According to Cointelegraph, a dispute has emerged between the Aave decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) and Aave Labs, the primary development company for Aave products, regarding the distribution of fees from a recent integration with decentralized exchange aggregator CoW Swap. The controversy was initiated by a pseudonymous Aave DAO member, EzR3aL, who pointed out that fees generated from crypto asset swaps using CoW Swap were being directed to an onchain address not associated with the Aave DAO treasury. Instead, these fees are reportedly going to a private address controlled by Aave Labs. EzR3aL questioned why the DAO was not consulted before the fees were redirected and argued that the revenue rightfully belongs to the DAO.
Aave Labs responded by asserting that the front-end components for the website and application interfaces have always been under its jurisdiction. The company also claimed responsibility for funding the development of the "adapters," which are essential lines of code enabling swaps and other integrations. Despite this explanation, tensions remain high, with several DAO members contending that the Aave DAO initially funded the development of the original adapter technology, and thus, the revenue from the integration should benefit the DAO.
Marc Zeller, founder of the Aave-Chan Initiative, a delegate platform for the Aave governance community, expressed concern over the decision to route fees exclusively to Aave Labs. Zeller criticized Aave Labs for redirecting Aave user volume towards competition in pursuit of monetization, labeling the move as "unacceptable." Cointelegraph attempted to contact Aave Labs for further comment but did not receive a response by the time of publication. This conflict underscores the complexities involved in managing a DAO, a novel governance and organizational structure that offers advantages over traditional business models but also presents unique challenges.
