support. A daily RSI of 43 indicates that it's not yet in extreme oversold territory, while the 4-hour MACD turning positive is a repair signal. We’ll need to wait for the trading volume data from bStocks to truly assess the impact of this product.

From RWA infrastructure to the rollout of the bStocks product, Binance is completing the chain. The remaining question is how regulation will keep pace, but at least the product is now on the table.
·
--
Last week, Matt Hougan from Bitwise hit up over 40 institutional advisors and came back with one key takeaway: "Talking BTC with them is like pulling teeth." This might be the clearest shift in traditional finance's attitude toward crypto in the past two years. He found that these advisors are way more interested in stablecoins and tokenization than BTC itself. It's not that they’re bearish on BTC; rather, they see it as a "finished product"—they know what it is and its value, but what really excites them are the innovations that can change how capital markets operate. On the same day, Franklin Templeton and BNP Paribas shared a joint perspective at the WAIB summit in Monaco: tokenization can enhance the settlement efficiency and collateral liquidity of European capital markets. The head of digital assets at Franklin Templeton put it bluntly, saying tokenization offers institutions "more options and flexibility," which is exactly why banks and large enterprises want to issue their own products now. The digital infrastructure scene is also ramping up. Digital Asset just raised $355 million, led by a16z, with a valuation of $2 billion. This cash will be used to expand the Canton Network, a blockchain designed specifically for financial institutions that can tokenize and settle traditional securities while safeguarding sensitive commercial data. Goldman Sachs, BNY Mellon, Standard Chartered, and Deutsche Börse have already run pilots on it. Earlier, Nasdaq got regulatory approval for a pilot on tokenized stock trading, and the New York Stock Exchange is partnering with Securitize to build on-chain trading infrastructure. JPMorgan and Bank of America are planning to launch a tokenized deposit network in the first half of 2027. Looking back at the scene: BTC has dropped nearly 30% this year, but traditional finance isn't retreating; they're switching lanes. It’s not about abandoning crypto, but shifting from "buy BTC" to "build infrastructure." BTC's daily RSI is at 32, still in the oversold zone, while the 4-hour RSI at 55 is starting to warm up. The daily MACD is still below the zero line, but the histogram is narrowing, indicating the downtrend is slowing. The funding rate is at 0.0027%, quite low but positive, showing that the bulls haven't run for the hills but aren't adding positions either. ETH's daily RSI is also at 32, oversold, with the funding rate turning negative at -0.0024%, as the bears are testing the waters. ONDO, as the leader in the RWA sector, saw a 5.3% increase today, with the 4-hour RSI at 53 leaning neutral to bullish and a trading volume of 12 million. At this level, it's better to wait for a pullback to confirm support before chasing highs. Money from traditional finance is shifting from "buying coins" to "building pathways," and this transition is more profound than any single ETF approval. In the short term, BTC is still bottoming out, but the pace of building on-chain infrastructure has never slowed down.
Last week, Matt Hougan from Bitwise hit up over 40 institutional advisors and came back with one key takeaway: "Talking BTC with them is like pulling teeth."

This might be the clearest shift in traditional finance's attitude toward crypto in the past two years.

He found that these advisors are way more interested in stablecoins and tokenization than BTC itself. It's not that they’re bearish on BTC; rather, they see it as a "finished product"—they know what it is and its value, but what really excites them are the innovations that can change how capital markets operate.

On the same day, Franklin Templeton and BNP Paribas shared a joint perspective at the WAIB summit in Monaco: tokenization can enhance the settlement efficiency and collateral liquidity of European capital markets. The head of digital assets at Franklin Templeton put it bluntly, saying tokenization offers institutions "more options and flexibility," which is exactly why banks and large enterprises want to issue their own products now.

The digital infrastructure scene is also ramping up. Digital Asset just raised $355 million, led by a16z, with a valuation of $2 billion. This cash will be used to expand the Canton Network, a blockchain designed specifically for financial institutions that can tokenize and settle traditional securities while safeguarding sensitive commercial data. Goldman Sachs, BNY Mellon, Standard Chartered, and Deutsche Börse have already run pilots on it.

Earlier, Nasdaq got regulatory approval for a pilot on tokenized stock trading, and the New York Stock Exchange is partnering with Securitize to build on-chain trading infrastructure. JPMorgan and Bank of America are planning to launch a tokenized deposit network in the first half of 2027.

Looking back at the scene: BTC has dropped nearly 30% this year, but traditional finance isn't retreating; they're switching lanes. It’s not about abandoning crypto, but shifting from "buy BTC" to "build infrastructure."

BTC's daily RSI is at 32, still in the oversold zone, while the 4-hour RSI at 55 is starting to warm up. The daily MACD is still below the zero line, but the histogram is narrowing, indicating the downtrend is slowing. The funding rate is at 0.0027%, quite low but positive, showing that the bulls haven't run for the hills but aren't adding positions either. ETH's daily RSI is also at 32, oversold, with the funding rate turning negative at -0.0024%, as the bears are testing the waters.

ONDO, as the leader in the RWA sector, saw a 5.3% increase today, with the 4-hour RSI at 53 leaning neutral to bullish and a trading volume of 12 million. At this level, it's better to wait for a pullback to confirm support before chasing highs.

Money from traditional finance is shifting from "buying coins" to "building pathways," and this transition is more profound than any single ETF approval. In the short term, BTC is still bottoming out, but the pace of building on-chain infrastructure has never slowed down.
Log in to explore more content
Join global crypto users on Binance Square
⚡️ Get latest and useful information about crypto.
💬 Trusted by the world’s largest crypto exchange.
👍 Discover real insights from verified creators.
Email / Phone number
Sitemap
Cookie Preferences
Platform T&Cs