Eli Sarro

МГНОВЕНИЕ, КОГДА АВТОНОМИЯ КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕНЕГ, НАШИ СЕРДЦА ПРОСЯТ ДОКАЗАТЕЛЬСТВА
Я не удивлён, что автономные платежи могут вызывать страх, потому что деньги для большинства людей не являются абстрактным понятием, это запись ваших долгих дней, вашего тихого стресса, ваших семейных обязанностей, ваших надежд и той части вас, которая хочет, чтобы жизнь казалась стабильной. Поэтому, когда кто-то говорит, что агент ИИ может тратить деньги от вашего имени, ваш разум делает то, что он должен делать: ищет опасности, исследует, что может сломаться, и пытается защитить вас от будущего, в котором вы будете чувствовать себя powerless. Если система перемещает ценности быстрее, чем вы можете понять, становится легко представить худший исход, и как только этот страх укореняется, каждое техническое обещание может начать звучать как шум, потому что более глубокая проблема заключается не в скорости или функциях, а в контроле, а контроль является эмоциональным до того, как он станет техническим, потому что контроль — это разница между делегированием и капитуляцией.

Я вижу, как внутри криптовалюты нарастает новый вид давления, потому что дело больше не только в том, чтобы люди отправляли деньги, а в том, что программные агенты перемещают ценность от нашего имени, и эта реальность может казаться мощной, одновременно затрагивая очень человеческий страх, страх незнания того, что происходит, когда вы не смотрите. Kite формируется для этого точного мира, блокчейн-платформа для агентских платежей, где автономные AI-агенты могут транзакционировать с проверяемой идентичностью и программируемым управлением, и идея проекта заключается не только в том, чтобы сделать транзакции быстрыми, но и в том, чтобы сделать их понятными, контролируемыми и отслеживаемыми таким образом, который защищает обычных людей от чувства беспомощности, которое иногда сопровождает автоматизацию.

ПОЧЕМУ ЧЕРНЫЕ ЯЩИКИ-БОТЫ ЗАСТАВЛЯЮТ ДОВЕРИЕ КАЗАТЬСЯ НЕВОЗМОЖНЫМ
Я вижу, что все больше людей полагаются на автоматизированные агенты для работы, которая раньше была личной, и в тот момент, когда агент касается денег, он также касается самой чувствительной части человеческого разума, потому что деньги — это не только цифры, это время, безопасность и доказательство того, что ваши усилия имели значение. Если агент может тратить, подписывать, подписываться и платить без четкой идентичности, он становится черным ящиком с властью, а власть без ясности создает тихий страх, который никогда полностью не исчезает, даже когда все кажется в порядке, потому что вы знаете, что одно неправильное движение может произойти на скорости машины. Они не просто боты в этой истории, они принимают решения, и когда принимающий решение анонимен, вы чувствуете себя так, будто стоите у двери, которая может открыться в любой момент без предупреждения.

ПОЧЕМУ Я ПОСТОЯННО ДУМАЮ ОБ ЭТОМ
Я вижу, как ИИ-агенты переходят от полезных голосов к реальным исполнителям, и это изменение кажется волнующим, пока не касается денег, потому что деньги — это то место, где доверие становится эмоциональным, и если агент может платить за данные, инструменты, подписки, товары и услуги, то самый главный вопрос — не скорость, а безопасность, а второй по важности вопрос — отслеживаемость, потому что если что-то пойдет не так, людям нужны ответы, которые будут понятны в реальном мире, а не ответы, скрытые в сложных журналах. Kite строится вокруг этого напряжения, создавая блокчейн, предназначенный для агентских платежей, где идентичность и правила не являются дополнительными опциями, а фундаментом, который делает автономные платежи приемлемыми для обычных людей и для бизнеса, который должен управлять рисками.

ВВЕДЕНИЕ МОМЕНТ ЛИКВИДНОСТИ ПРЕКРАЩАЕТ ЧУВСТВОВАТЬСЯ КАК БОЙ
Я собираюсь описать ликвидность так, как она на самом деле ощущается для реального человека, потому что в криптовалюте это редко просто числа на экране, это давление, которое вы чувствуете, когда рынок движется быстро, и вы начинаете думать, что должны действовать прямо сейчас, даже когда ваш разум устал. Если вы когда-либо наблюдали за позицией, в которую вы верили, когда она колебалась, то вы уже знаете, как быстро уверенность может превратиться в стресс, потому что становится трудно отличить умное решение от реакции страха. Мы видим, как та же история повторяется для многих людей, которые держат ценные активы, но все равно чувствуют себя в ловушке, когда им нужна стабильная покупательская способность, потому что обычный путь - продать что-то, что они хотели сохранить, и такая вынужденная продажа не ощущается как стратегия, это похоже на потерю контроля над собственным планом. @Falcon Finance пытается изменить эту эмоциональную реальность, строя ликвидность как нечто, к чему вы можете получить доступ, не разрушая ваше долгосрочное вложение, так что опыт становится спокойнее, более запланированным и менее хаотичным, не потому что рынки перестают двигаться, а потому что инструмент, который вы используете для движения внутри рынка, разработан быть более устойчивым, чем сам рынок.

THE MOMENT I REALIZED SMART CONTRACTS CAN BE TRICKED WITHOUT TOUCHING THE CODE

I’m not afraid of smart contracts because they are weak, I’m afraid of them because they are strong and obedient, and that obedience becomes dangerous when the truth they receive is not clean. A smart contract can look perfect on the surface, it can be audited, it can be transparent, it can be open for anyone to read, yet if a single number enters the contract and that number is wrong, the contract still executes like it is doing the right thing, and users suffer while the chain stays silent. If a price feed is delayed, if a market is thin and easy to move, if an attacker finds a way to push a number for a short moment, it becomes enough to liquidate someone, to drain value, or to make an honest trade settle at an unfair rate, and that is why I keep saying that the honesty of smart contracts depends on the honesty of the data that enters them. We’re seeing the whole industry accept this slowly, because many of the most painful losses did not come from fancy code bugs, they came from reality being injected into code in a way that was not protected well enough.

WHAT APRO IS IN SIMPLE WORDS AND WHY IT FEELS LIKE A GUARD AT THE DOOR

They’re describing @APRO_Oracle as a decentralized oracle network that brings outside data into onchain smart contracts across many networks, and it becomes important because blockchains do not naturally know what is happening outside their own ledgers. Smart contracts cannot watch markets, they cannot read news, they cannot verify a game result, they cannot measure events in the real world, so they need an oracle layer that collects data, checks it, and delivers it in a way that contracts can use. I’m looking at APRO as an attempt to make that door stronger, because the door is where attackers often gather, and the best attackers do not try to break the contract directly, they try to bend the reality that the contract believes. If the oracle is weak, it becomes a quiet shortcut to steal, but if the oracle is strong, it becomes a wall that forces attackers to spend more, to take more risk, and to reveal themselves faster, which protects ordinary users who do not have time to fight a war every day just to use a decentralized application.

HOW APRO BRINGS TRUTH THROUGH TWO PATHS THAT MATCH HOW PEOPLE REALLY BUILD

APRO is described with two main ways of delivering data called Data Push and Data Pull, and I like this because real products are not all built the same way. Data Push is the idea that the oracle network keeps publishing updates onchain so the most recent value is already there when a smart contract reads it, which matters for markets that move fast and for protocols where stale data can be exploited, because timing is where unfair advantage hides. Data Pull is the idea that the application requests data when it actually needs it, which can reduce constant costs for systems that do not require nonstop updates, and if the design is done carefully, it can still deliver speed and integrity at execution time, which is the moment that really counts. If you have ever built anything serious, you know how painful it is when an infrastructure tool forces one pattern on everyone, because it becomes a tax on your design, but with push and pull options, APRO is trying to meet builders where they are and let the product decide the rhythm instead of letting the oracle decide it for them, and we’re seeing that kind of flexibility become a requirement as apps spread across many chains and many types of users.

THE TWO LAYER MODEL AND WHY ONE LINE OF DEFENSE IS NEVER ENOUGH IN CRYPTO

A modern oracle cannot assume good behavior, because crypto is not a polite environment, it is an environment where incentives pull hard, and attackers are patient. APRO is described as using a two layer structure where one layer collects and submits data and another layer acts like a verifier and a dispute resolution referee, and it becomes meaningful because it reduces the danger of a single point of failure. If one layer is pressured, if a subset of operators goes wrong, if a data source becomes unreliable, there is still another mechanism designed to challenge and check, and that second layer matters because honest infrastructure is rarely about one big promise, it is about many smaller checks that catch mistakes early. We’re seeing the best systems behave like this, because real security is not one lock, it is many locks, and each lock forces an attacker to spend more effort for less reward, and that is often the difference between a system that survives real stress and a system that only looks good in calm conditions.

INCENTIVES THAT TRY TO MAKE HONESTY THE CHEAPEST CHOICE

I’m always watching incentives, because incentives write the real rules even when the documentation sounds beautiful. APRO is commonly explained with staking based participation where operators put value at risk, and if they submit incorrect data or behave maliciously, they can lose part of what they staked, which means lying becomes expensive rather than convenient. There is also the idea that outsiders can report suspicious behavior with their own deposits, which creates a wider monitoring culture where the network is not only watched by insiders but also watched by the community, and that matters because decentralization is not only about having many nodes, it is about making sure many eyes have a reason to care. If a system rewards honesty and punishes dishonesty in a way that is consistent, it becomes harder for attackers to buy the truth for a few seconds, and those few seconds are often all they need, so the goal is to remove that cheap window and replace it with a cost wall that keeps users safe even when they are not looking.

WHY PRICE SECURITY NEEDS RESISTANCE AGAINST SHORT MANIPULATION WINDOWS

Price is the most emotional data in crypto because it touches money directly, and people do not forget the moment they lost value because a feed was wrong at the worst time. APRO is often described as focusing on price security using methods designed to reduce the impact of short lived manipulation, including approaches that consider price over time and volume so a sudden spike or a thin market moment has less power to rewrite reality. If you are running lending, trading, derivatives, or any app that can liquidate users, you know this is not optional, because one manipulated update can become a chain reaction that hurts thousands of people who did nothing wrong. I’m not saying any oracle makes price risk disappear, because markets are still markets, but I’m saying a good oracle can reduce the unfair part of that risk, the part where someone changes the reality your contract believes for just long enough to profit, and if that unfair part is reduced, it becomes easier for normal users to trust the system and participate without feeling like they are walking into a trap.

VERIFIABLE RANDOMNESS AND WHY FAIRNESS IS A FORM OF HONESTY TOO

Not all truth is a price, because many smart contracts need randomness, and randomness is where human suspicion becomes intense. If a lottery, a game drop, an allocation, or any reward system feels rigged, people leave even if the math is correct, because emotions are part of adoption, and fairness is part of truth. APRO is described as including verifiable randomness tools, which aim to produce randomness along with proof that can be checked, so users do not have to trust a single party saying it was random. It becomes a way to replace blind faith with verifiable confidence, and we’re seeing this demand rise because communities want to know that insiders cannot quietly tilt outcomes, and builders want to remove the constant accusation that everything is manipulated, because once that accusation sticks, it destroys growth faster than any technical issue.

MULTICHAIN REALITY AND WHY AN ORACLE HAS TO FOLLOW THE USERS

They’re building on many chains now, and users move across ecosystems without thinking the way they did before. If an oracle only works well in one place, it becomes a bottleneck for builders who want consistent security and consistent behavior across networks. APRO is positioned as a multichain service with broad coverage and integrations, and this matters because a modern application is rarely isolated anymore, it is often deployed across multiple environments, connected to bridges, wallets, and assets that travel, and the oracle layer has to keep up with that reality. We’re seeing that the strongest infrastructure is the infrastructure that travels without losing quality, because users do not want to relearn trust on every new chain, and builders do not want to rebuild safety from scratch every time they expand, so the oracle that can deliver consistent reliability across networks becomes a quiet foundation that makes growth feel less risky.

WHAT I WANT YOU TO FEEL WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT APRO AND SMART CONTRACT HONESTY

I’m not here to sell a fantasy where everything is safe forever, because crypto does not work like that, and anyone who promises perfect safety is not being honest. I’m here to explain why an oracle like @APRO_Oracle matters, because it is trying to solve the problem that hurts people the most, which is the gap between code and reality. If APRO executes well on the ideas it describes, push and pull delivery, layered verification, staking based incentives, manipulation resistance, verifiable randomness, and multichain presence, it becomes the kind of infrastructure that helps smart contracts stay honest even when the outside world is noisy and full of incentives to cheat. We’re seeing the space slowly move from excitement to responsibility, and responsibility means admitting that users are not just wallets, they are people with plans, stress, and hope, and those people deserve systems that fight hard to keep reality clean. If you keep that in mind, then APRO is not just an oracle, it becomes a promise that truth should not be the weakest point of onchain finance, and if that promise holds, it can turn fear into calm and turn participation into something that feels safe enough to last.

#APRO @APRO_Oracle $AT

I’m watching the world shift from simple automation into something much deeper, where AI agents are not just answering questions but actually doing work, making decisions, and moving value. If an agent can book a service, buy data, rent compute, pay an invoice, and coordinate with other agents in real time, it becomes clear that the old internet was not designed for this. Most systems assume a human is present, a human is approving, a human is catching mistakes, and a human is taking responsibility. But an agent can act thousands of times faster than a person, and that speed turns small risks into big damage if identity and control are not built into the foundation. @KITE AI is trying to build that foundation by creating a blockchain platform for agentic payments where autonomous agents can transact with verifiable identity and programmable governance.

WHY AGENTIC PAYMENTS FEEL DIFFERENT FROM NORMAL PAYMENTS

In a human payment world, payments are occasional events. A person pays for food, a bill, a subscription, or a transfer. Even a business usually pays in batches. But in an agent payment world, value moves like a stream. An agent might pay tiny amounts again and again for every small action, for every model call, for every dataset query, for every tool execution, for every API request. If the system is slow, the agent loses its purpose. If the system is expensive, the agent becomes unusable. If the system is open without guardrails, the agent becomes a liability. This is why Kite keeps emphasizing an agent native approach, with real time coordination and payment rails that match machine speed rather than human rhythm.

WHAT KITE IS BUILDING AT THE CORE

Kite is positioned as an EVM compatible Layer 1 built for real time transactions and coordination among AI agents, with stablecoin focused settlement and very low cost payments so agents can pay in stable value rather than volatile value. The goal is not only to send money, but to make sure the sender is a real authorized actor, and to make sure the rules of spending are enforced automatically, even when nobody is watching the agent. Kite describes its stack as purpose built for autonomous agent operations, which is a strong claim, but it also explains exactly what it means by that, identity that has layers, authority that can be delegated safely, and constraints that are enforced by smart contracts rather than by hope.

THE THREE LAYER IDENTITY SYSTEM AND WHY IT FEELS LIKE SAFETY

When I read about Kite, the part that feels most human is the identity design, because identity is where fear lives. People do not fear technology when it is small. They fear it when it can act without them. Kite introduces a three layer identity system that separates user identity, agent identity, and session identity. The user is the root authority, the place where ultimate control lives. The agent is delegated authority, meaning it can act but only inside the boundaries it was given. The session is ephemeral authority, meaning it is created for a job and then it expires, so a short lived task does not require long lived power. Kite documentation explains that agent addresses can be derived deterministically from the user wallet using BIP 32, while session keys are random and expire after use, which is a practical way to reduce blast radius when something goes wrong. If a session is compromised, it should not mean the user is ruined. If an agent misbehaves, it should not mean the whole wallet is exposed. It becomes a design that tries to preserve autonomy without surrendering control.

USER IDENTITY THE ROOT THAT KEEPS RESPONSIBILITY CLEAR

I’m convinced the agent economy will only grow if responsibility stays clear. If an agent buys something, who is accountable. If an agent pays for a service, who authorized it. Kite makes the user identity the root authority. This matters because the future will be full of agents, and without a clear root, everything becomes fog. The user layer is where permissions begin, where policies originate, and where delegation can be revoked. This is not only a technical choice. It is a trust choice. It says the human remains the source of authority even when the machine operates.

AGENT IDENTITY DELEGATION THAT CAN STILL SAY NO

Agents need freedom to act, but freedom without limits is how disasters happen. Kite frames agent identity as delegated authority that is bounded by programmable constraints. Binance Research describes this as programmable governance where users can define global rules like a spend limit per agent per day and have those rules enforced across services automatically. That line carries a powerful idea. It means the user does not have to approve every action, but the user is still protected by network enforced limits that the agent cannot bypass, even if it makes a mistake, even if it is manipulated, even if it is compromised. If those limits are real, it becomes possible to let agents work while still feeling calm.

SESSION IDENTITY SPEED THAT DOES NOT LAST FOREVER

Sessions are the part that makes the system feel realistic for high frequency work. A session can be created for a specific operation, used briefly, and then it is gone. Kite explains this as ephemeral authority so each operation can have its own short lived credentials. That matters because the most dangerous permissions are the ones that stay alive long after the job is done. If a session disappears, the attack surface shrinks automatically. This is how you let an agent move fast without giving it permanent power for temporary work.

PAYMENT RAILS BUILT FOR MICRO ACTIONS

Kite also emphasizes payment rails that can support machine style spending, which often means tiny payments that happen constantly. Binance Research highlights state channel style payment rails for off chain micropayments with on chain security, designed to reduce latency and cost for large volumes of small transactions. If agents are going to pay for compute seconds, data packets, and tool calls, then micropayments are not a nice feature. They are the only way the economy makes sense. It becomes a shift from payments as events into payments as continuous flows that can be audited and controlled.

PROGRAMMABLE GOVERNANCE THAT FEELS LIKE A CONTRACT WITH YOUR FUTURE SELF

A big reason people fear autonomous systems is that they fear losing control quietly. Kite keeps returning to programmable governance and programmable constraints, where smart contracts enforce spending limits, time windows, and operational boundaries. There is something emotionally powerful in that, because it means you can set rules while you are calm, and those rules hold even when the system is moving fast. If you say an agent can only spend within a budget, or only interact with approved services, or only operate during a defined time window, those rules become part of the infrastructure. It becomes less about trust and more about enforceable intent.

WHY PAYMENTS COMPANIES ARE PAYING ATTENTION

Agentic commerce is moving from theory into serious industry focus. Reporting in 2025 described PayPal Ventures leading an 18 million funding round in Kite, framing Kite as trust infrastructure for autonomous payments. Separate reporting also discussed the challenge of agent payments and the idea that stablecoin settlement with low fees and fast finality can address gaps that traditional payment methods struggle with in an agent driven world. These signals do not guarantee outcomes, but they show that the problem Kite is targeting is being taken seriously by experienced payments investors, not only by crypto native builders.

KITE THE TOKEN AND WHY IT IS STAGED IN TWO PHASES

KITE is described as the networks native token, and its utility is designed to roll out in two phases. Binance Academy explains that the first phase focuses on ecosystem participation and incentives, while the later phase adds staking, governance, and fee related functions. This kind of staged utility matters because networks often fail when they force every function into the token immediately before usage exists. Kite is signaling that early stage growth is about participation and alignment, and later stage maturity is about security and long term governance. If the network grows into real usage, then the token functions become connected to real activity rather than only to narrative.

PHASE ONE PARTICIPATION AND ECOSYSTEM ALIGNMENT

In the early phase, the token is positioned around ecosystem participation, incentives, and on ramping builders and communities into the network. This phase is about creating activity, encouraging experimentation, and pulling real users and real service providers into the same space so the network becomes alive. When I think about agents, I think about ecosystems more than single apps, because agents do not want to be trapped. They want to move between services. A participation focused phase tries to create a living environment where builders can ship, users can explore, and the network can start collecting real signals about what people actually need.

PHASE TWO SECURITY GOVERNANCE AND FEES THAT CONNECT TO REAL USAGE

The second phase adds staking, governance, and fee related mechanics. Binance Research describes staking and governance as later stage functions, and it also explains commission based value capture tied to AI service usage, where a commission can be collected from transactions, connecting token economics to real network activity. This phase is where a system stops being an experiment and becomes infrastructure. Staking becomes a security layer. Governance becomes a shared steering wheel. Fees become a measurable signal of usage and demand. If agents are going to handle value at scale, the network needs to be secured by participants who have something at stake, and governed by a community that can evolve rules as reality changes.

WHAT THIS ALL MEANS FOR THE FUTURE OF THE AGENT ECONOMY

If @KITE AI succeeds, the most important outcome will not be a faster chain or a louder token story. The real outcome will be a world where autonomous software can pay safely. A world where merchants can accept value from agents with confidence. A world where service providers can verify that an agent is authorized and operating within constraints. A world where users can delegate work without feeling like they are handing their life savings to a black box. Kite is trying to make the agent economy feel normal, not by pretending risk is gone, but by building identity and rules into the rails.

A POWERFUL HUMAN CLOSING

I’m not interested in a future where AI can do more, but people feel less safe. I want a future where autonomy grows and trust grows with it. If we are truly entering an era where agents buy, pay, and coordinate in real time, then identity is not optional and governance is not decoration, it is the difference between progress and chaos. Kite is reaching for that difference with a three layer identity system, with network enforced constraints, and with payment rails built for micro actions at machine speed. If those pieces come together, it becomes more than technology. It becomes a kind of quiet protection that lets people breathe, because you can finally say yes to automation without saying goodbye to control.

#KITE @KITE AI $KITE