Flávio_22 BR
140 Posts
Flávio_22 BR
Notícias, memes, assuntos atuais e relevantes do mercado cripto e internacional.
0 Following
262 Followers
1.9K+ Liked
Posts
All
Quotes
Videos
THEY INVEST BILLIONS AND TODAY SUFFER BILLIONAIRE LOSSES 📉😵
In a world where AI is becoming more and more widespread, companies like Strategy and Bitmine are accumulating billions in unrealized losses and raising doubts in the market and among investors. How far will this loss go?
In this current crypto-assets downturn, their positions in Bitcoin and Etherium have stalled, awaiting further declines expected over the next few weeks.
In this latest drop to $59 thousand for Bitcoin and $1,550 thousand for Etherium, the updates to their most recently disclosed positions are:
Strategy (MSTR): about 845,256 BTC, with an approximate average cost of US$ 75.680 per BTC.
BitMine (BMNR): about 5,543,872 ETH, with an approximate average cost of US$ 3.446 per ETH.
The unrealized losses would be approximately:
Strategy (MSTR)
Average cost: US$ 75.680
Current price: US$ 59.000
Loss per BTC: US$ 16.680
Estimated total loss:
US$ 14.1 billion
BitMine (BMNR)
Average cost: US$ 3.446
Current price: US$ 1.550
Loss per ETH: US$ 1.896
Estimated total loss:
US$ 10.5 billion
Summary
Company / asset
Unrealized loss:
Strategy (MSTR)
Bitcoin
• US$ 14.1 billion
BitMine (BMNR)
Ethereum
• US$ 10.5 billion
In a world where AI is becoming more and more widespread, companies like Strategy and Bitmine are accumulating billions in unrealized losses and raising doubts in the market and among investors. How far will this loss go?
In this current crypto-assets downturn, their positions in Bitcoin and Etherium have stalled, awaiting further declines expected over the next few weeks.
In this latest drop to $59 thousand for Bitcoin and $1,550 thousand for Etherium, the updates to their most recently disclosed positions are:
Strategy (MSTR): about 845,256 BTC, with an approximate average cost of US$ 75.680 per BTC.
BitMine (BMNR): about 5,543,872 ETH, with an approximate average cost of US$ 3.446 per ETH.
The unrealized losses would be approximately:
Strategy (MSTR)
Average cost: US$ 75.680
Current price: US$ 59.000
Loss per BTC: US$ 16.680
Estimated total loss:
US$ 14.1 billion
BitMine (BMNR)
Average cost: US$ 3.446
Current price: US$ 1.550
Loss per ETH: US$ 1.896
Estimated total loss:
US$ 10.5 billion
Summary
Company / asset
Unrealized loss:
Strategy (MSTR)
Bitcoin
• US$ 14.1 billion
BitMine (BMNR)
Ethereum
• US$ 10.5 billion
GAME OVER: VINI JR MAKES THE DIFFERENCE AGAIN AND BRAZIL BEATS SCOTLAND 3-0 🇧🇷⚽🚀🚀
🇧🇷 FIRST HALF
Brazil started the match by pressing the Scottish ball exit and was rewarded early on.
7 minutes: Rayan pressured defender Scott McKenna, regained possession near the box, and set up Vinícius Júnior, who dribbled past keeper Angus Gunn and opened the scoring for Brazil: 1-0.
Scotland maintained more ball possession at times but struggled to create real opportunities against the Brazilian defense.
At 21 minutes, Vinícius Júnior scored again after stealing the ball from the Scottish defense, but VAR reviewed the play and the goal was disallowed for a foul in the buildup. The decision sparked quite a debate.
Brazil remained more dangerous on the counterattacks and, in stoppage time at 47 minutes, Bruno Guimarães crossed from the right and Vinícius Júnior appeared unmarked to head it in, extending the lead to 2-0.
First Half Summary
Brazil was efficient and aggressive in pressing.
Vinícius Júnior was the standout player.
Scotland had more possession at certain moments but created little danger.
Halftime score: Scotland 0 x 2 Brazil.
🇧🇷 SECOND HALF
In the final stage, Scotland tried to push their lines up to seek a comeback.
The Scots began to attack more, but ran into a well-organized Brazilian defense.
Brazil took advantage of the spaces left by the opponent and continued to pose a threat on counterattacks.
At 14 minutes into the second half, Matheus Cunha scored Brazil's third goal, practically sealing the match.
After the third goal, the national team controlled the pace of the game, managing the lead without facing significant threats.
Scotland tried to press until the end but couldn't break through the Brazilian defense.
🇧🇷 FIRST HALF
Brazil started the match by pressing the Scottish ball exit and was rewarded early on.
7 minutes: Rayan pressured defender Scott McKenna, regained possession near the box, and set up Vinícius Júnior, who dribbled past keeper Angus Gunn and opened the scoring for Brazil: 1-0.
Scotland maintained more ball possession at times but struggled to create real opportunities against the Brazilian defense.
At 21 minutes, Vinícius Júnior scored again after stealing the ball from the Scottish defense, but VAR reviewed the play and the goal was disallowed for a foul in the buildup. The decision sparked quite a debate.
Brazil remained more dangerous on the counterattacks and, in stoppage time at 47 minutes, Bruno Guimarães crossed from the right and Vinícius Júnior appeared unmarked to head it in, extending the lead to 2-0.
First Half Summary
Brazil was efficient and aggressive in pressing.
Vinícius Júnior was the standout player.
Scotland had more possession at certain moments but created little danger.
Halftime score: Scotland 0 x 2 Brazil.
🇧🇷 SECOND HALF
In the final stage, Scotland tried to push their lines up to seek a comeback.
The Scots began to attack more, but ran into a well-organized Brazilian defense.
Brazil took advantage of the spaces left by the opponent and continued to pose a threat on counterattacks.
At 14 minutes into the second half, Matheus Cunha scored Brazil's third goal, practically sealing the match.
After the third goal, the national team controlled the pace of the game, managing the lead without facing significant threats.
Scotland tried to press until the end but couldn't break through the Brazilian defense.
Partly True
NOBODY CARES ABOUT THE BRAZILIAN NATIONAL TEAM, NOBODY CARES ABOUT BRAZIL!
In a country where over 50 million people rely on some form of government aid, where interest rates are the highest in the world, surpassing even war-torn nations like Russia and Ukraine, and where our debt-to-GDP ratio sits at 80% with projections to exceed 100% by 2027, in a country where just in 2025, 5,680 companies entered restructuring processes (bankruptcy or filed for recovery in the period) the most significant since 2016, a country where politics seduces the naive with promises of a prosperous and dignified future but in the end, we work to pay taxes and live off crumbs from the government, anyway... Throw up an L and pay to see!
In a country where over 50 million people rely on some form of government aid, where interest rates are the highest in the world, surpassing even war-torn nations like Russia and Ukraine, and where our debt-to-GDP ratio sits at 80% with projections to exceed 100% by 2027, in a country where just in 2025, 5,680 companies entered restructuring processes (bankruptcy or filed for recovery in the period) the most significant since 2016, a country where politics seduces the naive with promises of a prosperous and dignified future but in the end, we work to pay taxes and live off crumbs from the government, anyway... Throw up an L and pay to see!
GAME OVER: VINI JUNIOR SCORES A STUNNER, MATCH ENDS 1-1 ⚽🇧🇷🇲🇦
The match between Brazil and Morocco ended in a 1-1 draw during the debut of both teams in Group C of the 2026 World Cup. Vinícius Júnior netted Brazil's goal in the 32nd minute of the first half, after Morocco took the lead with Saibari.
FIRST HALF
Morocco started strong, pressuring Brazil's ball exit and effectively controlling the midfield.
In the 21st minute, Brahim Díaz found Saibari with a deep pass, and the Moroccan forward made it 1-0.
Brazil struggled in the first 30 minutes, showing little offensive creativity.
At the 32-minute mark, Vinícius Júnior made a solo run down the left and fired off a beautiful shot to equalize at 1-1.
In the final minutes of the first half, Lucas Paquetá nearly turned the score around for the Seleção.
SECOND HALF
Brazil came back more aggressive and had greater ball possession.
Morocco remained dangerous on counterattacks, especially with Hakimi and Brahim Díaz.
Both teams created chances, but goalkeepers Alisson and Bono made solid saves.
The draw was deemed fair given the balance shown throughout the match.
GROUP C STANDINGS
After the first round:
Brazil: 1 point
Morocco: 1 point
Haiti and Scotland are yet to complete the group round.
BRAZIL'S NEXT MATCHES
🇧🇷 Brazil vs Haiti — June 19, 2026
🇧🇷 Scotland vs Brazil — June 24, 2026
Morocco's upcoming matches
🇲🇦 Scotland vs Morocco — June 19, 2026
🇲🇦 Morocco vs Haiti — June 24, 2026
The clashes on June 19 will be crucial for Group C qualification, as a win could bring either Brazil or Morocco very close to the knockout stage.
The match between Brazil and Morocco ended in a 1-1 draw during the debut of both teams in Group C of the 2026 World Cup. Vinícius Júnior netted Brazil's goal in the 32nd minute of the first half, after Morocco took the lead with Saibari.
FIRST HALF
Morocco started strong, pressuring Brazil's ball exit and effectively controlling the midfield.
In the 21st minute, Brahim Díaz found Saibari with a deep pass, and the Moroccan forward made it 1-0.
Brazil struggled in the first 30 minutes, showing little offensive creativity.
At the 32-minute mark, Vinícius Júnior made a solo run down the left and fired off a beautiful shot to equalize at 1-1.
In the final minutes of the first half, Lucas Paquetá nearly turned the score around for the Seleção.
SECOND HALF
Brazil came back more aggressive and had greater ball possession.
Morocco remained dangerous on counterattacks, especially with Hakimi and Brahim Díaz.
Both teams created chances, but goalkeepers Alisson and Bono made solid saves.
The draw was deemed fair given the balance shown throughout the match.
GROUP C STANDINGS
After the first round:
Brazil: 1 point
Morocco: 1 point
Haiti and Scotland are yet to complete the group round.
BRAZIL'S NEXT MATCHES
🇧🇷 Brazil vs Haiti — June 19, 2026
🇧🇷 Scotland vs Brazil — June 24, 2026
Morocco's upcoming matches
🇲🇦 Scotland vs Morocco — June 19, 2026
🇲🇦 Morocco vs Haiti — June 24, 2026
The clashes on June 19 will be crucial for Group C qualification, as a win could bring either Brazil or Morocco very close to the knockout stage.
Verified
CHECK OUT THE LOSSES THESE LEACHES ARE CAUSING BRAZIL EVERY MONTH. YOUR TAX MONEY BEING BURNED AWAY SUCCESSFULLY! 💸💸
By 2026, Bolsa Família is set to support around 18.7 to 18.9 million families in Brazil. The projected annual budget for the program is about R$ 158.6 billion.
Dividing this figure by the 12 months of the year:
Thus, Bolsa Família consumes roughly R$ 13.2 billion per month from public funds.
THIS EQUIVALENT TO APPROXIMATELY:
• R$ 440 million per day
• R$ 18 million per hour
Average value close to R$ 698 per benefiting family, considering extras for children, pregnant women, and teenagers.
For comparison, the annual expenditure of R$ 158.6 billion represents something around 1.2% to 1.3% of Brazil's GDP, depending on the final GDP value in 2026.
NOW SEE HOW OUR MONEY COULD BE USED IF IT WEREN'T FOR THE AUX. V.A.G.A.*.U.N.D.O:
Approximate unit cost
Quantity with R$ 13.2 billion
• Large hospital (250 to 300 beds)
R$ 400 million = 33 hospitals
• Medium-sized hospital (100 to 150 beds)
R$ 150 million = 88 hospitals
• Public elementary school
R$ 15 million = 880 schools
• Modern municipal daycare
R$ 5 million = 2,640 daycares
• Basic SAMU ambulance
R$ 350 thousand = 37,700 ambulances
• Mobile ICU ambulance
R$ 600 thousand = 22,000 ambulances
• Equipped police SUV/pick-up
R$ 250 thousand = 52,800 vehicles
• Rural school bus
R$ 500 thousand = 26,400 buses
• 1 MW solar energy system
R$ 4 million = 3,300 1 MW solar plants
To give an idea of the scale of the value:
R$ 13.2 billion in a single month is roughly equivalent to the construction cost of nearly 900 public schools or more than 30 large hospitals.
In a year, the approximately R$ 158.6 billion from Bolsa Família would correspond to:
around 396 large hospitals or
more than 10,000 public schools or
more than 630,000 police vehicles.
By 2026, Bolsa Família is set to support around 18.7 to 18.9 million families in Brazil. The projected annual budget for the program is about R$ 158.6 billion.
Dividing this figure by the 12 months of the year:
Thus, Bolsa Família consumes roughly R$ 13.2 billion per month from public funds.
THIS EQUIVALENT TO APPROXIMATELY:
• R$ 440 million per day
• R$ 18 million per hour
Average value close to R$ 698 per benefiting family, considering extras for children, pregnant women, and teenagers.
For comparison, the annual expenditure of R$ 158.6 billion represents something around 1.2% to 1.3% of Brazil's GDP, depending on the final GDP value in 2026.
NOW SEE HOW OUR MONEY COULD BE USED IF IT WEREN'T FOR THE AUX. V.A.G.A.*.U.N.D.O:
Approximate unit cost
Quantity with R$ 13.2 billion
• Large hospital (250 to 300 beds)
R$ 400 million = 33 hospitals
• Medium-sized hospital (100 to 150 beds)
R$ 150 million = 88 hospitals
• Public elementary school
R$ 15 million = 880 schools
• Modern municipal daycare
R$ 5 million = 2,640 daycares
• Basic SAMU ambulance
R$ 350 thousand = 37,700 ambulances
• Mobile ICU ambulance
R$ 600 thousand = 22,000 ambulances
• Equipped police SUV/pick-up
R$ 250 thousand = 52,800 vehicles
• Rural school bus
R$ 500 thousand = 26,400 buses
• 1 MW solar energy system
R$ 4 million = 3,300 1 MW solar plants
To give an idea of the scale of the value:
R$ 13.2 billion in a single month is roughly equivalent to the construction cost of nearly 900 public schools or more than 30 large hospitals.
In a year, the approximately R$ 158.6 billion from Bolsa Família would correspond to:
around 396 large hospitals or
more than 10,000 public schools or
more than 630,000 police vehicles.
Verified
MICHAEL SAYLOR IN PANIC! BITCOIN DROP CAUSES BILLION-DOLLAR LOSS FOR THE WORLD'S LARGEST CRYPTO TREASURY📉🚨
The recent drop of Bitcoin below US$ 60.000 has put Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) in a tight spot. The company holds about 843,706 BTC and has an average acquisition cost around US$ 75.700 per bitcoin.
CURRENT SITUATION OF STRATEGY 💰
• Bitcoins held: around 843,706 BTC.
• Average cost: approximately US$ 75.700 per BTC.
• Market value of BTC: below US$ 60.000.
UNREALIZED LOSS 📉
If we use a price of US$ 59.000 per BTC, the difference from the average cost is around US$ 16.700 per coin.
Multiplying by the total position:
843,706 BTC × US$ 16.700 ≈ US$ 14.1 billion in unrealized losses.
This figure is an estimate based on Bitcoin's current price and may fluctuate with the market rate. Specialized market sources are already indicating unrealized losses in the range of US$ 13.5 billion to US$ 14 billion for Strategy.
IS MICHAEL SAYLOR AT RISK? 🤔
Despite the accounting loss, the company is not in a critical situation:
Most of Strategy's debts do not have margin calls tied to Bitcoin's price.
The company still has a Bitcoin portfolio exceeding the total value of its financial obligations.
However, the longer Bitcoin stays below the average cost, the more pressure there will be on MSTR shares and on the company's ability to raise new funds.
In summary, with Bitcoin below US$ 60 thousand, Strategy is accumulating approximately US$ 14 billion in unrealized losses, but is not in immediate danger of insolvency. The key point for the market is whether Bitcoin can climb back above the US$ 75 thousand mark, which corresponds roughly to the company's average cost.
The recent drop of Bitcoin below US$ 60.000 has put Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) in a tight spot. The company holds about 843,706 BTC and has an average acquisition cost around US$ 75.700 per bitcoin.
CURRENT SITUATION OF STRATEGY 💰
• Bitcoins held: around 843,706 BTC.
• Average cost: approximately US$ 75.700 per BTC.
• Market value of BTC: below US$ 60.000.
UNREALIZED LOSS 📉
If we use a price of US$ 59.000 per BTC, the difference from the average cost is around US$ 16.700 per coin.
Multiplying by the total position:
843,706 BTC × US$ 16.700 ≈ US$ 14.1 billion in unrealized losses.
This figure is an estimate based on Bitcoin's current price and may fluctuate with the market rate. Specialized market sources are already indicating unrealized losses in the range of US$ 13.5 billion to US$ 14 billion for Strategy.
IS MICHAEL SAYLOR AT RISK? 🤔
Despite the accounting loss, the company is not in a critical situation:
Most of Strategy's debts do not have margin calls tied to Bitcoin's price.
The company still has a Bitcoin portfolio exceeding the total value of its financial obligations.
However, the longer Bitcoin stays below the average cost, the more pressure there will be on MSTR shares and on the company's ability to raise new funds.
In summary, with Bitcoin below US$ 60 thousand, Strategy is accumulating approximately US$ 14 billion in unrealized losses, but is not in immediate danger of insolvency. The key point for the market is whether Bitcoin can climb back above the US$ 75 thousand mark, which corresponds roughly to the company's average cost.
Verified
Verified
BLACKROCK MAKES BILLION-DOLLAR BITCOIN SALE, THEY KNOW SOMETHING FEW DO 👁️
The latest move that caught attention was an outflow of approximately US$ 1.01 billion in Bitcoin from BlackRock's ETF IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust) over several days. This sparked rumors that BlackRock was 'dumping' Bitcoin, but the data suggests otherwise.
The key point: it wasn't BlackRock choosing to sell Bitcoin. The movement occurred because investors in the ETF pulled money from the fund, and the ETF mechanism requires the corresponding BTC to be sold to honor these redemptions.
Main reasons noted:
Redemptions from institutional investors in the IBIT ETF.
Negative flow in Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S., with billion-dollar outflows across multiple funds simultaneously.
Macroeconomic environment becoming more unstable, reducing exposure to risk assets.
The sale was operationally executed via Coinbase Prime to adjust the ETF to the withdrawals.
Regarding BlackRock's current Bitcoin portfolio:
The IBIT ETF remains massive. Recent data shows approximately 817,000 BTC under management, valued at around US$ 64 billion, representing nearly 3.9% of the total max Bitcoin supply.
Moreover, the ETF itself continues to be one of the largest institutional vehicles in the Bitcoin market.
One detail that creates confusion: BlackRock does not own these bitcoins economically; they manage client assets. In market discussions, many investors remember that the IBIT acts as a 'wrapper' for exposure to BTC, and the inflows and outflows from clients dictate buying and selling.
For long-term investors, the read changes significantly: ETF outflows don’t always mean institutions have lost confidence; sometimes it’s just capital rotation or profit-taking.
The latest move that caught attention was an outflow of approximately US$ 1.01 billion in Bitcoin from BlackRock's ETF IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust) over several days. This sparked rumors that BlackRock was 'dumping' Bitcoin, but the data suggests otherwise.
The key point: it wasn't BlackRock choosing to sell Bitcoin. The movement occurred because investors in the ETF pulled money from the fund, and the ETF mechanism requires the corresponding BTC to be sold to honor these redemptions.
Main reasons noted:
Redemptions from institutional investors in the IBIT ETF.
Negative flow in Bitcoin ETFs in the U.S., with billion-dollar outflows across multiple funds simultaneously.
Macroeconomic environment becoming more unstable, reducing exposure to risk assets.
The sale was operationally executed via Coinbase Prime to adjust the ETF to the withdrawals.
Regarding BlackRock's current Bitcoin portfolio:
The IBIT ETF remains massive. Recent data shows approximately 817,000 BTC under management, valued at around US$ 64 billion, representing nearly 3.9% of the total max Bitcoin supply.
Moreover, the ETF itself continues to be one of the largest institutional vehicles in the Bitcoin market.
One detail that creates confusion: BlackRock does not own these bitcoins economically; they manage client assets. In market discussions, many investors remember that the IBIT acts as a 'wrapper' for exposure to BTC, and the inflows and outflows from clients dictate buying and selling.
For long-term investors, the read changes significantly: ETF outflows don’t always mean institutions have lost confidence; sometimes it’s just capital rotation or profit-taking.
Verified
URGENT NEWS: ALEXANDRE DE MORAIS NOTIFIED BY US JUSTICE, STF MONITORS THE CASE.
The presidency of the STF (Supreme Federal Court) is keeping an eye on the notification of Minister Alexandre de Moraes to respond to a lawsuit filed against him in the United States by the Rumble platform and the Trump Media & Technology Group, a company linked to American President Donald Trump.
The Blog has learned that legal mechanisms are being examined to preserve the autonomy and prerogatives of the STF and the Brazilian Judiciary.
The Court maintains ongoing dialogue with the AGU (Attorney General's Office) and MJ (Ministry of Justice), which is the central Brazilian authority on international legal cooperation within the framework of the mutual legal assistance agreement between Brazil and the United States.
In practice, these institutions are working in a coordinated manner to evaluate the necessary measures and the legal and diplomatic instruments that may apply to the case.
According to the document sent to Moraes, he has 21 days to respond to the initial petition filed in a Florida court. If he fails to respond, the minister may face the proceedings in default.
The email notification was authorized after the US Justice attempted for months to carry out the procedure through the Hague Convention, which deals with the processing of official documents between countries.
The presidency of the STF (Supreme Federal Court) is keeping an eye on the notification of Minister Alexandre de Moraes to respond to a lawsuit filed against him in the United States by the Rumble platform and the Trump Media & Technology Group, a company linked to American President Donald Trump.
The Blog has learned that legal mechanisms are being examined to preserve the autonomy and prerogatives of the STF and the Brazilian Judiciary.
The Court maintains ongoing dialogue with the AGU (Attorney General's Office) and MJ (Ministry of Justice), which is the central Brazilian authority on international legal cooperation within the framework of the mutual legal assistance agreement between Brazil and the United States.
In practice, these institutions are working in a coordinated manner to evaluate the necessary measures and the legal and diplomatic instruments that may apply to the case.
According to the document sent to Moraes, he has 21 days to respond to the initial petition filed in a Florida court. If he fails to respond, the minister may face the proceedings in default.
The email notification was authorized after the US Justice attempted for months to carry out the procedure through the Hague Convention, which deals with the processing of official documents between countries.
DAILY NEWS: TRUMP BOOSTS HIS MILITARY FOOTPRINT IN EUROPE 🇺🇸🇵🇱
Recent news indicates that Donald Trump has announced the deployment of an additional 5,000 American troops to Poland, a decision that has sparked strong reactions and some political and military confusion.
KEY POINTS:
Trump stated that the decision was influenced by the election of Polish President Karol Nawrocki, a political ally backed by him. In a public message, Trump cited the close relationship between the two as a significant factor.
The announcement caught observers off guard as it came just days after the Pentagon had halted or postponed previous troop movement plans to Poland. This led analysts to classify the action as a sharp change in direction.
Poland currently hosts about 10,000 American troops; if the plan is fully implemented, the U.S. military presence in the country would increase significantly.
The Polish government reacted positively. President Karol Nawrocki publicly thanked Trump and emphasized the importance of the alliance between the two nations.
Experts assess that the move may have strategic objectives: to bolster NATO's eastern flank amid tensions with Russia and the ongoing war involving Ukraine. However, critics point out a lack of clarity in the American strategy for Europe.
As of now, there is still little official information from the Pentagon regarding when, how, and which units would be deployed, so the situation remains in flux.
Recent news indicates that Donald Trump has announced the deployment of an additional 5,000 American troops to Poland, a decision that has sparked strong reactions and some political and military confusion.
KEY POINTS:
Trump stated that the decision was influenced by the election of Polish President Karol Nawrocki, a political ally backed by him. In a public message, Trump cited the close relationship between the two as a significant factor.
The announcement caught observers off guard as it came just days after the Pentagon had halted or postponed previous troop movement plans to Poland. This led analysts to classify the action as a sharp change in direction.
Poland currently hosts about 10,000 American troops; if the plan is fully implemented, the U.S. military presence in the country would increase significantly.
The Polish government reacted positively. President Karol Nawrocki publicly thanked Trump and emphasized the importance of the alliance between the two nations.
Experts assess that the move may have strategic objectives: to bolster NATO's eastern flank amid tensions with Russia and the ongoing war involving Ukraine. However, critics point out a lack of clarity in the American strategy for Europe.
As of now, there is still little official information from the Pentagon regarding when, how, and which units would be deployed, so the situation remains in flux.
🚨 URGENT: FLÁVIO BOLSONARO PLUMMETS 6 POINTS IN THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE👀
Senator and presidential candidate Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) has dropped 6 points in the presidential race following the alleged involvement of a loan with Master Bank. According to the latest Atlas Bloomberg survey, Flávio now holds 41.8% of the voting intentions compared to 48.9% for Lula. Flávio's team, reacting to the current survey, has decided to hit back at the TSE against the published research, arguing that: "The survey presented stimuli capable of influencing the perception of the respondents"
Senator and presidential candidate Flávio Bolsonaro (PL) has dropped 6 points in the presidential race following the alleged involvement of a loan with Master Bank. According to the latest Atlas Bloomberg survey, Flávio now holds 41.8% of the voting intentions compared to 48.9% for Lula. Flávio's team, reacting to the current survey, has decided to hit back at the TSE against the published research, arguing that: "The survey presented stimuli capable of influencing the perception of the respondents"
LULA AND HIS TAXES, THE BLUSINHA TAX AND ITS BILLION-DOLLAR REVENUE YOU DON'T KNOW 💰
From what has been disclosed so far, the total revenue from the so-called 'blusinha tax' (federal tax on international purchases up to US$ 50) has been close to R$ 9,6 to R$ 9,7 billion since its implementation until the announced extinction in May 2026.
THE APPROXIMATE BREAKDOWN WAS:
• Aug–Dec/2024: R$ 2,88 billion
• Year 2025: R$ 5 billion
• Jan–Apr/2026: R$ 1,78 billion
APPROXIMATE TOTAL:
R$ 9,66 billion.
There is a small difference between reports because some use slightly different periods (for example, up to May 8, 2026, which indicated R$ 1,85 billion in 2026).
ANOTHER IMPORTANT POINT: The extinction did not eliminate all taxes on international purchases. The government has zeroed out the 20% federal tax for purchases up to US$ 50, but the state ICMS (17%–20%) continues to exist.
In terms of fiscal impact, the government estimates it will forgo nearly R$ 10 billion in the next three years with the end of the tax collection.
FOR COMPARISON: The accumulated revenue of approximately R$ 9,66 billion is close to the market value of some mid-sized companies listed on the B3 — showing that despite the nickname 'blusinha tax', the measure has turned into a significant source of federal revenue.
From what has been disclosed so far, the total revenue from the so-called 'blusinha tax' (federal tax on international purchases up to US$ 50) has been close to R$ 9,6 to R$ 9,7 billion since its implementation until the announced extinction in May 2026.
THE APPROXIMATE BREAKDOWN WAS:
• Aug–Dec/2024: R$ 2,88 billion
• Year 2025: R$ 5 billion
• Jan–Apr/2026: R$ 1,78 billion
APPROXIMATE TOTAL:
R$ 9,66 billion.
There is a small difference between reports because some use slightly different periods (for example, up to May 8, 2026, which indicated R$ 1,85 billion in 2026).
ANOTHER IMPORTANT POINT: The extinction did not eliminate all taxes on international purchases. The government has zeroed out the 20% federal tax for purchases up to US$ 50, but the state ICMS (17%–20%) continues to exist.
In terms of fiscal impact, the government estimates it will forgo nearly R$ 10 billion in the next three years with the end of the tax collection.
FOR COMPARISON: The accumulated revenue of approximately R$ 9,66 billion is close to the market value of some mid-sized companies listed on the B3 — showing that despite the nickname 'blusinha tax', the measure has turned into a significant source of federal revenue.
Log in to explore more content