Total token supply 1B, initial circulation is 15.86% (circulation data source CMC)
No specific token unlocking details provided, related tokenomics can be viewed (based on this ratio, the airdrop should be very small, overall it is highly controlled) https://docs.oooo.money/tokenomics
The fundamentals support a modular full-chain interoperability protocol for the Bitcoin ecosystem
Team information unknown, based on available information it can be inferred to be a domestic team
Financing information has not been disclosed, only that Series A financing closed in January
Current pool price is 0.07, corresponding to 70 million FDV and 11.102 million circulating market cap (normal price). The pre-market price averaged at 0.075 but the liquidity is too low to be significantly meaningful
Gameplay: Overall fundamentals are relatively average, the sector has basically reached a regulatory limit. However, since it is infrastructure, the overall imagination space will be slightly larger
If we calculate the opening selling pressure at 1.5%, it is 1.05 million selling pressure, I believe as long as there are market makers involved, it won't drop significantly
The most prudent way is still to wait for a period after the opening to observe the price performance; if it performs well overall, then consider trading in waves
Pre-sale time 16:00 - 18:00, 18:00 opening, specific airdrop time not mentioned
Total token supply 3B, initial circulation is 17.9% (source CMC)
Tokenomics no specific information
Fundamentally an art collection trading platform (mainly targeting cards)
Team information unknown, based on available information, it can be inferred to be a foreign team
Round 1 financing raised 11.5 million USD, raised in October. Investment institutions have a good background, invested in Polygon and its gaming NFT sector, as well as the $XRP project team
Current pool price 0.013, corresponding to 39 million FDV and 6.981 million circulating market value (normal low price). There is pre-market but liquidity is too low for meaningful reference, current main transaction price is around 0.021
Pre-sale terms: not yet announced
Gameplay: Overall fundamentals are okay, although the sector is quite average, the product side looks decent overall, and has good institutional backing and funds
Currently, the most important chip distribution and airdrop have no news, so it’s quite difficult to make a judgment
But it’s recommended to pay close attention to the opening situation
Pre-sale time 16:00 - 18:00, opening time will be notified separately. No airdrop information seen
Total token supply 10B, initial circulation is 20%【‼️This part of the information cannot be guaranteed, two Bitway can be found on CMC, corresponding to different tokenomics】
3% Booster activity (TGE releases 0.5%), other Tokenomics information not disclosed
The fundamentals consist of a CeDeFi stablecoin yield protocol and a BTC Layer1 infrastructure protocol【‼️The original project name was Side Protocol, which had already undergone TGE around the end of last year, and after the name change, it received investment from Yzi】
A team of locals + foreigners, the Chinese co-founder has previously worked as a researcher at Binance Labs, and another co-founder met while working at the previous company, with an overall background that is quite standard
Round 1 30 million FDV financing 1.5 million USD, that is financing 5% tokens (2023 financing, institutional background is quite average); there is also Round Yzi Labs strategic round, specific information unknown
Pre-sale terms: 50k financing 1% tokens, corresponding to 5 million FDV. 216 threshold
Play: Overall fundamentals are quite average, if the performance after opening is good, it is highly likely that the project party will find market makers, there is room for play. Coupled with Yzi's strategic investment, there are expectations for contracts (but I don’t think it’s likely to launch soon)
No airdrop information seen, so overall selling pressure currently only comes from Booster + Alpha pre-sale part
The predecessor Side Protocol I remember had issued coins once, at that time it was said to be issued on Sol and its own chain, but I have not found specific tokens. I only have a vague impression that the performance at that time was quite average (if there are familiar friends, please feel free to add haha)
Overall, I think there are quite a few potential pitfalls, let’s wait and see how it goes after the opening for a while
$RTX CA(BSC):0x4829a1d1fb6ded1f81d26868ab8976648baf9893 CA(Sol):J1wnHdKvP34fg7TtYdX63UPJMTdXNzJGEqfNJB22vKjU alpha 17:00 opening, the specific airdrop collection time is not specified Total token supply of 100 million, initial circulation is 16.66% 5% treasury, 11.66% ecosystem and community (6.66% airdrop, TGE unlock 1.332%) The fundamentals are a multi-chain DeFi protocol, similar to a leveraged version of Pendle YT Hong Kong team, the founders were previously in traditional finance, RateX is the first entrepreneurial project. Looking at Twitter, they have now gone to do another new product line Mooncake Round 1 funding of 25 million FDV, specific amount unknown, Round 1 7 million USD funding. GSR and Animoca jointly invested in two rounds
Total token supply 1B, initial circulation is 20.5% (data source CMC)
No specific token distribution ratio has been provided
The fundamentals are based on the DeFi ecological protocol built on Berachain PoL, and it is also one of the key projects in Berachain Spotlight
Team information is unknown; based on existing information, it can be speculated that it is a foreign project, but the possibility of Chinese involvement cannot be ruled out
Raised 18.75 million USD in 3 rounds of financing, notable institutions include Framework Ventures and Yzi Labs (a separate strategic round)
The total value locked (TVL) of the entire protocol is only over 200 million USD, peaking at over 2 billion in the first half of the year
Current pool price is 0.095, corresponding to 95 million FDV and 19.475 million circulating market value (normally low price)
Presale terms: not yet announced, updates will follow
Play: Overall fundamentals are decent; I think it is passable. It is just an ecological project of Berachain, and currently, there are no standout performances among existing Berachain ecological projects, including the official ones
However, given that so much money has been raised and Yzi Labs has invested, if relationships are well managed, there is still potential in the contract
Finally, there is a rather strange point: the on-chain TGE is at 16:00, but CEX will not open until 20:00, including the distribution of CEX presale airdrops (historically, there has always been a gap of one to two hours)
CA(BSC):Not available, updates to follow CA(Sui):0x9f854b3ad20f8161ec0886f15f4a1752bf75d22261556f14cc8d3a1c5d50e529::magma::MAGMA
Alpha launch time unknown, estimated at 18:00 or 19:00
Total supply 1B, initial circulation at 20.06%
10% community incentives and airdrops, 2% liquidity, 7% foundation and marketing, 1.06% ecosystem revenue
The fundamentals are based on the Move programming language built Sui AMM DEX
Team information unknown, based on existing information, it can be speculated to be a project from China. Observing their Twitter, they seem to have good relations with some project parties under the Sui ecosystem, such as the founders of Walrus and MystenLabs
In the first round of financing, they raised 6 million USD, announced more than a week ago. The investing institutions are all Chinese, likely just a speculative project. From the list, the one with the most speculative capability should be Navi Protocol (this one I recall is also not very reputable)
Current pool price 0.11, corresponding to 110 million FDV and 25.33 million circulating market value (normal price)
Gameplay: Overall fundamentals look decent, it can be considered a small popular project, the project party has also found quite a few people for promotion, clearly a domestic project
It seems to have contract potential, but certainty is low, must consider the launch performance further
If this launch still only has the Sui chain without the BSC chain, then if they provide a contract later, it is likely to be the peak point (reference $US)
If it also goes on the BSC chain, liquidity will be relatively better, providing room for fluctuations. The premise is that the launch is low or within a normal valuation range (personally believe under 300 million is considered normal)
The fundamentals are entertainment culture brands, such as selling tickets in collaboration with concerts
Team information unknown, core team members include Wildwood (an industry godfather figure, previously involved in Disney's Star Wars/Avatar projects) and former Coinbase/Base engineers【This part is excerpted from KOL advertising content】
However, from the available information, I feel that the operation is led by a domestic team (only found a bunch of Chinese-speaking KOLs for advertising, not much overseas promotional content seen)
Currently, the pool price is 0.11, corresponding to 110 million FDV and 25.33 million circulating market cap (normal price)
Play: The narrative fundamentals of the track are average, and the project's revenue based on advertising data shows that last year alone there was 1.3M, totaling 3M in revenue (which is laborious work)
Currently, if the airdrop selling pressure is calculated at the pool price, it is about 3.3 million USD, let's see if it can drop below 100 million FDV
Personally, I tend to have contract expectations, but the certainty is not as high as yesterday, needs to combine with market trends
$US CA(Sui): 0xee962a61432231c2ede6946515beb02290cb516ad087bb06a731e922b2a5f57a::us::US alpha 20:00 opening Total token supply is 10B, with initial circulation at 22.2%. No specific unlocking ratio mentioned; circulation is mainly from the community and ecosystem (30%), foundation (20%), airdrop, and future incentives (7.5%). The overall majority is in the hands of the project party, and currently, the airdrop looks like it will be around 3% (0.02% Kaito's mouth) The fundamentals are DeAI infrastructure. European and American team, other information unknown. The second round of financing raised 11 million USD, and there is one undisclosed strategic round remaining. The core investor is Polychain, and the overall investment lineup is biased towards European and American VCs, and they have received investments from Sui and Walrus.
The judgment is correct; both of yesterday's new coins were given contract positions today!
cryptoHowe
--
『12.9 $NIGHT $WET New Coin Research』
$NIGHT @MidnightNtwrk CA(BSC):Not yet announced, will be updated later CA(Night):0691b2fecca1ac4f53cb6dfb00b7013e561d1f34403b957cbb5af1fa4e49474854 Alpha opening time unknown, estimated at 16:00 or 17:00 Total token supply 24B, initial circulation is 69.19% (data source CMC) No specific unlocking ratio mentioned The fundamentals are a privacy blockchain developed by Input Output Global (IOG), which is a very established infrastructure developer Team and funding information unknown, European and American team Asked surf for help with the analysis, for reference only https://asksurf.ai/share/605d461b-9d61-461b-b50b-b90d3b7508ec?r=0A4FCCCE2713
$NIGHT @MidnightNtwrk CA(BSC):Not yet announced, will be updated later CA(Night):0691b2fecca1ac4f53cb6dfb00b7013e561d1f34403b957cbb5af1fa4e49474854 Alpha opening time unknown, estimated at 16:00 or 17:00 Total token supply 24B, initial circulation is 69.19% (data source CMC) No specific unlocking ratio mentioned The fundamentals are a privacy blockchain developed by Input Output Global (IOG), which is a very established infrastructure developer Team and funding information unknown, European and American team Asked surf for help with the analysis, for reference only https://asksurf.ai/share/605d461b-9d61-461b-b50b-b90d3b7508ec?r=0A4FCCCE2713
5% liquidity, 2.8% ecological fund, 13.2% community rewards
The fundamentals are infrastructure protocols related to entertainment
European team, core members have extensive experience in entertainment/gaming, the whole team comes from the @PixionGames project (the biggest risk here is that the product makers and the coin operators are two different groups)
No specific financing rounds and amounts are mentioned, relevant investors include Delphi Digital, Spartan, Anomica, Ronin, etc. The lineup looks okay
Gameplay: The project narrative track is not very good, has been disproven, and there is not much real buying power. The overall Tokenomics and financing information are too simple to draw many valid insights
It's easy to see from the team background that the actual coin operation is not done by the project itself, likely controlled by VCs
Not recommended to touch, I personally believe this kind of project has no contract expectations
Total token supply 10B, initial circulation is 15% (there is a discrepancy with the data on CMC, 15% shall prevail)
No specific allocation details for this 15% were mentioned, and the official Twitter did not mention any airdrop matters (it is speculated that this 15% has little external chips apart from Alpha's share)
The fundamentals are modular blockchain infrastructure that can connect institutional private chains with public chains, enabling institutions to use various DeFi products. Its developer Parfin is a very established infrastructure provider, focused on business in South America.
The Brazil team, the CEO has good experience and resources in traditional finance, and the CTO has been working on blockchain products since 2014. Overall, the team’s fundamentals are quite good, at least they have gone through a bull and bear cycle in their parent company.
They raised 25 million USD in two rounds of financing, with Framework Ventures as their core investor. The overall institutional lineup completely overlaps with its parent company Parfin, and it is worth noting that Parfin also received investment from Tether last month.
The average VC investment cost is 113 million FDV, corresponding to a price of 0.0113. Currently, the pool price is 0.06, corresponding to 600 million FDV and 90 million circulating market capitalization. Pre-market transaction prices are generally below 0.04.
Gameplay: Overall, the project’s fundamentals are stable and improving, and in terms of FDV, it falls within a normal valuation range. Purely considering circulating market value, I think it’s acceptable.
Currently, I personally would consider going for the airdrop while also averaging in some at 0.04 in the pre-market (this generally means buying only a few hundred USD, don’t buy too much, and the official delivery is at 10 PM tonight, not available right at the opening).
Of course, I should also mention the related risks. Although the fundamentals are good, projects of this type generally find it difficult to provide users with a point to fomo buy in, so we are buying based on the narrative expectations being undervalued, leading to a value mismatch. Also, today’s market performance is relatively poor, so everyone should participate according to their risk preferences.
alpha 16:00 opening, airdrop collection time synchronized with opening
Total supply 1B, initial circulation 4.5%
1% airdrop (remaining 4% will be unlocked in 8 months), 1.5% liquidity, 1% treasury, 0.5% ecological fund【The treasury and ecological fund ratios are not explicitly stated, but based on the current situation, only 0.5% is left for alpha, which seems unlikely. So it should be alpha 1%, treasury + ecological fund 1%】
The fundamentals are a metaphysical prediction application incubated by the Manta ecosystem
Team and financing information unknown, but based on existing information, it can be inferred that it is a domestic team
Current pool price 0.04, corresponding to 40 million FDV and 1.8 million circulating market value
Gameplay: This narrative track is obviously falsifiable, and there won't be much buying pressure. Personally, I believe there is no potential for subsequent contract upgrades
Low market value with high control, at most it will be a rebound after digesting the selling pressure. Irys starts to set the example, and we can see how these small tokens perform next
If the performance is good, then the upcoming new currency strategy should return to a fundamentals-based state, rather than purely looking at the strength of the investors
Total supply 10B, initial circulation is 20%, no specific unlock ratio specified
For fundamental analysis and financing background, check this article https://x.com/0xcryptoHowe/status/1959150326659129394
Mainly a European and American team, the core members have limited Crypto Native experience. Moreover, from previous information received, the project party has a very noticeable information gap when targeting the Chinese market, providing a very sufficient budget but not seeing many major influencers involved in promotion (indirectly proving that the team should have paid quite a bit in tuition)
Currently, the pool price is 0.052, corresponding to 520 million FDV and 104 million circulating market cap. The pre-market trading price is generally around 0.02
Gameplay: I think this narrative track has quite a prospect, infrastructure projects generally still align with BN's appetite, and there's a certain possibility for the Korean market as well. There is currently not much information on listings, so we can wait and see if anything is announced in the afternoon
The current BN contract standard should have undergone a major adjustment, no longer easily giving day1 perp, but choosing to observe the performance and data within a period after TGE before granting
The current pool price is considered above average, a bit expensive. I also can't be sure about the reasonable valuation range because, strictly speaking, Irys has no direct competitors of the same type, only similar type competitors
Personally, I am preparing to grab the alpha airdrop. If there is no listing information for BN announced before TGE, it will be included in the upcoming observation list for a chance to enter
alpha 18:00 opens, airdrop collection is at the same time as the opening
Total token supply 1B, initial circulation is 9% (source: CMC)
5% liquidity, 7.2% community, the specific ratio for the ecosystem is not stated, but the share with the community is similar on the chart (the total of the three parts does not match the information from CMC)
The fundamentals are an AI-driven entertainment creation platform
Team information is unknown, but it can be inferred from existing information that it is a domestic team
Round 1 financing, specific amount not disclosed, only Folius Ventures as an investor. There may be projects incubated by it
Current pool price 0.05, corresponding to 5000w FDV (circulating market cap information is incorrect and cannot be calculated). Pre-market prices have recently traded above 0.045, while there are some large orders of over a thousand dollars trading around 0.06 (this situation is relatively rare)
Gameplay: The narrative track is not good, no day1 perp indicates average strength resources
Folius's ability to gather is considered relatively average, not as good as waiting to see tomorrow's Irys
Team information is unknown, but based on existing information, it can be inferred that it is a Japanese team (promotion mainly concentrated in China and Japan)
Round 1 financing, specific amount not disclosed, recently announced, mainly funded by Chinese investors. Interestingly, the $AIA project team also invested in this project
Current pool price 0.04, corresponding to 4000w FDV and 870w circulating market value. Pre-market price has mainly maintained around 0.05 recently
Gameplay: Narrative track is not good, no day1 perp indicates average strength and resources
Given that the $AIA project team has invested, if this project can get on the BN contract later, it will need to be monitored
I do not recommend playing at the opening, but you can see if there are any shadows of $AIA, such as trends, whether on-chain addresses overlap, etc.
Today, I will sort out the recent trends of the market from the big cycle to the small cycle. Disclaimer: This is purely personal reflection and analysis. The views are for reference only and do not constitute any investment advice. The first thing we need to know is that in a bull market, the top is not spoken of, and in a bear market, the bottom is not spoken of. We need to update our views and trading strategies in a timely manner based on the changes in the current market conditions. Essentially, this means adapting ourselves to the market environment, rather than expecting the market to adapt to us. The reason why the recent market is extremely difficult to navigate is that: Firstly, a large number of long-term indicators are starting to fail, and time is needed to find new indicators that can adapt to the current market conditions.
Team information unknown, based on existing information it can be inferred that it is a domestic team
Round 1 financing, specific amount not disclosed, investment from Chinese funds. The diving boss's fund also invested, likely also to cut losses
Current pool price 0.0003, corresponding to 3000w FDV and 717w circulating market value
Gameplay: Narrative track is not good, no day1 perp indicates average strength and resources. Moreover, institutions with financing backgrounds have significant losses
Still not recommended to touch, this type of project has not performed well in the past. The only good one is $BEAT with insider connections, but that also happened after it went on perp
Total token supply 280 million, initial circulation 15.14%
1.785% ecosystem, 1.785% liquidity, 11.57% airdrop and community incentives (the circulation ratio here differs from the specific unlocking shares given in the white paper, I think the project party didn't design it well, or hid some operable undisclosed circulation shares)
The fundamentals are an RWA asset issuance platform, focusing on the issuance and trading of art assets
Team and financing information unknown, currently based on existing information, it can be inferred that it is a domestic team
Current pool price 0.132, corresponding to 36.96 million FDV and 5.6 million circulating market value
Gameplay: the narrative track is not good, and the absence of day1 perp shows that the strength and resources are average. Moreover, the team and financing information are not transparent, which poses considerable risks
The current market situation can no longer be assessed purely on affordability; the value of shells is decreasing. Coupled with the current market downturn, do not expect it to have any good outcomes