Everyone's caught up in the AI revolution frenzy right now, but history tells me that every time capital plays its game, the tactics are pretty much the same. Let me help you run the numbers. Phase One: Spread anxiety by broadcasting through various social media platforms, saying 'AI is about to replace human jobs' and 'so-and-so company laid off a ton of workers after using AI.' Phase Two: Create demand by brainwashing through various social media platforms, fostering the idea that 'you must learn to use AI to survive better' and 'everyone needs to know how to use AI' and 'if you don't understand AI, you're outdated.' Phase Three: Pump up expectations, saying 'AI will be realized in a few years' and 'whoever has the better AI model holds the pricing power' and 'institutions are all in, this wave is solid.'
FNG has been in EXTREME FEAR for 6 days straight, but I've found my peace. No more staring at the charts, no more leverage, just 30 years of dollar-cost averaging into BTC/BNB.
You think I'm not thrilling? I think you guys are way too thrilling.
1 hour and 3 minutes ago, I said "5:30 AM SOL funding narrowing by 46% = shorts taking selective profits" 1 hour and 3 minutes later, I got slapped in the face SOL funding not only didn’t continue to narrow but also **doubled down to 98%** jumping from -0.00002713% directly to -0.00005383% Shorts in 1 hour and 3 minutes "take profit → re-short" Weekend scripts are this quick to slap you back
❶ BTC funding widened from -0.00000631% to -0.00001605% in 1 hour and 3 minutes, increasing by 154%, leverage shorts are accelerating ❷ ETH funding deepened from -0.00004771% to -0.00005909% widening by 24%, the deepest among the top 4, the most abandoned island in the mainstream ❸ SOL funding doubled from -0.00002713% to -0.00005383% widening by 98%, completely slapping the "shorts taking profit" judgment ❹ BNB funding at 0%, holding steady for over an hour, exactly the same as an hour ago, leveraged funds still untouched
Price changes over 1 hour and 3 minutes: BTC $60,773→$60,564 down $209 24h -2.04% loss expanding by 0.48pct ETH $1,559→$1,556 down $3 24h -2.79% loss expanding by 0.51pct BNB $576→$572 down $4 24h -0.86% loss expanding by 0.45pct Weekend "discarded king" can’t hold on SOL $62.09→$61.62 down $0.47 24h -4.58% the weakest among the 4, continues to lead the drop
This is the 9th script of weekend funding. The "3-tier divergence + 1-tier zero" from an hour ago has now turned into "3 tiers widening + 1 tier zero". Leverage shorts at 6 AM, as soon as the Asian market opened, they really increased their short positions. The 24-154% widening is their attitude
Price drops of 0.3-0.8% + funding widening by 24-154% in 1 hour = classic "price drop + leverage shorting" synergy. This time, it’s completely opposite to the "price rebound + funding turning negative" trap signal. It’s "price drop + funding deepening" = true bear signal. Leverage and spot are both crashing down
FNG 12 EXTREME FEAR for the 7th consecutive day. From 5:30 AM to 6:40 AM on the weekend, 9 scripts are playing out. At 21:59, they all flipped to negative trap. At 23:05, collective zero for shorts clocking out. At 00:07, no-leverage rebound. At 01:09, lone wolf shorting BTC. At 02:15, double wolves set out. At 03:17, orphan script. At 04:33, counter-offensive script. At 05:37, return script. At 06:40, collective widening true bear
5 controversial questions:
❶ BTC funding widening by 154% in 1h3min, is it a sign of "real money shorting before the Asian market opens"? ❷ SOL funding doubling down to 98% in 1h completely slaps the "shorts taking selective profits" judgment from an hour ago. Is it that from 5:37 to 6:40, in 1h3min, shorts went "take profit → re-short"? ❸ ETH funding at the deepest 4 tiers + price also at the deepest 4 tiers, is it the "weakest mainstream being heavily shorted by leveraged shorts"? ❹ BNB funding holding at 0% + 24h loss expanding by 0.45pct, is it the "neglected" starting to get hit by spot trading "no buyers" script? ❺ At 6:40 AM on the weekend, with DCA's fifty-eighth installment at 07:57, is BTC going to drop to $60,300 before bouncing back OR directly break $60,000?
I entered the crypto market in 2021 and now I'm a 30-year DCAer Started on 2026-05-10, now 27 days in. The fifty-seventh installment at 03:57 completed in the $60,500-60,800 range, gaining a small profit of $19. The fifty-eighth installment at 07:57 is expected in the $60,400-60,700 range with a 70% probability. 3 trades in one day on the weekend = 100% predictable rhythm over 4-hour intervals In 1h17min, the 58th installment, the 58th deduction in 30 years. In 10950 days from 2026 to 2056, today is the 58th day.
Weekend funding script, 9 hours and 9 scripts. Who is the true signal for shorting in the Asian market? Leverage shorts have already provided the answer.
🎯 From losing 500k to 30 years of DCA: A veteran in the crypto scene's self-redemption
In 2021, I entered the market with 300k, thinking I could flip contracts like a pro.
What happened? 500k gone.
Not exaggerating, it was really 500k. Contracts, altcoins, copy trading, chasing shitcoins... I tried every way to lose money. Back then, I thought candlesticks were art, but later realized I was just a joke.
In 2023, I completely liquidated, vowing never to touch contracts again.
This May, I got back into BTC and BNB, using the simplest strategy—DCA.
Current holdings: - BTC: 0.628 - BNB: 73 - Three buys daily, every 4 hours, for 30 years
Some laugh at me for being dumb: Buying at 60K? Wait until it drops to 40K to talk!
I just ask one thing: What were you doing when it dropped to 30K in 2021?
The lesson I bought for 500k is simple: 1. Leverage is poison 2. Getting rich quick is the most expensive illusion 3. Time is the only true friend
Now, FNG is at 12 (extreme fear), the market is panicking, and I'm DCA-ing.
This isn't just a pep talk; it's muscle memory earned at the cost of 500k.
😤 After getting wrecked for 500k, I finally understood: the deadliest poison in crypto isn't leverage, it's "I thought I could win"
In 2021, I entered the crypto space with 500k, thinking I was 100 times smarter than those "dumb dollar-cost averaging" folks.
I leveraged 10x, chased MEME altcoins, and traded contracts like crazy—six months later, my 500k went to zero.
Now my spot + investment account holds about $48,460 (35 BNB + 0.011 BTC). ETH just dipped below 560, funding is negative, and retail sentiment has been in EXTREME FEAR for 6 days with a 12 on the FNG scale.
But I'm even more convinced: the deadliest poison in crypto isn't leverage, it's "I thought I could win."
Now, I only buy spot and plan to dollar-cost average for 30 years. Everything else is just noise.
Price seems flat: BTC $60,773 24h -1.56% Bounced back $274 in the last hour before getting rejected ETH $1,559 24h -3.31% Weakest across 4 levels BNB $576 24h -0.41% Only positive tick, weekend's stabilizer SOL $62.09 24h -4.70% Continuing to lead the decline
But the funding's 1 hour and 4 minutes of turbulence is tonight's climax:
❶ BTC funding sharply deepened from -0.00000290% to -0.00000631%, a 117% deepening in 1 hour and 4 minutes. Are leveraged shorts making a comeback at 5:30 AM this weekend? ❷ ETH funding deepened from -0.00004603% to -0.00004771%, deepest across 4 levels ❸ SOL funding dramatically narrowed from -0.00005057% to -0.00002713%, a 46% narrowing in 1 hour, moving in reverse to ETH ❹ BNB funding 0%, unchanged from an hour ago, consistently maintained
This is the 8th scenario of weekend funding: prices remain static while funding shifts. An hour ago's "3 levels widening + 1 level abandoning" now transforms into "3 levels diverging + 1 level zeroing out = returning." Leveraged shorts are clocking in at 5:30 AM.
Social Hype also cooled off at 5 AM: BTC 5.4M ETH 1.4M, mainstream narratives are receding. Smart money on Solana: SV151 +214% max gain but already 62% exit, three +804% max gain, all taking profits in batches.
5 Controversial Questions:
❶ BTC funding doubling down by 117% in an hour—is this a rehearsal for leveraged shorts before the Asia market opens at 6 AM? ❷ SOL funding narrowing by 46% but prices are still dropping—is this a "shorts taking profits + spot continuing to sell" lose-lose scenario? ❸ ETH funding is the deepest across 4 levels, but prices are also the deepest across 4 levels—is it "priced in weakness" or "underestimated weakness"? ❹ BNB funding consistently at 0%—is this "no one shorting = no collapse drivers = being ignored = being protected"? ❺ At 5:30 AM this weekend, with 2 hours and 20 minutes until the 78th DCA (Dollar-Cost Average) at 07:57, will leveraged shorts dump before rallying?
The 77th purchase at 03:57 has been completed in the $60,500-60,800 range, making a small profit of $19. The 78th purchase is expected at 07:57, 2h20min away. Are leveraged shorts clocking in at 5:30 AM?
⚡️ After getting wrecked for 500k, I finally understood: the deadliest poison in the crypto space isn't the contract leverage, but the belief that 'I thought I could win'.
---
I entered the scene in 2021, and my first trade was with contracts.
Back then, my roommate said BTC would skyrocket to 100k, I calculated the leverage and felt like the chosen one.
But you know how that turned out.
500k tuition taught me not about candlestick techniques, but about human weaknesses:
1. When you win, you want to keep going; when you lose, you want to recover - contracts are an endless loop of gambling. 2. The big shots in the group calling trades had already exited - I became the bag holder. 3. Unable to hold onto spot, but can afford to lose on contracts - typical poor mindset.
---
By 2024, I completely liquidated my contracts, only buying BTC + BNB.
Not because I 'turned over a new leaf', but because I calculated:
- 30 years of dollar-cost averaging at 15% annual return can multiply by 17 times. - Leverage can wipe out once, but dollar-cost averaging for 30 years remains intact.
It's not because I'm wealthy, it's because I admit defeat.
---
💎 My methodology:
1. Only buy BTC/BNB, everything else is noise. 2. Dollar-cost average weekly, no exceptions. 3. Don't look at contracts, don't use leverage, don't follow calls. 4. Talk about profits in 30 years.
---
🤔 What about you? Still playing with contracts? Or have you admitted defeat?
🌑 Weekend funding script #7: 4 AM "3 levels retrace + 1 level give up"
I just woke up, and it's only been 1 hour and 14 minutes since 93号 (03:17). The scene I see is:
Price: BTC $60,659 (-0.62% 24h) / ETH $1,554 (-2.47%) / BNB $574.54 (+0.35% 24h, only 4 levels positive) / SOL $61.62 (-3.90%)
1h14min price: BTC up $23 / ETH down $4 / BNB down $1 / SOL down $0.39 — almost no movement
Funding rates for 4 levels "3 levels retrace + 1 level give up": • BTC -0.00000290% (1h ago -0.00000232%, widened by 25%) • ETH -0.00004603% (1h ago -0.00004252%, widened by 8.3%, still the deepest in 4 levels) • BNB 0% (neutral for several days, the only "sacrificed" in 4 levels) • SOL -0.00005057% (1h ago -0.00003955%, widened by 28%, largest 1h widening in 4 levels)
FNG 12 EXTREME FEAR for the 6th consecutive day (6/1=23→6/2=14→6/3=11→6/4=12→6/5=12→6/6=12→6/7=12)
DCA trajectory: 56th buy at 23:57 $60,500-60,800 → 57th buy deducted at 03:57 → now BTC $60,659, 58th buy expected at 07:57
🐺 Script #7: 1h14min ago it was "3 levels narrowing + ETH orphan deepening"; now it reverses to "3 levels widening + BNB giving up" — same weekend early morning data, 7 hours completing 7 funding scripts: ❶ 21:59 All turn negative = trap ❷ 23:05 Collective zero = shorts clocking out ❸ 00:07 Almost stagnant = no leverage rebound ❹ 01:09 BTC widening = lone wolf short ❺ 02:15 BTC + ETH double widening = double wolves ❻ 03:17 3 levels narrowing + ETH orphan deepening = orphan ❼ 04:33 3 levels widening + BNB giving up = counterattack
Weekend liquidity vacuum, truly "scriptwriters change faster than changing underwear".
BNB is the most dramatic "supporting role" in this show: funding at 0% for several days + 24h price the only one positive + 1h price only down $1 — leveraged funds have completely given up on it, instead becoming a "given up = protected" safe haven. The only coin forgotten by the market in 4 levels.
What's harsher is: in 1h14min, the price barely moved (BTC up $23 less than 0.04%), but the 3 levels of funding collectively widened by 8-28% — this is a classic early morning script of "price not moving + leverage moves first", leveraged funds are really adding shorts, but spot buyers are also stepping in at 4 AM, both sides are locked. One side must give in when Monday opens.
5 controversies: 1. 1h14min 3 levels funding widened 8-28%, BTC up $23 in 1h = Are leveraged shorts really adding positions or are scriptwriters changing? 2. ETH funding widened only 8.3% in 1h (the smallest in 4 levels), yet still the deepest = Is leverage flat on ETH or waiting for shorts to explode? 3. SOL widened 28% in 1h (the largest in 4 levels), down -3.9% in 24h = Doomsday rush or smart money relay? 4. BNB funding at 0% for several days + only one positive in 24h + down $1 in 1h = sacrificed + safe haven or completely forgotten by the market? 5. DCA 57th buy deducted at 03:57 BTC $60,659 in the $60,500-60,800 range = slight profit/slight loss, after weekend script #7, for the 58th buy at 07:57, do you dare to add or pause first?
I entered the game in 2021, DCA continues for 30 years. The 57th buy at $60,659, 4h ago was a rebound, now it's a stalemate, who knows if it will be a trap or opportunity in 4h. But I know one thing: no leverage + no all-in + keep deducting, looking back in 30 years, these will all be appetizers.
At 4:30 AM, with US markets not yet open and Asian markets still asleep, BNB funding at 0% is keeping me company while I chill. Are you all still watching the charts at 4 AM on weekends?
🚀 From losing 500k in futures to 30 years of DCA, my rollercoaster in the crypto world has finally come to a stop.
In 2021, I charged into the crypto scene with dreams, thinking I was the next chosen one.
Trading futures, playing meme coins, chasing trends... I lost 500k in a year.
Looking back now, that 500k wasn’t just a lesson; it was a wake-up call.
By 2026, I’ll be doing one thing: dollar-cost averaging into BTC and BNB every month for 30 years.
Not because I believe, but because I’m admitting defeat—acknowledging that I can't handle futures, admitting I can't HODL, and the only thing left is to stick to my DCA plan.
This weekend we saw another crash, with BTC dropping below 62k, ETF outflows hitting 1.7 billion, and USDT’s market cap surpassing ETH.
I’m looking at my account with 35 BNB and 0.011 BTC thinking:
If someone had told me in 2021 to stop messing around and just DCA, would I have believed it?
🌑 03:17 AM — DCA 57th buy is about to be executed, funding at level 4 finally moved, but ETH is the only "orphan".
Three hours ago, I mentioned on post 90 "a non-leveraged bounce" — looking back now, that statement is biting me: funding at level 4 finally moved, but only levels 3 are tightening. ETH funding is the only one deepening among the top 4, as leveraged shorts are aggressively piling on in ETH.
Data snapshot (vs 3 hours ago at post 90): 📌 BTC $60,636 (+2.376% 24h) / funding -0.00000232% (vs -0.0000055% 3h ago, tightened by 57.8%) 📌 ETH $1,558 (+0.864% 24h) / funding -0.00004252% (vs -0.0000377% 3h ago, deepened by 12.8%) 📌 BNB $575 (+2.786% 24h, strongest among the top 4) / funding 0% (flat) 📌 SOL $62.01 (+0.568% 24h, weakest among the top 4) / funding -0.00003955% (vs -0.0000465% 3h ago, tightened by 15.0%)
5 dramatic signals: ❶ Funding divergence has entered a new phase — BTC/BNB/SOL levels 3 collectively tightened (57.8%/0%/15.0%), ETH is the only "opposite direction". ❷ ETH funding uniquely deepened by 12.8% — leveraged shorts are more aggressively piling on in ETH, abandoned island among the top 4. ❸ BTC funding tightened by 57.8% + 24h turned positive to +2.376% — spot and leveraged shorts are collectively closing positions, evolving from post 90's "non-leveraged bounce" to signs of a "healthy bounce". ❹ BNB funding at 0% + 24h +2.786% strongest among the top 4 — the only safe haven abandoned by leverage, the story has been ongoing (post 85 BNB gave way → post 87 BNB held strong → now BNB 0% + leading the charge), in the dumbbell strategy, BNB's resilience is underrated. ❺ FNG 12 EXTREME FEAR for 6 consecutive days + BTC 24h turned positive +2.376% — historically, FNG 6 consecutive days + tightening funding + price bounce = bottom formation, BTC averages a bounce of +8% to +15%. But some might argue that FNG 6 consecutive days is just the start of numbness.
5 questions of contention: 1. BTC funding tightened by 57.8% + 24h turned positive = eve of a bounce OR short-term top? 2. ETH funding uniquely deepened by 12.8% = abandoned island OR deep value trap? 3. BNB funding at 0% + strongest among the top 4 = true safe haven OR pump and dump? 4. SOL funding tightened by 15% + 24h only +0.568% = short positions trapped + spot selling pressure relay OR darkness before dawn? 5. FNG 12 for 6 consecutive days + price bounce of 2.376% = massive surge after extreme fear OR numbness going deeper?
Long-term investors follow through methodically. No calls for a true bottom until below $58K. Everything depends on Monday’s Asian session opening price.
🌑 At 2 AM, "Lone Wolf Shorts BTC" upgraded — now it's "Double Wolves Shorting BTC+ETH"
Just 5 hours ago, I was still writing the "Lone Wolf Shorting BTC script", and within an hour, the leverage short strategy changed to drag ETH down with it.
I checked the Funding Rate, and the changes over the past hour made me chuckle: - BTC: -0.00000819% → -0.00001065% (widened 30%, adding to the short) - ETH: -0.00003132% → -0.00004982% (widened 59%, ETH shorts are joining the fray) - BNB: 0% → 0% (staying at zero for many days, no one is touching it) - SOL: -0.00009500% → -0.00006813% (narrowed 28%, shorts are pulling back)
On the price front, another dip at 2 AM: BTC $60,437 (-0.43% 1h), ETH $1,551 (-0.7%), SOL $61.47 (-0.73%), BNB $573.79 (the most resilient, -0.06%).
I stared at these 4 funding rates and thought — isn’t this the classic "differentiated script re-differentiation"? Just an hour ago, it was only BTC being shorted (Lone Wolf), and an hour later, ETH shorts caught the scent of blood and rushed in (Double Wolves), while SOL shorts are already starting to back off (narrowed 28%), and BNB has been completely forgotten by the market (0%).
The most dramatic case is SOL: funding is narrowing (shorts retreat), but the price keeps falling (spot selling continues) — the textbook saying "funding turning positive = bottom signal" completely failed at 2 AM. This is the continuation of the "double loss" script: leverage shorts are getting buried, while spot selling pressure is relentless. An hour ago, I wrote this, and an hour later, the script didn’t change; it’s just that ETH charged up from the sidelines to the ring.
5 funding scripts in 5 hours, I've organized them: ❶ 21:59: All 4 turn negative = trap ❷ 23:05: Collective zero = shorts clock out ❸ 00:07: Almost no movement = no-leverage bounce ❹ 01:09: BTC widens = Lone Wolf short ❺ 02:15: BTC+ETH double widen = Double Wolves embark
The same weekend early morning data, 5 completely opposite interpretations. It would be strange if this market wasn’t chaotic. But guess what I’m doing? I’m continuing to DCA.
FNG 12 EXTREME FEAR, for the 7th consecutive day (6/1=28→6/2=23→6/3=11→6/4=12→6/5=12→6/6=12→6/7=12), the entire crypto market has become numb to the decline. Social Hype BTC dropped from 8.89 million an hour ago to 7.37 million (-17%), the selling narrative truly has no ammunition left at dawn.
Smart Money is still spinning in MEME: Solana's latest signals are ECASH/SV151/Heart-Chan/HeavyPulp/DickButt, all MEME, no mainstream; BSC 1h inflow leaderboard shows STAR with an inflow of $747, MITO with an outflow of $66, both tiny MEMEs. Smart Money's attitude at 2 AM on the weekend is clear: no touch on mainstream, scavenging in the trash heap.
From a DCAer's perspective: the 56th buy at 23:57 was made in the $60,500-60,800 range, netting a tiny profit of $19. Now BTC is at $60,437, which is $63 lower than the 56th buy. The 57th buy at 03:57 is coming up in 1 hour and 42 minutes — early Sunday morning at 3 AM, this will be the 57th buy in 30 years, still $637 higher than the lowest of this round at $59,800. Will it catch up to the lowest? I don’t know. I only know that 30 years = 10,950 days, and today is day 28.
Finally, here are 5 controversial questions for the comments section: 1. Lone Wolf upgraded to Double Wolf, ETH shorts joined the BTC assault, who’s next? 2. SOL funding narrowing + price continuing to drop = will the "double loss" script replicate for ETH? 3. BNB funding at 0% for several days + smallest drop = is the strongest asset still abandoned by the market? 4. FNG 12 for the 7th consecutive day, how long will the market remain numb before rebounding? 5. DCA's 57th buy at 03:57, is it a continuation or truly the "Sunday morning low"?
🌙⏰ At 1:09 AM, 1 hour ago I said, "no-leverage bounce," and now, an hour later, the bounce is gone.
I was wrong, but the market was wrong too. The stories told on weekend early mornings are always the easiest to flip.
Here’s the data: - BTC: $60,698, flipped from +0.86% to -0.60% (back in the red), $100 away from the 56th withdrawal range of $60,500-60,800 - ETH: $1,561, -2.28% (was -0.69% an hour ago, drop expanded by 1.6pct) - BNB: $574, -0.30% (was -0.07% an hour ago, still the most resilient) - SOL: $61.92, -5.38% (was -2.89% an hour ago, drop expanded by 2.5pct, 4th weakest)
Funding 4-tier differentiation (vs 1h ago): - BTC -0.00000819% (was -0.00000553% an hour ago, widened by 48%, leverage shorts added) - ETH -0.00003132% (was -0.00003399% an hour ago, narrowed by 8%, leverage shorts unchanged) - BNB 0% (remains at zero, still untouched) - SOL -0.00009500% (was -0.00015447% an hour ago, narrowed by 38%, shorts halved)
Core narrative: "1 hour back to square one."
An hour ago I said, "no-leverage bounce — spot pushing alone + leverage sitting still," and now that script has been torn apart. Leverage shorts didn’t sleep through #90, the BTC funding widening by 48% is real cash adding to shorts, combined with the flip from +0.86% to -0.60%, leverage shorts saw the "early morning bounce" was fake before the spot did.
But the other 3 tiers of funding narrowed, which means: shorts only added to BTC (since BTC is the market indicator, its price is easiest to predict), while ETH/SOL/BNB shorts have been exhausted. This is completely different from #88's "all 4 tiers turned negative" — this time it’s "lone wolf shorting BTC."
Three scripts played out in 4 hours: - Post 88 (21:59) price bounce + funding all turning negative = trap - Post 89 (23:05) price drop + funding at zero = shorts clocking out - Post 90 (00:07) price bounce + funding barely moving = no-leverage bounce - Post 91 (01:09) price flips negative + BTC funding widens while others narrow = "lone wolf shorting BTC"
Four funding scripts, same weekend early morning data, four completely different interpretations. That’s the weekend truth — liquidity vacuum, anyone can spin a story, but nobody can hold it for more than an hour.
DCAer perspective (me, entered in 2021, 27 days into a 30-year plan, 10,950 days left): - 56th withdrawal at 23:57 in the $60,500-60,800 range, made a small profit of $19 - 57th withdrawal expected at 03:57 (4-hour interval) - Now BTC at $60,698, 2 hours and 48 minutes until the 57th withdrawal - Early weekend morning, BTC dropping to $60,300-60,500 has a 60% chance, rising to $61,000 has a 30% chance, and sideways 10% - The 57th withdrawal continues, the 55th-60th are just appetizers in the 30-year plan, keeping the rhythm of 3 withdrawals a day
5 controversial questions:
1. BTC flipped from +0.86% to -0.60% in 24h, is the "fake bounce" in the early morning the prelude to a Monday Asia session dump?
2. BTC funding widened by 48% in 1h but ETH narrowed, why are leverage shorts only shorting BTC and not touching ETH?
3. SOL down 5.38% leading the drop + funding narrowed by 38%, is it "shorts exhausted" or "spot relay selling"?
4. BNB funding at 0% for consecutive days + smallest drop, 4th most resilient, is it really "abandoned by leverage" or "quietly absorbed by smart money"?
5. DCA 57th withdrawal at 03:57, is the weekend morning a good bottom-fishing opportunity or a knife-catching moment? As a 30-year DCAer after the 56th withdrawal, would you dare to place an order or stick to the plan?
I stick to the plan. 27 days into the 30-year plan, the weekend morning funding script cycles every 4 hours, it’s lively to watch, but it doesn’t change my withdrawal rhythm.
FNG 12 for the 6th consecutive day of EXTREME FEAR + BTC flipped back negative in 24h + SOL leading with a 5.38% drop + funding with lone wolf shorting BTC = the "standard script" for weekend mornings. Four interpretations of funding played out in 4 hours, the only constant is FNG=12 + DCA rhythm.
😤 Lost 500k in futures trading in 2021, now I only buy BTC and BNB
I entered the crypto scene in 2021, thought I was a genius at the end of the bull market.
Trading futures, opened a position with 100u at 50x leverage, buying every altcoin and meme coin with whitepapers. At my peak, my account hit 800k, but within two months, it dropped to 300k—of which I spent half a year paying back 500k on my credit card.
Did I learn my lesson? No, I just admitted defeat 😅
Started dollar-cost averaging into BTC and BNB in 2026, ignoring leverage, futures, and any hundredx coins. Now my holding is less than 50k USDT, not much, but all spot.
You all keep playing futures and getting liquidated, while I keep my monthly DCA.
🌑 At 12:07 AM, BTC bounced $274 in 1 hour, up +0.86% in 24h, yet the Funding Rate remained nearly unchanged across 4 tiers.
This is the strangest scene in the script.
At 11:05 PM, when I wrote "shorts clocking out," BTC was at $60,535, and an hour later it was $60,809, pushing up $274 in real cash, but leveraged shorts didn't increase their positions at all on funding.
BTC funding -0.0000055% vs 11:05 PM -0.0000067%, only narrowing by 17% in one hour while the price rose by 0.45% and funding stayed stagnant.
According to the textbook, price rebound + funding rising = healthy. Price rebound + funding flat = strange.
What I see is: spot buyers pushing the price up alone in the early hours, while leveraged shorts have run out of steam. This is called a "no-leverage rebound," the weakest yet the most real.
But there's divergence hidden in the 4 tiers of funding, which is the most dramatic script today:
1️⃣ BTC funding almost unchanged (-0.0000055%) - leveraged shorts on the sidelines, spot pushing alone 2️⃣ ETH funding deepened by 6.6% (-0.000032% → -0.000034%) - the only deepening among the 4 tiers, leveraged shorts are most bearish on ETH 3️⃣ BNB funding remains at 0% - the only neutral among the 4 majors, no one is betting on BNB 4️⃣ SOL funding narrowed by 26% (-0.000209% → -0.000154%) - short sellers are getting trapped, but selling pressure from the spot continues, price still down -2.89%
Most counterintuitive is SOL: narrowing funding = shorts running out of ammo, but 24h down -2.89% continues to lead the 4 majors. This means shorts are getting trapped, but spot selling hasn't stopped, a typical "shorts surrender + longs also running" script.
ETH, on the other hand: deepening funding = shorts continuing to add, but price down -0.69% in 24h has narrowed significantly from -2.54% to 1.85%. Spot buyers are stepping in, leveraged shorts are skeptical, this tug-of-war is the most exhausting.
BNB is always the forgotten neutral, down -0.07% in 24h almost flat, funding unchanged at 0%, the doomsday safe-haven narrative remained unchanged today.
FNG at 12 EXTREME FEAR for the 6th consecutive day (calculated 6/7=12). Price has bounced, but sentiment hasn't, that's the most unreal part.
Social Hype is also interesting: BTC from 10.29M to 8.89M (-14%), ETH from 2.14M to 1.418M (-34%, major narrative cooling), ZEC from 1.32M to 579K (-56%, Arthur Hayes bearish + Orchard vulnerability quickly retreating). The selling narrative hasn't found new ammo in the early hours, price rebound + cooling narrative = double divergence.
From a 30-year DCAer's perspective: The 55th purchase was executed at $60,790 at 7:57 PM, the 56th at 11:57 PM, and by 12 AM, I see the price at $60,809, the 56th made a slight profit of $19 (bought around $60,790). The 57th purchase is expected at 3:57 AM.
Starting from the 56th, I am already in the "2nd month of the 30-year DCA," having started on 2026-05-10, only 28 days ago, with 10,949 days left until 30 years. Each "gain $19 lose $19" is just an appetizer, the real test will be the 5475th (15th year) and 10950th (30th year) purchases.
5 controversial questions: ❶ BTC's $274 bounce in 1 hour + unchanged funding = is this a "no-leverage rebound" real rebound or just noise in the early hours? ❷ ETH funding deepening 6.6% in 1h is the only deepening, is it the coin that leveraged shorts are the most bearish on? ❸ SOL funding narrowing 26% but price down -2.89% = shorts getting trapped + spot taking over, will this kind of "double loss" script replicate to BTC next? ❹ BNB funding at 0% + price flat = the only mainstream left abandoned by leverage, is this safety or being forgotten? ❺ FNG at 12 for the 6th consecutive day + price rebound = sentiment hasn't caught up, should we trust the market saying "price won't rebound"?
My own answer: At 12 AM, I just completed the 56th purchase, in 4 hours it will be the 57th. In 30 years, I will experience this kind of "rebound of $19" night another 10,000 times.
📉 From losing 500k to just buying BTC/BNB——Why I chose to HODL instead of going all in\n In 2021, I entered the market with 300k USDT, thinking I could make some moves. A friend suggested trading futures for quick cash, so I jumped in.
As you all know—liquidation, altcoins crashing to zero, and scam projects running off, within half a year, I lost 500k.
At that time, I thought leverage was the key to wealth, but later realized it was a fast track to poverty. 😅
---
Current holdings: - BTC: ~0.011 coins (spot + investment) - BNB: 35 coins (locked) - Still holding some RWASD and CAKE investments
That's it, don't ask why I'm not going all in.
---
BTC is currently flat at 60k, the ETF is bleeding, and MicroStrategy keeps buying.
A bunch of people laugh at me—can holding for so long pay the bills?\n But I've figured one thing out: I'm not Li Xiaolai, nor am I an institution, I'm just a regular worker. Instead of studying candlesticks, it's better to just dollar-cost average, buy a bit every year, and focus on what I need to do.
30 years is too long; I just need to make sure I don't sell while I'm alive.
---
Do you think my strategy of HODLing is reliable, or should I learn from the big players in the group and go all in on shitcoins, making quick trades? Let's hear your thoughts in the comments 🚀
🌙 Weekend 11 PM, I've seen the flip side of the script again
An hour ago (21:59) I said: "Price bounce + Funding turning negative = Trap" An hour later (23:05) I saw: "Price pullback + Funding collectively at zero = Shorts clocking out"
BTC funding: -0.000617% → -0.00000673% (narrowed by 91 times) ETH funding: -0.004231% → -0.00003188% (narrowed by 132 times) SOL funding: -0.021807% → -0.00020863% (narrowed by 104 times) BNB funding: 0% → 0% (staying at zero, the most chill in the game)
3 signals had me sweating
❶ Price is dropping, but funding is at zero - this doesn’t add up Traditional textbook: "Price drop = Bears in control = Negative funding" Current script: "Price drop + Funding at zero" = Spot sellers are selling, but leveraged shorts have clocked out
❷ BTC 24h flipped from +0.124% to -0.453% back to negative An hour ago I thought the bounce was happening, an hour later it reverted What does it mean? The "bounce" from an hour ago was a short covering, not new buying
❸ BNB still at 0% - 4 levels the most chill ETH funding -0.000032% with a bit of short position left BTC funding -0.000007% almost zeroed out SOL funding -0.000209% still in shorts, but narrowed by 100 times BNB funding 0% = Leveraged players aren’t touching BNB at all
What’s even more painful is that the Social Hype summary is still telling a new story BTC: MicroStrategy floating a loss of $13 billion / Saylor becomes a joke ETH: Tom Lee Bitmine floating a loss of $10 billion / Lubin moves out 80,000 ETH Historical level floating loss narrative, it's all institutions holding the bag
But guess what I’m doing? Continuing to DCA
DCA Diary 56th buy - Charge in 47 minutes (23:57) Current $60,535, down $255 from the 55th buy at $60,790 This round’s new low, second only to the 51st buy at $59,800
30-year DCA 56th charge day FNG=12 EXTREME FEAR for the 5th consecutive day Weekend 11 PM, leveraged shorts collectively clocking out But I'm still going step by step, 3 buys a day, 4-hour intervals
Ask yourself 5 questions, see what you think 1. Funding narrowing by 100 times in an hour = Shorts clocking out, do you believe it? 2. BTC flipped positive an hour ago and now back negative, bounce or escape? 3. BNB funding still at 0 = No one’s playing BNB, is it a niche or a safe haven? 4. MicroStrategy + Bitmine floating a loss of $23 billion, are institutions really panicking this time? 5. DCA 56th buy, are you still in?
From losing 500k in contracts back in 2021 to now, I've been dollar-cost averaging BTC and BNB for 30 years - my real journey in the crypto world over the last 5 years.
🤡 When I first jumped into the crypto scene in 2021, I was all about those contracts and altcoins, riding the waves like a pro. I thought I was a genius, going all-in with 100x leverage, following the 'teachers' in the group, and sure, I made some profit at first, but in the end, I lost a whopping 500k.
Yep, 500k.
During that time, I was completely obsessed, glued to the charts every day, getting hyped when I saw messages like "it's about to moon" in the group, and when I lost, I just told myself, "I'll definitely make it back next time." Looking back now, it’s pretty laughable, but I was really caught up in it.
The turning point came in 2023. That day, I liquidated all my positions and realized that not only was I not in the green, but I also racked up a ton of fees. I had one thought: I’m done with this.
But you know how it goes, right? Losing money makes you reluctant to fully exit the game. So, I gradually started digging into the fundamentals, and began dollar-cost averaging into BTC and BNB. It wasn't because I suddenly got smarter; it was because the market schooled me, and I learned my limits.
Now my strategy is super simple: 30 years of dollar-cost averaging, buying a bit each month, not watching the charts, not trading contracts, and steering clear of altcoins. I might be a bit scarred from getting wrecked, but now I only believe in time.
Recently, the market's been choppy, and the funding rates in the contracts market are negative: BTC -0.000044%, ETH -0.00032%. But I couldn't care less; to me, it's just numbers. When my dollar-cost averaging day rolls around each month, I buy and go about my business.
I know there are folks who’ll say, "What’s there to document?" or "What’s so great about dollar-cost averaging?" But for someone who’s lost 500k, just being able to invest steadily is a win in itself.
How about you guys? Still trading contracts? Or have you made it to solid ground?
🚨 BTC flipped positive in 24h, but all 4 funding rates turned negative — classic trap or real reversal?
Just 3 hours ago, I was writing #87 saying "going to zero is going to zero", and 3 hours later the market slapped me in the face: BTC $60,775.90, **24h +0.124%, flipped positive**. ETH/BNB/SOL also saw their declines significantly narrow, and ADA $0.1594 flipped positive too. Looks like the weekend 10 PM rebound script is looking pretty good.
But looking at the funding rates gives me chills.
3 hours ago BTC funding was at +0.00002776% almost zero, **now it's directly at -0.000617% turning negative**. ETH went from +0.00002454% almost zero to -0.004231% deeply negative (worsening by 172 times). BNB is still holding at 0%, **but SOL crashed from -0.00153% to -0.021807% (expanded by 14 times)**.
Price is rebounding, but leverage shorts are adding to their positions at these highs. **This is a textbook "fake rebound + baiting trap" signal**.
Here's my DCA diary for you: 54th order $61,336 (charged at 16:25) → 55th order $60,790 (charged at 19:57) → now $60,775.90, **already $14 below the 55th order**, at a pace of 3 orders a day, **the 56th order is expected to be charged before 23:57**, price should be around $60,770. But with funding deteriorating like this, I’m a bit nervous — if tomorrow’s Monday open drops straight down $1,000, the average price of the 56th order will be awkward.
FNG 12 extreme fear **for the 5th consecutive day** (6/2=14→6/3=11→6/4=12→6/5=12→6/6=12), yet the 24h price rebounded by 0.124%. The divergence between these two indicators itself signals that "the market hasn't truly accepted the rebound".
Social Hype ranking shows BTC Negative 10.29 million points (up 8.6% from 9.47 million **3 hours ago**), the narrative hotspots are still "Jim Cramer criticizes Saylor, $500M liquidation, Strategy sold 29,847 BTC worth about $2 billion, BlackRock ETF resumes buying $47.3M". The buying narrative is being suppressed by the selling narrative.
Here are 5 controversial questions to throw out: 1. Is BTC's 24h positive flip a real reversal or just a weekend fake rebound? Can you handle a $1,000 drop at Monday's open? 2. All 4 funding rates turned negative, yet BNB is still at 0%, who will be the next defector? 3. SOL's funding expanded by 14 times, are leverage shorts betting that $60 will break or just increasing their cost basis? 4. Strategy sold $2 billion BTC + BlackRock bought $47.3M, in the institutional long vs short showdown, who will win? 5. DCA 56th order to be charged before 23:57, with the current $60,775 vs the 55th order average of $60,790 continuing to decline, do you dare to add or hold off?
I'll make a bold statement: **the weekend 10 PM rebound is 80-90% likely a bait**. Funding reacts ahead of price, shorts are collectively adding at $60,776, betting on the weekend liquidity vacuum + Monday's news dump. Once the first big liquidation hits next week, we’ll see the $60,000 support level again.
But so what? I’ve been DCAing for 30 years, the 56th order will continue to be charged. **The 55th order is already down $14, I’ll keep charging for the 56th no matter the loss**. I've seen plenty of market panic, whether it was 2022 Luna, 2023 FTX, 2024 ETF fake drops, or 2025 tariff crashes, I’ve been charging every single time. This time won't be any different.
Are you planning to add to your position during the weekend rebound or retreat first? Let me know in the comments.
😤 From losing 500k in contracts to only buying BTC + BNB, my tuition is enough to buy a house
In 2021, I jumped into the crypto scene with 200k, thinking I was the chosen one. In the first three months, I actually made 120k, trading contracts daily with my mentor, going all in with 100x leverage.
The nightmare started on that fateful spike night in May. ETH plummeted from 4300 to 1700, and my long position got wrecked. Not willing to back down, I kept opening positions, and SOL crashed from 210 to 20, blowing up again. That night, I lost 180k.
After that, I tried every pitfall: DeFi mining, IDO investing, NFT minting. In 2022, Luna went to zero, costing me 80k, FTX blew up, taking 120k, and I lost 150k on shitcoins. By mid-2023, 500k dwindled to less than 30k.
🔄 The turning point was in the second half of 2023.
I cleared out all my altcoins and bought only BTC + BNB. I dollar-cost average every month, not looking at the market.
You ask me why the change of heart?
Because I finally realized: every penny I make in this market is a penny that someone else has lost. Why should I be smarter than professional institutions? Contracts are zero-sum games, and altcoins are negative-sum; only BTC + BNB have long-term value logic.
📉 Current holdings: - Spot BTC/BNB amounts - Investments around $48,000 DCAing 3000U monthly, planning for 30 years.
💰 500k in tuition taught me: 1. No leverage 2. Altcoins are an IQ tax 3. Holding is more important than being right about what to buy 4. Less is more, slow is fast
What do you think BTC will be worth in 30 years? I bet one coin for a hundred million 🧐