比特川
High-Frequency Trader
4.6 Years
技术分析博主、职业交易员🔸公众号：比特投机客丨🔸推特@ChuanBit、Youtube：比特川丨手续费8折邀请码：CHUAN666丨点聊天室进群
37 Following
23.2K+ Followers
22.5K+ Liked
2.1K+ Shared
All
Quotes
Videos
Live
PINNED
See original
Basic Trading Teaching and Previous Article Collection Post丨Continuously Updated... Recommended to Bookmark
This article collects some of my previous teaching videos/articles that are helpful for beginners, making it convenient for everyone to browse and learn quickly.
1. You can also send me a private message on Binance, just enter my Binance ID: [chuan666] to chat with me!
2. This is Chuan Ge's exclusive registration rebate link for new users: https://www.binance.com/join?ref=CHUAN666丨Rebate registration invitation code: CHUAN666 (permanent 20% transaction fee rebate); by using my invitation link, in addition to enjoying a permanent transaction fee rebate, you can also enjoy free trading signal strategies and free technical trading teaching content. If you don't know how to operate, you can comment and ask me!
1. You can also send me a private message on Binance, just enter my Binance ID: [chuan666] to chat with me!
2. This is Chuan Ge's exclusive registration rebate link for new users: https://www.binance.com/join?ref=CHUAN666丨Rebate registration invitation code: CHUAN666 (permanent 20% transaction fee rebate); by using my invitation link, in addition to enjoying a permanent transaction fee rebate, you can also enjoy free trading signal strategies and free technical trading teaching content. If you don't know how to operate, you can comment and ask me!
PINNED
See original
🎈Many friends ask me why it's necessary to open a fee rebate. Let me explain why I suggest that everyone engaged in contracts must have a rebate.
First, when your position is profitable, the rebate is an additional income subsidy for you.
Second, when your position is at breakeven, the rebate itself is a source of profit.
Third, when you incur losses or even face liquidation, the rebate can at least help you recover some losses, rather than being completely drained by fees.
Many brothers think that with only a few hundred or a few thousand U, there is no need to open a rebate. This is because you overlook the true calculation method of fees. Binance contract fees are not calculated based on the principal amount, but based on the nominal position of the transaction.
🎈Here's the simplest example: if you use 1000U to open a 100x leverage, the actual nominal position is 100,000 U. If it's a market order, the fee is 0.05%. Opening fee: 100,000 × 0.05% = 50U; closing fee is similarly calculated: 100,000 × 0.05% = 50U. This means that for this order, the total fee for opening and closing is 100U, and you've already lost 10% in fees just by opening the position. This doesn't even account for the frequent entry and exit, and repeated stop losses.
Many people don't lose on direction, but before they even start trading, they are already bleeding slowly in fees. The rebate is not unnecessary; in a high leverage, high-frequency trading environment, it is the only certain thing that can help you reduce costs.
🔔In the end, everyone should not underestimate the rebate. You can save a few meals worth of money in a month at the least, and save tens of thousands or even over a hundred thousand at most. This money often becomes the confidence you need to turn things around when the market is not favorable.
❗️Use invitation code: CHUAN66, give me your ID after registration, and I will share my personal trading ideas, strategy directions, and related benefits. Rebate + service all in one. If you haven't opened a rebate yet, quickly contact me to open it. Registration link🔗: https://www.binance.com/join?ref=chuan666
📣Additionally, Binance now supports adding friends for chat, feel free to reach out to chat!
Especially for those of you who need rebates but haven't met me yet.
Steps to operate:
1. You can search in the Binance app homepage search box: Search 🔍 Chat Room -> Add Friend -> ID: Chuan666
2. Steps to join the Binance exclusive chat room: Click on my avatar -> Find the chat room in the personal center (as shown in the second picture) -> Click to join.
First, when your position is profitable, the rebate is an additional income subsidy for you.
Second, when your position is at breakeven, the rebate itself is a source of profit.
Third, when you incur losses or even face liquidation, the rebate can at least help you recover some losses, rather than being completely drained by fees.
Many brothers think that with only a few hundred or a few thousand U, there is no need to open a rebate. This is because you overlook the true calculation method of fees. Binance contract fees are not calculated based on the principal amount, but based on the nominal position of the transaction.
🎈Here's the simplest example: if you use 1000U to open a 100x leverage, the actual nominal position is 100,000 U. If it's a market order, the fee is 0.05%. Opening fee: 100,000 × 0.05% = 50U; closing fee is similarly calculated: 100,000 × 0.05% = 50U. This means that for this order, the total fee for opening and closing is 100U, and you've already lost 10% in fees just by opening the position. This doesn't even account for the frequent entry and exit, and repeated stop losses.
Many people don't lose on direction, but before they even start trading, they are already bleeding slowly in fees. The rebate is not unnecessary; in a high leverage, high-frequency trading environment, it is the only certain thing that can help you reduce costs.
🔔In the end, everyone should not underestimate the rebate. You can save a few meals worth of money in a month at the least, and save tens of thousands or even over a hundred thousand at most. This money often becomes the confidence you need to turn things around when the market is not favorable.
❗️Use invitation code: CHUAN66, give me your ID after registration, and I will share my personal trading ideas, strategy directions, and related benefits. Rebate + service all in one. If you haven't opened a rebate yet, quickly contact me to open it. Registration link🔗: https://www.binance.com/join?ref=chuan666
📣Additionally, Binance now supports adding friends for chat, feel free to reach out to chat!
Especially for those of you who need rebates but haven't met me yet.
Steps to operate:
1. You can search in the Binance app homepage search box: Search 🔍 Chat Room -> Add Friend -> ID: Chuan666
2. Steps to join the Binance exclusive chat room: Click on my avatar -> Find the chat room in the personal center (as shown in the second picture) -> Click to join.
See original
🎈This is my last time opening the $BTC event contract
No matter how much I made before, after this order, I won't do it again
❗️I have to mention the existence of conspiracy theories
❗️In the last couple of days, several orders have been losing by 2 seconds
It feels like being targeted
Is there data in the backend to see orders? Just happened to lose me?
It's so disgusting, no matter what technical analysis or indicators you use
❗️Brothers who made some money on the event
❗️Avoid! Avoid! Avoid!
No matter how much I made before, after this order, I won't do it again
❗️I have to mention the existence of conspiracy theories
❗️In the last couple of days, several orders have been losing by 2 seconds
It feels like being targeted
Is there data in the backend to see orders? Just happened to lose me?
It's so disgusting, no matter what technical analysis or indicators you use
❗️Brothers who made some money on the event
❗️Avoid! Avoid! Avoid!
See original
Friends, good morning on Thursday! I sent out a 1BNB red envelope to everyone. If you follow me and comment '111', you can receive it. There are 2666 copies, and everyone will get one. $BNB
See original
As the digital world gradually slips from human control, Kite's 'boundary line' will become a new social consensus
I have been thinking about one thing: the AI agents we see today are just the initial form of the future digital society. Right now, you let it write some copy, check some data, run some automated processes, and it feels like a tool. But if you observe closely, you will find that it already has the shadow of a 'behavioral subject'; it automatically plans paths based on tasks, optimizes strategies based on historical behavior, and performs actions that you haven't articulated but it considers 'reasonable'. This initiative is something tools do not possess; it is more like a new type of 'digital role'.
See original
Why there is no national-level stablecoin framework that can be directly transferred to the blockchain, but Falcon can.
#FalconFinance @Falcon Finance $FF
Many people like to compare stablecoins on the blockchain with the central banking system of the real world. Some say USDC is like a digital version of the dollar, some say MakerDAO is a central bank on the blockchain, and some say RWA carries the assets closest to 'national credit.' However, if you truly understand the monetary system of the real world, you will know that the central bank model cannot be directly transferred to the blockchain. The reason is not that the blockchain lacks government bonds, not that the blockchain lacks regulation, and not that the blockchain lacks reserve assets, but that the blockchain lacks 'structural architecture.' The currency in the real world is not supported by a single asset, but by a whole set of structures: financial regulation, fiscal capacity, industrial scale, capital market depth, international demand, risk absorption mechanisms, legal frameworks... All these elements interweave to make a country's currency stable, resilient, and extensible. What the blockchain has always lacked is not assets, but this entire set of 'structural capabilities.'
Many people like to compare stablecoins on the blockchain with the central banking system of the real world. Some say USDC is like a digital version of the dollar, some say MakerDAO is a central bank on the blockchain, and some say RWA carries the assets closest to 'national credit.' However, if you truly understand the monetary system of the real world, you will know that the central bank model cannot be directly transferred to the blockchain. The reason is not that the blockchain lacks government bonds, not that the blockchain lacks regulation, and not that the blockchain lacks reserve assets, but that the blockchain lacks 'structural architecture.' The currency in the real world is not supported by a single asset, but by a whole set of structures: financial regulation, fiscal capacity, industrial scale, capital market depth, international demand, risk absorption mechanisms, legal frameworks... All these elements interweave to make a country's currency stable, resilient, and extensible. What the blockchain has always lacked is not assets, but this entire set of 'structural capabilities.'
See original
If stablecoins experience another systemic collapse, can USDD withstand it?
If a systemic collapse of stablecoins happens again, can USDD withstand it? This question is not to promote optimism, but to ensure that I at least have a calculable answer in my mind before I truly need to make a decision.
First of all, let me say that USDD is not the kind of stablecoin that 'will never encounter issues.' On the contrary, its design logic has never assumed a calm world, but rather that the worst-case scenario will inevitably occur. Many stablecoins have issues because they assume the market is generally functioning normally. Once faced with extreme conditions, they have to rely on temporarily changing the rules, pausing functions, or freezing addresses to stop the bleeding. This approach may stabilize prices in the short term, but in the long run, it will definitely destroy trust, as you never know how the rules will change next time. The idea behind USDD 2.0 is the opposite; it does not rely on 'after-the-fact remedies' but rather incorporates extreme situations into the system's structure in advance.
First of all, let me say that USDD is not the kind of stablecoin that 'will never encounter issues.' On the contrary, its design logic has never assumed a calm world, but rather that the worst-case scenario will inevitably occur. Many stablecoins have issues because they assume the market is generally functioning normally. Once faced with extreme conditions, they have to rely on temporarily changing the rules, pausing functions, or freezing addresses to stop the bleeding. This approach may stabilize prices in the short term, but in the long run, it will definitely destroy trust, as you never know how the rules will change next time. The idea behind USDD 2.0 is the opposite; it does not rely on 'after-the-fact remedies' but rather incorporates extreme situations into the system's structure in advance.
See original
When agents accelerate the world a hundred times, only Kite can ensure that everything remains under control
During this time, I have been pondering a question: What speed will our digital world operate at once AI agents become fully widespread?@KITE AI
Try to imagine that a conventional process might take 5 minutes, 10 minutes, or even half an hour, while an agent could execute these tasks in just 0.2 seconds, 0.5 seconds, or sometimes even less than 0.1 seconds.
This is not simply about 'efficiency improvement,' but a qualitative change in execution density. An ordinary person can perform dozens of digital operations in a day, while an agent might complete hundreds, or even more, in a minute. It has no fatigue, no hesitation, no confirmation steps; as long as the logical chain is established, it will execute immediately.
Try to imagine that a conventional process might take 5 minutes, 10 minutes, or even half an hour, while an agent could execute these tasks in just 0.2 seconds, 0.5 seconds, or sometimes even less than 0.1 seconds.
This is not simply about 'efficiency improvement,' but a qualitative change in execution density. An ordinary person can perform dozens of digital operations in a day, while an agent might complete hundreds, or even more, in a minute. It has no fatigue, no hesitation, no confirmation steps; as long as the logical chain is established, it will execute immediately.
See original
When assets enter FalconFinance, they are no longer just numbers, but structural components with 'roles'.
If you look back at the on-chain asset ecosystem, you will find a very awkward reality: there are more and more assets, but the 'roles' of these assets have not increased. ETH is collateral, BTC is collateral, LRT is collateral, RWA is collateral, and LP is also collateral. Once all assets enter the protocol, they have almost only one function: to provide collateral value.
This logic has continued from the early days of MakerDAO to the present, with no changes in structural hierarchy. If I were to describe it in one sentence, it would be: 'Assets on the chain are infinitely simplified into a number,' and no system truly understands, interprets, or utilizes it. Thus, the development of on-chain assets has turned into a highly monotonous pattern: regardless of how complex, promising, or financially attributed the assets are, they ultimately get compressed into a single-dimensional variable.
This logic has continued from the early days of MakerDAO to the present, with no changes in structural hierarchy. If I were to describe it in one sentence, it would be: 'Assets on the chain are infinitely simplified into a number,' and no system truly understands, interprets, or utilizes it. Thus, the development of on-chain assets has turned into a highly monotonous pattern: regardless of how complex, promising, or financially attributed the assets are, they ultimately get compressed into a single-dimensional variable.
See original
What is truly needed in the multi-chain era is not cross-chain bridges, but a 'credit unification layer' like FalconFinance.
The blockchain industry has been discussing cross-chain for the past few years. It seems that whoever can transfer assets from chain A to chain B faster, cheaper, and more securely will have an advantage in the multi-chain era. Various bridges, various verification models, and various cross-chain architectures have emerged, but the reality is that the true problem of cross-chain has never been 'can it be done,' but rather 'after it is done, does it still count as the same thing.'
This statement sounds simple, yet it represents the biggest deadlock in cross-chain finance: assets have crossed over, but credit has not; stablecoins have moved, but the structure has broken; users start anew on another chain, with an entirely different economic logic. What an economic system fears most is this kind of 'credit dislocation,' as it can make the entire cross-chain ecosystem resemble dozens of unrelated small cities—able to interact with each other but unable to form a unified market. Cross-chain bridges address transportation, while FalconFinance addresses finance; these are two entirely different levels.
This statement sounds simple, yet it represents the biggest deadlock in cross-chain finance: assets have crossed over, but credit has not; stablecoins have moved, but the structure has broken; users start anew on another chain, with an entirely different economic logic. What an economic system fears most is this kind of 'credit dislocation,' as it can make the entire cross-chain ecosystem resemble dozens of unrelated small cities—able to interact with each other but unable to form a unified market. Cross-chain bridges address transportation, while FalconFinance addresses finance; these are two entirely different levels.
See original
FalconFinance is not a stablecoin protocol, but the starting point of on-chain 'credit structure.'
Many people are attracted to the USDf stablecoin shell when they first see @Falcon Finance FalconFinance and instinctively categorize it within the framework of 'stablecoin projects.' However, if you study it a little deeper, you will find that this classification is too superficial for FalconFinance. Its core is not about 'creating a stablecoin,' but rather 'rebuilding the credit structure of on-chain finance.' Traditional stablecoins, whether decentralized or centralized, essentially rely on collateral to build up credit, with only one core variable: whether there is a problem with the collateral and whether the collateralization rate is high enough. FalconFinance's approach is not simply to stuff more assets into a pool, but to establish a 'credit structure system' that allows different assets to play different roles within the system, making credit not come from a single asset, but from the structure itself.
See original
If the token economy enters the 'Automated Era', Kite will make all economic actions trustworthy again
In the past of the cryptocurrency market, the core of token economics was 'human behavior'. Whether it is market making, locking, governance, dividends, staking, subsidy, incentive parameter adjustment, or liquidity migration, most of these economic actions rely on human judgment and manual execution. You decide when to mine, when to exit, when to claim rewards, when to sell, and when to participate in governance. But in the last two years, I have increasingly felt a change: the token economic system is slowly breaking away from 'human rhythm' and shifting towards 'automated rhythm'. $KITE #KITE
See original
The Era of Multi-Agent Collaboration: Kite is the underlying guardrail that prevents 'complex systems from collapsing'
In the past, when we talked about AI execution and intelligent automation, we always regarded agents as a 'standalone tool', as if it were just a smarter script. However, if you really observe the ecosystem of large models in recent months, you will understand that the next stage for agents is not 'single agent becoming stronger', but 'multi-agent collaboration'.
In the future, a task is likely not to be completed by a single agent, but by a group of agents working together: one responsible for collecting data, one for analyzing results, one for executing operations, one for monitoring risks, one for logging, and one for checking whether constraints are met. The entire task is like an assembly line, with each node being a specialized agent. As the on-chain ecosystem becomes increasingly complex, humans will not participate in every step, but will rely on these collaborative agents to help us complete complex operations. This sounds great, but it also means the costs are very high: system complexity will rise exponentially, and the behavior of each agent may affect another agent, while all agents ultimately connect to execute on-chain. Without @KITE AI Kite, such a system would only require one agent to go out of bounds for a chain reaction collapse to occur.
In the future, a task is likely not to be completed by a single agent, but by a group of agents working together: one responsible for collecting data, one for analyzing results, one for executing operations, one for monitoring risks, one for logging, and one for checking whether constraints are met. The entire task is like an assembly line, with each node being a specialized agent. As the on-chain ecosystem becomes increasingly complex, humans will not participate in every step, but will rely on these collaborative agents to help us complete complex operations. This sounds great, but it also means the costs are very high: system complexity will rise exponentially, and the behavior of each agent may affect another agent, while all agents ultimately connect to execute on-chain. Without @KITE AI Kite, such a system would only require one agent to go out of bounds for a chain reaction collapse to occur.
See original
How to ensure that when assets begin to move automatically on-chain, Kite is the only way to ensure that 'movement does not exceed authority'
In the on-chain world, 'asset movement' is originally a very serious operation that requires caution. Whether it is transferring, staking, redeeming, liquidating, exchanging, or cross-chain, every action represents a real value transfer. The reason asset movement was safe in the past is that it relied on human clicks: you personally confirm, you personally sign, you personally take responsibility.@KITE AI
But now the situation is different; AI agents are beginning to take over asset movement. You will let the agents help you automatically take profits, automatically replenish, automatically arbitrage, automatically reinvest, automatically migrate liquidity, and even help you automatically run multi-chain strategies. On-chain assets no longer 'wait for your operation', but 'act on their own'. If you observe the recent trends carefully, you will find that asset movement is shifting from 'manual operation' to 'autonomous execution'.
But now the situation is different; AI agents are beginning to take over asset movement. You will let the agents help you automatically take profits, automatically replenish, automatically arbitrage, automatically reinvest, automatically migrate liquidity, and even help you automatically run multi-chain strategies. On-chain assets no longer 'wait for your operation', but 'act on their own'. If you observe the recent trends carefully, you will find that asset movement is shifting from 'manual operation' to 'autonomous execution'.
See original
#BTC
The current structure and trend of Bitcoin is consistent with my viewpoint published on 12/23 (the resistance at 90700 has not been broken, with a high short and low long range between 90500-85000);
Today, Bitcoin hit a low of 86724, and my additional viewpoint is: if Bitcoin breaks this low again tonight, there is a very high probability it will fall back to the support at 85500.
However, at the same time, 86724 is also the 0.618 support level, so there will definitely be a struggle between bulls and bears at this position.
❗️ This time, Bitcoin's only opportunity was the failure to test the important resistance level of 94500, just as I expressed my views on Bitcoin on 12/23, I continue to be bearish on the market.
The current structure and trend of Bitcoin is consistent with my viewpoint published on 12/23 (the resistance at 90700 has not been broken, with a high short and low long range between 90500-85000);
Today, Bitcoin hit a low of 86724, and my additional viewpoint is: if Bitcoin breaks this low again tonight, there is a very high probability it will fall back to the support at 85500.
However, at the same time, 86724 is also the 0.618 support level, so there will definitely be a struggle between bulls and bears at this position.
❗️ This time, Bitcoin's only opportunity was the failure to test the important resistance level of 94500, just as I expressed my views on Bitcoin on 12/23, I continue to be bearish on the market.
#BTC To be honest, I am very disappointed with the trend of Bitcoin in the early morning. The only rebound in the past month, rising to 94500, has been suppressed.
Most traders in the market should be looking forward to Bitcoin testing 92000 and 94500 this time; unfortunately, it has been resisted at 90700 this time; from the perspective of the daily structure, it can be preliminarily determined that the rebound is weak.
The only short-term strategy available now is: high short and low long in the range of 90500-85000; as long as it does not break down or break through on the right side, the strategy is that simple.
There are only 8 days left in 2025, and there may not be much of a market... Let's quietly look forward to the trend of Bitcoin in the first quarter of 2026 and the attitude of market funds!
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
Most traders in the market should be looking forward to Bitcoin testing 92000 and 94500 this time; unfortunately, it has been resisted at 90700 this time; from the perspective of the daily structure, it can be preliminarily determined that the rebound is weak.
The only short-term strategy available now is: high short and low long in the range of 90500-85000; as long as it does not break down or break through on the right side, the strategy is that simple.
There are only 8 days left in 2025, and there may not be much of a market... Let's quietly look forward to the trend of Bitcoin in the first quarter of 2026 and the attitude of market funds!
{spot}(BTCUSDT)
See original
I believe that large-scale AI automation will bring an invisible financial storm, and Kite is proactively building a bulwark against it.
I have recently often pondered a question: what would happen if AI agents truly entered every wallet, every strategy, every liquidity pool, every liquidation engine, and every trading environment? The answer is not difficult to imagine; it's just that many people are unwilling to face it; it would be an invisible financial storm.
You throw thousands of high-speed actors into a sufficiently complex on-chain economy; they will make decisions, execute strategies, respond to each other, and act simultaneously at a pace far exceeding that of humans. Humans think, hesitate, observe, and wait; agents do not; they only execute, execute, execute. In human cognition, this is called 'efficiency improvement,' but in the era of automation, this is called 'liquidity resonance.' An agent adjusting a position in a certain pool may trigger ten agents to follow; ten agent operations may prompt a hundred agents to respond; an entirely machine-driven behavior waterfall may suddenly appear on-chain, and humans cannot react in time. If this behavior lacks boundary control, permission isolation, and identity differentiation, it is sufficient to overturn a protocol, a token, or even an entire chain one day. The existence of Kite is to prevent such storms from exceeding their boundaries.
You throw thousands of high-speed actors into a sufficiently complex on-chain economy; they will make decisions, execute strategies, respond to each other, and act simultaneously at a pace far exceeding that of humans. Humans think, hesitate, observe, and wait; agents do not; they only execute, execute, execute. In human cognition, this is called 'efficiency improvement,' but in the era of automation, this is called 'liquidity resonance.' An agent adjusting a position in a certain pool may trigger ten agents to follow; ten agent operations may prompt a hundred agents to respond; an entirely machine-driven behavior waterfall may suddenly appear on-chain, and humans cannot react in time. If this behavior lacks boundary control, permission isolation, and identity differentiation, it is sufficient to overturn a protocol, a token, or even an entire chain one day. The existence of Kite is to prevent such storms from exceeding their boundaries.
See original
I feel that smart contracts will increasingly resemble robots, and Kite is the "universal truth layer" among them.
I have been thinking about a change recently: smart contracts are evolving from "rule machines" to "behavior machines." Previous contracts were simple; they just executed fixed logic: if A is satisfied, then execute B, with no discussion, no reasoning, and no degrees of freedom. However, as on-chain interactions become more complex and automation becomes more widespread, smart contracts are beginning to take on more and more responsibilities related to "judgment."
For example, a mortgage loan contract must be dynamically adjusted based on real-time parameters; an automated market-making contract must be executed automatically based on strategy; an insurance contract must determine whether an event has truly occurred; a governance contract must calculate the final state based on multi-party voting. More importantly, in the future, most calls to smart contracts will not be made by humans, but by AI agents. This means that the behaviors that contracts need to handle are no longer human clicks, but machine-generated continuous chains of instructions. Smart contracts will increasingly resemble robots, needing to execute actions based on external inputs, but the biggest challenge for robots is not execution, but how to determine whether the "input is real."
See original
Why I say that the true members of future DAOs are not humans, but AI agents, and Kite is the lowest cost governance solution.
If you observe the development of the entire crypto world over the past two years, you will find that our understanding of DAOs is quietly changing. In the past, when talking about DAOs, it always felt like a group of people sitting together to vote, discuss, submit proposals, modify rules, and jointly decide the future of an ecosystem.
But now many DAOs are no longer drawn this way. More and more DAOs are beginning to rely on automated strategies, rely on robots to manage the treasury, rely on scripts to execute parameter adjustments, and rely on intelligent automation to handle payments and subsidies. Governance is no longer based on 'manual human effort', but rather on 'system automation'.
But now many DAOs are no longer drawn this way. More and more DAOs are beginning to rely on automated strategies, rely on robots to manage the treasury, rely on scripts to execute parameter adjustments, and rely on intelligent automation to handle payments and subsidies. Governance is no longer based on 'manual human effort', but rather on 'system automation'.
See original
🎈Shorting is fun, keep shorting and keep having fun $BTC $ETH
🎈Give me a big short and Ethereum fiercely
📍I lost an Ethereum long in the middle, how unlucky!
🎈Give me a big short and Ethereum fiercely
📍I lost an Ethereum long in the middle, how unlucky!
Every time an event contract opens, it's like this
$BTC 's long position bouncing back is very normal
$ETH 's subsequent long position is in such poor shape
The key is that after the loss, the market directly rebounds after a dozen seconds
Is this not targeted? Everyone remember to avoid雷 when opening events!
$BTC 's long position bouncing back is very normal
$ETH 's subsequent long position is in such poor shape
The key is that after the loss, the market directly rebounds after a dozen seconds
Is this not targeted? Everyone remember to avoid雷 when opening events!
Login to explore more contents