币圈纪委

Brothers who have participated in trading competitions or are active traders can take a look

The rebate angel has been around for a long time

Let's get straight to the data

The NIGHT trading competition held recently

Rebate around 500U

The final reward tokens were only 1700U, accounting for a full ⅓

Whether playing futures, spot trading, or rushing in trading competitions, as long as you want to compete for the leaderboard, the volume will definitely go up, and the transaction fees are the main costs

In the chat page, top right corner ➕, add contacts

Enter my ID: 1108990344

Any questions will be answered, and ongoing help will be provided for optimizing rebates

#返佣 #助力人

Many people only focus on profits and losses, neglecting commission rebates

I have been doing rebates for many years, relying on solid data

Previously participated in the NIGHT trading competition

Commission rebates approached 500U

The final reward tokens amounted to about 1700U

👉 The rebates alone accounted for nearly a quarter of the profits

Whether you are trading contracts, spot, or participating in long-term trading competitions, as long as the trading volume increases, the commission will definitely be the largest cost

Doing rebates correctly is equivalent to adding leverage to yourself in the long run

📌 Top right corner ➕ Add contact

📌 Enter my ID: ste0e3

Future rebate optimizations and structural adjustments will continue to be followed up for you

Let's review an on-chain case that has already played out.

The observation points were pretty straightforward:
A giant whale accumulated 20 trillion PEPE by buying 1,173 ETH from May to September 2023. Later on-chain tracking revealed that this address deposited 500 billion PEPE into Coinbase in November 2024 to take profits. According to Lookonchain's analysis, the address still held 15 trillion PEPE at that time, with total profits exceeding $45 million.

So why is this worth revisiting, instead of just another 'get rich quick' story?

First, the accumulation period was long; it wasn't just a one-day emotional trade.
Second, when taking profits, they didn't liquidate everything at once but rather cashed out gradually while keeping some positions.
Third, the on-chain path is complete; you can see 'how to buy, how to hold, how to sell'.

If we break it down into an alpha sample, what's truly effective isn't just 'buying the right PEPE',
but rather:
- Accumulating in batches at lower levels
- Cashing out in batches at higher levels
- Not letting exit actions lock you out completely

Many people only like to look at the results when reviewing,
but the most valuable part of on-chain activity often lies in the process.

Public sources: Lookonchain / Debank
This does not constitute investment advice, dyor

First, let's assess:
These types of sell-offs aren't massive, but 'who's selling' often impacts the market narrative more than 'how much' was sold.

On-chain tracking shows that Ethereum Foundation-related addresses sold 416.67 ETH in early July 2026 for around 933,340 DAI, at a price of approximately $2,240. While this amount isn't huge in the ETH market, it will be discussed repeatedly—not because of the dollar amount, but due to the identity of the seller.

I see these events as 'on-chain anomaly alerts' rather than definitive directional signals for three reasons:

1. Actions from foundation addresses naturally amplify emotional interpretations.
2. The sell-off occurred from publicly traceable wallets, not vague rumors.
3. What the market really needs to watch is not this single transaction, but whether there are subsequent actions that follow.

So a more rational approach here isn't to immediately interpret this as a bearish signal,
but to continue tracking:
- Are there similar addresses continuing to sell?
- Is the selling frequency increasing?
- Is the market's absorption of this public selling pressure weakening?

The conclusion is simple:
There's an anomaly, but it's not enough to judge a downtrend just yet. Keep the records and observe.
Source: Lookonchain / Arkham
This does not constitute investment advice; DYOR.

Let's cut to the chase:
Rather than focusing on ‘some whale just went long’, what’s really worth noting is the capital shifting risk from high-leverage positions back to spot holdings.

In public tracking, the address `0x15a4` made a classic move in mid-March 2026: first, they closed out BTC perpetual longs, locking in around $1.88 million in profit; then they withdrew 7.136 million USDC from Hyperliquid; next, they bought 1,827 ETH on spot. According to Lookonchain's analysis at the time, this address subsequently held about 12,028 ETH.

Why is this set of moves worth studying?

First, it’s not just about ‘adding more risk’, but rather shifting the risk exposure from leverage to spot.
Second, it maintains a directional bias on ETH while clearly reducing the pressure of potential liquidation.
Third, this kind of position migration usually reflects actual capital preferences better than a single isolated buy order.

I won't draw direct market conclusions from the actions of a single address.
However, if we see similar wallets synchronizing to do a ‘de-leverage, keep the direction’ migration later on, that signal would definitely be worth modeling and observing.

Public sources: Lookonchain / Hyperliquid / Arkham
Not investment advice, do your own research (dyor)

Narrative Radar

Lately, I've been keeping an eye on a pretty simple phenomenon: some 'wallets that haven't moved in a long time' are starting to show activity again.

It's not because these wallets jumping back into action means the trend is set; on the contrary, the more dormant a wallet is before it re-enters the market, the more it deserves to be documented and observed closely.

I personally look at three things first:

① Are they buying mainstream assets or highly volatile altcoins?
② Is it a test order or are they continuously adding to their position?
③ Are there other wallets with a similar style making moves around the same time?

What really holds research value isn’t the wallets that are constantly making noise throughout the day.
Instead, it’s those that are usually quiet but bring clear preferences when they do decide to trade.

At this stage, I won’t easily interpret the actions of a single wallet as a market conclusion.
But it’s well-suited to serve as an 'early observation sample.'

In summary:
Track first, then judge; observe continuity before discussing significance.
This doesn’t constitute investment advice, dyor.

Observation Log | On-Chain Movements

- Address: `0xB476`
- Action: After a long silence, making a big buy into ETH
- Scale: Approximately 5.81 million USDC
- Purchase Amount: Approximately 2,570 ETH
- Average Price: Approximately $2,261

Why This is Worth Noting:

1. This isn't a high-frequency noise trade; it's a long-dormant address re-entering the market.
2. The target asset is ETH, not a more speculative altcoin.
3. This behavior resembles re-establishing a watchlist position rather than a purely random move.

I'm not going to interpret this as a “bottom signal.”
What's more interesting to watch is whether this type of address will continue to stack more or if similar addresses will appear in sync.

Data Source: Lookonchain / Arkham Public Tracking
Not financial advice, DYOR.

Observation Log | On-Chain Activity

- Address: `0xB476`
- Action: After a long silence, made a big buy of ETH
- Scale: Approximately 5.81 million USDC
- Amount Bought: Approximately 2,570 ETH
- Average Price: Approximately $2,261

Why This is Noteworthy:

1. This isn't just a high-frequency noise trade; it's a long-dormant address re-entering the game.
2. The asset being bought is ETH, not a high-flying altcoin.
3. This behavior resembles capital re-establishing an observation position, rather than a random play.

I wouldn't directly interpret this as a 'bottom signal'.
What's more interesting is whether this type of address will continue to add to their position, or if similar addresses will emerge simultaneously.

Data Source: Lookonchain / Arkham Public Tracking
Not investment advice, DYOR

What I'm more concerned about isn’t the short-term ups and downs, but why a wallet that’s been dormant for so long suddenly came back to life.

There's a public tracking address `0xB476` that, after over a year of no significant activity, recently made a single purchase of about 5.81 million USDC to buy 2,570 ETH, with an average transaction price around $2,261. Just looking at this action doesn’t confirm the trend, but the fact that a "long-dormant address has re-entered with a significant buy" is definitely a signal worth noting.

Why am I keeping an eye on this address?

First, wallets like this, if not just a spur-of-the-moment decision, often have a more comprehensive funding strategy behind them.
Second, coming back after a long hibernation usually has more research value than high-frequency noise trades.
Third, they’re buying the most liquid mainstream assets, not high-emotion altcoins, and this choice itself reveals their preferences.

I’m not rushing to interpret this as a trend reversal; I’m just viewing it as a "sample worth continuous tracking." The more important question moving forward is: is this type of address making a one-off test buy, or will they continue to stack more?

Data source: Lookonchain / Arkham public tracking
This does not constitute investment advice, dyor.

While I was checking out a set of retracement trading pairs, I found myself more concerned about whether funds would flow back into certain high Beta sectors. SUI/USDT is currently hovering around $1.21, down about -3.42% in the last 24 hours; APT/USDT is around $1.043, down approximately -5.13%; and ARB/USDT is at about $0.1313, down roughly -5.68%. From the market action, it’s clear these trading pairs have retraced deeper than BTC/USDT, indicating that funds haven’t officially flowed back into growth narratives yet. However, since these dips have already shown up, it’ll be clear who bounces back first.

In situations like this, I usually refrain from jumping to conclusions right away and instead focus on the structure. While BTC/USDT is still oscillating around $79,507, if trading pairs like SUI/USDT, APT/USDT, and ARB/USDT start to exhibit a quicker stop-loss rhythm, it often signals that some more sensitive capital is testing the waters again. This doesn't necessarily mean an immediate trend reversal, but at least it indicates the market is beginning to sift out new relative strength players.

Right now, I’m less focused on "should I chase" and more on "who will be the first to stage an independent recovery." If BTC/USDT stabilizes moving forward and SUI/USDT or APT/USDT shows a stronger recovery slope, that kind of relative strength rotation is definitely worth tracking. I’ll note this down and see if the market gives confirmation later. This isn’t investment advice, just DYOR.

These past couple of days while watching the charts, I've been reminded of quite a few old scripts. Like DOGE/USDT is still hovering around $0.114, up about +2.74% in the last 24 hours, while BTC/USDT and ETH/USDT are still looking a bit weak. This phenomenon is pretty common in the space: when the mainstream hasn’t fully rallied, the meme coins come out to steal the spotlight. When you stretch the timeline, you often see folks trying to cash in on the hype, and things start to get interesting.

The reason isn’t complicated; once the market enters a phase of 'local euphoria and overall hesitation', the first to pop up isn’t new logic, but familiar faces. Some will spin a short-term spike into a narrative that they’ve been positioned for ages, while others will blow up a single rebound candlestick into a cognitive realization. Then, once the hype fades, they’ll shift the blame onto the market. We’ve seen this playbook with many coins, especially with trading pairs like DOGE/USDT that come with built-in traffic; any volatility triggers a flurry of arguments and credit-grabbing performances.

So my judgment is pretty straightforward: when you see certain KOLs start to clash and tear each other apart over a short-term move, hold off on picking sides. Price action is real, but the act of leveraging that volatility to shine a spotlight on oneself is just as real. First, check out the trading pair itself, then see if the narrative has any sustainability; otherwise, you might get led astray by those who thrive on drama.

Today, $LAB just tanked.

Are you all ready to short it?

It's clear to anyone with a sharp eye that many familiar KOLs are quietly exiting the web3 scene, whether in the square or on X.

Some are straight-up leaving the space for traditional jobs, while others are pivoting to AI.

This just goes to show that the industry is really in a downcycle right now.

There's no real development happening; all we see are scams tied to pump-and-dump coins.

It's getting harder to rake in profits from the usual strategies.

Does the industry even have a future?

$BTC $ETH

$TON becoming a mainstream coin is just a matter of saying one thing

If the line drops, it’ll go really deep

But it's not time yet; chasing long now is the right move.

$ENJ can go long, community sentiment is still bullish

Plus, with the new season of Multiverse launching on April 28, there's fresh loot, quests, side missions, and a 50,000 ENJ reward + new NFTs

At least this will bring a short-term uptick in user trading volume; the pullback is just a healthy shakeout

#ENJ

You have cut quite a bit, and no one should say anything to anyone

#WLFI

$币安人生
Binance life has been strongly controlled by the dog, do you feel it? It's time to observe and consider shorting, brothers.

In the cryptocurrency circle, being submissive sends liquidity to the market.

Brothers in sbti strike hard 😂

When will there be a Binance version? 😂

#bnb