kospiopensup1.41%

July 2 (Reuters) - A Texas man has been charged with manslaughter after driving a Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab operating with its automated driving assistance system into a suburban Houston home, killing a ​76-year-old grandmother, court papers show.
Michael David Butler, 44, told police he was ‌operating his Model 3 in Full Self-Driving mode on June 19 when he plowed into Martha Avila's home in Katy, Texas, and told paramedics "the car was on 'Autopilot,'" according to court papers. Avila ​died later at a nearby hospital.
According to an arrest affidavit, Butler said ​he was making a DoorDash delivery run when he changed the music ⁠on the Tesla's touch screen, and eventually "passed out
His speed reached 73 miles per ​hour, more than double the legal limit, and the brake pedal wasn't used in the ​minute before the crash, the affidavit said. Butler denied having felt ill, and no alcohol or common street drugs were in his system, the affidavit said.
According to KHOU television, Butler appeared in probable cause court on Thursday where bail was set at $150,000, with requirements that he wear an ​ankle monitor and ​not drive.
The National Highway ⁠Traffic Safety Administration has been investigating the crash, and has since 2016 opened nearly 50 special investigations of Tesla crashes believed to involve ​advanced driver assistance systems. About two dozen deaths were reported.
Tesla ​has said ⁠its Autopilot system enables vehicles to steer, accelerate and brake within their lanes, while Full Self-Driving lets vehicles obey traffic signals and change lanes. Both require "fully attentive" drivers, it has said.
Avila's ⁠family ​sued Tesla last week, saying her wrongful death reflected ​the electric vehicle maker's gross negligence and failure to warn that its self-driving systems were defective.
#JuneJobsDataCoolsFedHikeBets
#USNonfarmPayrollsAdd57K
#CumberlandFarmsFilesForUSIPO
#EthereumBreaks$1700Up7.98%
#KOSPIOpensUp1.41%

I mean : all the projects talk about changing Web3..... real question is, what is this project doing differently ?
I don't know why I've been thinking about something for a while now. When we talk about onchain, why is it that almost all the discussions stop at speed, low costs or the performance of new chains ?
Maybe because they are obvious. It's easy to explain with numbers. But then it suddenly occurred to me..... if inded large institutions, stablecoins, RWAs, and even AI agents start working onchain in the next few years, then what is the most important question?
The more I read, the more it seems that the problem is not just "transacting". The problem is, who decides which transactions should be made and which should not?
And this is exactly where my interest in Newton Protocol arose. At first I thought, maybe another #DeFi infrastructure, just big talk. But after digging a little deeper, I saw that they are actually focusing on something else. They keep using the words policy and authorization. At first, they seemed very simple. Later, I realized that maybe it's not that simple. In the traditional financial system, a large transaction is not completed by just pressing a button. Before that, identity is verified, risk is assessed, and rules are followed. This whole process is so natural that we don't even think about it separately. For a long time, the main goal of onchain was: what is written, smart contracts will do. But the real world doesn't just run on code. Rules change, markets change, and risks change. Maybe this is why Newton Protocol is presenting itself as a decentralized policy engine. This part is the most different for me. They are not just talking about running smart contracts, but rather thinking about how to implement programmable policy, compliance, and business rules before execution.
Another thing that I found quite meaningful.
They talking about privacy-preserving enforcement. That is, rules can be followed, but without revealing unnecessary information. Although it may sound simple, if it works in practice, its impact could be very large. Because in the future, organizations will not only look for fast networks, they will want an infrastructure where complianc and privacy are possible together. Sometimes, of course, I also have my own questions :
How effective will such a big vision be in practice ?
Because the Mainnet Beta does not mean that everything is ready - this is not the case, but rather this is where the real test begins :
Will developers use it? Will organizations integrate it with their existing systems?
How easy will it be to keep the same type of policy in effect on different blockchains?
Time will tell the answers to these. Another thing that seems important to me is - AI. There is a lot of discussion about AI agents now. But the more automated AI becomes, the more questions will arise:
Where are the limits of decision-making?
Which tasks are allowed, which are not?
Fast execution alone will not do. Wrong execution can also be fast. Then the importance of guardrails is the greatest. Newton Protocol seems to be giving importance to this area. It is trying to make execution more verifiable by using offchain data, cryptographic proof and cross-chain policy together. If it succeeds in reality, it will not be just another protocol, but a layer on which other systems will depend. I can't say for sure where the future will go. Many good ideas in Web3 have not gone very far in reality. So it's not right to judge by vision alone. But one thing seems clearer now than ever. The competetion of the future may not be limited to being the fastest blockchain. Rather, the question of which infrastructure can most reliably connect rules, risks, and decisions with real execution - that question may gradually become more important. @NewtonProtocol is looking for an answer to that problem, so it seems worth thinking about it to me. Now the rest is practical implementation. That's where we will understand whether this idea just sounds good, or if it can really become a necessary foundation for the on-chain economy of the future.... Anyway, time will tell 🚀
@NewtonProtocol $NEWT #Newt
$ZKP
#EthereumBreaks$1700Up7.98%
$STAR
#PhiladelphiaSemiconductorIndexFalls4% @NewtonProtocol #KOSPIOpensUp1.41%