SatriaSatyaSindya

I have not succeeded in recovering the losses due to being forced to close positions in futures (OCEAN) due to the merger process of FET, AGIX and OCEAN into ASI.
And related to that, I have written that #Binance must protect its users from such developer actions and I also suspect that there will be a possibility that such developer actions will spread to other developers if the exchange continues to facilitate them. (read here)
And sure enough, Binance announced that they would support the rebranding process of GALXE (GAL) to Gravity (G). And again, users are forced to close future positions that have already been opened without taking into account potential losses. (read here)
And, I wrote again that this process would be detrimental and guessed that this kind of action would become even more contagious and crazy. (read here)
My guess is correct. It won't take long for RNDR to be rebranded to RENDER and all future positions are recommended to be closed or forced to close at the specified time. (read here)
This is crazy and users should speak up so that Binance stops supporting this process until they find a way so that whatever process the developer wants to do doesn't harm Binance users.
If we as users experience losses due to the market process then that is normal. That is our risk in the market.
Or if Binance delists a pair for reasons such as low trading volume then that is understandable, because it is for the good of the user.
However, if Binance delists the pair due to developer actions, Binance must think about the potential losses that users could experience.
If Binance actually supports the actions of this developer then this will definitely spread and frankly I am very afraid of opening a position in the future market.
Imagine, you open a position with a certain trading plan. Then suddenly when your position is experiencing negative PNL (not yet touching SL) you receive news that the position must be closed or will be forced to close.
And what's crazy is that this happened within a short period of time, less than a month. Imagine if you were unlucky enough to get a position at OCEAN, AGIX, GAL, and RNDR during this process. How much did you lose? You can lose your entire balance without ever experiencing a failed trade. Even if you only have one of them, you won't necessarily be able to recover your losses immediately.
Notes :
I spoke to the Binance support team and got a good response. They promised to convey this issue to the relevant technical team. I have been with Binance for a long time and believe they have enough expertise and certainly the intention to protect their users. Users must be made comfortable without having to worry that their positions could be closed/advised to close at any time due to third party actions. But of course the more people talking about this issue the better. If you read this please share.
#CPI_BTC_Watch
#DelistingNotice #BTC_Bounce_Back_to_57k

We are in the crypto world because we believe this industry is the future. We choose Binance as a place to trade because we believe they will do what is best for their customers.
However, several events in the crypto world have caused huge losses caused by irresponsible developer behavior.
We believe the exchange is trying to get better, that's why we are all still here. However, it seems that this is not enough. There are still actions by developers that harm consumers which are not resolved fairly.
Remember the LUNA case. Incompetent and evil developers have harmed so many people. Not only for LUNA holders but also for everyone in the industry because the LUNA case caused a massive price collapse.
Now there is an event (I won't call it a case) of merging 3 AI tokens, namely FET, OCEAN, and AGIX.
On June 14, 2024, #Binance made an announcement that they will support the merger process of Fetch.ai (FET), Ocean Protocol (OCEAN) and SingularityNET (AGIX).
You can read more detail at the following link: FET, OCEAN, AGIX merge
In summary, the contents are:
OCEAN and AGIX tokens will assume the ticker of FET at Binance.All OCEAN and AGIX tokens will be swapped to FET at a ratio of:
1 OCEAN = 0.433226 FET;
1 AGIX = 0.433350 FET.
For users who hold the delisted tokens on spot, it seems certain that they will be converted.
However, for the future market, considering that users do not hold assets directly, the question arises whether the losses incurred as a result of the developer's actions will be replaced or not?
Should, if we want to be fair, for future positions opened before June 14th all losses incurred should be reimbursed. Who is charged with compensating for the loss? In my opinion, it is the developer's side, whether with tokens or other mechanisms.
This situation is getting worse because the merger process occurs at a time when the market is experiencing a correction.
$BTC experienced a correction of around 12% from June 14 to June 25 (when automatic settlement was carried out).

Although not always, a drop in BTC will be followed by a drop in prices for most altcoins.
So, this merge action was carried out at the wrong time. When most people were panicking because of the uncertain market situation, an announcement suddenly appeared that made the situation worse.
Therefore, this incident proves that users are always at the most vulnerable.
Just imagine, currently AI is one of the most popular narratives on the market so AI-related tokens have a large trading volume. Most people are bullish on AI related coins, including FET, AGIX and OCEAN. Not only holding it in the spot but also opening a position in the future market. Then suddenly they were asked to force it to close when they were getting a negative PNL.
So, it should be a lesson for exchanges (all exchanges) to have rules regarding developer actions regarding their tokens listed on exchanges.
Meanwhile, for incidents that have occurred, the exchange should force developers to compensate all losses experienced by users in all markets.
If not, can we guess what will happen if $OP , $ARB , and Matic decide to merge to form the SUPERL2 token?



#DelistingNotice

Copy trading looks simple: pick a trader → copy → profit.
But once you actually explore the system on Binance Copy Trading, you’ll realize something important:
Finding a truly reliable, battle-tested trader is way harder than it looks.
This guide breaks it down in a practical, no-nonsense way.

📊 1. Bias in the “Recommended” Categories
Categories you’ll see:
High PnLHigh ROIMost CopiedMost Copier PnL

🔹 High PnL
✅ Pros:
Shows real profit in absolute termsUseful for spotting traders who can generate large gains
❌ Cons:
Biased toward large capitalDoesn’t show efficiency
📌 Example:
Trader A:Capital: $1,000,000Profit: $50,000Trader B:Capital: $1,000Profit: $300
➡️ Trader A ranks higher
➡️ But Trader B is actually more efficient

🔹 High ROI
✅ Pros:
Measures efficiency (% return)Good for comparing different account sizes
❌ Cons:
Easily inflated by high leverageCan be pure short-term luckDoesn’t consider how long the trader has been active
📌 Example:
Trader C:Trading for 5 daysROI: +120%
➡️ Looks amazing
➡️ But could just be a lucky streak

🔹 Most Copied
✅ Pros:
Shows social trustIndicates popularity
❌ Cons:
Driven by hype and FOMONot a guarantee of performance
📌 Example:
A trader goes viral → gains followers quickly → ranks high
Even if performance is average

🔹 Most Copier PnL
✅ Pros:
Shows impact on followers
❌ Cons:
Biased by number of followersDoesn’t reflect strategy quality
📌 Example:
1000 followers making small profits each
➡️ Total looks huge
➡️ Individual results are not impressive

🧠 Takeaway
These categories highlight what looks big — not what’s actually healthy or sustainable.

⚙️ 2. “All Portfolio” Metrics: Pros & Cons
Metrics available:
PnLROIMDDAUMCopy TradersCopier PnLSharpe Ratio

🔹 PnL
✅ Pros:
Real profitEasy to understand
❌ Cons:
Capital biasIgnores risk
📌 Example:
Big accounts dominate rankings even if they’re inefficient

🔹 ROI
✅ Pros:
Measures efficiency
❌ Cons:
Leverage distortionIgnores risk
📌 Example:
A 3-day trader with +80% beats a 200-day trader with +70%

🔹 MDD (Max Drawdown)
✅ Pros:
Shows worst historical lossImportant for survivability
❌ Cons:
Only reflects past eventsDoesn’t guarantee future safety
📌 Example:
A trader with low MDD might just not have faced bad market conditions yet

🔹 AUM
✅ Pros:
Shows trust level
❌ Cons:
Popularity biasNot skill-based
📌 Example:
A well-known trader attracts capital even with average performance

🔹 Copy Traders
✅ Pros:
Social validation
❌ Cons:
Herd behavior
📌 Example:
People follow trends, not always performance

🔹 Copier PnL
✅ Pros:
Shows real impact on followers
❌ Cons:
Depends on entry timingBiased by follower count
📌 Example:
Followers joining late earn less even if trader performs well

🔹 Sharpe Ratio
✅ Pros:
Measures risk-adjusted returnsIndicates consistency
❌ Cons:
Can look good on “smoothed” strategiesDoesn’t capture extreme risk
📌 Example:
Averaging strategies can produce smooth returns → high Sharpe

🧠 Takeaway
No single metric is enough. You need context and combinations.

⏱️ 3. The BIG Problem: Time Filters
Available filters:
7 / 30 / 90 / 180 / 365 days

❗ The issue
These are performance windows — NOT trader age

📌 Example
🔴 Case:
Trader X:Trading for 3 daysROI: +80%
➡️ Appears in:
Top 30DEven 365D rankings

🔴 Another case:
Trader Y:Trading for 200 daysROI: +70%
➡️ Gets outranked

🧠 Takeaway
The system cannot distinguish between:
Experienced tradersShort-term lucky traders

🕳️ 4. Unrealized PnL: Helpful but Not Enough

✅ Key fact
Binance includes unrealized PnL.
This means:
Floating losses ARE countedPerformance is more realistic

✅ Pros
Reduces fake “perfect” curvesMakes performance more honest
📌 Example:
A trader with -30% floating loss will show weaker performance

❌ Limitations
Even with unrealized PnL, you still can’t see HOW risk is built.

📌 Example 1: Position size risk
Floating loss: -5%
➡️ Looks small
➡️ But position might be huge

📌 Example 2: DCA / Martingale
Trader keeps adding positionsFloating still small
➡️ Looks stable
➡️ Risk is actually stacking up

🧠 Takeaway
Unrealized PnL makes data more honest — but not fully transparent.

🚨 5. Red Flags of Risky Traders (DCA / Martingale)

🔴 1. Win rate 95–99%
📌 Example:
100 trades → 98 wins
➡️ Likely holding losses instead of closing them

🔴 2. Hidden positions
📌 Example:
You can’t see open trades
➡️ You don’t know real exposure

🔴 3. High ROI + Low MDD
📌 Example:
ROI: 120%MDD: 8%
➡️ Too perfect → likely hidden risk

🔴 4. Super smooth equity curve
📌 Example:
Consistent upward line with almost no dips
➡️ Likely averaging strategy

🔴 5. Very short trading history
📌 Example:
7 days → 90% ROI
➡️ Not tested

🔴 6. Popular but low copier profit
📌 Example:
Many followers but low copier gains
➡️ Hard to replicate results

🔥 6. Big Picture
All combined:
Category biasMetric conflictsMisleading time filtersLimited transparency

🎯 Result
The traders that look the best… are often NOT the safest.

🧠 7. Smarter Way to Choose Traders
✅ Focus on:
Long duration (90–180+ days)Low MDDStable Sharpe ratioPositive copier PnL

❌ Avoid:
Extreme ROIUnrealistic win ratesVery short performance history

🔚 Final Thought
Binance provides a lot of data — and even includes unrealized PnL.
But still:
Good-looking stats don’t always mean safe strategies.

🔥 Final Truth
The most attractive trader on the list…
might be the most dangerous one to copy.
🤝 A Transparent Approach to Copy Trading (Yes, Including My Own)
After everything you’ve just read, one fair question is:
“So… are you one of those risky traders too?”
The honest answer?
Yes — partially. And intentionally so.

⚠️ Let’s Be Real First
I do use DCA (Dollar-Cost Averaging) — but only on long positions.
Not on shorts.
And more importantly:
I do NOT use martingaleI do NOT endlessly increase sizeI do NOT let positions drift toward liquidation risk

🧠 What Makes My Approach Different
DCA by itself isn’t the problem.
The real problem is how it’s used.
Here’s how I control it:
Position sizing is planned, not emotionalThere is a clear limit to how far I will averageRisk is contained, not escalated blindly

👁️ Full Transparency — No Hiding
This is the part that matters most.
I will NOT hide my open positions.
That means:
You will see my floating lossesYou will see when I’m wrongYou will see when I’m earlyYou will see everything

🔥 The Trade-Off (And Why It Matters)
Most “perfect-looking” traders:
hide positionssmooth their curveshow unrealistically high win rates
I don’t.
So yes — my performance may:
look messiershow drawdownsfeel more “real”
But that’s exactly the point.

🆕 Starting Small — And Why That Matters
I’m also just getting started.
My capital is relatively small — around 500 USDT, basically the minimum required to join.
And honestly?
That’s a sign of something important:
I’m not comfortable losing big either.
This means:
I’m cautious with riskI’m still proving myselfI’m trading with real consequences, not ego

🎯 The Philosophy
I’m not trying to look like:
“The best trader on the leaderboard”
I’m trying to be:
A trader who survives — and stays consistent over time

🤔 So… Should You Copy Me?
Not blindly.
But if you’re looking for someone who:
doesn’t fake perfectiondoesn’t hide riskis comfortable being judged in real-timeis still early — and growing
Then maybe I’m worth watching.

🔚 Final Thought
If I perform well — you’ll see it.
If I perform badly — you’ll also see it.
No filters. No illusions.
And that’s exactly how it should be.

My lead Trader
$BTC $ETH $BNB #StrategyBTCPurchase #BinanceLaunchesGoldvs.BTCTradingCompetition #CopyTradingDiscover

Matic rebranding became the umpteenth action that made future traders lose money without having to experience failed trades. And it seems like Binance is happy to do this no matter how much it costs its users.
Binance makes the futures market more like gambling than trading. they can close existing positions whenever they want with the losses borne by the user.
maybe some time in the future you will find an announcement that ADA will be rebranding to IDI, XRP to PRX, maybe even SHIBA will become HUSKY.
The only thing that might be less likely to be rebranded is BNB, not because it's good, but because if it were reversed, it would still be BNB.
#TON #DOGSONBINANCE #BNBChainMemecoins #TelegramCEO #PowellAtJacksonHole

Trend and Price Action:
The price recently broke above a key resistance level around $53, which was previously tested multiple times without a sustained breakout. This breakout could indicate a shift in momentum.
Support and Resistance:
The breakout above $53, a significant resistance level (4h(R)), is a positive sign. If the price can hold above this level, it could act as support, potentially setting up for further gains.
Additional resistance may be encountered around $54 and higher levels, as marked by previous price action.
Volume Analysis:
There is a noticeable increase in volume accompanying the breakout, suggesting that the move might be backed by strong market participation. High volume on a breakout generally indicates a more reliable price move.
Ichimoku Cloud:
The price is currently above the Ichimoku Cloud, which typically suggests a bullish trend. However, it's important to note the thickness of the cloud; a thinner cloud might indicate weaker support/resistance.
EMA 50 (gray line) and EMA 200 (blue line):
The price is above the moving averages, which could be providing additional support. This positioning usually indicates a bullish outlook.
Conclusion:
The current chart shows signs of a potential bullish continuation, especially if the price holds above the $53 level. For a long position:
Entry: Consider entering around the current price, with a confirmation of the $53 level holding as support.
Stop-Loss: A stop-loss could be placed below the recent support zone, perhaps around $51, to limit downside risk.
Targets: Initial targets could be set around $56-$58, with further targets depending on the continuation of the bullish trend.
As always, consider market conditions and other factors such as overall market sentiment and news that could impact the price action.
#US_Job_Market_Slowdown #Babylon_Mainnet_Launch #BinanceHODLerBANANA #HamsterKombat #BinanceTurns7

I tried to catch the falling knife and I found my hand was bleeding lol. But actually the average price I have is not that bad at 1,232. Meanwhile, my position in futures hasn't touched SL of 0.7 yet, so yeah, I'm still excited.
If BTC strengthens and there is sufficient inflow into the altcoin then I can expect the price to close above the Ichimoku cloud on the daily time frame, which signals a potential reversal of the downtrend to an uptrend.
But the chart shows that there is quite strong resistance there besides the cloud itself, namely the confluence of the EMA 50 (grey line) and daily resistance D(R). So there is still a possibility that this coin will decline again.

If the price can overcome this obstacle, MANTA's opportunity for a reversal will be very large.

I considered taking partial profits at the first significant resistance level, for example around 1.50.
The second target is near the next resistance level or a key psychological level, such as 2.00 or above.
I plan not to close the entire position but leave at least 25% of my current exposure. Who knows, MANTA will eventually fly even higher.
If you are interested in MANTA and considering entering the market then wait until the price closes above the Ichimoku cloud on the daily time frame, which signals a potential downtrend reversal.
Consider entering at a level slightly above the cloud's upper boundary to confirm the breakout. If the cloud's upper boundary is at 1.00, an entry around 1.05 could be considered.
$MANTA

#ETH_ETFs_Trading_Today #Bitcoin_Coneference_2024

The chart shows a clear downtrend, indicated by lower highs (LH) and lower lows (LL). The price is below the Ichimoku cloud, suggesting bearish momentum.
The price is below the cloud, which generally indicates a bearish outlook. However, if the price moves above the cloud, it could signal a potential trend reversal.
The EMA 50 (gray line) seems to be acting as a dynamic resistance, and the price is currently below it.
Conclusion:
Given the prevailing downtrend and the price being below significant resistance levels, entering a long position might be risky at this point. It's important to wait for more bullish signals, such as a break above resistance levels, price moving above the Ichimoku cloud, or a bullish divergence formation. Additionally, consider monitoring for changes in volume and other confirming indicators to ensure a stronger signal before entering a long position.
Trading Plan
If the price breaks above the Ichimoku cloud, it could indicate a potential trend reversal to the upside. Here's a suggested trading plan for entering a long position, including potential entries, stop loss, and take profit levels:
1. Entry Point
Entry Condition: Wait for the price to close above the Ichimoku cloud on a daily time frame, confirming a bullish breakout.
Confirmation: Ensure the breakout is accompanied by increased trading volume, which can confirm the strength of the move.
Entry Price: Consider entering the trade at a price slightly above the breakout level to avoid false breakouts. For example, if the cloud's upper boundary is at 0.36, you might set an entry trigger around 0.37. Alternatively, you can wait for a fallback to the cloud after a breakout to see if the cloud can act as support.
2. Stop Loss
Initial Stop Loss: Place the stop loss below a recent significant support level or the lower boundary of the Ichimoku cloud. This would account for potential volatility and avoid getting stopped out prematurely. For example, if the recent support level is at 0.33, consider setting the stop loss slightly below this level, say around 0.32.
3. Take Profit
Target Levels: Identify key resistance levels or Fibonacci retracement levels from the previous downtrend to set take profit targets.
First Target: A conservative target might be the next significant resistance level, such as 0.45, where you could take partial profits.
Second Target: A more aggressive target could be a higher resistance level, such as 0.50 or beyond, depending on market conditions and overall trend strength.
Trailing Stop: Consider using a trailing stop to lock in profits as the price moves in your favor. This can be set at a percentage below the current price or a fixed distance, allowing the trade to capitalize on further gains while protecting profits.
$PYTH
#ETH_ETFs_Trading_Today #Bitcoin_Coneference_2024 #PYTH/USDT.

There are clear signs of bullish momentum, with several BOS showing an uptrend. The price has retraced to key Fibonacci levels after the recent high.
The green zone below the current price level indicates a strong support area where buying interest may be present.
Detailed Long Position Analysis and Setup
Based on the current charts and observations, here is the plan for setting up a long position in VeChain (VET/USDT):
Short-term trade
Entry Point
Identify a specific entry point around the 0.705 or 0.786 Fibonacci retracement levels. The current levels to watch are:
Fibo 0.705: 0.0299
Fibo 0.786: 0.0295
Monitor the price action closely around these levels.
Stop Loss
To manage risk, set a stop loss slightly below the 0.786 level. A recommended stop loss level could be:
Stop Loss: 0.0290
This ensures that if the price breaks below the 0.786 level, your position will be exited to prevent further losses.
Take Profit
Set take profit targets at key resistance levels and recent swing highs. Suggested take profit levels are:
First Take Profit (TP1): 0.0315 (around the 0.382 Fibonacci level)
Second Take Profit (TP2): 0.0325 (recent swing high)
Third Take Profit (TP3): 0.0340 (further resistance level)
Risk-Reward Calculation
Risk: Entry (0.0295) - Stop Loss (0.0290) = 0.0005
Reward (TP1): Take Profit 1 (0.0315) - Entry (0.0295) = 0.0020
Reward (TP2): Take Profit 2 (0.0325) - Entry (0.0295) = 0.0030
Reward (TP3): Take Profit 3 (0.0340) - Entry (0.0295) = 0.0045
This gives you a favorable risk-reward ratio, making the trade potentially profitable.
Final Considerations
Ensure you stick to your trading plan and do not move your stop loss further down.
Keep an eye on market news and events that could impact VeChain and the overall crypto market.
Be patient and let the trade play out according to your plan.
Medium-term trade
Entry: current price araound 0.0295
Stop Loss: Below the support zone, for safety let's place it at 0.0268.Take Profit 1 (1:2 RRR): 0.0349Take Profit 2 (1:3 RRR): 0.0376Take Profit 3 (1:4 RRR): 0.0403Adjustments: As the trade progresses, you can move the stop loss to break even or trail it to lock in profits.Monitoring: Keep an eye on the price action and market conditions to make informed adjustments if necessary.
$VET

#ETH_ETFs_Trading_Today #Bitcoin_Coneference_2024 #BinanceHODLerBANANA

The price is currently trading around 0.5748 USDT, showing a slight upward movement.
The price action suggests a series of higher lows and higher highs, indicative of a bullish trend.
The ChOCH is indicated around the 0.56 USDT level, suggesting a reversal from a bearish to a bullish trend.
There are red zones marked as supply zones at higher price levels around 0.85 to 0.95 USDT and around 0.75 to 0.80 USDT.
Long Position Opportunity Analysis:
Entry Points:
A potential entry point for a long position could be near the current price level around 0.5748 USDT, especially if the price continues to show bullish momentum and breaks above the ChOCH level decisively.
Stop Loss:
A logical stop loss could be set just below the gray demand zone, around the 0.52 to 0.54 USDT level, to limit potential losses if the price reverses.
Target Levels:
Initial target levels could be set near the first supply zone around 0.75 USDT, providing a favorable risk-reward ratio.
A secondary target could be around the higher supply zone near 0.85 to 0.95 USDT, if the bullish momentum continues.
Additional Considerations:
Volume and Momentum:
Monitor trading volume and momentum indicators to ensure that there is sufficient buying interest to support a long position.
Market Conditions:
Keep an eye on broader market conditions and any news that might impact the AEVO/USDT pair.
$AEVO
#ETH_ETF_Approval_23July #Mt_Gox_BTC_Dip #BinanceTurns7

The price has slightly moved up to 6,431.
It appears to have broken above the descending trendline, which could indicate a potential trend reversal or at least a short-term bullish move.
The price is still close to the lower edge of the Ichimoku Cloud. However, the cloud can also act as resistance. Breaking into or above the cloud could indicate further bullish potential.
The formation of higher lows and higher highs can indicate the beginning of an uptrend. Recent price action suggests a higher low in mid-June and potentially a higher high if it can maintain above 6,425.
Conclusion:
There seems to be an opportunity to open a long position, given that:
The price has broken above the descending trendline.
It is testing the daily resistance, and a decisive break above this level could indicate further upside.
Trade Setup:
Entry: Consider entering a long position if the price closes above daily resistance.
Stop-Loss: Place a stop-loss below the recent swing low, around 6.2, to manage risk.
Take Profit: Look for potential take-profit levels at 7.5 and 8.624.
$DOT
#CPI_BTC_Watch #Ethereum_ETFs_Expected_Date #BinanceTurns7 #DOT

The chart has highlighted gray areas indicating significant support and resistance zones. The upper gray area around the $54-$56 range marks a resistance level where the price previously faced selling pressure.
The lower gray area around the $42-$44 range indicates a support level where the price found buying interest.
The CHoCH label indicates a point where the market structure shifted. In this context, it likely marks a change from a bearish trend to a bullish trend.
The current price is $48.49, showing a slight upward move (+1.63%) from the previous close. The price action suggests an attempt to break above the resistance formed at the recent highs.
The overall sentiment from the chart indicates a potential bullish reversal, especially if the price continues to hold above the key Fibonacci levels and maintains upward momentum. However, it needs to break and hold above the resistance levels for a more confirmed bullish trend.
Action plan:
Entry: Consider entering a long position if the price breaks and holds above the resistance level around $48.49 with strong volume.
Targets: towards the resistance zone around $54-$56.
Stop Loss: Place a stop loss below the 61.8% Fibonacci retracement level ($45.67) or below the recent swing low for better risk management.
$COMP

#CPI_BTC_Watch #Ethereum_ETFs_Expected_Date #BinanceTurns7 #SOFR_Spike

The current price is around $0.0274, which is approaching the supply zone near $0.028 - $0.029.
There has been a recent bullish move as shown by CHoCH, indicating that buyers are gaining strength.
This chart shows that the price is testing a major resistance level, and the outcome at this level could determine the next big move.
A break above this supply zone will see VET turn Bullish and may lead to further upward movement towards higher resistance levels.
Action plan:
Entry: Consider entering a long position if the price closes above the supply zone ($0.028 - $0.029) with strong bullish momentum.
Stop Loss: Place a stop loss below a key support level, such as $0.0246 or $0.0238, to limit potential losses.
Target: Set an initial profit target at the next resistance level around $0.033 - $0.035. Adjust targets based on price action and momentum.
Additional risk factor: lately there are a lot of actions from developers such as mergers and rebranding of tokens which makes futures trading even more scary because at any time you can receive an announcement from Binance that your position must be closed forcibly because the pair you are trading will be delisted no matter what. (read more about the rebranding craze at this link)
$VET

#CPI_BTC_Watch #Ethereum_ETFs_Expected_Date #BinanceTurns7 #VET

The merger process of $FET , AGIX and OCEAN into ASI has not yet been completed, which has harmed many people, today we received information that Galxe (GAL) will be rebranding become Gravity (G). read here.
During the merger process of the 3 AI tokens, I had a position in Future for OCEAN and it was forced to close with a loss.
Until now, I don't know whether traders who experience losses in the Future market will receive compensation or only those who have assets in spot will be converted according to a predetermined exchange rate.
For this reason, I then wrote that the exchange should protect investors/traders from the actions of developers.
When dev plan to take a certain action, I'm sure it's because they see potential profits. And investors/traders should not have to bear the costs of that action.
Even if an action must be taken then any form of compensation must be something they are obliged to do before the exchange decides to facilitate the process.
Just imagine, today you open a position in Perpetual Future with a certain trading plan. Then suddenly you get a notification that the pair you are trading will be delisted because the dev will take an action so you have to close it no matter whether you are making a profit or a loss.
It's very fortunate that I don't have a position in GAL perpetual. If I had it then I would experience 2x losses in less than a month.
I'm afraid, if this precedent doesn't get attention, then I'm afraid tomorrow we will hear again that dev coin A will be rebranding, dev coin B will be renaming, dev coin C blah blah blah you name it
Frankly, I'm afraid to open a position in perpetual futures.
#SOFR_Spike #US_Job_Market_Slowdown #BinanceTurns7

Don't know if sharing this will make me look stupid or what, but it's true that even though I've been in crypto since 2017 there is one thing I've never managed to learn, namely when is the right time to get out of the market.
I use the DCA strategy, within a certain range. For BTC order 1 to the last order up to 33% for alt most of the time I divided orders in the 66% range.
Actually, it is very conservative, but still, the timeliness of determining the first order point is very influential.
And today, in a very bad market situation which they said was caused by the Mt Gox repayment issue, the average price of each coin I hold is as follows:
BTC = 65458.71 (-13.88%)
ETH = 3 596.80 (-(16.84%)
SOL = 148.55 (-10.11%)
PYTH = 0.3246 (-17.12%)
LINK = 14,589 (-15.83%)
TAO = 313.4 (-20.48%)
POLYX = 0.4011 (-46.16%)
API3 = 2,749 (-40.85%)
MANTA = 1,285 (-41.58%)
RDNT = 0.1531 (-42.65%
BNB = 611.7 (-19.26%)
FET = 1.514 (-21.29%)
Not all orders have been filled yet. However, even though this is actually still in line with the trading plan and I am ready to face further declines, I really hope the market rebounds and I can close some positions in profit.
Of all the coins I own, $SOL seems to bounce pretty well. Meanwhile BTC.D seems to have been rejected on TF 4H. Hopefully if BTC bounces we will see alts bounce faster.

#SOL #MtGoxJulyRepayments

When I heard the news that Mantra was partnering with a Real estate giant from the United Arab Emirates I checked the OM chart to see if I could open a Long position.
but basically I heard the news a bit late so what I saw was really scary LOL.
It seems that the LONGers were beaten very quickly.
But this coin is interesting, with RWA's narrative being prominent in 2024 (apart from AI). I always take the time to monitor its movements.

If the price moves closer to 0.5 then I will add OM to the watchlist.
$OM


#Mantra(om) #RWACrypto #RWATokenization #Omusdt

Render Network (RNDR) has gained significant traction following its mention by Apple. During Apple's Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) in 2024, the company showcased the Octane X 3D rendering software, which is powered by the Render Network, on the new iPad Pro. This integration allows users to leverage decentralized GPU power for advanced CGI capabilities directly from their devices.
Apple's endorsement has validated Render Network's technology and highlighted its potential for broader adoption in digital content creation. The announcement led to a notable increase in RNDR's token value, reflecting growing investor confidence and market enthusiasm.
GLM (Golem Network Token) has the potential for adoption similar to RNDR, although it faces different challenges and opportunities.
Both RNDR and GLM actually have similarities, although there are slight differences in service focus. While RNDR focuses on GPU-based rendering, Golem offers a broader range of computational tasks. This versatility can be an advantage if effectively marketed to the right audiences.
RNDR price action

The price is currently hovering around the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement level, suggesting a potential support zone.
The 0.705 ($6.40871) and 0.786 ($5.555132) levels serve as further potential support zones if the price continues to decline.
If the price holds above the 0.618 Fibonacci level ($7.325516), it may attempt to test higher resistance levels at $8.569 and $9.812484.
Although I hope that the price will immediately bounce from Fibo 0.618, I am wary of the Fair Value Gap (Green box) which was formed on February 12, 2024.
If price action shows a potential reversal at Fibo 0.618, maybe I will enter but with a small amount in anticipation of price filling the Fair Value Gap which is close to Fibo 0.786.
GLM price action

The price is heading towards the 0.786 Fibonacci level, which indicates a strong support zone where the price may consolidate or reverse.
This area coincides with the Fair Value Gap which was formed on February 19, 2024.
If the price holds above the 0.786 Fibonacci level and the support zone (Fair Value Gap area), a potential reversal might occur.
The first targets would be the 0.705 and 0.618 levels. A break above these levels would indicate a potential move towards the 0.5 and 0.382 Fibonacci levels.
But this is weekly price action, it will probably take some time to see what will happen in this area in the next few weeks.
Additionally, this is a very wide support area, around more than 28%. So, for example, if there is an opportunity to enter, it is a good idea to divide the order into several parts as anticipation.
$RNDR
$GLM
#RNDR📉 #GLMUSDT #MtGoxJulyRepayments #US_Job_Market_Slowdown