tax

The Canadian Tax Agency (CRA) has pulled in over $100 million CAD from crypto audits in the last three years — yet not a single criminal charge has been filed since 2020.
A massive win for tax recovery… but a major signal of enforcement weakness.
🔍 Key Highlights
🔥 35-member crypto audit team
Handled 230+ cases, targeting high-risk and undeclared crypto users.
⚠️ 40% of Canadian crypto users
Either did not declare taxes or pose serious compliance risks.
🔎 CRA admits a major problem:
They still struggle to identify taxpayers accurately in the crypto space.
📂 Court Orders Issued
CRA demanded user data from NFT giant Dapper Labs — originally 18,000 users, narrowed to 2,500 after negotiations.
💼 This is only the second time in history a Canadian court forced a crypto company to share large-scale user data (first was Coinsquare in 2020).
🧭 What It Means
Canada is tightening its grip on crypto taxation.
Enforcement remains limited, but data collection is expanding fast.
More crypto platforms may face similar court orders in 2026.
Crypto tax transparency is entering a new era — quietly, but powerfully.
#CryptoNews #Canada #tax

Over the past decade, Bitcoin’s price has trended sharply upward. Patient investors who buy and hold Bitcoin for at least a year (often called “HODLers”) have seen outsized gains. In contrast, active day traders – who buy and sell Bitcoin frequently within short timeframes – have generally struggled. Historical data and studies bear this out. For example, Bitcoin’s average annualized return over the last ten years was roughly **49%**. A chart of 10-year returns below (from a Morgan Stanley analysis) illustrates how Bitcoin’s growth dwarfs that of stocks or gold.
Figure: Annualized returns (2014–2023) for Bitcoin vs. major assets. Bitcoin (~49% avg/yr) far exceeds the Nasdaq, S&P 500, and gold. Long-term holders have simply ridden Bitcoin’s multi-year bull markets. By contrast, research finds that most day traders lose money. For instance, regulatory data (FINRA) show about 72% of traders ended a year with losses, and one analysis reports roughly 90% of day traders lose money over time. In short, history and data suggest “time in market” beats “timing the market.”
Strong Long-Term Performance
Bitcoin’s historic growth rewards buy-and-hold. Over 2014–2023, Bitcoin gained far more, on average, than traditional investments. A $1,000 investment held 10 years would multiply many times over. By contrast, even skilled traders often underperform. Trading involves transaction costs, taxes, and the constant challenge of timing volatile moves. Empirical studies confirm this gap: active traders typically fail to beat a simple holding strategy.
Compound Growth: Holding Bitcoin allows investors to capture its compound growth. Reinvested gains and the coin’s strong multi-year uptrends mean that patient holders often see exponential increases over time. (A recent Morgan Stanley report notes Bitcoin’s 10-year average return was ~49% per year.)
Lower Fees: Long-term holding incurs far fewer transaction fees. Each buy or sell on Binance or any exchange typically costs a percentage of the trade. By trading only infrequently, holders pay much lower overall fees. For example, Binance charges about 0.1% per spot trade (even lower with BNB discounts), so trading 100 times instead of 1 time dramatically increases costs.
Tax Benefits: In many countries (e.g. the U.S.), holding over one year qualifies for lower long-term capital gains taxes. Short-term trades (within 1 year) are often taxed at higher ordinary-income rates. Thus HODLing can yield tax savings. One analysis notes: “trading often triggers higher short-term capital gains taxes, while holding benefits from long-term tax rates”.
Less Emotional Stress: HODLers typically feel less daily stress. They do not watch every fluctuation or fret over minor dips. Binance Academy observes that long-term investors *“do not worry about daily price fluctuations”*. This calmer approach helps avoid panic-selling in volatility.
Key Advantages of Holding
Simplicity and Time Commitment: You buy once and hold. No need to watch screens all day. Day trading requires constant attention and fast reactions, whereas holding lets you “set it and forget it.” Binance notes that holding needs only basic market awareness, not advanced trading skill.
Alignment with Trends: #bitcoin long-term trend (driven by growing adoption, halving events, etc.) has been strongly upward. By staying invested for years, holders capture these macro gains. As one summary puts it, Bitcoin and other cryptos have *“seen tremendous gains over time”*.
Lower “Wear and Tear”: Less frequent trades mean fewer opportunities for mistakes. Each trade risks timing errors, slippage, or emotional mistakes. Holding avoids most of this.
Challenges of Day Trading
Day trading #Bitcoin❗ can seem enticing in a volatile market – there are many price swings to exploit. However, these same swings make trading extremely risky and difficult:

High Volatility: Crypto prices can jump or crash in minutes. Predicting these moves is famously hard. One analysis notes that intraday cryptocurrency prices are often driven by sudden news or market emotion, *“making day-trade timing extremely difficult”*. Rapid swings can quickly erase profits.

Low Success Rate: Studies consistently find that the vast majority of day traders lose money. For example, one detailed review found about 90% of day traders lose money consistently. Another reported 72% of traders lost money in a year. Only a tiny fraction (on the order of 1–3%) achieve lasting profits over years.
High Fees and Costs: Frequent trading incurs much higher fees. Binance charges a fee each time you buy or sell. Over many trades, those costs can erode any profits. In contrast, a holder pays those fees only a few times.
#Tax and #liquidity Penalties: In some jurisdictions, each short-term trade triggers a tax event at higher rates. And capital not held in Bitcoin during big rallies misses gains entirely.
#Psychological Stress: Day trading is stressful. You must watch prices constantly and make split-second decisions. This pressure leads to emotional biases (fear, greed, FOMO). Binance notes that traders under stress often make “poor decisions” due to psychological pressure. In short, trading requires high discipline and can amplify mistakes if you panic or overtrade.
This table highlights why a patient HODL strategy can outperform active trading for most people. Long-term holders benefit from Bitcoin’s overall growth, paid-in-full compounding, and minimal costs. Day traders face an uphill battle of fees, taxes, and an unforgiving win-rate.
CONCLUSION
In summary, for the average beginner or casual investor, buying and holding Bitcoin for the long term has often been more profitable than day trading. Historical data show Bitcoin’s price has surged over the years, and studies repeatedly show that most active traders underperform or even lose money. Meanwhile, holding $BTC aligns you with its strong long-term uptrend, while incurring fewer fees, benefiting from more favorable taxes, and requiring less stressful daily oversight. Of course, every investor’s situation is different: those with very high risk tolerance, time, and skill may choose to trade. But for most people, especially beginners, a HODL-oriented approach on Binance offers a simpler, safer path to capturing Bitcoin’s long-term gain.

🔹 The U.S. Treasury extends accounting maneuvers to avoid default

🔹 Court rulings on Trump-era tariffs could accelerate the debt crisis

🔹 Washington signals possible end to the 'revenge tax' amid global tax talks

The U.S. Treasury Department announced it will continue using emergency accounting measures to avoid breaching the debt ceiling, extending them through July 24, 2025. This gives lawmakers more time to reach a solution and avoid a potential national default.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged Congress to act without delay, warning that pending court rulings on Trump-era tariffs could push the U.S. closer to a financial breaking point, known as “X-date”—the moment when the government can no longer meet its financial obligations.

Emergency Measures Buy Time but Not a Solution
The Treasury confirmed that it is extending the period during which it can use “extraordinary accounting measures”—temporary tactics like suspending investments in federal programs or reallocating funds across government accounts—to stay under the statutory debt limit.
Bessent sent a formal letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson and other key congressional leaders, calling on them to act before the upcoming August recess. While these temporary steps help avoid an immediate crisis, Bessent emphasized they do not fix the root problem: the need to raise or suspend the debt ceiling.
Failing to act, he warned, could damage investor confidence and hurt the U.S. credit rating, with serious repercussions not only for the national economy but for global markets as well.

GOP Divisions Delay Action as Debt Threat Looms
Pressure is mounting on Republican lawmakers, who have so far failed to finalize a major tax and spending package due to internal disagreements over funding priorities.
If they don’t reach a deal soon, the Treasury could run out of options to keep paying bills without breaching the debt ceiling. The longer Congress delays, the higher the risk of market volatility, investor panic, and public distrust.

Court Rulings on Tariffs Could Shake Government Revenues
Adding to the uncertainty are ongoing legal challenges to Trump-era tariffs. These tariffs have generated $23 billion in revenue, which has helped bolster the Treasury’s cash reserves during this debt-restricted period.
However, a recent ruling from the U.S. Court of International Trade declared that some of these tariffs exceed presidential authority and lack a legal basis. If the Treasury is forced to stop collecting or even refund certain tariffs, the government could lose a key revenue stream at a critical time.
Such a development could move the X-date up by weeks, giving Congress significantly less time to act than current projections suggest.

Treasury Suggests End to 'Revenge Tax' Amid OECD Tax Progress
In a separate development, the Treasury is signaling that it may soon eliminate the controversial "revenge tax", as OECD-led global tax talks show real progress. Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender stated that an international agreement may render the U.S. Section 899 provision—aimed at countries with digital service taxes—unnecessary.
Section 899, introduced under the Trump administration, is widely seen as a retaliatory measure. It would impose tax penalties on investors and firms in countries that the U.S. believes are discriminating against American tech giants like Google, Apple, and Amazon with digital taxes.
Countries such as France, Canada, and the United Kingdom have enacted such digital taxes. If a global agreement is reached, the U.S. may drop these retaliatory threats, potentially easing transatlantic tensions.

🔻 Summary
The U.S. Treasury is buying time—but market patience is limited. By extending emergency measures, it gives Congress breathing room, but pressure is mounting fast. If courts, tariffs, or political inaction converge, the U.S. could face a default crisis within weeks. Decisions made in the coming days could prove critical.

#USPolitics , #TRUMP , #Tariffs , #TradeWars , #tax

Stay one step ahead – follow our profile and stay informed about everything important in the world of cryptocurrencies!
Notice:
,,The information and views presented in this article are intended solely for educational purposes and should not be taken as investment advice in any situation. The content of these pages should not be regarded as financial, investment, or any other form of advice. We caution that investing in cryptocurrencies can be risky and may lead to financial losses.“

Here's the reasoning in summary, read this at least once.
The Federal Revenue, the State, the system, whatever you want to consider, are people that form a legal entity, basically.
There is no group coexistence without rules, rights and obligations, therefore, there is no life without the State, our most modern form of social organization.
Taxes are demonized by people, and there is a reason for this, it is indisputable, after all we pay high taxes (they are not the highest in the world, but they are high) and we do not get an adequate return, and this is another problem.