币圈默默
80 Posts
币圈默默
专业加密货币市场分析师｜量化交易研究者 ｜技术分析纯实盘分享｜🚀手续费八折邀请码11323171｜感谢您的关注
High-Frequency Trader
8.6 Years
39 Following
200 Followers
100 Liked
Posts
All
Quotes
PINNED
Pig Butchering Scam: How to Identify and Prevent
Pig butchering scams are a common form of online fraud where scammers use a well-crafted strategy of "fattening the pig before slaughtering" to lure victims into investing large sums of money, ultimately resulting in significant losses. In recent years, such scams have frequently appeared in the investment and finance sectors, posing a serious threat to personal asset security. Understanding their tactics, recognizing their features, and mastering prevention strategies is key to protecting oneself.
1. Common Luring Tactics of Scammers
Scammers often use bait like "guaranteed profits" and "high returns" to entice victims into investing, even encouraging them to borrow money for investment or make large deposits. When victims want to withdraw funds, they block the withdrawals with various excuses (such as system maintenance, technical issues, or required fees).
Core Warning (Four Don't Principles):
Don’t be greedy: There's no such thing as a free lunch; high returns often come with high risks. Don’t rush: Stay calm when faced with investment inducements; don’t let short-term profits cloud your judgment. Don’t fall into traps: Reject investment platforms and links from unknown sources. Don’t lose rationality: Any investment decision should be based on rational judgment, not emotions or "mentor" manipulation.
2. Key to Unmasking the Scam
Fake Profit Displays: Scammers often show fake profit screenshots or data, claiming to be investment experts. Emotional Manipulation: They build trust through online friendships and gradually shift to investment topics. Platform Switching: They lure victims from legitimate exchanges to unknown scam platforms. Withdrawal Obstruction: Withdrawals are smooth when profits are made, but become impossible after losses or large investments.
3. Anti-Scam Strategies
Be Cautious in Identifying Investment Information: Beware of so-called "investment masters" and enticing information about "arbitrage" or "airdrops"; avoid transferring funds to unknown "pig butchering" platforms. All investments should be conducted through legitimate, regulated platforms. Act Quickly to Cut Losses and Preserve Evidence: If you suspect you might be scammed, stop losses immediately and don’t be swayed by the scammers’ temptation of "just invest a bit more to break even."
Pig butchering scams are a common form of online fraud where scammers use a well-crafted strategy of "fattening the pig before slaughtering" to lure victims into investing large sums of money, ultimately resulting in significant losses. In recent years, such scams have frequently appeared in the investment and finance sectors, posing a serious threat to personal asset security. Understanding their tactics, recognizing their features, and mastering prevention strategies is key to protecting oneself.
1. Common Luring Tactics of Scammers
Scammers often use bait like "guaranteed profits" and "high returns" to entice victims into investing, even encouraging them to borrow money for investment or make large deposits. When victims want to withdraw funds, they block the withdrawals with various excuses (such as system maintenance, technical issues, or required fees).
Core Warning (Four Don't Principles):
Don’t be greedy: There's no such thing as a free lunch; high returns often come with high risks. Don’t rush: Stay calm when faced with investment inducements; don’t let short-term profits cloud your judgment. Don’t fall into traps: Reject investment platforms and links from unknown sources. Don’t lose rationality: Any investment decision should be based on rational judgment, not emotions or "mentor" manipulation.
2. Key to Unmasking the Scam
Fake Profit Displays: Scammers often show fake profit screenshots or data, claiming to be investment experts. Emotional Manipulation: They build trust through online friendships and gradually shift to investment topics. Platform Switching: They lure victims from legitimate exchanges to unknown scam platforms. Withdrawal Obstruction: Withdrawals are smooth when profits are made, but become impossible after losses or large investments.
3. Anti-Scam Strategies
Be Cautious in Identifying Investment Information: Beware of so-called "investment masters" and enticing information about "arbitrage" or "airdrops"; avoid transferring funds to unknown "pig butchering" platforms. All investments should be conducted through legitimate, regulated platforms. Act Quickly to Cut Losses and Preserve Evidence: If you suspect you might be scammed, stop losses immediately and don’t be swayed by the scammers’ temptation of "just invest a bit more to break even."
$LAB
Finally figured out why my stop-loss didn’t trigger immediately, almost got liquidated!
Hey crypto buddies, recently I ran into something really frustrating (it happened a few days ago) and wanted to share it with you all, hoping it helps those facing the same issue.
Last night, to prevent a spike, I set a stop-loss order with both the trigger price and limit price set at 5.3860. I was thinking of reducing my position here to avoid getting liquidated.
This morning, I found out that although my position was reduced, it only executed at 4 AM, after the price spiked to 7.7 and then dropped back. My liquidation price was nearly under 8, and I was shocked.
Why does my stop-loss not execute when set?
I consulted customer service in the morning and learned: I set a conditional order (take profit/stop-loss order), not a regular limit order. It needs to meet the “trigger price” before the system places a limit order.
Since my trigger price and limit price were exactly the same (both 5.386), when the price hit the trigger at 2:46, the system started placing buy orders. But placing the order takes a very short time, and by then the candlestick had already moved up a bit. The rule for order execution is “less than or equal to limit price,” and since the price was already above 5.386, the placed order didn’t execute immediately. It wasn’t until the price dropped later that it satisfied the conditions for execution.
Customer service also told me this isn’t the first time this has happened; many people have encountered it. The official website states “triggered when the price is greater than or equal to the trigger price,” but that only describes the triggering conditions and doesn’t mean the price will instantly execute perfectly when it touches. Especially when the trigger price and limit price are set the same, the chances of execution are significantly lowered.
Customer service showed me the official explanation and suggested: in the future, when setting limit take profit/stop-loss orders, it’s best to keep a little distance between the trigger price and the limit price to give the system some buffer for placing and executing orders. This can greatly increase the actual execution rate. Of course, even then, it can’t guarantee 100% execution, especially during high volatility.
Finally figured out why my stop-loss didn’t trigger immediately, almost got liquidated!
Hey crypto buddies, recently I ran into something really frustrating (it happened a few days ago) and wanted to share it with you all, hoping it helps those facing the same issue.
Last night, to prevent a spike, I set a stop-loss order with both the trigger price and limit price set at 5.3860. I was thinking of reducing my position here to avoid getting liquidated.
This morning, I found out that although my position was reduced, it only executed at 4 AM, after the price spiked to 7.7 and then dropped back. My liquidation price was nearly under 8, and I was shocked.
Why does my stop-loss not execute when set?
I consulted customer service in the morning and learned: I set a conditional order (take profit/stop-loss order), not a regular limit order. It needs to meet the “trigger price” before the system places a limit order.
Since my trigger price and limit price were exactly the same (both 5.386), when the price hit the trigger at 2:46, the system started placing buy orders. But placing the order takes a very short time, and by then the candlestick had already moved up a bit. The rule for order execution is “less than or equal to limit price,” and since the price was already above 5.386, the placed order didn’t execute immediately. It wasn’t until the price dropped later that it satisfied the conditions for execution.
Customer service also told me this isn’t the first time this has happened; many people have encountered it. The official website states “triggered when the price is greater than or equal to the trigger price,” but that only describes the triggering conditions and doesn’t mean the price will instantly execute perfectly when it touches. Especially when the trigger price and limit price are set the same, the chances of execution are significantly lowered.
Customer service showed me the official explanation and suggested: in the future, when setting limit take profit/stop-loss orders, it’s best to keep a little distance between the trigger price and the limit price to give the system some buffer for placing and executing orders. This can greatly increase the actual execution rate. Of course, even then, it can’t guarantee 100% execution, especially during high volatility.
$ONDO The daily chart is approaching the resistance zone between 0.5000 and 0.5200, where sellers might try to cap the upward movement. This area is critical as it represents the ceiling that could determine whether ONDO continues its bullish trend or pauses for consolidation.
Currently, buyers are in control, and momentum is pushing ONDO towards the resistance band.
Consider taking a light short position ahead of time.
Currently, buyers are in control, and momentum is pushing ONDO towards the resistance band.
Consider taking a light short position ahead of time.
Just wanna ask the big guys, why did my stop-loss hit the point but I didn't take a loss? Is this how it goes for everyone?
I don't know why I set a stop-loss price, but there are no losses!
It's tough to hold onto a high long position like $TAG ; the top rankings have been bouncing around these past couple of days. Gotta move the stop-loss to secure profits.
You can consider adding to your short position around $ZKJ 0.29. This recent pump is mainly driven by spot trading activity on Bybit, creating a strong FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) among retail traders. The current turnover rate is super high, with a lot of chips scattered around, and there's no solid fundamental support. There's a strong resistance level at 0.03, and if the trading volume drops, we could see a quick pullback.
Strategy is stacking more Bitcoin again.
Michael Saylor, as usual, dropped that orange dot on X, and the market is interpreting it as a 'bullish signal.' But this time, what I see isn’t confidence; it's a giant stuck in a flywheel, trying to keep it spinning at increasingly higher costs.
1. The Truth Behind the Accumulation
Let’s look at the data:
Strategy currently holds about 650,000 BTC, which is 3.1% of the total BTC supply, with an average acquisition price of around $67,458. Year-to-date, BTC has returned 16.9%.
On the surface, Saylor’s 'diamond hands' strategy has indeed made money. But the question is: how does he maintain this accumulation pace?
The answer is: issuing debt, preferred stock, and perpetual preferred stock.
2. Financing Costs Are Eating Up the Flywheel
Alex Xu from Mint Ventures recently revealed a key piece of data:
The financing rate for Strategy’s perpetual preferred stock (STRC) has skyrocketed to 11.5%, and it’s about to switch from monthly to bi-weekly interest payments.
What does this mean?
The annual burden of preferred stock dividends is estimated to reach $750 million to $800 million.
The company’s traditional software business generates about $100 million in quarterly revenue, which is far from enough to cover the dividends.
This doesn’t even include the interest on convertible bonds.
3. What This Means for BTC?
Strategy is the largest publicly traded holder and net buyer of BTC, and its fate is deeply tied to BTC’s performance.
Good news:
Saylor is holding firm and not selling any coins; currently, the financial situation is far from a meltdown.
With $1.4 billion in reserves, they can last at least 12 months.
Bad news:
Rising financing costs will inevitably slow down the buying pace.
Once the mNAV stays below 1 for too long, the flywheel will officially fail.
As the largest buyer of BTC, a slowdown in their buying pace itself creates marginal selling pressure.
#SaylorStrategy #Strategy增持比特币
Michael Saylor, as usual, dropped that orange dot on X, and the market is interpreting it as a 'bullish signal.' But this time, what I see isn’t confidence; it's a giant stuck in a flywheel, trying to keep it spinning at increasingly higher costs.
1. The Truth Behind the Accumulation
Let’s look at the data:
Strategy currently holds about 650,000 BTC, which is 3.1% of the total BTC supply, with an average acquisition price of around $67,458. Year-to-date, BTC has returned 16.9%.
On the surface, Saylor’s 'diamond hands' strategy has indeed made money. But the question is: how does he maintain this accumulation pace?
The answer is: issuing debt, preferred stock, and perpetual preferred stock.
2. Financing Costs Are Eating Up the Flywheel
Alex Xu from Mint Ventures recently revealed a key piece of data:
The financing rate for Strategy’s perpetual preferred stock (STRC) has skyrocketed to 11.5%, and it’s about to switch from monthly to bi-weekly interest payments.
What does this mean?
The annual burden of preferred stock dividends is estimated to reach $750 million to $800 million.
The company’s traditional software business generates about $100 million in quarterly revenue, which is far from enough to cover the dividends.
This doesn’t even include the interest on convertible bonds.
3. What This Means for BTC?
Strategy is the largest publicly traded holder and net buyer of BTC, and its fate is deeply tied to BTC’s performance.
Good news:
Saylor is holding firm and not selling any coins; currently, the financial situation is far from a meltdown.
With $1.4 billion in reserves, they can last at least 12 months.
Bad news:
Rising financing costs will inevitably slow down the buying pace.
Once the mNAV stays below 1 for too long, the flywheel will officially fail.
As the largest buyer of BTC, a slowdown in their buying pace itself creates marginal selling pressure.
#SaylorStrategy #Strategy增持比特币
Mint Ventures research partner Alex Xu publicly stated something: he reduced his BTC position from full to 30%.
This isn't an emotional move; it's a conclusion drawn from a fundamental check-up. He listed six reasons:
Insufficient driving energy: The narrative from geek experiments to institutional allocations has played out, and the next wave needs to hit sovereign balance sheets, which is too challenging.
Increased opportunity cost: Found quite a few solid companies with attractive prices.
Overall industry slump: Most Web3 models have been disproven, and DeFi is also shrinking.
Rising financing costs for strategies: Perpetual preferred stock rates have reached 11.5%, with interest payments every two weeks.
Gold closing the gap: Tokenized gold is indistinguishable from BTC in terms of divisibility and portability.
Security budget issues: Post-halving fee source exploration has basically failed.
This isn't bearish on BTC; it's a reevaluation.
He mentioned that BTC remains one of his larger holdings, but it requires continuous monitoring of fundamental changes. If the reasons for negativity loosen or new factors arise, he will buy back in.
This isn't an emotional move; it's a conclusion drawn from a fundamental check-up. He listed six reasons:
Insufficient driving energy: The narrative from geek experiments to institutional allocations has played out, and the next wave needs to hit sovereign balance sheets, which is too challenging.
Increased opportunity cost: Found quite a few solid companies with attractive prices.
Overall industry slump: Most Web3 models have been disproven, and DeFi is also shrinking.
Rising financing costs for strategies: Perpetual preferred stock rates have reached 11.5%, with interest payments every two weeks.
Gold closing the gap: Tokenized gold is indistinguishable from BTC in terms of divisibility and portability.
Security budget issues: Post-halving fee source exploration has basically failed.
This isn't bearish on BTC; it's a reevaluation.
He mentioned that BTC remains one of his larger holdings, but it requires continuous monitoring of fundamental changes. If the reasons for negativity loosen or new factors arise, he will buy back in.
Open positions at $AKE are rising, CVD is strong, volume ratio = 1.92x
Let's check out how the coins picked by my AI are performing.
Let's check out how the coins picked by my AI are performing.
$BTC High position pullback risk increases, can $AAVE reverse in adversity?
BTC long/short ratio drops to 0.52, bears dominate; ETH/SOL/BNB bulls are in charge, AAVE shows resilience in the eye of the storm.
1. BTC: 66% bears on the scene, $78k becomes a key resistance level.
As of now, BTC long/short ratio is 0.52, with bulls only occupying 34%, clearly dominated by bearish forces. Recently, Bitcoin faced resistance and pulled back near $78k, and the CME gap ($80k-$84k) remains unfilled, creating a strong wait-and-see sentiment in the market.
Recommendation: Be cautious about chasing longs in the short term, with support levels to watch in the $72k-$74k range.
2. ETH: Bulls hold 54%, looking to break above $2,000.
ETH long/short ratio is 1.18, with bulls slightly in the lead. Recently, Ethereum's Meme season is back, and ecosystem heat is rising; if it can hold above $2,000, it is expected to restart an upward trend. Support at $1,850 and resistance at $2,100.
3. AAVE: The contrarian in the storm.
AAVE suffered a $10 billion run due to the rsETH vulnerability incident, yet the long/short ratio remains at 1.13 (with bulls at 53%), indicating some market confidence in its long-term value. Recommendation: Aggressive traders might consider a light long position at support, with a stop-loss set 5% below recent lows.
4. Recommended tokens:
BNB - Long/short ratio 1.92, bulls dominate, Binance ecosystem continues to thrive.
SOL - Long/short ratio 1.64, boosted by Meme season excitement, ecosystem flourishing.
AAVE - Under pressure in the short term but fundamentals remain, suitable for gradual accumulation.
BTC long/short ratio drops to 0.52, bears dominate; ETH/SOL/BNB bulls are in charge, AAVE shows resilience in the eye of the storm.
1. BTC: 66% bears on the scene, $78k becomes a key resistance level.
As of now, BTC long/short ratio is 0.52, with bulls only occupying 34%, clearly dominated by bearish forces. Recently, Bitcoin faced resistance and pulled back near $78k, and the CME gap ($80k-$84k) remains unfilled, creating a strong wait-and-see sentiment in the market.
Recommendation: Be cautious about chasing longs in the short term, with support levels to watch in the $72k-$74k range.
2. ETH: Bulls hold 54%, looking to break above $2,000.
ETH long/short ratio is 1.18, with bulls slightly in the lead. Recently, Ethereum's Meme season is back, and ecosystem heat is rising; if it can hold above $2,000, it is expected to restart an upward trend. Support at $1,850 and resistance at $2,100.
3. AAVE: The contrarian in the storm.
AAVE suffered a $10 billion run due to the rsETH vulnerability incident, yet the long/short ratio remains at 1.13 (with bulls at 53%), indicating some market confidence in its long-term value. Recommendation: Aggressive traders might consider a light long position at support, with a stop-loss set 5% below recent lows.
4. Recommended tokens:
BNB - Long/short ratio 1.92, bulls dominate, Binance ecosystem continues to thrive.
SOL - Long/short ratio 1.64, boosted by Meme season excitement, ecosystem flourishing.
AAVE - Under pressure in the short term but fundamentals remain, suitable for gradual accumulation.
#今日市场观点
Bitcoin has been hovering around 75000 today, looks like we're mainly in a consolidation phase. Last night, BlackRock kept buying, and the inflows over 8 days have broken a 3-month record, which is a positive signal. However, negotiations in Iran have taken a turn, oil prices are rebounding, and Bitcoin is feeling the pressure, so we should expect range-bound trading in the short term.
Keep an eye on a few points:
Tonight's US stock market opening
Whether BlackRock's ETF inflows can continue
The Iran ceasefire agreement expires on April 22, which is a key time window
Altcoins have been showing some movement these past two days, but the divergence is quite severe. The directions I mentioned earlier: Binance-related, CZ-related, and low market cap coins with high control, are still the mainstream. Remember to set stop losses; in this kind of market, things can change rapidly.
Trading suggestions:
Short-term: Bitcoin is oscillating in the 73000-76000 range, focus on selling high and buying low. Altcoins: Look for strong performers, but definitely don't chase highs, set stop losses. Mid-term: Buy Bitcoin on dips; there shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Bitcoin has been hovering around 75000 today, looks like we're mainly in a consolidation phase. Last night, BlackRock kept buying, and the inflows over 8 days have broken a 3-month record, which is a positive signal. However, negotiations in Iran have taken a turn, oil prices are rebounding, and Bitcoin is feeling the pressure, so we should expect range-bound trading in the short term.
Keep an eye on a few points:
Tonight's US stock market opening
Whether BlackRock's ETF inflows can continue
The Iran ceasefire agreement expires on April 22, which is a key time window
Altcoins have been showing some movement these past two days, but the divergence is quite severe. The directions I mentioned earlier: Binance-related, CZ-related, and low market cap coins with high control, are still the mainstream. Remember to set stop losses; in this kind of market, things can change rapidly.
Trading suggestions:
Short-term: Bitcoin is oscillating in the 73000-76000 range, focus on selling high and buying low. Altcoins: Look for strong performers, but definitely don't chase highs, set stop losses. Mid-term: Buy Bitcoin on dips; there shouldn't be too much of a problem.
A certain exchange company is testing two AI agents developed by former executives:
Fred: Based on co-founder Fred Ehrsam, specializing in document optimization and strategic planning.
Balaji: Based on former CTO Balaji Srinivasan, dedicated to providing innovative ideas.
These AI agents will be integrated into the company's internal communication system, allowing employees to consult and discuss with them at any time, just like talking to real executives.
Previously, they launched the Agentic Wallet, enabling AI to autonomously execute on-chain transactions;
at the same time, they are promoting the x402 protocol to build a payment infrastructure dedicated to AI.
This attempt by XXbase may trigger imitation across the entire crypto industry.
Tokens focused on AI themes:
$LINK $TAO $NEAR
Fred: Based on co-founder Fred Ehrsam, specializing in document optimization and strategic planning.
Balaji: Based on former CTO Balaji Srinivasan, dedicated to providing innovative ideas.
These AI agents will be integrated into the company's internal communication system, allowing employees to consult and discuss with them at any time, just like talking to real executives.
Previously, they launched the Agentic Wallet, enabling AI to autonomously execute on-chain transactions;
at the same time, they are promoting the x402 protocol to build a payment infrastructure dedicated to AI.
This attempt by XXbase may trigger imitation across the entire crypto industry.
Tokens focused on AI themes:
$LINK $TAO $NEAR
#交易记录 300U Game Challenge Day 1: 310U->460U->170U
Based on the changes in positions, I made two trades, $BR and $OG , both at about 25% position, 10x leverage, and they were all executed as limit orders, with good entry points.
The main loss was on $HEMI , and I realized something was wrong, so I manually stopped the loss.
Currently it's a halving, should I switch to a challenge to zero? The smaller the capital, the more cautious one must be, I can't go all in, and I need to strictly adhere to drawdowns and stop losses; it's all about practicing my mindset.
Based on the changes in positions, I made two trades, $BR and $OG , both at about 25% position, 10x leverage, and they were all executed as limit orders, with good entry points.
The main loss was on $HEMI , and I realized something was wrong, so I manually stopped the loss.
Currently it's a halving, should I switch to a challenge to zero? The smaller the capital, the more cautious one must be, I can't go all in, and I need to strictly adhere to drawdowns and stop losses; it's all about practicing my mindset.
I was blown up twice in three days by $RAVE , leaving only over 300 U. Let's play a game, I will also challenge 300 U to 3 WU, let's see how many days I can play.
Log in to explore more content