Coinstelegram

La scadenza è reale e le conseguenze sono serie. Il principale regolatore dei mercati finanziari della Francia, l'Autorité des Marchés Financiers, ha lanciato un avviso diretto alle aziende crypto che operano in Europa: ottenere una licenza MiCA entro il 30 giugno o affrontare il blacklisting, azioni di enforcement e potenziali procedimenti legali.
L'avviso, consegnato dalla presidente dell'AMF Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani durante una conferenza stampa giovedì e riportato per la prima volta da Reuters, segnala che la pazienza dell'Europa con gli operatori crypto non autorizzati è ufficialmente esaurita.

La scadenza è reale e le conseguenze sono serie. L'organo di vigilanza dei mercati finanziari francese, l'Autorité des Marchés Financiers, ha lanciato un avvertimento diretto alle aziende crypto che operano in Europa: ottenere una licenza MiCA entro il 30 giugno oppure affrontare il blacklisting, azioni di enforcement e potenziali procedimenti legali.
L'avvertimento, consegnato dalla presidente dell'AMF Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani durante una conferenza stampa giovedì e riportato per la prima volta da Reuters, segnala che la pazienza dell'Europa nei confronti degli operatori crypto non autorizzati è ufficialmente finita.

Un ingegnere della sicurezza informatica di Google è stato arrestato a New York con accuse federali dopo aver presumibilmente utilizzato dati riservati dell'azienda per piazzare scommesse vincenti su Polymarket — portando a casa circa $1.2 milioni di profitti da scommesse che i pubblici ministeri descrivono come praticamente prive di rischio, riporta ABC news. Michele Spagnuolo, 36 anni, cittadino italiano, è comparso davanti a un giudice magistrato federale mercoledì mattina dopo il suo arresto, affrontando accuse di frode sulle materie prime, frode telematica e riciclaggio di denaro.

Un ingegnere della sicurezza informatica di Google è stato arrestato a New York con accuse federali dopo aver presumibilmente utilizzato dati riservati dell'azienda per piazzare scommesse vincenti su Polymarket — portando a casa circa $1.2 milioni di profitti da scommesse che i pubblici ministeri descrivono come praticamente senza rischio, riporta ABC news. Michele Spagnuolo, 36 anni, cittadino italiano, è comparso davanti a un giudice di un tribunale federale mercoledì mattina dopo il suo arresto, affrontando accuse di frode sulle merci, frode informatica e riciclaggio di denaro.

fmas:26 Concludes Successfully, BringingTogether Africa’s Online Trading andFintech Community
fmas:26 successfully wrapped up another impactful edition, bringing together leading brokers, fintech innovators, affiliates, IBs, traders, investors, payment providers, and technology companies from across Africa and beyond.
Held at the Cape Town International Convention Centre (CTICC), the event delivered two days of networking, knowledge-sharing, and business opportunities, reinforcing its position as one of Africa’s leading events for the online trading, fintech, crypto, and payments industries.
This year’s edition welcomed thousands of attendees who explored the exhibition floor, connected with industry leaders, discovered new technologies, and gained valuable insights from expert-led speaker sessions.
A Dynamic Exhibition Floor
fmas:26 featured a vibrant exhibition space with global and regional and international brands showcasing their latest products, services, and innovations. Attendees had the opportunity to meet face-to-face with key decision-makers, strengthen partnerships, and explore new business opportunities.
Of great importance to the summit, was giving traders the capacity to explore different brokerages and tools, and walk away as sharper traders, the expo floor did just that. It also hosted engaging activations, giveaways, networking lounges, and live demonstrations, creating an energetic atmosphere throughout the event.
Insightful Speaker Sessions
The conference agenda featured industry experts and thought leaders discussing some of the most important trends shaping the industry today. Sessions included “Inside My Best Trade with Jimmy Moyaha”, “The Micro Future(s): Trading NAS100 and US30 as a Retail Trader,” and educational workshops such as “Trade the News — What Actually Moves Markets (and why almost everyone gets it wrong).” Speakers including Jimmy Moyaha, Yaliwe Mlambo, and Lourens Reichert shared valuable insights and perspectives with attendees throughout the event.
In addition to the conference sessions, fmas:26 also hosted roundtable discussions, giving attendees the opportunity to engage in more focused conversations and exchange ideas directly with industry professionals.
Unmatched Networking Opportunities
One of the key highlights of fmas:26 was the networking experience. From the expo floor to the official networking events, attendees had countless opportunities to build meaningful connections with professionals from across the industry.
The event once again demonstrated the value of in-person events by creating an environment where businesses can connect, collaborate, and grow.
Celebrating Industry Excellence
fmas:26 also partnered with For Traders to host The Trading Cup, celebrating trading talent and performance throughout the event. Participants competed for a range of prizes, including a $100,000 Challenge and iPad for first place, a $50,000 Challenge for second place, a $25,000 Challenge for third place, and $6,000 Challenges awarded to traders placing fourth through tenth.
The competition added another exciting element to the expo, highlighting skill, strategy, and engagement within the trading community.
Looking Ahead
The success of fmas:26 highlights the growing importance of Africa within the global fintech and online trading landscape. With strong attendance, high-level discussions, and valuable business connections, the event continues to serve as a leading platform for the industry.
Organisers extend their thanks to all sponsors, exhibitors, speakers, media partners, and attendees who contributed to making fmas:26 a success.
Ian Daniels, Executive Committee Member at ACI UK, commented on the event:
“An important event at the intersection of retail and institutional trading.”
More information about upcoming events and future editions can be found on the officialFMsummits website.

fmas:26 Si è concluso con successo, portando
Insieme la Comunità del Trading Online e della
Fintech in Africa
fmas:26 ha chiuso con successo un'altra edizione impattante, riunendo broker leader, innovatori fintech, affiliati, IB, trader, investitori, fornitori di pagamenti e aziende tecnologiche provenienti da tutta l'Africa e oltre.
Svoltosi al Cape Town International Convention Centre (CTICC), l'evento ha offerto due giorni di networking, condivisione di conoscenze e opportunità di business, consolidando la sua posizione come uno dei principali eventi in Africa per il trading online, fintech, crypto e industrie dei pagamenti.

European Blockchain Convention returns toBarcelona as institutional capital moves to thecentre of the digital asset market EBC12 convenes on 16–17 September 2026 — bringing together the decision- makers, allocators and infrastructure providers who are defining what comes next
Barcelona, Spain — The question facing the digital asset industry is no longer one of legitimacy. After the approval of spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, the rollout of MiCA across the European Union, and growing allocations from asset managers and pension funds, institutions are in the market. The question now is one of execution — which platforms, counterparties and infrastructure will define the institutional layer of what comes next.
It is in that context that the European Blockchain Convention (EBC) will return to Barcelona on 16–17 September 2026 for its 12th edition — bringing together over 6,000 attendees from 70+ countries across two days of market intelligence, meetings and commercial momentum. Join the 12th edition with institutions like BlackRock, Cardano, Bitwise, Baillie Gifford, WisdomTree, Hilbert Capital, Zodia Custody, Midchains, and Caisse des Depots among others.
“EBC is built around a simple idea: when the right people are in the room, progress happens faster. In a market as fragmented as Europe& digital asset landscape, that matters.”— Victoria Gago, Co-CEO, European Blockchain Convention
INSTITUTIONS AT THE CENTRE — SINCE THE BEGINNING While the industry& narrative around institutional adoption has accelerated sharply over the past 18 months, EBC focus on that audience predates the trend. From its first edition, EBC was designed not around retail participation or token launches, but around the decision-makers who control capital at scale: asset managers, banks, infrastructure providers, exchanges and the policymakers shaping the rules they operate under.
Europe compounds the challenge. It is not one market — it is a region of parallel conversations, different regulatory timelines and different capital pools across London, Paris, Frankfurt, Zurich and Barcelona. EBC positioning as Europe Digital Asset Marketplace reflects a structural reality: the market needs a place where those conversations converge. Over 12 editions, it has become that place.
The programme spans the issues that define institutional participation in digital assets today: regulatory convergence and market structure across major jurisdictions; capital allocation strategy from sovereign funds to private banks; the infrastructure required for institutional-grade operations; the rise of real-world asset tokenisation; stablecoin and CBDC dynamics as settlement infrastructure; and the role of AI in reshaping market intelligence and execution.
What makes EBC valuable is not scale for the sake of scale. It is the concentration of the right market participants in one place — decision-makers, operators, investors and infrastructure leaders — with enough relevance and intent to make the time count.;— Victoria Gago, Co-CEO, European Blockchain Convention
The European Blockchain Convention (EBC) is the Europe Digital Asset Marketplace — the pan-European event where institutions, capital allocators, infrastructure providers and policymakers converge. Now in its 12th edition, EBC has established itself as the commercial centre of the European digital asset market. Registration is open at
European Blockchain Convention 12
Press contact: media@eblockchainconvention.com

La European Blockchain Convention torna a
Barcellona mentre il capitale istituzionale si sposta verso il
centro del mercato degli asset digitali
EBC12 si riunisce il 16–17 settembre 2026 — riunendo i decision maker, gli allocatori e i fornitori di infrastrutture che stanno definendo cosa verrà dopo
Barcellona, Spagna — La domanda che affronta l'industria degli asset digitali non è più una questione di legittimità. Dopo l'approvazione degli ETF su Bitcoin e Ethereum spot, il lancio del MiCA in tutta l'Unione Europea, e l'aumento delle allocazioni da parte dei gestori patrimoniali e dei fondi pensione, le istituzioni sono nel mercato. La domanda ora è di esecuzione — quali piattaforme, controparti e infrastrutture definiranno il layer istituzionale di ciò che verrà dopo.

David Hoffman just did the unthinkable — at least by the standards of the Ethereum community that has known him for years. The co-founder of Bankless, one of crypto’s most influential educational platforms and for a long time the most visible Ethereum bull in the industry, has sold his entire ETH position.
He published a detailed article explaining his reasoning, titled “Why I Sold My ETH” — and the argument he makes is more nuanced and more troubling for long-term ETH holders than a simple loss of faith.
The crypto community’s reaction was immediate and divided. For years, Hoffman was the person you sent to skeptics when they questioned Ethereum’s future. His conviction was a reference point. Watching that conviction translate into a complete liquidation has forced a conversation the Ethereum community has been quietly avoiding.
The Thesis That Died: “ETH Is Money”
Hoffman’s core argument is not that Ethereum the network has failed. It is that Ethereum the network can succeed — and ETH the asset can still underperform.
For years, the bull case for ETH rested on a specific thesis: that as the Ethereum network grew, demand for ETH as the native money of that network would grow proportionally. ETH was positioned as the internet’s reserve currency — the asset that everything else in the ecosystem would ultimately be priced in and settled through. The phrase “ultra sound money” captured this idea: ETH’s deflationary mechanics, combined with its role as gas and collateral, would make it a superior monetary asset over time.
Hoffman’s position is that this thesis has effectively closed. Not because Ethereum failed to grow — it grew enormously. But because the value that growth generated did not accrue to ETH in the way the thesis predicted. Instead, it dispersed across the ecosystem.
Layer 2 networks captured user activity and transaction fees. Applications built on top of Ethereum captured user value through their own tokens. Stablecoins — not ETH — became the dominant medium of exchange within the ecosystem. Real-world asset tokenization and TradFi integration brought enormous capital onto Ethereum rails, but that capital settled in dollars, not ETH. The network won. The asset did not win proportionally.
As Hoffman framed it: Ethereum can continue to dominate as infrastructure, but that dominance no longer guarantees that ETH captures the majority of the value flowing through that infrastructure.
Why the Community Is Upset
The reaction to Hoffman’s decision has been sharp — and understandable. Bankless built its audience on Ethereum conviction. The platform’s entire brand was constructed around the thesis that Ethereum and ETH were the same bet.
Watching the co-founder publicly separate those two ideas and sell his ETH while maintaining respect for the network feels, to many followers, like a betrayal of the intellectual framework they built their own investment theses around. Critics have pointed out that selling at current prices — with ETH trading around $2,070, well below its all-time high — means Hoffman is exiting at a significant discount to peak valuations. Others argue that his thesis is correct in its analysis but wrong in its timing, and that the current weakness in ETH is temporary rather than structural.
What neither side is disputing is that Hoffman’s decision to publish his reasoning publicly — rather than quietly repositioning — has forced one of the most substantive debates about ETH’s investment thesis that the community has had in years.
The Numbers Making His Case Harder to Dismiss
Hoffman’s argument does not exist in isolation. The market data surrounding ETH right now gives his thesis uncomfortable support.
ETH spot ETF products have recorded more than $2 billion in outflows over the past two weeks, according to SoSoValue data — a significant institutional withdrawal from a product category that was supposed to be the catalyst for a new ETH demand cycle. The contrast with Bitcoin ETF inflows over the same period is stark. Institutional capital is choosing Bitcoin as its primary crypto allocation and treating ETH with significantly more ambivalence.
The Ethereum Foundation has also been navigating a difficult period. Multiple high-profile departures from the foundation have raised questions about strategic direction and execution capacity at the protocol level. For a network whose value proposition depends partly on the credibility and competence of its core development community, leadership instability is a meaningful concern.
ETH’s price itself tells a story. Trading at approximately $2,070 — a fraction of its all-time high — the token has consistently underperformed Bitcoin throughout the current market cycle. The narrative that ETH would close the gap with Bitcoin during this bull run has not materialized, and the window for that to change before the market cycle turns is narrowing.
What This Actually Means for the Ethereum Ecosystem
Hoffman is careful to distinguish between his view on ETH the asset and his view on Ethereum the network. He is not predicting Ethereum’s failure as infrastructure. He is arguing that infrastructure success and token appreciation are no longer the same bet — and that investing in one does not automatically mean investing in the other.
That distinction is the most important idea in his article — and the one that the Ethereum community most needs to engage with honestly. If the value generated by Ethereum’s growth continues to disperse across L2s, applications, stablecoins, and TradFi integrations rather than accruing to ETH itself, the investment case for holding ETH specifically becomes harder to defend even as Ethereum the platform thrives.
David Hoffman spent years making the case for ETH. The fact that he has stopped is worth taking seriously — even if you ultimately disagree with his conclusion.

David Hoffman just did the unthinkable — at least by the standards of the Ethereum community that has known him for years. The co-founder of Bankless, one of crypto’s most influential educational platforms and for a long time the most visible Ethereum bull in the industry, has sold his entire ETH position.
He published a detailed article explaining his reasoning, titled “Why I Sold My ETH” — and the argument he makes is more nuanced and more troubling for long-term ETH holders than a simple loss of faith.
The crypto community’s reaction was immediate and divided. For years, Hoffman was the person you sent to skeptics when they questioned Ethereum’s future. His conviction was a reference point. Watching that conviction translate into a complete liquidation has forced a conversation the Ethereum community has been quietly avoiding.
The Thesis That Died: “ETH Is Money”
Hoffman’s core argument is not that Ethereum the network has failed. It is that Ethereum the network can succeed — and ETH the asset can still underperform.
For years, the bull case for ETH rested on a specific thesis: that as the Ethereum network grew, demand for ETH as the native money of that network would grow proportionally. ETH was positioned as the internet’s reserve currency — the asset that everything else in the ecosystem would ultimately be priced in and settled through. The phrase “ultra sound money” captured this idea: ETH’s deflationary mechanics, combined with its role as gas and collateral, would make it a superior monetary asset over time.
Hoffman’s position is that this thesis has effectively closed. Not because Ethereum failed to grow — it grew enormously. But because the value that growth generated did not accrue to ETH in the way the thesis predicted. Instead, it dispersed across the ecosystem.
Layer 2 networks captured user activity and transaction fees. Applications built on top of Ethereum captured user value through their own tokens. Stablecoins — not ETH — became the dominant medium of exchange within the ecosystem. Real-world asset tokenization and TradFi integration brought enormous capital onto Ethereum rails, but that capital settled in dollars, not ETH. The network won. The asset did not win proportionally.
As Hoffman framed it: Ethereum can continue to dominate as infrastructure, but that dominance no longer guarantees that ETH captures the majority of the value flowing through that infrastructure.
Why the Community Is Upset
The reaction to Hoffman’s decision has been sharp — and understandable. Bankless built its audience on Ethereum conviction. The platform’s entire brand was constructed around the thesis that Ethereum and ETH were the same bet.
Watching the co-founder publicly separate those two ideas and sell his ETH while maintaining respect for the network feels, to many followers, like a betrayal of the intellectual framework they built their own investment theses around.
Critics have pointed out that selling at current prices — with ETH trading around $2,070, well below its all-time high — means Hoffman is exiting at a significant discount to peak valuations. Others argue that his thesis is correct in its analysis but wrong in its timing, and that the current weakness in ETH is temporary rather than structural.
What neither side is disputing is that Hoffman’s decision to publish his reasoning publicly — rather than quietly repositioning — has forced one of the most substantive debates about ETH’s investment thesis that the community has had in years.
The Numbers Making His Case Harder to Dismiss
Hoffman’s argument does not exist in isolation. The market data surrounding ETH right now gives his thesis uncomfortable support.
ETH spot ETF products have recorded more than $2 billion in outflows over the past two weeks, according to SoSoValue data — a significant institutional withdrawal from a product category that was supposed to be the catalyst for a new ETH demand cycle. The contrast with Bitcoin ETF inflows over the same period is stark. Institutional capital is choosing Bitcoin as its primary crypto allocation and treating ETH with significantly more ambivalence.
The Ethereum Foundation has also been navigating a difficult period. Multiple high-profile departures from the foundation have raised questions about strategic direction and execution capacity at the protocol level. For a network whose value proposition depends partly on the credibility and competence of its core development community, leadership instability is a meaningful concern.
ETH’s price itself tells a story. Trading at approximately $2,070 — a fraction of its all-time high — the token has consistently underperformed Bitcoin throughout the current market cycle. The narrative that ETH would close the gap with Bitcoin during this bull run has not materialized, and the window for that to change before the market cycle turns is narrowing.
What This Actually Means for the Ethereum Ecosystem
Hoffman is careful to distinguish between his view on ETH the asset and his view on Ethereum the network. He is not predicting Ethereum’s failure as infrastructure. He is arguing that infrastructure success and token appreciation are no longer the same bet — and that investing in one does not automatically mean investing in the other.
That distinction is the most important idea in his article — and the one that the Ethereum community most needs to engage with honestly. If the value generated by Ethereum’s growth continues to disperse across L2s, applications, stablecoins, and TradFi integrations rather than accruing to ETH itself, the investment case for holding ETH specifically becomes harder to defend even as Ethereum the platform thrives.
David Hoffman spent years making the case for ETH. The fact that he has stopped is worth taking seriously — even if you ultimately disagree with his conclusion.

Se oggi cercavi Uniswap su Google, il primo risultato che hai visto era probabilmente una truffa. Gli attaccanti stanno eseguendo campagne di phishing sofisticate attraverso il sistema pubblicitario a pagamento di Google — posizionando link falsi di Uniswap sopra il sito ufficiale del protocollo reale e svuotando i portafogli di chiunque si colleghi ad essi.
Almeno $400,000 sono stati rubati attraverso due indirizzi di attaccanti identificati nella campagna attuale, secondo le analisi on-chain segnalate da più ricercatori di sicurezza su X.
Il quadro generale è peggiore. SEAL — l'Alleanza di Sicurezza, una delle organizzazioni di intelligence sulle minacce più attive nel DeFi — riporta che la campagna è attiva da oltre un anno. Solo a marzo, gli annunci di phishing di questo tipo hanno rubato $1.27 milioni in due settimane, con SEAL che ha bloccato più di 356 link malevoli durante quel periodo. Google è stata a conoscenza del problema per tutto il tempo. Gli annunci continuano a girare.

Se oggi hai cercato Uniswap su Google, il primo risultato che hai visto probabilmente era una truffa. Gli attaccanti stanno eseguendo campagne di phishing sofisticate attraverso il sistema pubblicitario a pagamento di Google, posizionando link falsi di Uniswap sopra il sito ufficiale del protocollo reale e svuotando i portafogli di chiunque si connetta a essi.
Almeno $400.000 sono stati rubati tramite due indirizzi di attaccanti identificati nella campagna attuale, secondo le analisi on-chain segnalate da diversi ricercatori di sicurezza su X.
Il quadro generale è peggiore. SEAL — l'alleanza per la sicurezza, una delle organizzazioni di intelligence sulle minacce più attive nel DeFi — riporta che la campagna è in corso da oltre un anno. Solo a marzo, le pubblicità di phishing di questo tipo hanno rubato $1,27 milioni in due settimane, con SEAL che ha bloccato più di 356 link malevoli durante quel periodo. Google è stata a conoscenza del problema per tutto il tempo. Gli annunci continuano a girare.

Ottantasei wallet Gnosis Safe sono stati svuotati in circa due ore lunedì — perdendo un totale di $3 milioni a causa di un attaccante che ha sfruttato una vulnerabilità in un modulo di terze parti chiamato SquidRouterModule su Ethereum e Base. L'attacco è stato rilevato in tempo reale dal sistema di monitoraggio degli exploit di Blockaid, che ha segnalato la violazione mentre si stava svolgendo attivamente su entrambe le chain.
Tutti i token rubati sono stati immediatamente convertiti in DAI attraverso pool di liquidità Uniswap V3 controllati dall'attaccante e aggregati in un unico wallet, che attualmente detiene circa $3,07 milioni in DAI. La consolidazione dei fondi in una posizione di stablecoin è una mossa standard post-exploit progettata per eliminare il rischio di volatilità dei prezzi mentre l'attaccante decide i prossimi passi.

Ottantasei portafogli Gnosis Safe sono stati svuotati in circa due ore lunedì - perdendo un totale di 3 milioni di dollari a causa di un attacco che ha sfruttato una vulnerabilità in un modulo di terze parti chiamato SquidRouterModule su Ethereum e Base. L'attacco è stato rilevato in tempo reale dal sistema di monitoraggio delle frodi di Blockaid, che ha segnalato la violazione mentre si stava svolgendo attivamente su entrambe le catene.
Tutti i token rubati sono stati immediatamente convertiti in DAI attraverso pool di liquidità Uniswap V3 controllati dall'attaccante e aggregati in un unico portafoglio, che attualmente detiene circa 3,07 milioni di DAI. La consolidazione dei fondi in una posizione stablecoin è una mossa standard post-exploit progettata per eliminare il rischio di volatilità dei prezzi mentre l'attaccante decide sui prossimi passi.

Il FM Africa Summit ospiterà il FM Africa Crypto Summit, un evento esclusivo di networking crypto sponsorizzato da TDME il 25 maggio al Time Out Market di Cape Town, riunendo i principali attori dell'ecosistema di asset digitali dell'Africa per un'esclusiva serata di connessioni importanti.
Si svolgerà dalle 17:00 alle 22:00, il FM Africa Crypto Summit è progettato come un'esperienza di networking mirata per professionisti di crypto, fintech, trading, liquidità, infrastruttura e Web3 che operano nell'economia digitale in rapida evoluzione dell'Africa.

Il FM Africa Summit ospiterà il FM Africa Crypto Summit, un evento esclusivo di networking crypto sponsorizzato da TDME il 25 maggio al Time Out Market di Cape Town, unendo
attori chiave dell'ecosistema degli asset digitali dell'Africa per una serata esclusiva di connessioni importanti.
Si svolgerà dalle 17:00 alle 22:00, il FM Africa Crypto Summit è progettato come un'esperienza di networking mirata per professionisti di crypto, fintech, trading, liquidità, infrastruttura e Web3 che operano nell'economia digitale in rapida evoluzione dell'Africa.

Polymarket, la piattaforma di mercati predittivi più grande al mondo, ha confermato che uno dei suoi wallet amministrativi è stato compromesso su Polygon, con gli attaccanti che hanno drenato oltre $520,000 da indirizzi utilizzati per operazioni interne. L'incidente è stato segnalato per la prima volta dall'investigatore on-chain zachXBT, che ha pubblicato un avviso alla comunità identificando l'indirizzo dell'attaccante e i wallet svuotati in tempo reale tramite il suo canale Telegram.
La piattaforma ha agito rapidamente per chiarire l'entità della violazione — e il dettaglio più importante per gli utenti è ciò che non è stato colpito. I fondi degli utenti, i meccanismi di risoluzione del mercato e l'infrastruttura dei contratti smart core sono rimasti intatti durante l'incidente.

Polymarket, la più grande piattaforma di mercati predittivi al mondo, ha confermato che uno dei suoi portafogli amministrativi è stato compromesso su Polygon, con gli attaccanti che hanno drenato più di $520,000 da indirizzi utilizzati per operazioni interne. L'incidente è stato segnalato per la prima volta dall'investigatore on-chain zachXBT, che ha pubblicato un avviso alla comunità identificando l'indirizzo dell'attaccante e i portafogli svuotati in tempo reale tramite il suo canale Telegram.
La piattaforma si è mossa rapidamente per chiarire l'ambito della violazione — e il dettaglio più importante per gli utenti è ciò che non è stato colpito. I fondi degli utenti, i meccanismi di risoluzione del mercato e l'infrastruttura fondamentale dei contratti smart sono rimasti intatti durante tutto l'incidente.

Il token HYPE di Hyperliquid sta scambiando a 59,20 dollari oggi — a un passo dal suo massimo storico — dopo aver guadagnato più del 57% in una sola settimana. In un mercato dove la maggior parte degli altcoin è o piatta o in calo, quel tipo di forza relativa richiede un'analisi piuttosto che un semplice riepilogo del prezzo.
Cosa sta realmente guidando HYPE in questo momento, e cosa segnala il suo movimento per il mercato più ampio?
La risposta coinvolge l'accumulo istituzionale, afflussi record di ETF, una pietra miliare di valutazione fondamentale e una tesi più ampia su quali progetti crypto meritano di esistere realmente nel 2026.

Il token HYPE di Hyperliquid sta scambiando a $59,20 oggi — a un passo dal suo massimo storico — dopo aver guadagnato oltre il 57% in una sola settimana. In un mercato dove la maggior parte delle altcoin è piatta o in calo, quel tipo di forza relativa richiede un'analisi piuttosto che un semplice riepilogo dei prezzi.
Cosa sta realmente guidando l'HYPE in questo momento e cosa segnalano i suoi movimenti per il mercato più ampio?
La risposta coinvolge l'accumulo istituzionale, afflussi record negli ETF, un traguardo di valutazione fondamentale e una tesi più ampia su quali progetti crypto meritino realmente di esistere nel 2026.