Mendes Trades

🤼‍♀️☢️📊🫠To avoid any misunderstanding, we want to make one point very clear.

Our content is not shaped by what the market wants to hear, but by what we live and execute every day. What we share is born from real practice and analysis.

We do not follow the logic of adapting our speech just to generate engagement or meet momentary trends. We follow a line of coherence: what we apply is exactly what we share with you. We do not sell narratives. We share methods.

Speaking of our portfolio, our positions are also lean, manageable, and based on conviction. Today, our four projects are SORA, $RHEA , $SIGMA , and $EDEN . They could be ten, but we prefer quality over quantity.

Opportunity is built with focus, management, and a lot of study.

#ALPHA🔥 #Square #Binance

🚀🛑💎Levra..

I understand that Levra is a project that deserves attention. I am not talking about speculation, but about thesis. Evaluate with me: it is a project still in its early stages, but it tries to explore a little-occupied path, leveraging with simplified access, connecting the experience of centralized wallets and exchanges with decentralized liquidity.

Projects like $GMX and $DYDX have already proven the strength of decentralized leverage, but remain restricted to the purely DeFi environment. Levra seeks precisely the meeting point between these worlds.

If it can deliver a pluggable solution that works within wallets like Trust Wallet, SafePal, Bitget Wallet, OKX Wallet, or even the Binance Web3 Wallet, it will no longer be just another leverage protocol and will act as infrastructure.

It is still early for conclusions, but if it executes what it is proposing, in a simple, secure, and replicable way, it can become a strategic bridge between CEX, wallets, and decentralized liquidity.

🛑🤼‍♀️But if it does not turn this idea into something real and adopted, the chance of going to zero is enormous.

#Binance #ALPHA

When the price falls, the risk does not increase. The opportunity is what appears.

One of the most common mistakes in correction phases is thinking that the solution to reduce the loss is to sell the project that is falling and run to the first one that is rising. The green on the chart represents what has already happened, not what is about to happen. In other words, you leave something solid and enter late into a movement that has already occurred.

The loss only becomes real after the sale. Exiting a structured project just because it is temporarily in decline may be exactly what prevents you from recovering when the market starts to react again. Most of the time, this impulsive switch increases the risk and deepens the loss even more.

In moments of correction, the focus is not to run away. It is to reorganize. Evaluate and work to reduce the average ticket. Those who understand this anticipate the profit zone when the cycle turns. A falling market does not mean loss; it means opportunity for those who know how to build a position.

$EDEN $SIGMA $RHEA
#Binance #ALPHA

Yes, a good highlight!!!

🚀💎🤼‍♀️📊As part of the transparency regarding the movements we make, we have taken a small position in two emerging contracts: DELPH (Delph AI Oracle) and LEVRA. Imagine that with about 50 dollars it is possible to acquire almost 10 million tokens, without committing significant capital and maintaining the possibility of substantial returns if any of them gains traction.

DELPH fits into the thesis we have already followed about oracles and infrastructure aimed at on-chain data intelligence, something that may gain relevance in the 2026 cycle. LEVRA presents a less common proposal, focused on decentralized leverage in DEXs, still without demand validation, but with potential to explore a poorly developed space. These are strategic bets: low value, high volume of tokens, and the possibility of multiplication if the thesis is confirmed.

#Binance #ALPHA

🛑📊💎🚀When I detail about seeking great opportunities in the crypto market, it is not just about choosing promising projects. It is necessary to understand the combination between low issuance, accessible initial price, and, mainly, the TIMING of entry. The biggest gains happen when you invest before the project reaches its first critical barrier: the 1 DOLLAR mark.

Projects with issuance up to 1 billion usually only release an initial portion. It is at this stage that the true opportunity lies, as they have the ease to reach 1 dollar when they start delivering their first results. And it is precisely during this period that you can buy a relevant amount of tokens with LITTLE capital.

When the project breaks 1 dollar, it can still advance to 2, 3, or 5 dollars, but this depends on another type of fuel: institutional partnerships, more robust development, and the entry of external capital; it depends more on its delivery.

That’s why my positions follow this pattern. It’s not an opinion; it’s market research. I have been analyzing several projects, and they all follow the same curve: initial phase with low supply released, explosion up to near 1 dollar, and after that, the movement begins to stall. It’s not an absolute rule; some continue to rise, but this behavior repeats itself with greater frequency. That’s why we follow this pattern, and it’s in this type of project that we position our capital.

$EDEN $RHEA $SIGMA
#Binance #ALPHA

🤼‍♀️📊🛑☢️A Aster is a blockchain infrastructure project that has gained prominence for offering interoperability between networks and having institutional support. It has technology, it has narrative, and it has positioning. However, investment analysis goes beyond the technical proposal: the market stage and the ENTRY timing are determining factors.

Today, the token already has a capitalization above 2.8 billion dollars, a total supply of 8 billion, and a consolidated price above 1 dollar. When a project reaches this level, a significant portion of the appreciation has already been priced in, reducing the capacity for rapid multiplication. Can it appreciate more? SURE. But it is unlikely with that asymmetry sought in early phases, when the price still allows for relevant ACCUMULATION.

Another point is the unlocking schedule. Starting in January 2026, about 78 million tokens will be released per month, approximately 1% of the total. This recurring flow tends to create selling pressure, as a large part of these tokens belongs to the team, which typically uses these releases to realize capital and fund development (SELL).

Therefore, for the small investor seeking 💎, the timing is no longer ideal. Not only because of the appreciation stage but also because, with a price above 1 dollar, those with lower capital cannot acquire a significant amount of tokens capable of generating substantial gains. In other words, it is a good project, but it is no longer in the ideal phase for the SMALL investor!

$ASTER #AsterDEX #Binance

📊🛑🤼‍♀️🚀 There are opportunities that only appear when the market corrects.

When the market enters correction cycles, there is a silent movement that many ignore: the significant increase in EARN and staking opportunities. In this scenario, several projects start to offer locks with more aggressive yields, precisely to avoid capital FLIGHT. It is common to see options with locks of 60, 90, and even 180 days, with APYs significantly higher, often above 30%, 40%, or even 50%.

This happens because projects need to maintain liquidity and stability while the market goes through phases of uncertainty. To do this, they better compensate those who agree to keep the tokens locked. For those with a holder's mindset, this is one of the most interesting times to take advantage of these strategic windows. I personally tend to choose the maximum lock periods, provided the project has structure and credibility, precisely to capture the highest possible benefit, always disabling automatic renewal options.

It is worth remembering: these opportunities are usually limited, have a maximum coverage of adherence, and are closed as soon as the packages are filled. Therefore, keeping track of this movement is essential. In phases where the price fluctuates or retreats, accumulating tokens for free through EARN is one of the smartest ways to recover part of the temporary devaluation, using the cycle to your advantage.

Corrections scare those who operate on impulse. But for those who think strategically, they open doors that do not appear in euphoria.

#earn #STALKING #Binance
$EDEN

🤼‍♀️☢️🛑📊Understand

In the last few weeks, the crypto market has gone through a sequence of corrections, something natural after months of accelerated growth. This movement should not be interpreted as abnormality, but rather as part of the mechanics that sustain this market: profit-taking, strategic involvement, and influence "MANIPULATION" by major players.

The current scenario does not represent free fall, but it also does not signal a quick recovery. We have entered a moderate crypto winter, where LATERALIZATION tends to dominate the behavior of the market in the coming month. In my reading, Bitcoin should remain between 75 thousand and 90 thousand dollars until December, with occasional peaks above or below this range, without significant structural breaks.

In January and February, it may bring a different movement. During this period, many companies close their fiscal cycles, announce results, and the flow of capital tends to be redistributed to sectors with greater potential, the crypto market. This movement tends to be quieter, but it is where the replenishment of liquidity and preparation for bullish cycles occurs.

This is not a moment of despair. It is a moment of strategic reading to evaluate new positions or increase current ones; the main thing is to wait for the cycle to start again. Those who understand this difference do not react to the noise, they act strategically.

$BTC $BNB

thank you for the support! I am bringing information outside the bubble 😅😂

📊☢️🤼‍♀️Understand this market dynamic

There is a curious phenomenon in the market with the $BTC : while the asset appreciates and matures, the pessimistic narratives remain exactly the SAME. The numbers change, but the discourse does not alter. When Bitcoin was worth 1 dollar, they said it wouldn't go beyond 10. When it reached 10, they said it would never reach 100. Then the limit would be 1,000, 10,000, 30,000. Today, even above 90 or 100 thousand dollars, the story continues: "it will drop to 40 60", "the cycle is over", "the correction will be fatal".

The reason is not a lack of information. It is strategy. The big players know that their movements are MONITORED. Therefore, they disclose partial sales, exploit the psychological impact of this news, and observe the panic spreading. They do not sell to abandon the market, but to provoke corrections, generate liquidations, capture forced supply, and reposition at lower prices. It's an engineering of FEELING, not of price.

Retail reacts to these headlines as if they were predictions. But they are not predictions. They are instruments of INFLUENCE. Those who hold capital, liquidity, and information do not need to predict the market; they just need to influence it. And the more retail reacts to these narratives, the more the big players concentrate Bitcoin and power.

That is why understanding the dynamics of the market is not about guessing the next price target, but identifying who benefits when FEAR controls decisions. History does not guarantee the future, but it always reveals the method. And those who ignore the method end up becoming part of it as statistics.

#BTC #BTC☀

🤼‍♀️☢️📊Understand the real dynamics of airdrops

When we talk about airdrops, it is essential to understand their true purpose. The airdrop was born as a legitimate tool in the crypto universe to generate initial engagement, expand the community, and stimulate the first CONTACT with the project. However, over time, developers realized there was a loophole: the airdrop did not just need to engage; it could SELL the perception of engagement.

This is where the central point lies. The practice itself is valid, but the intention has changed. This mass distribution began to be used to manipulate perception, influence the masses, and artificially construct the APPEARANCE of growth. It conveys the idea of accelerated expansion and true engagement, even when that does not exist. Therefore, when you see projects claiming they have grown significantly in a short time, that growth does not always represent real adoption or buying interest. Many times, it is merely the result of an influence strategy, "AIRDROPS".

Today, with current platforms, it is enough to insert 20 thousand random addresses and trigger tokens automatically. These wallets receive symbolic amounts, sufficient to show up in the metrics. The visual impression is one of progress.

Therefore, understanding the dynamics of airdrops is to understand that they can serve both as a legitimate incentive mechanism and as a tool of PERCEPTION. The issue is not with the airdrop itself, but with the purpose for which it is used by each PROJECT!

#Square #ALPHA #Binance
$SIGMA $RHEA $EDEN

📊🚀🤼‍♀️Another project that I believe has great potential!!!

When money stops being just digital and starts being intelligent

The market has already tokenized assets, digitized currencies, and built bridges between blockchains. The next step is not to create new tokens but to allow money to become intelligent. It should be capable of executing payments on its own, distributing income, settling contracts, managing cash flow, and integrating traditional banks with stablecoins and DeFi platforms all automatically, auditable, and institutional.

It is exactly at this point that #Sigma positions itself. It is not just another staking or DeFi application. It is a layer of financial automation capable of connecting stablecoins, banks, CBDCs, and RWA protocols, allowing transactions to become programmable, secure, and integrated. SIGMA meets a real demand from companies, funds, and tokenized structures that require efficiency, compliance, and automatic execution.

SIGMA delivers something that the institutional market is really looking for: intelligent settlement, automated payments, and infrastructure to transform blockchain into a functional financial system.

For these reasons, we understand that if SIGMA can deliver these advances, it will be one of the projects with the best potential in #defi for the 2026 race. That's why we are invested in this project.


$INJ $SIGMA #staking #ALPHA

☢️🛑🤼‍♀️And finally, putting aside the burnings and focusing only on the trade fee, understand this point. Every project that does not have a product, an activity that justifies the fee charge, is in practice just being FUNDED by its buyers. In meme projects, for example, it is common to see fees of 5% on purchase and 5% on sale, which means 10% in a single completed operation.

Now, consider a meme with volume, moving 1 million dollars in 24 hours. With a 10% fee, it means that about 100 thousand dollars were captured by the project, with no utility, no structure. And the most serious part: this fee does not reach USDT or BNB for the developer. It arrives in tokens of the project itself, received via contract. What do they do with these tokens? Most of the time they are sold to the market, resold to YOU!

That’s why investing in memes without understanding these fundamentals is financing the creator of the project.

Getting in at the beginning can pay off due to volatility and hype, but entering when the project is already stagnant is just transferring capital. If you are not at the origin, you are feeding the pockets of the developers!!

Easy Money!

$quq $BTTC $PEPE
#PEPE‏ #SHIB #BTTC

🤼‍♀️🛑☢️Continuing the previous analysis, where we discussed burning mechanisms and trading fees in MEME, it is essential to understand how you are impacted, how you are harmed, and primarily, how you are robbed within these structures.

The first is in the charging of fees in projects that do not have activity, product, or development structure. In this scenario, those who buy the token do not participate in an ecosystem; they only FINANCE those who originated it.

The second is in the promised burns. If the fee had a genuine deflationary purpose, it would have already been automatically directed, in the contract itself, to the burn wallet at the time of the transaction. When the burn is scheduled for future dates, it ceases to be a technical mechanism and becomes a tool to stimulate buying.

The third and worst is the most silent. The investor pays a fee to buy and pays a fee to sell; these tokens go to central wallets and are then reinserted into the market. This means that they are penalized twice: first, because they lose tokens that were already theirs without realizing it; second, because they repurchase them, transferring their UDT and BNB directly to the creators.

I know that many will still have doubts about the veracity of this article; when in doubt, do the test, buy 100 tokens and see how you only receive 95 😂🤼‍♀️

$BOB $Jager $FLOKI
#floki #SHIB #PEPE‏

$EDEN , bringing more about the RWA sector here, today we specifically talked about the EDEN token and why it is an asset that deserves to be monitored. OpenEden is a project that operates at a more structural layer of the market, focusing on real utility, regulatory infrastructure, and integration with institutional capital.

It focuses on the tokenization of US TREASURY assets, allowing traditional financial instruments to be converted into digital assets with liquidity, yield, and traceability. This positions EDEN as a relevant factor within the movement of integration between the conventional financial market and the blockchain environment.

The project's growth occurs progressively, supported by clear stages: consistent increase in TVL, construction of infrastructure, institutional adoption, and expansion of the token's utility. The recent integration with $PENDLE strengthens this process by allowing real yield generation with liquidity in cUSDO, consolidating EDEN as a functional component within an on-chain income architecture.

For these reasons, I maintain a position in this asset, precisely because I understand that in light of the regulatory agenda and the advancement towards 2026 of tokenized assets, it has great relevance for this new cycle!

$EDEN #RWA #PENDLE

thank you for the comment!!

☢️🛑🚀🤼‍♀️ Understand Why Large Burns Rarely Create Value

When a project announces that it has burned or will burn billions of tokens, the idea of immediate appreciation is created. The supply is indeed reduced. However, in most cases, the burn is not the result of legitimate market purchases, but rather the elimination of tokens previously collected through FEES. In other words, there is no influx of new capital, only redistribution of what was already within the system.

In projects like $Jager, the contract charges 5% on purchase and 5% on sale. Part of this goes to the team's cash (re-injected into the market) and part is allocated to the burn. The investor has already been penalized even before the burn exists. There is no relevant economic effect because the project merely recycles tokens, does not generate buying pressure, and does not create genuine scarcity. That is why the price rarely reacts with much euphoria!!

The difference is when the burn is financed with real money, as in Binance's Buyback & Burn model ($BNB ). In this case, there is indeed effective buying in the market, concrete removal of circulating supply, and direct impact on liquidity. That is why BNB has shown appreciation after burn cycles: there was true scarcity, not just symbolic elimination.

It is important to understand: in these burns financed by fees, the event does not signal what will happen with the token; it merely records what has already happened. The burn does not anticipate future value; it merely consolidates a recycling of tokens already captured from the market.

In summary, every burn reduces supply, but not every burn creates value. Many times, it works MORE AS A STIMULUS FOR ITS COMMUNITY, "just as a smokescreen," and obviously captures the unsuspecting!

$BOB
#BTTC #floki

🤼‍♀️🚀🛑☢️I have been analyzing several projects and it is becoming increasingly difficult for the small investor. We are in a real jungle, but we are not the hunter, we are the prey.

First predator: the Snipers. They take position in milliseconds at the launch of the contract. As soon as small investors start to build some solid movement, they are already being executed. Just the first green candle appears and you can already smell the barbecue made with our flesh.

Second predator: the Whales. They manipulate the chart, create a sense of euphoria, give the impression that it is a serious project, ready to take off. The small investor comes in excited, thinking they have found the diamond. But soon they are devoured from all sides, torn apart and left almost dying, with a small capital margin.

Third predator: the OTC. Silent, elegant, and fatal. It does not appear on the chart, leaves no trace. It negotiates directly with the project owner, creates a private liquidity route, and executes everything at once. When the small investor realizes, they have already lost 80%, 90%, or even 100% of the capital. No candle, no alert, just sadness. It seems comical if it weren't tragic.

And even if they survive all this, there remains the last predator: Hope. It keeps the investor trapped, believing that there will always be a new peak, a new breath, a new miracle. But this peak never arrives.

In the end, the biggest problem for the small investor is not the purchase. It is the exit, remember, good profit is profit realized!

#ALPHA #RWA #MEME

When you understand how the game works, you will understand why every MEME project is born with a supply in the trillions.

If you go to Binance, click on the filter, and organize the coins from the lowest price to the highest, and start buying those that cost 0.0000003, you just fell into the trap that these projects created. They do not sell technology. They sell the perception of opportunity.

They discovered that most people do not analyze value; they analyze price. They do not ask, "What does this project deliver?" but "How many tokens can I buy with 50 dollars?" The more zeros, the greater the sense of potential. The more units you can buy, the greater the illusion of future gains.

That is why it is no coincidence that meme projects always have trillions, quadrillions, or infinite supply. Huge supply is not a mistake; it is a psychological strategy. It keeps the price eternally cheap and hope eternally alive.

They do not manipulate the chart. They manipulate your perception.

They do not sell tokens. They sell hope.

I believe it is time to wake up.

$SHIB $Jager $BOB
#floki #pepe