Info Plus Anyl

Welcome to the new CreatorPad, where you can now participate and track your rankings and earnings easier!
A short recap of what it is–CreatorPad is a new monetization platform for Binance Square creators to earn rewards for high-quality content creation. Creators can participate in various campaigns organized by Web3 projects to earn generous rewards. They can also track their mindshare score and rankings on the CreatorPad Mindshare leaderboard in real time. Unlike traditional paid project promotions, CreatorPad operates with full transparency. Each campaign’s task details, airdrop rules, and reward criteria are clearly listed on the campaign page, allowing users to review them anytime to ensure all content comply with established standards. (read more here)

With our first major update after receiving lots of valuable community feedback, here are the changes we’ve made!
Update 1: Introducing Square Points
Square Points is a point system that ranks creators in leaderboards; to earn points, you can complete tasks under different project campaigns. It is a scoring system designed to evaluate user activity within Binance Square that determines the eligibility and ranking for different campaigns.

Square Points are calculated daily based on the sum of points from your content, engagement, and trades on Binance exchange (wallet excluded).Points summary would be updated daily on CreatorPad at 09:00 UTC.In project campaigns, the total points on the leaderboard are a cumulative sum of daily points over the campaign period.To check your daily points breakdown, click on the Project leaderboard and it will be displayed under “My Points” 
Update 2: Bonus points for effective engagement and trades
You can receive up to 5 points per day per project from engagement received by a verified account on the day of posting eligible project content.
Effective Engagement

If we discover the same batch of creators misusing the engagement bonus by engaging with the same batch of users, you will be DISQUALIFIED from the project campaign or CreatorPad. If you see any creators involved in this activity, please report them via the report survey form: Follow bonus points will only be counted once per creator, and likes will only be counted once per post.
You can receive up to 25 points per day per project from the effective trades you've made on the Binance exchange (wallet excluded).
Effective Trade

Only new trades and position openings after the campaign launch date will be counted.For the project campaign, only trades involving the tokens specified on the campaign page will be counted.Both buying and selling tokens contribute to the Square bonus points at the current stage.
Update 3: Non-eligible content and point reduction for lower quality content

Update 4: Report Survey Form
We’ve introduced a new CreatorPad misconduct form for reporting creators or accounts you suspect of violating our Terms and Conditions, including using AI-generated content to unfairly farm rewards or engagement, or employing bots to manipulate campaign results. 
We will carefully review every report and will respond via your registered feed secretary within 7 days.
Update 5: Removing the Creator Leaderboard
The Square Creator Leaderboard has been removed. Points and rankings will now be based only on participation in specific project campaigns. Each leaderboard will be tagged to a specific project campaign for clearer competition.
Overall summary and breakdown of how the new point system looks like:
You can earn up to 105 points per day per leaderboard. 

Points breakdown of Posting task

Posts detected to contain a high proportion of AI-generated content will have their overall score per post deweighted to maintain fairness and authenticity.Posting duplicated, copied, or substantially similar content—whether from other users, previous submissions, or external sources—is strictly prohibited. Any user found to have posted duplicated content will be deemed ineligible for rewards. To maintain a fair and quality-driven campaign environment, users are limited to a maximum of 5 posts within any 30-minute window. Posting content excessively in a short period (e.g., 10 posts in 10 minutes) is considered spam and is prohibited.Users must keep all campaign-related content posts publicly accessible and online for a minimum of one (1) month after the official end date of the campaign. Removing, deleting, or making campaign content private before the end of this retention period will result in disqualification from receiving rewards.
Notes:
You can see a clear summary of the points earned for each piece of content in your Square Points tab. More detailed breakdowns are coming soon to help you understand your scoring even better. Please note that videos and livestreams are currently not counted; they will be included in future updates. Stay tuned!

Thank you for your continuous support!

Useful links:
Square T&Cs and Community GuidelinesCreatorPad FAQ

A gentle opening that matters
When you first hear about a system that promises to transform how we store and value large data assets you want clear language and real conviction so I’m going to speak plainly because this matters and because the future of decentralized storage will shape how creators and institutions treat data for years to come. They’re building more than raw infrastructure, they’re shaping an economy where data is treated as a durable and tradable resource and where trust is encoded into the system design rather than assumed. If you care about privacy, resilience, or the ability to run applications that cannot rely on a single vendor then what Walrus proposes becomes essential to understand and to evaluate with care and rigor. We’re seeing the rise of storage systems that are purpose built for high volume media and machine learning datasets and Walrus sits squarely within that new generation of protocols.

Walrus Blockchain and its Architecture
Walrus operates on the Sui blockchain which is a modern, high-performance layer one network optimized for scalability and low-latency transactions. This blockchain foundation allows Walrus to manage storage contracts, handle staking, and enforce economic incentives in a trustless manner. Sui's architecture provides parallel transaction execution which enhances throughput and ensures that multiple storage operations can occur simultaneously without bottlenecks. The combination of Sui blockchain with Walrus’s erasure coding and blob storage allows for decentralized, censorship-resistant, and cost-efficient file storage while maintaining cryptographic proofs of integrity and availability. This design was chosen to balance performance, security, and long-term sustainability, ensuring that the protocol can handle large-scale, real-world applications and the unpredictable stresses of decentralized networks.

What Walrus is and how it works in plain language
Walrus is a decentralized storage protocol built to handle very large binary files while preserving security and availability through clever engineering. At the heart of their design is the idea that instead of making one copy of a file and hoping the host keeps it safe you split the data into pieces encode it so it can be reconstructed even if many pieces are missing and then distribute those pieces across a set of independent storage nodes which are coordinated by onchain logic. The result is that files become resilient without the need for wasteful full replication and that the economic model ties rewards and penalties to verifiable storage work. I’m describing this in simple terms because the mechanics matter to anyone thinking in months or years about uptime and integrity and about how to design products that remember the past.
The architecture and the reason behind its choices
Walrus uses erasure coding combined with blob storage which is different from how some older decentralized solutions approached things. Erasure coding is a mathematical technique that converts a blob into encoded fragments such that the original blob can be reconstructed from a subset of those fragments. This is why they are able to achieve strong durability with much less overall storage overhead than naive replication. The storage nodes hold encoded slivers and they run lightweight proofs and challenge mechanisms so the network can detect missing or dishonest behavior. There is also a role for staking and economic incentives so operators are both rewarded for good behavior and penalized for failure to serve data. It becomes important in practice that payments and incentives are designed to keep storage affordable while ensuring the network remains secure and reliable under stress and uncertainty.
The metrics that truly matter and why you should care
When evaluating a storage protocol you should look beyond simple price tags and check metrics that map directly to user experience and risk. Key measures include availability which tells you how often your data is accessible latency which explains how quickly you can read or reconstruct a file recovery speed which determines how fast the network can heal after node failures and economic sustainability which is the relationship between payments made for storage and the ongoing operational costs of nodes. We need to be honest about these metrics because underprovisioning any of them creates hidden failure modes. If the network has excellent redundancy but poor recovery speed then large data loads will slow down workflows and if the economics do not fairly compensate providers then you will see attrition and that will degrade availability over time. I’m stressing these facts because they are where engineering meets human expectations and where long term usefulness is won or lost.
How Walrus handles stress and failure and what can go wrong
Designing for real world failure is where a storage protocol reveals its maturity. Walrus anticipates Byzantine faults node churn and economic stress by combining cryptographic proofs with erasure coding and a carefully constructed incentive layer. Proofs and regular challenges force nodes to demonstrate possession and retrievability while staking ensures operators have skin in the game. Even so there are realistic risks. Economic shocks could dramatically raise the cost of storage payments or cause temporary shortages of willing providers. Attackers could attempt coordinated failures or censorship attempts and legal pressures could complicate cross border storage decisions. Recovery processes need to be battle tested and the governance model has to be transparent and quick enough to respond. We’re seeing early networks that perform well in labs but that still need sustained live traffic to prove their resilience at scale and that is the next mountain to climb.
The human and developer experience
For builders the story is practical. Walrus presents SDKs and developer tools aimed at making the storage primitive feel like a first class building block so dapps and services can embed large media and datasets without forcing users into opaque vendor lock in. The onboarding should be familiar to engineers and the documentation intends to reduce friction. For creators and enterprises the appeal is a promise that their assets will remain accessible and verifiable even if individual nodes go offline. This promise is emotionally powerful because it replaces anxiety about central point failures with a system that rewards good behavior and makes data durability auditable and transparent. They’re intentionally designing the platform to feel dependable so teams can plan product roadmaps with more confidence.
Token economics with clarity and realism
The WAL token is functionally integrated into how storage is provisioned and paid for and token mechanics address payments staking and governance. When a user pays for storage they are purchasing a time limited service and the economic flows are structured so that fees are distributed over time to storage providers and to stakers which helps reduce the sensitivity of storage costs to short term token price volatility. Governance rights allow active participants to propose and vote on protocol changes and upgrades so evolution is not left to a single vendor or group. Realistically the token design must prevent perverse incentives while maintaining liquidity and utility for the network to thrive under varied market conditions.
Practical examples of use cases and the value narrative
Imagine a media company that needs to archive high resolution footage with guarantee of retrievability or a machine learning team that needs vast labeled datasets that must remain immutable and accessible for model training and auditing. In both situations the value of Walrus is that it aligns incentives and provides a market based way to provision storage while offering cryptographic assurances. The combination of careful encoding and economic design means storage can be cheaper than naive replication while still delivering strong guarantees about integrity and availability. This translates to new product possibilities and lower long term costs for organizations that adopt the model.
Governance risk and the social layer
Protocols are not purely technical artifacts they are social systems and governance is where the network negotiates tricky trade offs. Effective governance must be participatory transparent and adaptive while protecting long term security. There are real governance risks including the capture of voting power by large token holders or slow response to emergent failures. Designing fair representation and mechanisms to bootstrap decentralization are honest problems and they require continual attention. We’re seeing many protocols experiment with delegated models and with epochs of gradual decentralization and those lessons will influence how Walrus matures.
What to watch next and how to evaluate progress
Watch what happens to the metrics that matter. Look for independent audits proven recovery drills and real world integrations that show sustained traffic and diverse storage providers. Monitor the health of the incentive system and whether fees remain predictable in fiat terms. Also watch the governance forums and the pace of meaningful protocol upgrades that address real world failures rather than incremental feature changes. If the network can demonstrate consistent availability under stress and evolve its governance responsibly then it will have delivered a pragmatic answer to a longstanding set of infrastructure challenges.
Final thoughts and a human closing
I’m hopeful about what careful engineering paired with thoughtful incentives can accomplish and I’m cautious about the unknowns that come from economic volatility and adversarial pressure. The people building this are solving problems at the intersection of economics cryptography and product design and they deserve scrutiny that is both demanding and fair. They’re creating an architecture that can change how we think about data custody and about the economics of storage and in doing so they raise the bar for what decentralized infrastructure can deliver. If you are a builder or a buyer of data services take the time to study the metrics test the recovery scenarios and join the governance conversations because durable systems grow in public and through iteration. It becomes less about hype and more about the steady work of engineering and community building.

@Walrus 🦭/acc $WAL #Walrus