Enes

🚨 Crypto Community Alert 🚨 Fake Images and Scammers Are Fueling FUD
The crypto space is once again facing a wave of misinformation driven by fake images and deceptive accounts designed to spread fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD).
A recent case highlights how some high-profile social media accounts use manipulated images to appear credible. These accounts often present themselves as supporters of major blockchain ecosystems, using real event photos, banners, and large follower counts to gain trust. Upon closer inspection, however, inconsistencies in image quality, clothing, backgrounds, and resolution reveal clear signs of digital manipulation.

In one example, altered photos were shared to falsely suggest personal interactions that never occurred. Low-resolution figures were composited with high-resolution selfies — a common tactic used in image forgery. In another instance, an original photo featuring a different industry figure was edited and repurposed to mislead viewers.
Such tactics are not harmless. Fake images can be used to legitimize scams, manipulate narratives, and mislead newcomers who may not yet know how to verify sources or spot digital inconsistencies.
While criticism and feedback are essential for improvement in any ecosystem, not all “feedback” comes from honest actors. The ability to distinguish genuine discussion from deliberate deception is becoming a critical skill in crypto — especially as AI-generated content grows more advanced.
The takeaway is clear: always verify sources, question viral images, and avoid trusting claims based solely on social media popularity. In crypto, understanding reality accurately isn’t optional — it’s a requirement.
$ASTER $BNB #FUD #scam

U.S. President Donald Trump has signed a bill officially ending the U.S. government shutdown, reopening federal agencies and restoring normal government operations.
The shutdown, which disrupted public services and left hundreds of thousands of federal workers either furloughed or working without pay, sparked intense political negotiations in Washington. With the bill now signed, affected employees will receive back pay, and essential government functions are expected to resume immediately.
Trump described the move as a necessary step to restore stability, emphasizing the importance of keeping the government functioning while broader political disagreements continue to be debated.
The decision has drawn mixed reactions across the political spectrum. Supporters argue it brings relief to workers and businesses impacted by the shutdown, while critics say it underscores deeper structural issues in U.S. budget negotiations that remain unresolved.
As government operations restart, attention now turns to whether lawmakers can prevent similar shutdowns in the future — or if this marks only a temporary pause in Washington’s ongoing fiscal battles.

Mr. Copper: The Trader Who Once Controlled the Global Copper Market
In the world of commodities, few figures are as legendary — or as controversial — as “Mr. Copper.”
Behind the nickname was Yasuo Hamanaka, a trader whose actions in the 1980s and 1990s reshaped the copper market and permanently changed how commodity exchanges are regulated.

Who Was Mr. Copper?
“Mr. Copper” was the nickname given to Yasuo Hamanaka, the former head of the metal-trading division at the Japanese trading giant Sumitomo Corporation.
During the mid-1980s, Hamanaka rose to fame by turning Sumitomo into the largest copper trader in the world — despite the company owning no copper mines.
At the peak of his influence:
Hamanaka controlled around 5% of the world’s copper supplyTraders gave him another nickname: “Mr. Five Percent”His positions were powerful enough to influence global copper prices

How One Man Cornered a Global Commodity
Hamanaka’s strategy relied on a combination of:
Massive physical copper holdingsAn aggressive accumulation of futures and options contractsMaintaining long positions to squeeze short sellers
Because copper was relatively illiquid, controlling even a small percentage of supply gave Sumitomo outsized influence. Traders knew something was wrong, but at the time, the London Metal Exchange (LME) did not require detailed position disclosures.
That lack of transparency made it nearly impossible to prove market manipulation — until it was too late.

From Market Hero to Rogue Trader
For years, Hamanaka was admired inside Sumitomo for delivering enormous profits. But when market conditions shifted in 1995, increased copper supply triggered a price correction.
Suddenly, Sumitomo’s massive long positions became a liability.
In 1996, the truth emerged:
Hamanaka had engaged in fraud and forgeryHis trades resulted in $2.6 billion in lossesHe was convicted and sentenced to seven years in prison
Sumitomo denied knowledge of the illegal activity but ultimately paid $150 million to settle regulatory claims.

How Mr. Copper Changed the Market Forever
The fallout didn’t just affect Sumitomo.
In response, the London Metal Exchange introduced stricter rules on:
Position reportingMarket transparencyLimits on concentration
These reforms were designed to ensure that no single trader could ever again corner a global commodity market the way Hamanaka did.

Why the Mr. Copper Story Still Matters
The story of Mr. Copper is more than a financial scandal — it’s a lesson in:
The dangers of opaque marketsThe power of leverage in illiquid assetsWhy transparency and regulation matter
Decades later, traders still reference Mr. Copper as a reminder of what happens when one person gains too much control over a market.

Final Take
Yasuo Hamanaka’s rise and fall stands as one of the most dramatic episodes in commodities history.
He proved that markets can be bent — but also that they eventually snap back.
And when they do, the consequences are rarely small.

Who Dominates Crypto Trading? CoinGecko Reveals the Top 10 Centralized Exchanges by Market Share
CoinGecko has released its latest research on the centralized crypto exchange (CEX) landscape, revealing which platforms truly dominate global trading volume — and how the balance of power shifted throughout 2025.
Despite a volatile year marked by liquidations, hacks, and bearish sentiment, centralized exchanges processed a staggering $18.7 trillion in spot trading volume.
Here’s what the data shows.

Binance Remains the Undisputed Market Leader
Once again, Binance secured its position as the largest centralized exchange in the world.
2025 market share: 39.2%Total 2025 spot volume: $7.3 trillionDecember 2025 volume: $361.8B (down 40.6% MoM)
Although Binance saw a slight -0.5% year-on-year decline, it still controlled nearly 40% of all spot trading volume among the top 10 exchanges — more than the next several competitors combined.
The drop in late-2025 volume was largely attributed to bearish market sentiment following the major liquidation event on October 10.

Bybit Holds Second Place Despite a Tough Year
Bybit finished 2025 as the second-largest centralized exchange:
Market share: 8.1%Total 2025 volume: $1.5 trillionDecember 2025 volume: $90.0B
Despite suffering a major hack earlier in the year, Bybit managed a slow but steady recovery. Its market share dropped to 6% in March but gradually rebounded, proving strong user retention and resilience.

MEXC Emerges as the Fastest-Growing Exchange
The biggest surprise of 2025 was MEXC.
Market share: 7.8%Total 2025 volume: $1.5 trillionYoY growth: +90.9% (highest among top 10)
MEXC’s aggressive zero-fee spot trading policy attracted high-frequency traders and retail users alike, allowing it to leapfrog competitors and secure third place.

Other Notable Performers in 2025
Several exchanges posted solid growth despite market headwinds:
Bitget: +45.5% YoYGate: +39.7% YoYHTX: +35.6% YoYCrypto.com: +4.3% YoYCoinbase: +2.8% YoY
Meanwhile, OKX and Upbit saw modest declines, reflecting regional and regulatory pressures.

Top 10 Centralized Crypto Exchanges by Market Share (2025)
Binance — 39.2%Bybit — 8.1%MEXC — 7.8%Gate — 7.5%Crypto.com — 7.2%Bitget — 6.4%OKX — 6.3%Coinbase — 6.1%HTX — 6.0%Upbit — 5.5%
Collectively, the top 10 exchanges increased total trading volume by +7.6% YoY, underscoring the continued importance of centralized platforms — even as DeFi grows.

Final Take
Despite ongoing narratives around decentralization, centralized exchanges still dominate crypto liquidity. Binance remains the clear leader, while MEXC’s explosive growth and Bybit’s recovery highlight how competitive the sector has become.
As market conditions evolve, liquidity, fees, trust, and infrastructure will continue to determine which exchanges stay on top.

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ) has addressed a wave of misinformation circulating across the crypto market over the past few days. In a direct response on social media, CZ clarified several viral claims, calling them false, exaggerated, or taken out of context.
Here are the four major FUD narratives — and the facts behind them.

1. “There’s a $7 Million Polymarket Bet on CZ” — Fake
One of the most widely shared claims suggested that a Polymarket prediction event related to CZ had attracted $7 million in volume.
CZ denied this outright.
According to him:
The event does not exist on PolymarketIt’s not listed on any prediction marketThe claimed trading volume is completely fabricated
CZ added humorously:
“If it did exist, I’d be the first to throw a cake in my own face.”

2. “CZ Canceled the Supercycle” — Not True
Another rumor claimed that CZ had “canceled” the crypto supercycle.
CZ clarified that this is a misinterpretation:
He said he is “less confident than before”He never claimed the supercycle was overHe does not control the market
“If I had that kind of power, I wouldn’t be on Crypto Twitter with you all. I’d be snapping my fingers all day.”

3. “Binance Sold $1 Billion in Bitcoin” — Incorrect
This claim confused user activity with exchange activity.
CZ explained:
Binance did not sell BitcoinBinance users sold BitcoinBinance wallet balances change mainly when users withdraw funds
Many users keep assets on Binance and use it as a wallet even after trading, which often leads to misinterpretation of on-chain data.

4. “SAFU Fund Didn’t Buy Bitcoin” — Misunderstood
CZ reminded the community that Binance stated the SAFU fund would be converted into BTC over a 30-day period.
Key points:
Purchases won’t happen via DEXsBinance is a CEX with the deepest liquidityFunds may be bought gradually and transferred later
He also put the numbers into perspective:
“$1 billion over 30 days compared to Bitcoin’s $1.7 trillion market cap — do the math.”
According to CZ, the move is a confidence gesture, not a market-moving event.

Noise Is Loud, Facts Are Quiet
@CZ ’s message was clear:
FUD spreads faster than factsContext gets lostOn-chain data is often misunderstood
He ended simply:
“Back to building.”
#CZ #FUD

The Greatest Trade in History: Satoshi Nakamoto Made $86 Billion — Without Ever Selling a Single Bitcoin
While traders obsess over entries, exits, and leverage, one person has quietly executed the most profitable crypto position of all time — without pressing the sell button once.
That person is Satoshi Nakamoto.

Satoshi Has Never Sold a Single Bitcoin
Blockchain data shows that the wallets attributed to Bitcoin’s creator have remained completely inactive for over 16 years.
The last known outgoing transaction from a Satoshi-linked wallet occurred in 2009, shortly after Bitcoin’s launch. Since then:
No sellingNo transfersNo movement
Not during bull markets.
Not during crashes.
Not at $1, $1,000, or $69,000.

An $86 Billion Unrealized Profit
Satoshi is believed to control approximately 1.1 million BTC, mined in Bitcoin’s earliest days when mining difficulty was effectively zero.
At today’s prices, that stash is worth roughly $86 billion USD.
That makes Satoshi:
The best-performing individual in crypto historyOne of the top 25 richest people in the worldWealthier than most tech founders — without an IPO, VC funding, or marketing
And still… untouched.

The Ultimate Diamond Hands
Every major Bitcoin cycle has tempted long-term holders to sell:
The 2013 bubbleThe 2017 maniaThe 2021 peakMultiple 70% drawdowns
Satoshi ignored them all.
No profit-taking.
No lifestyle upgrade.
No explanation.
Just silence.

Why Satoshi’s Coins Matter
The fact that Satoshi has never sold is more than trivia — it’s foundational to Bitcoin’s credibility.
Those unmoved coins represent:
No insider exitNo founder dumpNo hidden control over supply
In a market where founders often cash out early, Satoshi did the opposite — and disappeared.

The Greatest Mystery in Finance
Satoshi Nakamoto could crash markets with a single transaction.
But after 16 years, the message is clear:
Bitcoin was never about personal wealth.
It was about creating money that didn’t need a creator.
And that may be the greatest trade — and sacrifice — in financial history.

This philosophy isn’t unique to long-term investors — it’s also been consistently echoed by Changpeng Zhao (CZ), the former CEO of Binance.
Over the years, CZ has repeatedly emphasized that:
Most traders underperform because they overtradeEmotional decisions destroy long-term returnsHolding quality assets through volatility beats chasing short-term moves
His core advice has remained unchanged across bull and bear markets:
“If you can’t hold, you won’t be rich.”
According to CZ, the biggest mistake investors make isn’t buying the wrong asset — it’s selling too early. Markets reward patience, discipline, and the ability to sit through drawdowns without panic.
In a space obsessed with constant action, doing nothing is often the most profitable strategy.
Not financial advice.

Michael Saylor is facing one of the largest unrealized drawdowns in corporate crypto history — yet he’s doubling down.
At its peak, Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings reached an all-time high AUM of $78.7 billion. Today, that figure is down by roughly $23 billion, driven by Bitcoin’s pullback from recent highs.
Most CEOs would pause.
Saylor didn’t.

The Numbers Behind the Drawdown
Over the past five years, Strategy has invested approximately $54.26 billion into Bitcoin. Despite extreme volatility, the company is still up about 2.3% on total capital deployed.
That may sound modest — but context matters.
This includes:
Multiple 50–70% Bitcoin drawdownsA full bear marketAggressive leverage cyclesRising interest rates and macro pressure
Through all of it, Strategy never sold.

$75 Million More BTC — In the Middle of the Dip
Instead of slowing down, Saylor just added another $75 million worth of Bitcoin to Strategy’s balance sheet.
No hedging.
No diversification.
No risk-off messaging.
Just the same thesis he’s repeated for years:
Bitcoin is superior to cash, bonds, gold, and equities as a long-term store of value.

Why Saylor Keeps Buying Despite the Pain
Saylor’s strategy has never been about short-term performance.
His thesis is built on three core beliefs:
Bitcoin is digital property, not a tradeVolatility is the cost of admissionTime in Bitcoin beats timing Bitcoin
From his perspective, a $20B drawdown isn’t failure — it’s temporary noise in a multi-decade bet against fiat debasement.

A High-Conviction Bet — or the Biggest Gamble in Corporate History?
Critics argue Strategy is dangerously exposed to a single asset. Supporters say Saylor is executing the purest institutional Bitcoin thesis ever attempted.
One thing is certain:
No other public company CEO has:
Allocated this much capital to BitcoinHeld through this level of volatilityContinued buying during massive drawdowns
Whether this becomes a legendary conviction trade or a historic cautionary tale will be decided by time — and Bitcoin’s next decade.

The recent release of the Epstein documents — totaling nearly 3.5 million pages and published by the U.S. Department of Justice on January 30 — has shaken politics, finance, and now the crypto world.
Within hours of the release, social media was flooded with explosive claims:
“Satoshi Nakamoto is in the Epstein files”“Jeffrey Epstein created Bitcoin”“Bitcoin was a CIA project”
But how much of this is real — and how much is misinformation?
Here’s what the facts actually show.

The Viral ‘Satoshi Email’ Is Fake
One of the most widely shared images on social media claims to show an email from Jeffrey Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 31, 2008, the same day Bitcoin’s whitepaper was released.
The email allegedly reads:
“The pseudonym ‘Satoshi’ works perfectly. Our little digital gold mine is ready for the world.”
However, this image is not authentic.
Multiple technical inconsistencies expose it as fake:
Two separate “To:” fields appear in the headerThe email formatting does not match DOJ archive standardsThe phrase “little digital gold mine” does not appear anywhere in the official Epstein documentsThe email address shown does not exist in DOJ records
There is no verified email connecting Epstein to Bitcoin’s creation.

Why ‘Satoshi’ Appears in the Documents — and Why It Doesn’t Matter
Yes, the name “Satoshi” does appear in some of the Epstein documents.
One file even states that Epstein “spoke with some of Bitcoin’s founders.”
But context matters.
These references date to 2016, years after Bitcoin was created, mined, and widely distributed. Communicating with Bitcoin developers nearly a decade later does not imply authorship of the protocol.
There is:
No overlap between Epstein and Satoshi’s known emailsNo connection to Bitcoin’s original GitHub commitsNo link to early wallets associated with Satoshi NakamotoNo cryptographic evidence tying Epstein to Bitcoin’s keys

What Epstein Did Do: Invest in Crypto
The documents confirm that Epstein was involved in crypto — as an investor, not a creator.
Verified information shows:
Epstein invested $3 million in Coinbase in December 2014The deal was facilitated through Brock Pierce and Blockchain CapitalCoinbase was valued at ~$400 million at the timeEpstein sold part of the stake in 2018, reportedly cashing out ~$15 millionHe also invested in Blockstream, an early Bitcoin infrastructure company
Blockstream co-founder Adam Back confirmed the 2014 investment publicly. While Back himself has long been speculated to be Satoshi Nakamoto, there is no definitive proof of that claim either.

MIT, Donations, and Bitcoin Core Developers
The Epstein files also reveal that he donated $850,000 to MIT between 2002 and 2017.
Of this:
$525,000 went to the Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) at the MIT Media Lab
During Bitcoin Foundation’s financial crisis in 2015, several Bitcoin Core developers — including Gavin Andresen, Wladimir van der Laan, and Cory Fields — later worked with MIT DCI.
However:
Developers have stated they were unaware of the donation’s sourceSalaries were paid directly by MITBitcoin’s decentralized governance makes donor control technically impossible

So… Is Jeffrey Epstein Satoshi Nakamoto?
No.
There is zero technical, cryptographic, or historical evidence that Jeffrey Epstein:
Wrote Bitcoin’s whitepaperMined the genesis blocksControlled Satoshi Nakamoto’s private keysParticipated in Bitcoin’s creation between 2008–2009
The viral claims are driven by fake images, timeline confusion, and speculation, not facts.

The Bigger Picture: Why Bitcoin Still Works
The Epstein Papers do not put Bitcoin itself at risk.
Bitcoin’s greatest strength remains unchanged:
Open-source codeDecentralized governanceNo single founder controlNo dependency on early investors
Even if controversial figures invested later, the protocol operates independently of any individual, institution, or donor.
That resilience is exactly what Satoshi designed.

Candlesticks aren’t magic — but they do visualize trader psychology in real time.
Here are 5 classic patterns that show up again and again across all markets:

1️⃣ Three Line Strike
A strong reversal pattern. After three candles in one direction, price snaps hard the other way. High reversal accuracy when confirmed.

2️⃣ Three Black Crows
Three strong bearish candles after an uptrend. Often signals trend exhaustion and continuation to the downside.

3️⃣ Doji
Indecision. Buyers and sellers are fighting — momentum is fading. Context matters more than the candle itself.

4️⃣ Hammer
Long lower wick, small body. Price gets rejected at lower levels → potential bullish reversal after a downtrend.

5️⃣ Morning & Evening Star
Three-candle reversal structures.
• Morning Star = bullish
• Evening Star = bearish
📌 Important:
Candlesticks alone can give false signals. The real edge comes from combining them with order flow, volume, and liquidity.
Price tells the story — but order flow confirms it.
Trade smarter, not harder.

With River continuing to set new all-time highs, it’s understandable that more people are starting to look beyond the price and ask what kind of project this actually is.

River is a chain-abstraction based stablecoin system designed to improve how liquidity and assets move across different blockchains. At its core is satUSD, a multi-collateral stablecoin that can be minted and used across more than 9 public networks. The idea is simple in theory but complex in execution: assets shouldn’t be limited by chains, bridges, or fragmented ecosystems.

Today, crypto holds trillions of dollars in value, yet liquidity remains scattered across hundreds of L2s and isolated DeFi environments. River positions itself as infrastructure that helps assets move toward where they are most useful, without forcing users to manually navigate cross-chain complexity. From my perspective, this focus on abstraction rather than competition is what makes the project interesting.

In terms of traction, River has reached around $300M in cumulative TVL, with approximately 150M satUSD already in circulation. The protocol is live across 9+ chains and is listed on major exchanges such as Binance, OKX, and Bybit, with recent expansion into KR spot CEXs. Trading competitions across platforms like Aster, MEXC, Coinone, and HTX suggest that the team is actively trying to keep liquidity and user activity engaged rather than letting momentum fade.

On the ecosystem side, several recent milestones stand out. River has announced a strategic partnership with Sui, aiming to connect EVM and Move-based ecosystems. There is also a partnership with , signaling collaboration within the stablecoin landscape rather than direct rivalry. Most notably, River closed a $12M strategic round with participation from TRON DAO, Justin Sun, Maelstrom (the family office of Arthur Hayes), Spartan Group, along with Nasdaq-listed companies and institutions from the US and Europe. This level of backing suggests institutional interest in the broader chain-abstraction narrative, not just short-term price action.

What personally stands out to me is that River doesn’t frame itself as a replacement for existing chains or DeFi protocols. Instead, it treats fragmentation as a given reality of the market and builds around it. Native cross-chain execution and multi-collateral design feel like a more sustainable approach than relying on increasingly complex bridge architectures.
According to Alea Research, River’s points and airdrop conversion mechanisms may still offer early-user opportunities, which indicates that the economic design of the system is still evolving. That experimentation phase is often where long-term infrastructure projects either find product-market fit or fail to do so.

Overall, River looks less like a typical stablecoin and more like an attempt to build ecosystem-level financial infrastructure. Whether it becomes a lasting layer in crypto will depend on adoption, regulatory clarity, and how well it scales beyond early momentum, but the problem it’s trying to solve is real. This is a personal view, not investment advice.
#RİVER $RIVER $SUI #RIVER