CoindooOfficial

Andrei Grachev, Managing Partner of DWF Labs, said what a growing number of institutional players have been thinking for months: the altcoin season as retail investors have known it is not coming back.

Key Takeaways
DWF Labs' Andrei Grachev declares traditional altseason structurally dead, replaced by short, violent sector rotationsETFs and institutional capital are locking liquidity into BTC and ETH, starving mid-cap alts of momentumGrachev still expects new ATHs for major assets in H1 2026, but warns hype-driven projects will not survive the new cycleThe CMC Altcoin Season Index sits at 45/100 - still firmly Bitcoin Season territory, up from 35 last month
In an interview with Cointelegraph on March 15, Grachev laid out a case that goes beyond typical cycle analysis - this is not about timing the market wrong, it is about a market that has fundamentally changed its behavior.
The crypto market has expanded to thousands of tradeable tokens, all competing for a pool of investor capital that, while growing, cannot be spread thin enough to lift everything at once. The "rising tide" dynamic that defined 2017 and 2021 - where nearly every altcoin rallied simply because Bitcoin rallied - no longer holds. There is too much supply and not enough conviction behind most of it.
The ETF factor compounds this. The approval and rapid growth of spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs has created institutional on-ramps that keep large capital anchored to large-cap assets. Fund managers with mandates to participate in crypto have a clean, compliant vehicle in BTC ETFs. They do not need to venture into mid-cap altcoins to get exposure, and most won't. That liquidity, which in previous cycles would have rotated down the risk curve, is now largely trapped at the top.
"Tokenomics alone are not enough if the product is useless," Grachev stated plainly. The implication is direct: the era when a well-structured token launch could generate sustained price appreciation regardless of underlying utility is over.
Violent Rotations, Not Seasons
What replaces altseason, according to Grachev, is something more brutal and more selective. Rather than a broad multi-month rally, the market will see short, aggressive surges in specific sectors - AI tokens one week, RWA protocols the next - followed by rapid capital rotation out as investors chase the next narrative. He describes these as "violent" rotations. Traders who are late to identify the rotation, or who hold through the exit, absorb significant losses.
The Sectors That Survive
Grachev is not bearish on the broader industry. DWF Labs has been actively accumulating through the current downturn, and he expects new all-time highs for major assets in the first half of 2026. His reasoning centers on two factors: the deleveraging that followed the October 2025 crash cleared out speculative excess, and institutional capital typically resets its deployment cycle after year-end, meaning fresh money entered the market in January and February.
The beneficiaries, in his view, will be concentrated in tokenized real-world assets - private credit instruments and debt products brought on-chain - alongside infrastructure projects that deliver measurable user growth. What is not on the list: projects whose primary value proposition is token distribution mechanics.
The Counter-Case
Not all analysts accept the structural-shift thesis. A segment of the market holds what might be called the springboard theory - that Bitcoin dominance above 58% historically precedes the largest altcoin rotations, because once BTC stabilizes, capital chases higher returns down the risk curve in a compressed timeframe.
Technical analysts including Michaël van de Poppe have flagged bullish RSI divergences on weekly charts for Optimism, Arbitrum, and Near Protocol, suggesting downward price trends may be losing momentum even if prices have not yet reversed.
What the Index Is Actually Saying
The data does little to contradict Grachev's thesis. As of March 15, the CoinMarketCap Altcoin Season Index sits at 45 out of 100 - up from 35 last month and 37 last week, but still deep inside Bitcoin Season territory. To reach official Altcoin Season status, the index needs to clear 75.
Source: https://coinmarketcap.com/charts/altcoin-season-index/
The 90-day chart tells the fuller story. Altcoin market cap peaked above $1.4 trillion in late December before sliding steadily toward $1.0 trillion with no convincing recovery. The yearly high of 78 - reached on September 20, 2025 - showed the market briefly touched genuine Altcoin Season territory before collapsing to a yearly low of 12 in April 2025. The trajectory since has been a slow, uneven grind upward. Recovery, not reversal.
If Grachev is right, that distinction matters more than most retail investors realize. The market will reward specificity - the right sector, the right entry, the right exit - and punish everyone still waiting for a season that no longer arrives on schedule.
#crypto

The global cryptocurrency market continued its upward momentum this week, pushing total market capitalization above $2.5 trillion as major digital assets recorded solid gains.

Key Takeaways
Total crypto market capitalization has climbed to $2.51 trillion, rising about 3.19% in recent trading.Bitcoin is trading near $73,780, gaining approximately 9% over the past week.Ethereum has outperformed Bitcoin, rising nearly 13% in seven days.Several major altcoins including Solana and XRP posted strong weekly gains.Market indicators suggest sentiment is improving but not yet euphoric.
While Bitcoin remains the dominant force in the market, Ethereum and several large-cap altcoins have posted stronger weekly performance, signaling a gradual expansion of momentum beyond the leading cryptocurrency.
Sentiment indicators show that investors remain cautiously optimistic, with the Fear & Greed Index currently at 41, indicating neutral sentiment.
Bitcoin Holds Lead as Market’s Anchor Asset
Bitcoin remains the largest cryptocurrency by market capitalization and continues to serve as the primary anchor for the broader digital asset market.
The asset is currently trading near $73,782, with a market capitalization of approximately $1.47 trillion. Over the past week, Bitcoin has climbed about 9%, reflecting steady demand from both retail and institutional investors.

Despite the recent rally, short-term trading shows Bitcoin moving within a relatively narrow range.Trading volume remains strong, with more than $37 billion in daily turnover, highlighting continued liquidity across major exchanges and Strategy hinting in continuing to boost it's BTC holdings.
Ethereum Emerges as Top Large-Cap Performer
Ethereum has emerged as one of the strongest performers among the largest cryptocurrencies this week.
The second-largest digital asset by market value is currently trading near $2,268, posting a 7.46% gain over the past 24 hours and nearly 13% growth over the past week. Ethereum’s total market capitalization now stands at approximately $273.7 billion.
The strong performance highlights renewed interest in Ethereum’s ecosystem, which continues to dominate the decentralized finance (DeFi), stablecoin, and smart contract sectors.
Analysts say Ethereum’s outperformance may also reflect expectations around further institutional adoption and growing activity across Layer-2 scaling solutions.
Altcoins Join the Rally
Beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum, several large-cap altcoins have also recorded notable gains. According to Data from CoinMarketCap Solana rose approximately 12% over the past seven days, trading near $93.41 with a market capitalization of roughly $53 billion.
The blockchain network has continued to attract developer activity and retail interest, particularly in decentralized applications and tokenized assets.
XRP, another major cryptocurrency, climbed nearly 9% during the week, reaching about $1.47. XRP now holds a market value of approximately $90.5 billion, placing it among the largest digital assets globally.
Meanwhile, BNB, the native token of the Binance ecosystem, posted a weekly gain of more than 8%, trading around $681.
These gains suggest that market momentum is spreading beyond Bitcoin, although the sector has not yet entered what traders traditionally refer to as a full “altcoin season.”
Market Indicators Suggest Improving Sentiment
Market sentiment indicators show a gradual improvement in investor confidence.
The Average Crypto Relative Strength Index (RSI) currently sits near 61.8, which places the market close to overbought territory. While this suggests strong buying pressure, it also indicates that prices could experience short-term consolidation if traders begin taking profits.
Meanwhile, the Altcoin Season Index stands at 45 out of 100, signaling that the market remains primarily driven by Bitcoin rather than a broad altcoin rally.
Historically, readings above 75 indicate a full altcoin season where most alternative cryptocurrencies outperform Bitcoin. Current levels suggest that such a phase has not yet begun.
Outlook: Momentum Builds but Caution Remains
The latest price movements highlight a market that is gaining strength but still maintaining a cautious tone.
While the overall market capitalization has climbed above $2.5 trillion, sentiment indicators show investors remain measured rather than euphoric. This dynamic often occurs during the middle stages of market cycles, when confidence is rising but volatility remains a constant factor.
Several potential catalysts could influence the next phase of the crypto market, including institutional investment flows, macroeconomic developments, and regulatory decisions affecting digital assets.
For now, Bitcoin continues to act as the market’s primary driver, while Ethereum and other large-cap cryptocurrencies gradually expand their influence.
If current trends persist, analysts say the crypto market could see continued growth as capital flows spread across a broader range of digital assets in the months ahead.
#bitcoin

Paolo Ardoino, Tether's CEO, recently took to social media with a straightforward claim: USDT is the stablecoin built for the people, not institutions.

Key Takeaways
USDT's largest single sender accounts for just 4.97% of total volume; rival stablecoins sit at 23.34%Over 550 million users across emerging markets depend on Tether for daily financial activityLATAM and Southeast Asia are driving the bulk of adoption, with retail micro-transfers dominatingTether launched USAT in early 2026 to compete for U.S. institutional ground currently held by USDC
He pointed to internal Tether analysis showing that the largest single sender on the network accounts for less than 5% of total send volume — compared to competing stablecoins, where one entity is responsible for nearly 25% of all transactions. Over 550 million users across emerging markets rely on USDT, he argued, precisely because it isn't beholden to a handful of large players. A digital dollar, in his words, for the billions left behind by the traditional financial system.
It's a narrative Tether has been refining for years. Whether the market buys it depends on what's happening on the ground.
https://twitter.com/paoloardoino/status/2030576495773499718
LATAM: The Clearest Case for Tether's Argument
Latin America has become one of the most compelling real-world demonstrations of stablecoin utility, and USDT sits at the center of it. The region recorded 63% crypto growth in 2025, making it the second-fastest-growing market globally.
Brazil leads in volume, with over $318 billion in annual crypto transactions, 90% of which are stablecoin-related. Integration with local neobanks and payment platforms like Mercado Pago has made USDT a functional part of everyday financial life for millions of Brazilians.
Argentina and Venezuela tell a different but equally pointed story. In Argentina, roughly 12% of the population actively uses crypto — the highest per-capita penetration rate in the region. The driver isn't speculation; it's survival. USDT offers a way to hold value when the local currency doesn't. Venezuela has gone further, with USDT embedded in ordinary commerce — groceries, services, daily transactions — as a workaround for triple-digit inflation.
Remittances reinforce the picture. Roughly $142 billion flows into Latin America annually through remittance channels, and an increasing share is settling in USDT, cutting out the fees that traditional money transfer operators have charged for decades.
Southeast Asia and Africa: Retail at Scale
The pattern repeats across Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, with local variations.
In the Philippines and Vietnam, USDT is the default rail for cross-border transfers and remittance settlement. Philippine adoption hit 22.5% in 2025. The TRON network — which handles over 60% of USDT supply — is the infrastructure of choice across Asia, favored for transaction fees that are a fraction of a cent. That cost structure fits the retail-heavy, high-frequency profile of users sending smaller amounts across borders.
Sub-Saharan Africa grew 52% in 2025, with Nigeria as the anchor market. Businesses there increasingly use USDT to settle trade with partners in China and the Middle East, bypassing local dollar shortages that have made traditional foreign exchange access unreliable.
What the Independent Data Shows
Separate from Tether's own positioning, third-party analysis from Chainalysis and Artemis covering the 12 months to January 31, 2026 puts some numbers behind the broader stablecoin market. USDT's largest single sender accounts for 4.97% of total send volume. For competing stablecoins — widely understood to include USDC — that figure sits at 23.34%.
USDT holds roughly 58–60% of total stablecoin market share, with approximately 25 million monthly active on-chain users at its Q4 2025 peak. USDC sits at around $75 billion market cap, with 8–10 million active monthly users, concentrated in DeFi, institutional trading, and corporate treasury use cases.
Early 2026 brought the first sign of pressure on Tether's dominance: a $3.2 billion market cap contraction as liquidity rotated toward USDC and PYUSD following the full implementation of the GENIUS Act, the first comprehensive U.S. federal framework for stablecoin oversight. It was a modest shift, but the direction was notable.
In response, Tether launched USAT in January 2026 - a new token built to meet GENIUS Act requirements and compete directly with USDC for regulated institutional adoption. Whether it gains traction against a more established compliance infrastructure remains to be seen. Recently, Big Four's Delloitte signed off on the U.S. stablecoin's reserve report.
The Concentration Stat Has Its Critics
Not everyone takes the 4.97% figure at face value. Large institutions routinely operate through multiple sub-wallets or settle transactions off-chain through exchange internal ledgers, which wouldn't show up in on-chain sender data. The decentralization argument may be partly a product of how transactions are counted rather than a clean reflection of who holds economic power over the network.
The regulatory environment adds another layer of complexity. FATF's March 2026 report flagged that stablecoins now account for roughly 84% of illicit virtual asset volume globally. Tether's footprint in sanctioned and restricted markets draws particular attention, with Chainalysis noting a rise in transactional hops through regional exchanges as USDT moves through more complex routing paths to maintain liquidity in those zones.
Telegram's TON blockchain integration offers a counterbalance to the compliance narrative. With over 150 million registered wallet users — many of them first-time crypto holders in emerging markets — Tether has a distribution channel that operates largely outside the reach of Western regulatory frameworks.
If current growth trajectories hold, analysts project USDT's active user count could surpass Bitcoin's estimated 571 million users by the end of 2026. For a token built on utility rather than speculation, that would be a milestone worth paying attention to.
#Tether

The stablecoin debate in Washington has been grinding on for months, and with a hard deadline now in view, one of the House's top crypto legislators is telling the Senate to stop stalling.

Key Takeaways:
Rep. French Hill is pushing the Senate to adopt the House-passed Clarity Act to break the stablecoin deadlockThe central fight is over whether crypto platforms can pay users "yield" for holding stablecoinsMajor crypto firms including Coinbase have withdrawn support over clauses threatening their business modelsAnalysts warn the bill dies if it doesn't clear the Senate Banking Committee by end of April 2026
Rep. French Hill (R-AR), speaking at the Milken Institute's Future of Finance event and separately on FOX Business, issued a blunt message: if the Senate cannot resolve its internal standoff over stablecoin yields, it should simply take up the House-passed Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act and move on.
The suggestion isn't subtle. It's a signal to Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott (R-SC) that the upper chamber's prolonged debates are becoming a liability — not just for the industry, but for the Republican agenda heading into an election cycle.
The Yield Problem Nobody Can Solve
At the center of the impasse is a deceptively simple question: can crypto platforms pay users for holding stablecoins?
Banks say no. Their argument is that stablecoin yield programs drain deposits from traditional financial institutions, destabilize community banks, and open the door to what they call "shadow banking." The crypto industry pushes back just as hard, comparing stablecoin rewards to money market fund returns and arguing that a ban would kneecap U.S. competitiveness.
The GENIUS Act, signed into law in July 2025, technically prohibited stablecoin issuers from paying direct interest — but left a door open for third-party platforms like Coinbase to offer their own reward programs. That loophole became the next battlefield almost immediately.
On February 25, 2026, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency moved to close it, proposing a rule that would create a "rebuttable presumption" that third-party yield arrangements are illegal interest payments in disguise. The proposal escalated tensions across the board.
Coinbase Pulled the Pin
The most disruptive moment in the Clarity Act's recent history came in mid-January 2026, when Coinbase abruptly withdrew its support for the Senate version of the bill. The move forced the Senate Banking Committee to cancel a scheduled markup session - the procedural vote where amendments are finalized before a bill advances.
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong had been unambiguous about his position: he would rather have no bill than a bad one. The yield ban, in his view, falls squarely into that second category. Rewards and staking incentives are a significant revenue driver for exchanges, and the industry argues that legislative language targeting those programs is less about consumer protection and more about protecting bank margins.
Coinbase isn't alone. Kraken, Circle, and other crypto firms have each flagged specific provisions threatening their operations. Among the most contentious is a sub-clause - 505(e)(2) - that would prevent the SEC from granting waivers to companies looking to move traditional equities onto blockchain rails. Critics argue the language would freeze an entire category of financial innovation and put the U.S. behind the EU's MiCA framework before it even starts.
DeFi developers have raised a separate alarm. The Senate version of the bill reportedly expanded Bank Secrecy Act requirements to cover decentralized protocols, effectively requiring "middlemen" who don't actually control user funds to collect personal data. Developers argue this is technically unworkable for truly decentralized code — and that it would push builders offshore.
On the regulatory side, a jurisdictional fight over whether the SEC or CFTC oversees digital assets remains unresolved. The industry largely prefers CFTC oversight, viewing it as more compatible with how crypto markets actually function than securities law frameworks written a century ago.
White House Pressure, Missed Deadlines
The White House has been attempting to broker a deal throughout February and March 2026, convening a series of "Crypto Policy Council" meetings to push Wall Street and Silicon Valley toward compromise. President Trump reportedly set a March 1 deadline for an agreement on stablecoin rewards. It passed without resolution, and the blame landed publicly on the banking lobby.
The political stakes are not abstract. Galaxy Digital analyst Alex Thorn warned on March 14 that if the bill doesn't clear the Senate Banking Committee before the end of April 2026, it will effectively die — consumed by the election cycle and the loss of floor time that comes with it. Prediction markets currently put the odds of a comprehensive crypto bill passing by late April at around 70%.
The Bigger Warning
Beyond the legislative mechanics, a broader argument has been building in policy circles. J. Christopher Giancarlo, the former CFTC chair known in the industry as "Crypto Dad," has been among the most vocal in framing the stakes for traditional finance.
His core argument is that the regulatory stalemate hurts banks far more than it hurts crypto. Crypto companies have the option to build offshore — in Europe, in Asia — and many already do. U.S. banks don't have that flexibility. They're tied to domestic charters and domestic regulators, which means uncertainty doesn't slow them down; it stops them entirely.
Giancarlo has pointed to "billions of dollars" in potential investment that bank legal teams are advising their boards to hold back until the regulatory picture clears. In his framing, the Clarity Act isn't a crypto industry wishlist — it's a survival mechanism for institutions that risk becoming structurally incompatible with a global financial system that is quietly going digital around them.
Whether the Senate moves quickly enough to prevent that from happening remains an open question — but Hill's message from the floor this week suggests Republican leaders are no longer willing to wait indefinitely for an answer.
#crypto

Bitcoin advocate and Strategy chairman Michael Saylor has once again drawn attention to his company’s aggressive Bitcoin accumulation strategy after posting a cryptic message on social media: “Stretch the Orange Dots.”

Key Takeaways
Strategy currently holds 738,731 BTC, making it the largest corporate Bitcoin holder.The company’s Bitcoin reserves are valued at roughly $53 billion at current market prices.Bitcoin is trading around $71,700, showing resilience despite recent volatility.Strategy’s average purchase price sits near $75,863, meaning the position is slightly below cost during the latest pullback.Saylor’s “orange dots” chart highlights 102 separate Bitcoin purchase events since the company began accumulating the asset.
The comment accompanied a chart tracking Strategy’s Bitcoin purchases over time, represented by orange markers placed along Bitcoin’s historical price curve.
The message reinforced Saylor’s long-standing investment thesis: continue accumulating Bitcoin across market cycles regardless of short-term volatility. Strategy - formerly MicroStrategy - has become the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, and its ongoing purchases remain one of the most closely watched institutional strategies in the crypto market.

Strategy’s Bitcoin Treasury Continues to Expand
Strategy’s Bitcoin holdings now stand at 738,731 BTC, according to the latest figures. At current prices around $71,700, the company’s digital asset reserves are valued at approximately $53.05 billion.
The accumulation strategy has unfolded over several years and across multiple market cycles. Each purchase is represented by an orange dot on the chart shared by Saylor, illustrating how the company has steadily increased its holdings regardless of price fluctuations.
This long-term approach reflects Strategy’s broader corporate philosophy: treating Bitcoin as a primary treasury reserve asset rather than a speculative investment.
The company has carried out morе than 100 separate Bitcoin purchase events, demonstrating a consistent accumulation strategy rather than attempting to time market bottoms.
Average Cost and Performance Metrics
Despite the massive scale of Strategy’s holdings, the company’s average Bitcoin purchase price remains relatively close to current market levels.
The firm reports an average acquisition cost of approximately $75,863 per BTC, meaning the position currently sits slightly below its average entry price after Bitcoin’s recent pullback.
However, the longer-term performance of the strategy remains strong.
According to internal metrics:
Bitcoin Yield Year-to-Date: 1.2%Bitcoin Yield in 2025: 22.8%BTC Gains in 2025: approximately 101,873 BTC equivalent
These numbers highlight how the company measures performance not just in price appreciation but also in the relative growth of its Bitcoin position over time.
The company also reported a $8.9 billion Bitcoin gain during 2025, illustrating the scale of potential returns when the cryptocurrency enters strong bull cycles.
Bitcoin Market Conditions Remain Stable
Bitcoin itself continues to trade within a consolidation range after recent volatility.
The cryptocurrency is currently priced near $71,703, according to market data, following a rally that briefly pushed prices above $73,000 earlier in the week.

Despite the short-term fluctuations, the broader crypto market has shown signs of stability.
The total cryptocurrency market capitalization currently stands at roughly $2.44 trillion. However, market sentiment remains cautious. The widely followed Crypto Fear & Greed Index currently reads 33, indicating that investors remain in a “fear” environment despite Bitcoin’s relatively strong performance.
Technical Indicators Suggest Consolidation
Technical indicators show that Bitcoin is currently in a neutral phase.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) sits around 52–62, suggesting moderate buying pressure but not enough momentum to trigger an overbought signal.
Meanwhile, the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator shows a modest bullish crossover beginning to form. Although the signal remains weak, it suggests that bearish momentum from the recent correction may be fading.
Price action over the past several sessions indicates that Bitcoin is consolidating within a $70,500–$72,000 trading range.
A breakout above this range could push the cryptocurrency toward new cycle highs, while a breakdown below support levels may trigger another round of volatility.
Supply Dynamics Strengthen Bitcoin’s Long-Term Narrative
Beyond short-term price action, Bitcoin’s supply dynamics continue to support the long-term bullish thesis promoted by Saylor and other institutional investors.
More than 20 million BTC have now been mined, leaving fewer than one million coins remaining to be issued over the next century.
At the same time, on-chain data indicates that Bitcoin exchange supply has fallen to its lowest levels since 2017, suggesting that a growing share of the total supply is being held in long-term storage.
This trend is often interpreted as a sign of accumulation among institutional investors and long-term holders.
Institutional Strategies Reshape Bitcoin Markets
Strategy’s aggressive accumulation approach has become a defining example of corporate Bitcoin adoption.
Since beginning its Bitcoin treasury strategy in 2020, the company has effectively transformed itself into a publicly traded proxy for Bitcoin exposure.
The strategy has inspired similar approaches among other companies and investment funds seeking long-term exposure to digital assets.
Institutional participation has also expanded through other channels, including spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds and large-scale corporate treasury allocations.
Together, these developments have fundamentally reshaped the structure of Bitcoin markets.
Outlook: Saylor’s Long-Term Bet Continues
Michael Saylor’s “stretch the orange dots” message reflects a broader philosophy that has guided Strategy’s approach to Bitcoin for years.
Rather than attempting to time the market, the company has focused on continuous accumulation across cycles, betting that Bitcoin’s scarcity and growing adoption will drive long-term value.
While short-term volatility remains a constant feature of the cryptocurrency market, Strategy’s massive holdings illustrate the scale at which institutional players are now participating in Bitcoin.
As Bitcoin continues to mature as a global asset class, strategies like Saylor’s may play an increasingly important role in shaping both market dynamics and long-term investor sentiment.
#bitcoin

Ethereum has been grinding against the $2.1K level for weeks, and the pattern is hard to ignore. Every approach, every attempted breakout - same result, a rejection.

Key Takeaways
ETH remains capped at the $2.1K resistance level, selling off every time it reaches this pointBulls need to defend the $1.8K support zone or risk further downsideThe Glamsterdam upgrade targets a 78% reduction in gas fees and a jump toward 10,000 TPSScheduled for H1 2026, Glamsterdam could be the catalyst institutions are positioning for early
Crypto analyst Daan Crypto Trades put it plainly this weekend: "Every time price gets to this point, it proceeds to sell off. There seems to be a lot of supply still around this area."
The logic isn't complicated. Heavy resistance zones don't disappear overnight. They get eaten through over time as buyers keep showing up and available supply thins out. Eventually the level breaks - but timing that moment is where most traders get burned.

For now, the more pressing question isn't when ETH clears $2.1K. It's whether it holds $1.8K. That's the support level analysts are watching as the line bulls cannot afford to lose. Drop below it and the structure gets significantly messier. Hold it, and the setup for an eventual breakout above resistance stays intact.
For now, the more pressing question isn't when ETH clears $2.1K. It's whether it holds $1.8K. That's the support level analysts are watching as the line bulls cannot afford to lose. Drop below it and the structure gets significantly messier. Hold it, and the setup for an eventual breakout above resistance stays intact.
The chart isn't telling a bearish story outright. It's telling a patient one. And patience, in this case, may be justified by what's coming on the development side.
deadline - is the most consequential change to Ethereum in recent memory. The name combines two separate layer updates, and together they go after the two problems that have frustrated Ethereum users the longest: high fees and slow throughput.
On fees, the structural changes being introduced could bring gas costs down by as much as 78%. For anyone who has tried to use an Ethereum-based application during peak network activity, that number is significant. It's the difference between a network that's theoretically useful and one that's actually usable at scale.
On speed, the upgrade introduces parallel transaction processing - meaning the network stops handling transactions one at a time and starts handling many simultaneously. Current throughput on Ethereum's base layer sits around 20 to 30 transactions per second. The post-Glamsterdam target pushes that toward 10,000 TPS on L1 alone. Factor in Layer 2 networks like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base - which already handle activity off the main chain - and the combined capacity of the ecosystem could reach into the millions of transactions per second.
There's also a deeper architectural shift embedded in this upgrade. A process currently managed by third-party intermediaries - governing how blocks are built and how value is extracted from transaction ordering - gets pulled directly into the Ethereum protocol itself. The outcome is a network that's harder to manipulate, more resistant to the front-running tactics that have long plagued decentralized exchanges, and less dependent on outside infrastructure to function correctly.
Developers are currently in active testing. Three of the core proposals have cleared initial stress tests. The primary risk is complexity - this is a large architectural overhaul, and if compatibility issues between different node clients surface during testing, the H1 2026 window could slip into the second half of the year.
Bottom Line
The short-term picture for ETH is straightforward if unexciting: resistance above, key support below, and a market waiting for a reason to move decisively in either direction.
The medium-term picture is harder to dismiss. A network upgrade that meaningfully cuts costs, dramatically increases capacity, and removes structural vulnerabilities doesn't arrive quietly. Glamsterdam isn't priced in yet - and if it ships on schedule, the conversation around Ethereum's utility at scale changes considerably.
At the time of writing, Ethereum is trading just below the $2,100 level after a 1.7% surge in the past 24 hours.
#ETH

Bitcoin has once again become the center of a heated political debate after former United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson described the cryptocurrency as a “Ponzi scheme” in a recent opinion article.

Key Takeaways
Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson called Bitcoin a “Ponzi scheme” in a Daily Mail opinion article.Johnson argued that Pokémon cards may have more tangible value and tradability than Bitcoin.The article was based on a story of an individual who lost money in an alleged Bitcoin investment scam.The comments triggered widespread backlash from the crypto industry and Bitcoin supporters.Industry leaders pointed to Bitcoin’s fixed supply and decentralized design as evidence against the Ponzi claim.
Johnson argued that Bitcoin has less intrinsic value than collectible items such as Pokémon trading cards, reigniting a long-running discussion about the legitimacy and economic role of digital assets.

The comments quickly spread across the crypto community and financial media, prompting strong reactions from industry leaders, investors, and analysts who pushed back against Johnson’s characterization of the world’s largest cryptocurrency.
Johnson’s Criticism Targets Bitcoin’s Value Proposition
In his opinion piece, Johnson framed Bitcoin as an example of speculative hype rather than a legitimate financial innovation.
He began by recounting a story involving a friend who invested £500 (approximately $660) with an individual who promised to double the money through Bitcoin investments. According to Johnson, the investor continued to pay additional fees to the promoter over a period of three and a half years, eventually investing £20,000 (around $26,000) in total.
Despite the payments, the individual was never able to retrieve the funds.
Johnson described the situation as financially devastating for the investor, saying the person struggled to pay bills and discovered that several others in the same neighborhood had fallen victim to similar schemes.
Using the story as an example, Johnson argued that Bitcoin markets are filled with unrealistic promises and speculative mania.
He went even further, suggesting that collectible Pokémon cards might be a more reliable asset than Bitcoin, noting their decades-long popularity and cultural recognition.
“These curious little Japanese cartoon beasties seem to exercise the same fascination over the five-year-old mind as they did 30 years ago,” Johnson wrote.
“Even if you remain impervious to the charm of Pikachu, you can just about see why a decades-old Pikachu card is still a tradeable asset.”
His comparison framed Bitcoin as an asset driven primarily by hype rather than tangible value.
Bitcoin Community Responds to the “Ponzi” Label
Johnson’s remarks quickly drew criticism from cryptocurrency advocates who argued that the story described in the article was not a failure of Bitcoin itself but rather a fraudulent investment scheme exploiting the cryptocurrency’s name.
Industry figures noted that scams exist across all financial sectors - from traditional securities fraud to real estate investment scams - and do not necessarily reflect the legitimacy of the underlying asset.
Michael Saylor from Strategy described the model of a Ponzi scheme as an answer to Johnsons' claims.

Critics also pointed out that Bitcoin’s transparent blockchain and decentralized structure make it fundamentally different from a Ponzi scheme, which relies on new investor funds to pay earlier participants.
Instead, they argued, Bitcoin functions as an open monetary network with publicly verifiable transactions and a fixed issuance schedule.
Armstrong Highlights Bitcoin’s Scarcity
Days before the controversy, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong offered a contrasting perspective, emphasizing Bitcoin’s unique monetary design.
Armstrong highlighted that the 20 millionth Bitcoin has now been mined, leaving only one million BTC remaining to be produced.

Because of Bitcoin’s programmed supply cap of 21 million coins, the remaining Bitcoin will be issued gradually over the next 100 years, a feature supporters say makes the asset resistant to inflation.
“Decentralized, inflation-proof, global money,” Armstrong wrote when referencing the milestone.
For many Bitcoin advocates, this scarcity is precisely what gives the asset its long-term value proposition, distinguishing it from traditional currencies that can be expanded by central banks.
Debate Reflects Broader Divide Over Digital Assets
The clash between Johnson’s criticism and Armstrong’s defense reflects a broader divide between skeptics and supporters of cryptocurrency.
Critics often argue that Bitcoin lacks intrinsic value because it is not backed by physical assets or government authority. They also point to price volatility and speculative trading as reasons to question its reliability as a store of value.
Supporters counter that Bitcoin’s value stems from its decentralized architecture, transparent ledger, and predictable supply schedule, which they believe offer advantages over traditional monetary systems.
Over the past decade, Bitcoin has evolved from a niche digital experiment into a global financial asset with a market value exceeding $1 trillion at various points in its history.
Institutional investors, asset managers, and publicly traded companies have increasingly entered the market, contributing to its broader adoption.
Market Reaction Remains Muted
Despite the controversy, Bitcoin’s price has remained relatively stable.
Recent trading charts show Bitcoin hovering around $71,700, consolidating after a volatile period that saw the asset briefly approach $73,500 earlier in the week.

Technical indicators such as the Relative Strength Index (RSI) remain in neutral territory, suggesting that traders are not reacting strongly to political commentary.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator also points to a balanced market environment where bullish and bearish momentum remain roughly equal.
This stability suggests that, for now, macro adoption trends and institutional participation are likely having a greater influence on Bitcoin’s price than political criticism.
A Continuing Narrative Battle
Johnson’s comments highlight the ongoing narrative battle surrounding Bitcoin’s role in the financial system.
While skeptics continue to question the cryptocurrency’s long-term value, proponents argue that Bitcoin’s technological foundations and growing global adoption make it one of the most significant financial innovations of the digital age.
As Bitcoin approaches the final stages of its issuance schedule and adoption continues to expand, debates like this are likely to remain a recurring feature of the asset’s public perception.
For now, the contrast between Johnson’s skepticism and Armstrong’s optimism reflects the broader conversation shaping the future of digital money.
#bitcoin

Bitcoin is trading near the $70,700 level as the broader cryptocurrency market consolidates following recent volatility.

Key Takeaways
Bitcoin is trading around $70,700, consolidating after recent volatility.The total crypto market capitalization stands near $2.41 trillion, reflecting a modest decline.RSI indicators show neutral momentum, suggesting the market is neither overbought nor oversold.MACD signals indicate weakening bearish momentum, hinting at potential stabilization.
Despite a slight pullback in the overall crypto market capitalization - now sitting around $2.41 trillion, down roughly 1.36% - Bitcoin continues to show relative resilience. BTC Exchange traded funds attracted more than $750 millions in the past five days.
Short-term price action indicates a market caught between consolidation and cautious accumulation, with technical indicators suggesting that traders are preparing for the next major move.
The latest price charts reveal a market that has been oscillating between key support and resistance levels while momentum indicators gradually stabilize.
On-chain data such as the MVRV ratio near 1.2 suggests the market is entering an accumulation phase rather than a full capitulation.
Short-Term Price Action Remains Range-Bound
The intraday charts show Bitcoin trading in a relatively tight range between $70,400 and $70,900, indicating a lack of strong directional conviction among traders.
During the latest trading sessions, Bitcoin briefly attempted to push toward the $71,000 resistance level, but sellers quickly emerged, forcing the price back toward the mid-$70K range. This pattern suggests that the market is currently in a consolidation phase where buyers and sellers are evenly matched.
The one-minute and five-minute charts highlight frequent short-term swings, with the price repeatedly bouncing between micro-support and resistance zones. Such behavior typically reflects algorithmic trading and liquidity-driven movements, rather than a clear macro trend.
For now, the $70,000 level remains the most important psychological support. As long as Bitcoin maintains this level, bullish sentiment is likely to remain intact.
Momentum Indicators Suggest Neutral Conditions
Technical indicators reinforce the view that the market is currently neutral.

The Relative Strength Index (RSI) on short timeframes sits between 52 and 61, indicating moderate buying pressure but not an overbought condition. In general, RSI readings around the mid-50 range suggest that the market is balanced, with neither bulls nor bears holding a clear advantage.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) indicator also provides insight into market momentum. The MACD line is slightly above the signal line, while the histogram remains near the neutral zone. This configuration typically indicates that bearish momentum is fading, though a strong bullish trend has not yet emerged.
Taken together, these signals suggest that Bitcoin may continue trading sideways in the near term before a stronger directional move develops.
On-Chain Data Signals Accumulation Phase
Beyond short-term technical indicators, on-chain data provides important clues about the broader market cycle.
One of the most closely watched metrics, the Market Value to Realized Value (MVRV) ratio, currently sits around 1.2. Historically, this level has often been associated with accumulation phases, where long-term investors gradually increase exposure after periods of market stress.

True cycle bottoms typically occur when the MVRV ratio falls below 1.0, which indicates that the average Bitcoin holder is underwater relative to their purchase price. Such conditions often correspond with full market capitulation.
Because the current reading remains above that threshold, analysts suggest that the market may still be in a mid-cycle consolidation rather than a final bottoming phase.
However, the fact that the ratio is approaching historically attractive accumulation levels suggests that long-term investors may already be gradually building positions.
Market Sentiment Remains Cautiously Optimistic
Despite ongoing macro uncertainty and geopolitical tensions, Bitcoin has demonstrated notable resilience. The asset has maintained its position above key psychological levels even during periods of broader market stress.
This resilience is partly supported by structural changes in the market. Institutional participation has increased significantly over the past few years, particularly through spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which have introduced a steady source of demand.
At the same time, Bitcoin continues to benefit from its reputation as a store-of-value asset within the digital economy, especially during periods of financial uncertainty.
Nevertheless, sentiment across the crypto market remains cautious. The recent decline in total market capitalization indicates that traders are still managing risk carefully.
Key Levels to Watch
From a technical perspective, several levels will likely determine Bitcoin’s next major move.
Immediate support:
$70,000$69,500
Short-term resistance:
$71,000$72,400
A sustained breakout above the $71,000 - $72,000 resistance zone could trigger renewed bullish momentum and potentially open the door for a retest of recent highs.
Conversely, a breakdown below $70,000 could accelerate short-term selling pressure and push Bitcoin toward deeper support levels near $69,000 or $68,500.
Outlook: Consolidation Before the Next Trend
For now, Bitcoin appears to be entering a consolidation phase following recent volatility, with price action stabilizing near the $70K region.
Technical indicators, on-chain metrics, and macro sentiment all point to a market that is neither strongly bullish nor bearish. Instead, traders appear to be waiting for new catalysts that could determine the next major trend.
Possible triggers include:
Continued institutional inflows into Bitcoin ETFsChanges in global monetary policyRegulatory developments affecting the crypto industryMacro-economic shifts influencing risk assets
If Bitcoin can maintain support above key psychological levels while accumulation continues on-chain, the current consolidation period may ultimately serve as the foundation for the next leg higher in the broader crypto market cycle.
#BTC

Coinbase is reportedly in advanced talks to take a strategic equity stake in Bybit, the Dubai-headquartered exchange that currently ranks as the world's second-largest crypto trading platform by volume.

Key Takeaways:
Coinbase is in reported talks to take a strategic equity stake in Bybit, the world's second-largest crypto exchangeThe deal would give Bybit a compliant pathway into the US market through Coinbase's regulatory infrastructureBybit faces serious hurdles including an active CFTC probe and the $1.5B hack attributed to North Korea's Lazarus GroupA combined entity would cover both regulated US retail and high-volume global derivatives trading
The discussions, first reported by industry insider Wu Blockchain and confirmed by three independent sources, center on an investment agreement rather than a full acquisition — with Bybit's valuation expected to land around $25 billion, a benchmark drawn from Intercontinental Exchange's prior investment in OKX. Bybit has declined to comment.
The core logic of the deal is straightforward: Bybit wants into the United States, and Coinbase holds the keys. US regulations have kept Bybit locked out of the American market for years. A partnership would provide what insiders are calling a "compliant route" for the exchange to access US capital and retail users, leveraging Coinbase's established compliance infrastructure, its New York BitLicense, and its status as a publicly traded company.

Armstrong's Bigger Play
The move fits squarely into Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's stated ambitions for 2026 — building an "all-in-one exchange" that integrates crypto, stocks, and commodities on a global scale. It also follows Coinbase's $2.9 billion acquisition of derivatives platform Deribit in 2025 and the launch of regulated futures trading in Europe earlier this month. The Bybit talks suggest Armstrong is not done. Rather than building derivative and international capabilities from scratch, Coinbase appears to be buying its way into them — selectively, and at scale.
OKX founder Star Xu called the potential arrangement "a good thing for the industry," arguing it would raise standards and reduce regulatory arbitrage across offshore markets. Wall Street analysts have set a 2026 price target for Coinbase stock between $200 and $300, positioning the exchange as a central player in the broader shift toward blockchain-based financial infrastructure.
Two Different Beasts
On paper, the two platforms could not be more different. Coinbase built its name on regulatory compliance and accessibility for retail beginners and US institutions. Bybit carved out its dominance in the international derivatives market, offering leverage up to 100x and a suite of sophisticated trading tools — copy trading, automated bots, and yield-bearing stablecoin products — that Coinbase has never matched.
By raw numbers, Bybit now edges out Coinbase. As of March 2026, Bybit posts approximately $1.74 billion in daily trading volume against Coinbase's $1.63 billion, and holds roughly 16% of global market share compared to Coinbase's 8%. Coinbase still leads in total registered users — 100 million to Bybit's 70 million — but that gap narrows quickly when you factor in Bybit's depth in high-frequency and derivatives trading.
What Each Side Stands to Gain
A combined entity would theoretically cover both ends of the market: regulated retail access for American users on one side, and high-volume derivatives infrastructure for professional and international traders on the other. Coinbase would immediately expand its product depth without years of regulatory groundwork in derivatives. Bybit, for its part, would gain something it badly needs — Coinbase's institutional credibility and security reputation, particularly after the catastrophic breach it suffered in early 2025. For Bybit, this is less about capital and more about legitimacy.
The Obstacles Are Not Small
Getting Bybit fully operational in the United States is a different matter entirely, and Coinbase's backing alone won't clear the path.
The CFTC has been investigating Bybit since late 2023. That same year, Coinbase was subpoenaed by the agency to hand over data on users who had interacted with Bybit — a signal that regulators believe the exchange was serving US customers without proper registration, a pattern that has already resulted in landmark enforcement actions against Binance and BitMEX. Adding to that, Bybit did not implement mandatory KYC checks until May 2023, a compliance gap that US regulators are unlikely to overlook during any licensing review.
Then there is the hack. On February 21, 2025, Bybit suffered the largest digital theft in the history of financial markets — $1.46 billion in Ethereum drained in a single breach. The FBI and blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis both attributed the attack to North Korea's Lazarus Group. Bybit moved quickly to replenish its reserves, but for US regulators, the incident exposed what they are likely to characterize as structural security failures. Proving that its infrastructure has been "fundamentally transformed" since then will be a prerequisite, not an afterthought.
A Tougher Regulatory Gauntlet in 2026
The regulatory landscape itself has also grown more complex. In March 2026, the SEC and CFTC signed a Memorandum of Understanding to coordinate their oversight of crypto markets under a so-called Joint Harmonization Initiative. That means Bybit cannot target a single regulator for approval — it must satisfy both agencies simultaneously on clearing, margin requirements, and product definitions. Under the Atkins-led SEC, the agency is placing renewed emphasis on investor protection and market manipulation. Bybit would likely need to register as a National Securities Exchange or Alternative Trading System, comply with the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (FIT21), and pass rigorous independent audits verifying that customer assets are properly segregated.
Beyond US borders, Bybit has already been fined or blacklisted in the Netherlands, Japan, France, and Malaysia for operating without local registration. Coinbase spent approximately $145 million on compliance operations in 2025 alone. Even with that framework available to Bybit as a potential partner, regulators may remain skeptical of what they could characterize as an attempt to use Coinbase's credentials as a workaround rather than a genuine structural overhaul.
The talks are real. The strategic rationale is clear. Whether the deal can survive the weight of Bybit's regulatory baggage is another question entirely.
#coinbase

US spot Bitcoin ETFs snapped a prolonged stretch of outflows and stagnation last week, recording their first five-day inflow streak of 2026.

Key Takeaways
US spot Bitcoin ETFs posted their first five-day inflow streak of 2026, pulling in ~$767M in a single weekBlackRock's IBIT alone absorbed roughly $600M, cementing its dominance in the spaceInstitutional buyers treated the $65K–$70K range as a buying opportunity while retail sentiment sat in "Extreme Fear"Ethereum and Solana ETFs lagged far behind, though staking-focused products are beginning to gain traction
Net inflows for the week ending March 14 totaled approximately $767.3 million, according to Farside Investors data - a sharp reversal from February, which closed with net negative flows.
The daily breakdown tells the story plainly: $167.1 million on March 9, $251 million on March 10, $115.2 million on March 11, and $180.4 million on March 13. By March 11, cumulative inflows for the month had already reached $1.56 billion, effectively wiping out the previous month's losses.
BlackRock Leads, Others Follow
No fund came close to BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) in terms of absorption. The fund pulled in roughly $600 million across the five-day period — about 78% of total weekly inflows — widening its lead over competitors in a market where consolidation around a handful of dominant products appears to be accelerating.
Total Bitcoin ETF assets across all funds now sit at $90.89 billion. That figure dwarfs every other crypto ETF category combined and signals just how thoroughly Bitcoin has outpaced alternative assets in capturing institutional capital.

The Trade Behind the Numbers
The inflow surge didn't happen in a vacuum. On March 10, Bitcoin jumped 3.29% following signals of potential de-escalation in the Middle East, which also sent oil prices lower. Analysts at The Block noted that a growing cohort of institutional investors is treating Bitcoin as a geopolitical hedge — a store-of-value narrative that gains ground each time traditional risk assets come under pressure.
The macro backdrop adds another layer. Goldman Sachs has pointed to global debt exceeding $100 trillion as a structural tailwind for Bitcoin, framing it as an alternative asset that benefits directly from deteriorating sovereign balance sheets.
What makes last week's inflows notable isn't just the size — it's who was buying. Retail sentiment, as measured by the Crypto Fear & Greed Index, hovered around 12–14, firmly in "Extreme Fear" territory. The buying came from institutional players who treated the $65,000–$70,000 consolidation range as a discount window, accumulating while smaller investors sat on the sidelines or exited.
Price Targets and Technical Levels
Standard Chartered revised its 2026 year-end Bitcoin price target to $100,000, though the bank flagged possible dips to $50,000 before any sustained recovery takes hold. Economist Henrik Zeberg projected a peak between $110,000 and $120,000 sometime in March 2026, tied directly to what he describes as the current "risk-on" phase of ETF-driven demand.
On the charts, Bitcoin faces resistance at $71,000 and $74,000. A clean break above the latter opens the door to the $80,000–$90,000 range. Until that level clears, the price action remains a test of whether last week's institutional conviction translates into sustained momentum.
Altcoin ETFs: Ethereum and Solana Struggle to Keep Up
While Bitcoin's ETF week was clean and decisive, the picture for Ethereum and Solana was murkier. Both assets saw net positive flows for the week, but the numbers and the consistency tell a different story.
Ethereum ETFs netted approximately $42 million over the period — notable, but barely a rounding error next to Bitcoin's haul. The week started badly, with $51.3 million in outflows on March 9 alone. Recovery came mid-week, partly driven by a new product: BlackRock launched the iShares Staked Ethereum Trust (ETHB) on March 12, drawing $15.5 million on its debut day. The fund's staking component marks a meaningful structural shift — it's the first major move by a dominant ETF issuer toward yield-bearing crypto products.
Even so, the ETH/BTC ETF asset ratio sits at just 13%. Given Ethereum's market cap relative to Bitcoin, that gap points to persistent under-allocation among institutional buyers.
Solana ETFs posted roughly $15 million in net inflows for the week, though the trajectory was uneven. Daily flows swung between positive and negative throughout the period. Staking-focused products — particularly Bitwise's BSOL — held up better than non-staking alternatives, accumulating $971 million in net inflows since launch. Major institutional names including Goldman Sachs and Electric Capital account for the bulk of SOL ETF activity, keeping volume concentrated and flows somewhat predictable.
The broader pattern across Ethereum and Solana suggests that staking yield is becoming a necessary feature, not a premium add-on, for altcoin ETF products to sustain institutional interest.
Crypto Markets and the War Premium
Last week's inflow surge unfolded against a backdrop that would have rattled most asset classes. The U.S.-Israel conflict with Iran has injected a persistent uncertainty premium into global markets, and Bitcoin — despite or perhaps because of that environment — attracted more institutional capital than it had in months.
That dynamic, if it holds, reshapes the usual risk-on/risk-off binary that has historically governed crypto flows. In prior cycles, geopolitical stress tended to push capital toward cash and US Treasuries. The fact that institutional buyers are now rotating into Bitcoin during episodes of geopolitical tension — not out of it — suggests the asset's macro identity is shifting.
Whether last week's streak marks the beginning of a sustained recovery or a brief interruption in a broader downturn depends heavily on how the conflict develops and whether the macro conditions that drove the March 10 price surge persist. What's clear is that the infrastructure — ETFs, institutional custody, regulated products — is in place to channel capital at scale when sentiment turns. Last week proved that mechanism works. What remains to be seen is whether the demand behind it does too.
At the time of writing, BTC is priced around $71,000 after regaining some bullish momentum this past week.
#BitcoinETF

Johann Kerbrat doesn't mince words. Robinhood's Head of Crypto has a simple explanation for why the company chose to build an Ethereum Layer 2 rather than launch its own standalone blockchain: everyone else doing the latter is, in his view, building a glorified database.

Key Takeaways
Robinhood is building its own Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain, called Robinhood Chain, to power real-world asset tokenizationThe company's Head of Crypto argues new Layer 1 chains are little more than "fancy databases" - slow and lacking real decentralizationRobinhood has already tokenized ~2,000 U.S. stocks and ETFs for EU customers; a full U.S. mainnet launch is planned for later in 2026Regulatory uncertainty remains significant - the SEC has confirmed tokenized stocks are securities, and centralized L2 sequencers may face exchange-level scrutiny
"You get security and decentralization for free," Kerbrat said of the Layer 2 approach, referring to Ethereum's base layer. New Layer 1 networks, he argues, rarely achieve genuine decentralization - they just end up slower and less efficient than traditional financial infrastructure, with none of the trustless guarantees that make blockchain worth using in the first place.
That logic underpins Robinhood Chain, the company's custom network built on the Arbitrum stack, designed specifically to support the tokenization of real-world assets. The public testnet went live on February 10, 2026, processing 4 million transactions in its first week. A mainnet launch is scheduled for later this year.

The architecture choice is strategic on multiple fronts, according to a report by CoinDesk. By anchoring to Ethereum, Robinhood sidesteps the resource-intensive work of maintaining base-layer consensus, freeing up development bandwidth for the products that actually face users. It also plugs directly into the liquidity already flowing through the Ethereum Virtual Machine ecosystem - something Kerbrat considers non-negotiable for an on-chain stock market to function. And crucially, an L2 still hands Robinhood full control over its sequencer revenue, fee structures, and compliance tooling.
To accelerate ecosystem development, the company has committed $1 million to the 2026 Arbitrum Open House program, funding buildathons and developer events. The tokenization side of the business is already moving: Robinhood has tokenized roughly 2,000 U.S. stocks and ETFs on Arbitrum for European customers - up from around 200 at launch.
Robinhood isn't alone in this playbook. Coinbase built Base. Kraken launched Ink. Major exchanges are increasingly treating proprietary Layer 2 networks not just as products, but as financial infrastructure they own end-to-end - controlling both the interface and the rails underneath it. Ethereum's own trajectory is accelerating this trend; co-founder Vitalik Buterin has suggested that as the base layer scales faster than anticipated, L2s will shift from general scaling solutions toward purpose-built, use-case-specific networks. Robinhood Chain is a textbook example of exactly that.
CEO Vlad Tenev has been equally direct about the broader vision. He describes tokenization as a "freight train" - unstoppable, and ultimately capable of enabling 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and the integration of on-chain equities into traditional financial products like mortgages. Whether that plays out in the U.S. anytime soon, however, depends heavily on regulators.
The Regulatory Picture Is Complicated - Especially in America
Robinhood's tokenization ambitions currently have a geographic boundary drawn around them. The 2,000 tokenized stocks it offers are available exclusively to European retail customers, operating under the EU's MiCA and MiFID II frameworks. In Europe, those tokens are structured as derivatives - not direct ownership of underlying shares - a structure that has already attracted attention from the Bank of Lithuania, which is seeking clarification on what, exactly, backs these assets legally.
In the United States, the path is considerably harder. The SEC's January 2026 joint statement settled one question definitively: tokenized equities are securities, full stop. Blockchain format changes nothing. The agency had already made this clear in July 2025, when its Crypto Task Force reminded firms that putting an asset on-chain does not "magically" exempt it from federal securities law. The 2026 guidance formalized that position, confirming that tokenized stocks are subject to existing registration, disclosure, and FINRA broker-dealer requirements - regardless of how they're structured technically.
For platforms like Robinhood that operate on a custodial model - holding traditional shares and issuing digital tokens against them - the SEC treats those tokens as "security entitlements," requiring strict adherence to conventional custodial rules. A proposed "innovation exemption" floated in January 2026 would streamline disclosures for decentralized governance models, but its applicability to a centralized platform is contested.
There are signs of movement at the infrastructure level. In December 2025, the DTCC received a no-action letter permitting a three-year pilot to test blockchain-based settlement, with the goal of compressing settlement times from T+1 to near-instant. Nasdaq filed with the SEC in September 2025 to enable tokenized securities to trade and settle on its exchange. These are incremental steps, but they suggest the underlying plumbing is being stress-tested in anticipation of something larger.
What hasn't moved as cleanly is Robinhood's more aggressive play: tokenizing private company shares - including OpenAI - without the issuing companies' endorsement. That has drawn direct legal pushback and SEC warnings around what the agency is calling "linked securities." It's a test of how far the tokenization thesis can be pushed before it runs into a wall.
The other regulatory risk is structural. SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce warned in late 2025 that Layer 2 networks using centralized sequencers - which Robinhood's proposed chain does - may eventually be regulated as national securities exchanges. If that interpretation gains traction, it would fundamentally change the compliance calculus for the entire exchange-as-infrastructure model.
Europe Tokenization Sector
While Robinhood expands its tokenized stock offering across Europe, the continent's financial infrastructure is undergoing its own transformation. The European Central Bank's Eurosystem has unveiled Appia, a strategic initiative designed to build a European tokenized financial ecosystem - one that keeps central bank money at its core.
The timing is notable: Robinhood is operating in a European market that is actively being rewired at the institutional level, potentially setting the stage for deeper integration between retail tokenization platforms and sovereign-backed digital financial rails.
What This Means for the Market
The broader implication of Robinhood's move is that the line between brokerage and blockchain infrastructure is disappearing. Robinhood isn't just offering crypto trading as a feature - it's building the settlement layer it wants to operate on, and using tokenized equities as the wedge to get there.
That model works in Europe today. Whether it works in the United States in 2026 depends on regulatory ground that is still actively shifting. The DTCC pilot, the SEC's evolving guidance, and ongoing industry filings all point toward a system that is slowly being rebuilt for on-chain settlement - but slowly is the operative word. For now, Robinhood Chain is a bet on where that system lands, placed before the outcome is certain.
#Robinhood

The 2025 Bitcoin cycle closed without breaking one of the market's more closely watched records. Long-Term Holders - wallets that have held Bitcoin for at least 155 days - spent approximately 15.1 million BTC over the course of this cycle.

LTHs spent 15.1M BTC in 2025 - less than the 15.3M spent in 2021, meaning this cycle did not set a new selling record
Coinbase's internal transfer of ~800K BTC distorted raw data; actual LTH selling was likely even lowerSpot Bitcoin ETFs now hold ~1.3M BTC (6.7% of supply); Digital Asset Treasuries hold ~1.1M BTC (~5%)Institutional holders behave differently from retail LTHs, potentially acting as a structural floor on selling pressure going forward
That figure falls short of the 15.3 million BTC spent during the 2021 bull run, which remains the high-water mark for LTH selling pressure. For context, the two cycles before that recorded around 7.3 million and 13.6 million BTC spent respectively.
That may seem surprising given the price action this cycle, which briefly pushed Bitcoin above $100,000. But the headline numbers require scrutiny before any conclusions are drawn.
The Coinbase Problem
A significant chunk of what appeared as LTH spending in raw on-chain data was, in reality, internal bookkeeping. Coinbase moved approximately 800,000 BTC — the majority of which was classified as LTH supply — in what amounted to wallet reorganization rather than market selling. Strip that out, and the actual selling pressure from genuine long-term holders looks considerably softer.
This isn't an isolated case. As more institutional-grade entities operate on-chain, internal transfers of this scale have become more common. It's less a bug in the data and more a structural feature of a maturing market — one that traditional on-chain metrics weren't originally built to accommodate.
Source: https://x.com/Darkfost_Coc/status/2032103201902567572
Who Counts as a Long-Term Holder Now?
The more substantive issue is that the definition of "Long-Term Holder" is quietly becoming outdated.
Historically, the LTH cohort was dominated by early adopters, miners, and conviction-driven retail investors who accumulated Bitcoin and sat on it through multiple bear markets. That population still exists. But two new categories of holder have entered the market at scale — and they behave differently.
The first is spot Bitcoin ETFs. Launched in the United States in January 2024, these products now collectively hold around 1.3 million BTC, roughly 6.7% of total supply. BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust alone accounts for over 770,000 BTC. These funds don't sell based on price euphoria. They sell — or more precisely, redeem — when their investors exit. That's a fundamentally different selling mechanism than the retail-driven distribution that characterized previous cycle tops.
The second is Digital Asset Treasuries. Companies like Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) have adopted Bitcoin as a primary reserve asset and now collectively hold approximately 1.1 million BTC, close to 5% of total supply. These entities have no formal obligation to maintain reserves the way ETFs do, but their acquisition strategies are long-horizon by design. Quarterly earnings pressure doesn't translate directly into Bitcoin liquidations.
What This Means Going Forward
Together, ETFs and treasury companies control roughly 11–12% of Bitcoin's total supply. When both cohorts are folded into on-chain LTH data — as they eventually will be, given their holding periods — the aggregate numbers will look increasingly stable relative to prior cycles. That's not necessarily bullish in a near-term price sense, but it does suggest that the kind of aggressive, cycle-peak distribution that drove sharp corrections in 2018 and 2022 may be harder to replicate.
Glassnode's recent note on Short-Term Holder supply adds another layer to the picture. STH supply in profit falling below 50% — a level now being watched closely — has historically been a precondition for sustained recovery rather than further downside. Until that metric flips back above the threshold, demand-side risk appetite tends to stay compressed.
[caption id="attachment_172171" align="aligncenter" width="2560"]Source: https://x.com/glassnode/status/2032346101152370788
The broader takeaway is that Bitcoin's ownership structure is in transition. The LTH metric, long a reliable gauge of conviction and distribution pressure, is being reshaped by actors whose behavior doesn't map cleanly onto the patterns analysts built their models around. Whether the existing frameworks catch up to that reality, or whether new metrics are needed entirely, is a question the on-chain analytics community will be wrestling with through the next cycle and likely beyond.
At the time of writing, BTC is trading around $71,000 after briefly breaking the $73,000 level yesterday.
#bitcoin

Solana processed $650 billion in adjusted stablecoin transaction volume in February 2026 — more than double its previous record of roughly $300 billion set in October 2025.

Key Takeaways
Solana hit a record $650B in stablecoin transaction volume in February 2026, overtaking Ethereum and TronThe network is shifting from speculative memecoin activity toward institutional-grade financial infrastructureGrayscale's 2026 outlook signals a structural market shift driven by regulation, tokenization, and DeFi growthUSDC has overtaken USDT in transaction volume, cementing its role as the institutional stablecoin of choice
According to a research note published by Grayscale on March 4, 2026, the blockchain overtook both Ethereum and Tron to claim the largest single share of an estimated $1.8 trillion in total global stablecoin activity for the month.
The network now handles over 50 million transactions daily at average fees below $0.001. These are not speculative metrics. They reflect real utility at scale.

What Grayscale's Numbers Actually Mean
Doubling a record in under five months — while fees remain near zero and throughput stays stable — is not routine growth. It suggests Solana is absorbing demand that previously had no adequate home on-chain.
Grayscale and Standard Chartered analysts point to a concrete shift in the composition of that demand. Memecoin speculation, which dominated Solana's activity narrative through 2024 and into 2025, is giving way to payment infrastructure: retail stablecoin transfers, remittances, and micropayments. The network holds the second-largest USDC circulation of any blockchain and ranks fourth in total stablecoin supply.
Two upcoming upgrades are central to this repositioning. Firedancer and Alpenglow, both expected in 2026, are designed to bring institutional fault tolerance and push throughput beyond one million transactions per second. For any institution running payroll or settlement infrastructure on-chain, reliability is non-negotiable. Real-world asset volumes on Solana — including tokenized gold products like Tether's XAUTO — have already surpassed $280 million weekly.
Grayscale's 2026 Outlook: One Direction
Grayscale's broader 2026 Digital Asset Outlook argues the industry is no longer running on speculative retail cycles. Regulatory clarity — specifically the anticipated CLARITY Act and bipartisan market structure legislation — is expected to provide the formal rulebook institutional allocators have been waiting for. The GENIUS Act is projected to push stablecoin adoption into corporate treasury management and cross-border payments, with Solana, Ethereum, Tron, BNB Chain, and Chainlink identified as primary beneficiaries.
Asset tokenization is flagged as an inflection point, with potential 1,000x growth projected by 2030. DeFi growth is being led by on-chain lending protocols like Aave and Morpho, alongside perpetual exchanges such as Hyperliquid. Protocols with verifiable fee revenue — Solana, Ethereum, and Tron — are where Grayscale expects investor focus to consolidate. Standard Chartered has set a base 2026 price target for SOL at $250, with a bull case of $250–$320 driven by ETF inflows and the Firedancer upgrade. Bitcoin is expected to reach a new all-time high by mid-year.
Grayscale also flags two narratives as noise: quantum computing threats — unlikely before 2030 — and digital asset treasuries, viewed as holding vehicles rather than meaningful demand drivers.
USDC vs. USDT: The Quiet Power Shift
A less headline-grabbing but consequential shift is playing out in the stablecoin market itself. USDC has overtaken USDT in transaction volume, and the gap is widening.
In February 2026, USDC accounted for roughly 70% of all stablecoin transfer volume — approximately $1.26 trillion of the $1.8 trillion total. USDT recorded around $514 billion despite holding a larger market cap. The 2025 annual totals, per Artemis Analytics, tell the same story: USDC processed $18.3 trillion against USDT's $13.2 trillion.
Tether's market cap lead remains intact, and it continues to dominate in markets where regulatory compliance matters less. But the volume divergence reflects a clear institutional preference — B2B settlements, regulated DeFi, payroll — for USDC's compliance posture. As U.S. stablecoin legislation advances, that preference is likely to deepen.
What It All Means
February 2026 was not an anomaly. Solana has established itself as the dominant stablecoin settlement network by volume. Its upcoming infrastructure upgrades are built to defend that position. The regulatory environment is moving in a direction that favors compliant infrastructure. And the stablecoin market is bifurcating — a compliance-first institutional rail on one side, a higher-risk alternative on the other.
The composition of on-chain activity — payments, remittances, tokenized assets, lending — looks less like a speculative bubble and more like financial infrastructure being rebuilt on public blockchains. Whether that holds through the volatility ahead is the only question that matters.
#solana

The XRP Ledger quietly shipped one of its most consequential updates in months. Version 3.1.2, released in March 2026, carries no new features - but that's precisely the point.

Key Takeaways
XRPL v3.1.2 patches a critical security flaw that could have exposed $80 billion in network valueNo new features - the update focuses entirely on stability and vulnerability fixesXRP trades at $1.41, up ~3.71% over 7 days, with $86B market capRSI and MACD signal cautious bullish momentum; watch the $1.42-$1.45 resistance zone
The release, as per info from the XRPL blog, addresses a server instability issue that caused nodes to crash or restart unexpectedly during normal operations, following the emergency patch (v3.1.1) deployed just weeks earlier. This is maintenance work, not innovation. And given what was at stake, that's exactly what the network needed.
The Vulnerability That Almost Wasn't Caught
The story starts on February 19, 2026, when security researcher Pranamya Keshkamat and Cantina AI's autonomous bug-hunting system, "Apex," identified a severe logic flaw buried inside the Batch amendment (XLS-56). The flaw sat in the signature-validation layer - the mechanism that confirms a transaction is authorized before it executes.
Had the vulnerability gone undetected and the amendment been activated, the consequences could have been severe: attackers would have been able to bypass wallet authorization entirely and drain funds without ever touching a private key. With over $80 billion in network value on the line, the XRPL Foundation moved fast.
By February 23, Ripple and the XRPL community had pushed v3.1.1 - an emergency release that explicitly flagged the Batch and fixBatchInnerSigs amendments as unsupported, preventing activation. Version 3.1.2 followed to clean up the residual instability that the first patch introduced. No new protocol features shipped in either release.
The response drew praise from within the industry. The XRPL Foundation's use of AI-assisted security tooling to catch a vulnerability of this scale before exploitation is notable - and increasingly necessary as the network absorbs more institutional capital.
A Network Growing Into Its Ambitions
The timing matters. The XRPL isn't the quiet, low-activity chain it was three years ago. Total value locked in tokenized assets on the ledger surged from $111 million to over $1.14 billion in early 2026. Daily successful payments climbed from roughly 1.5 million in late 2025 to approximately 2.5 million by Q1 2026. The network is carrying real weight now, and vulnerabilities that might have been theoretical risks in a quieter environment become live threats at this scale.
The Lending Protocol (XLS-66d) is currently in the voting phase, sitting at around 17% validator consensus - still well short of the 80% threshold required for activation. When it does pass, analysts expect it to accelerate the XRPL's pivot toward institutional DeFi. But that's a future-state story. For now, the infrastructure work comes first.
Technical Analysis: Consolidation With Upside Potential
XRP is trading at $1.41 as of March 13, 2026, up 1.99% over 24 hours and 3.71% over the past week, with a market cap of $86.4 billion and $3.55 billion in 24-hour volume.

On the 4-hour chart, the picture is one of measured consolidation following a sharp sell-off from the $2.00+ highs in January. The SMA 50 sits at $1.3786 and the SMA 100 at $1.3833 - both below current price, a mild bullish signal that price is reclaiming its short-term averages after weeks of compression.
The RSI currently reads 58.96 on the main line, with the signal at 54.80. Neither overbought nor oversold - XRP is in the middle band, with room to push higher without immediate exhaustion risk. Analyst DrProfitCrypto notes that monthly RSI recently touched levels last seen at the December 2022 bear market bottom, which historically preceded strong multi-week recoveries. That setup appears to have played out, with the bounce from the $1.37 range now underway.
MACD confirms the cautious optimism. The histogram is printing small positive bars, and the MACD line (0.0032) has crossed above the signal (0.0096 vs 0.0064 histogram). It's not an explosive crossover, but the direction is constructive.
In simple terms: XRP's price stabilized after a prolonged downtrend, found buyers near $1.35-$1.37, and is now pressing against overhead resistance between $1.42 and $1.45. A sustained close above $1.45 on the 4-hour timeframe would likely open the path toward $1.60-$1.65. Failure to hold $1.35 support on any pullback would change the picture.
What Comes Next
The immediate focus is $1.42-$1.45. That cluster has capped multiple rally attempts over the past few weeks, and breaking through it with volume would be a meaningful signal. Conservative analyst targets for year-end sit in the $3-$8 range, with more aggressive models citing historical fractal patterns projecting significantly higher. Those projections require assumptions that are far from guaranteed.
What's more concrete: a network that caught an $80 billion vulnerability before it became a loss event, patched it within days, and continues to add tokenization volume at a pace the industry is watching closely. The infrastructure upgrade cycle - from security fixes to institutional lending protocols - is setting the stage. Whether the market reprices that story aggressively or gradually depends on what the next few weeks deliver.
XRP at $1.41 is not where bulls want it. But the foundation being built underneath it is considerably stronger than it was six months ago.
#xrp

Crypto markets absorbed a punishing mix of geopolitical shock and on-chain chaos this week, yet institutional money kept flowing in. The result was a market that looked, at times, more like a war room than a trading floor.

Key Takeaways
Bitcoin topped $73K during the U.S.-Israel-Iran conflict, outpacing gold and equitiesA $50M DeFi swap error exposed critical execution risks on AaveBlackRock, Grayscale, and others launched staking ETFs amid record institutional inflowsStablecoin market cap hit $313B; Iranian crypto outflows spiked 700%+ during strikes
The escalating conflict between the United States, Israel, and Iran rattled financial markets through early March — but crypto didn't just survive the turbulence, it used it. When military strikes hit over the weekend of February 28, traditional markets were closed. Crypto wasn't. Platforms remained the only venues actively pricing war risk in real time, and the data reflected it: the Crypto Fear & Greed Index crashed to 10 — deep Extreme Fear territory — before recovering to 22–25 by mid-March as prices stabilized.
Bitcoin's performance over that stretch was hard to dismiss. Between March 1 and March 13, BTC gained roughly 10%, pushing past $73,000 and outpacing gold, the S&P 500, and the U.S. dollar in the same window.
Stablecoins and the Flight to Safety
The conflict also produced one of the more striking on-chain signals of the period. Blockchain analytics firms Chainalysis and Elliptic recorded a 700–873% spike in hourly crypto outflows from Iranian exchanges — including Nobitex — immediately after the first air strikes, as local users moved funds to overseas platforms or self-custody wallets.
Total stablecoin market cap hit a record $313 billion by March 9, with investors parking capital in dollar-pegged assets to ride out the chaos. USDT sat at the center of that flow, reinforcing its position as the default safe harbor in a risk-off crypto environment.
The $50 Million Swap That Went Wrong
The week's most-discussed on-chain incident had nothing to do with geopolitics. A wallet executed a trade through the Aave frontend, routing roughly $50.4 million in USDT via CoW Swap — and received approximately 324 AAVE tokens in return. At market prices, that came to around $36,000. MEV bots captured the rest through front-running and extreme slippage on a thin market.
Source: https://x.com/santimentfeed/status/2032229160983363959
It was a brutal lesson in execution risk. Discussion across platforms centered on how routing layers handle oversized orders, what slippage protections actually exist, and whether DeFi interfaces do enough to warn users before they confirm a trade of that size.
Aave's Double Blow
Aave's CEO announced a roughly $600,000 fee refund connected to the incident. Separately, an oracle and liquidation issue involving mispriced assets triggered a second round of problems the same week, resulting in unintended liquidations.
The DAO outlined a recovery plan covering up to 358 ETH through BuilderNet refunds, treasury funds, and an ad-hoc compensation mechanism. Neither incident is fatal to Aave's fundamentals, but the optics were poor and the community response was pointed.
Additionally, AAVE's founder, Stani Kulechkov, criticized the current DAO model of the protocol, and proposed a fix - keep tokenholdens in the room for major calls but take execution-level decisions out of their hands.
Institutions Keep Showing Up
Against that backdrop, the institutional product pipeline kept moving. BlackRock's iShares Staked Ethereum Trust (ticker: ETHB) began trading on Nasdaq, combining spot ETH exposure with on-chain staking rewards passed through to shareholders. Reports cited daily net ETF inflows around $57 million, staking allocations ranging from 70 to 95%, and Coinbase handling custody and staking operations. The management fee structure includes a temporary waiver — a familiar move to attract early assets before locking in a fee base.
Grayscale launched a separate Avalanche staking ETF (GAVA) on Nasdaq this week, giving institutional investors access to AVAX with staking yield included. Avalanche also drew attention through integrations allowing the token to move natively on Solana via Wormhole and liquidity protocols, with proponents pointing to lower fees and better liquidity depth as the appeal. VanEck's competing VAVX listing added to the growing institutional narrative around the chain.
XRP and Solana Round Out a Busy Week
XRP had its own share of attention. Social discussion tracked net flows across recently launched U.S. spot XRP ETFs, noting consecutive outflow days since March 4 following an earlier run of inflows. Reuters and Bloomberg coverage of Ripple's reported $50 billion share buyback valuation fueled ongoing debate about the link between corporate moves and XRP's price trajectory. Reddit remained skeptical, with recurring threads questioning whether Ripple's continued XRP sales offset any institutional demand building on the other side.
Solana, meanwhile, dealt with intermittent network downtime and slow confirmations — familiar territory — while a high-profile NFT launch and large stablecoin transfer volumes kept the chain in the conversation regardless. The reliability question hasn't gone away.
Two Markets, One Price
What this week made clear is that crypto is being pulled in two directions at once. On one side: growing institutional legitimacy, staking-enabled ETFs, record stablecoin reserves, and a credible case that Bitcoin functions as a real-time geopolitical hedge when traditional markets go dark.
On the other: DeFi protocols still exposed to oracle failures and MEV exploitation, users losing tens of millions to thin-market slippage, and a top-five network by market cap that periodically slows to a crawl. Both things are true simultaneously. The market, for now, is pricing both.
#crypto

The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has sanctioned six individuals and two entities for running a scheme that sent roughly $800 million to North Korea's weapons programs in 2024.

Key Takeaways
The U.S. Treasury sanctioned 6 individuals and 2 entities tied to a North Korean IT worker network that generated ~$800M in 2024 for weapons programs.North Korean operatives use stolen identities, fake personas, and AI deepfakes to get hired at Western companies as remote workers.Global illicit crypto flows hit a record $154–$158B in 2025, up 145% from the prior year, driven by sanctions evasion and industrialized fraud.2026 enforcement actions are escalating — but criminal networks are scaling faster.
The money came from a simple but effective operation: place North Korean nationals inside Western companies as remote IT workers and funnel their salaries back to Pyongyang. according to a report from KoreaTimes.
The network operated across North Korea, Vietnam, Laos, and Spain.
The two entities sanctioned are Amnokgang Technology Development Company, a North Korean firm that manages overseas IT worker deployments and procures military technology, and Quangvietdnbg International Services Company Limited, a Vietnam-based company used to convert worker earnings into cryptocurrency.
Six individuals were also designated. Nguyen Quang Viet, CEO of Quangvietdnbg, allegedly converted $2.5 million into crypto for the regime between mid-2023 and mid-2025. Yun Song Guk, a North Korean national, has been running IT worker groups out of Boten, Laos since at least 2023. Hoang Van Nguyen helped previously sanctioned North Korean official Kim Se Un open bank accounts and move funds. Hoang Minh Quang handled over $70,000 in transactions tied to Yun's network.
How the Scheme Works
Workers enter companies using stolen identities, fake credentials, and forged documents. Once inside, individual workers earn up to $200,000 a year — money that goes straight back to the regime.
The operation has become harder to catch. North Korea now uses AI to alter workers' appearances, voices, and accents during video interviews to match stolen identities. Some embedded workers go further — planting malware to steal proprietary data or extort companies for ransoms.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the regime "weaponizes sensitive data" and that the U.S. would continue to "follow the money." Foreign financial institutions that knowingly process transactions for the designated parties now face secondary sanctions.
2025 Crypto Crime: Record Numbers Across the Board
Global illicit cryptocurrency flows reached $154–$158 billion in 2025, a 145% increase from 2024.
Sanctions evasion surged 694%, driven largely by Russia-linked flows through the ruble-backed A7A5 stablecoin, which processed over $93 billion in under a year. Hackers stole $2.87 billion across 150 incidents. One breach — Bybit, in February 2025 — accounted for $1.46 billion, or 51% of the year's total hacking losses. Stablecoins now represent 84% of all illicit transaction volume, preferred for their liquidity and ease of cross-border transfers.
North Korea's total crypto theft for 2025 reached an estimated $2.02 billion — a 51% increase over the prior year — with operations documented in more than 40 countries. An estimated 1,500 IT workers operate out of China, with another 500 spread across Russia, Laos, Cambodia, and several African nations.
Fraud Has Industrialized
Scams in 2025 stopped being individual operations. They now run as structured businesses — with developers, data brokers, and dedicated money laundering networks working in parallel.
AI-enabled scams using deepfakes and voice cloning were 4.5 times more profitable than traditional methods. Impersonation fraud — where criminals pose as banks, the IRS, or government agencies to pressure victims into immediate transfers — grew 1,400% year-over-year. Chinese-language money laundering networks processed over $100 billion for global criminal markets in 2025.
Recent Enforcement Actions
On March 11, 2026, Europol and U.S. authorities dismantled SocksEscort, a malicious proxy service, seizing 34 domains and freezing $3.5 million in cryptocurrency. In January 2026, the FBI warned that North Korean group Kimsuky was using malicious QR codes in spearphishing campaigns targeting U.S. entities. The DOJ has filed for forfeiture of 127,000 BTC — valued at $15 billion — seized from the Prince Group, a Cambodia-based organization behind large-scale pig butchering scams. It is the largest crypto asset forfeiture in history.
Analysts at Chainalysis and TRM Labs identify North Korea's over-the-counter laundering brokers — informal traders who convert crypto into usable currency — as the most exposed part of the network and the most viable target for future enforcement.
#crypto

The global stablecoin market is entering a new phase as Circle’s USDC has surpassed Tether’s USDT in transaction volume for the first time since 2019, signaling a shift in how digital dollars are used across the crypto economy.

Key Takeaways
USDC has processed roughly $2.2 trillion in transaction volume in 2026, surpassing USDT’s $1.3 trillion and capturing about 64% of adjusted stablecoin transaction share.Tether remains the largest stablecoin by market cap at about $143 billion, compared with $78 billion for USDC.Stablecoin regulation is becoming a key focus globally, with the Bank of England reconsidering rules such as holding limits.
The development comes as regulators - particularly in the United Kingdom - continue to refine their approach to stablecoin oversight, highlighting the growing importance of these assets in global finance.
https://twitter.com/coinbureau/status/2032478730325766216
USDC Surpasses USDT in Transaction Activity
While Tether’s USDT remains the largest stablecoin by market capitalization, USDC is rapidly gaining ground in actual transaction activity.
Mizuho analysts Dan Dolev and Alexander Jenkins estimate that USDC has processed approximately $2.2 trillion in adjusted transaction volume so far in 2026, compared with roughly $1.3 trillion for USDT. That gives USDC an estimated 64% share of adjusted stablecoin transaction volumes, a significant reversal from the period between 2019 and 2025, when Tether consistently dominated activity.
During those years, USDC typically accounted for around 30% of stablecoin transaction share.
The shift suggests that the competitive landscape between the two largest stablecoins is beginning to evolve as new applications and institutional use cases emerge.
Stablecoins - digital tokens typically backed by reserves such as fiat currency or gold — have become essential infrastructure for the crypto ecosystem. They function as payment rails, trading settlement assets, and cross-border transfer mechanisms, allowing users to move funds quickly without relying on traditional banking systems.
The market remains heavily concentrated among the two leading players. Tether’s USDT currently holds a market capitalization of roughly $143 billion, while USDC stands at approximately $78 billion.
New Use Cases Driving Stablecoin Adoption
Analysts attribute the rise in USDC activity to a growing number of real-world applications beyond traditional crypto trading.
Mizuho’s report highlights several emerging use cases that are helping drive stablecoin demand, including prediction markets such as Polymarket and the rise of agentic commerce, where autonomous software agents transact digitally on behalf of users.
These developments suggest that stablecoins are increasingly being used as programmable financial infrastructure rather than simply liquidity tools for cryptocurrency exchanges.
The analysts emphasized that long-term leadership in the stablecoin sector will likely depend on real economic usage rather than market capitalization alone.
That perspective reflects a broader industry shift as stablecoins transition from a niche crypto tool to a foundational component of digital finance.
Circle Raises Long-Term Growth Outlook
Reflecting the acceleration in USDC adoption, Mizuho analysts raised several long-term forecasts for Circle.
The firm now expects “meaningful wallets” using USDC to reach 11.7 million by 2027, up from a previous estimate of 10 million. The revised projections also lift expected USDC market capitalization to approximately $139 billion, compared with an earlier estimate of $123 billion.
These projections highlight growing confidence that stablecoins will continue expanding into payments, financial services, and digital commerce.
Industry forecasts support that view. Analysts at Standard Chartered expect the total stablecoin market to reach $2 trillion in market capitalization by the end of 2028, potentially making stablecoins one of the largest sectors within the broader digital asset industry.
However, as adoption accelerates, regulators are increasingly examining how stablecoins should be governed within the traditional financial system.
Regulators Grapple With Stablecoin Frameworks
The rapid growth of stablecoins has sparked intense debate among policymakers about the appropriate regulatory framework for these assets.
In the United Kingdom, the Bank of England (BOE) has been developing a regulatory approach aimed at integrating stablecoins into the financial system while mitigating potential risks to banking stability.
The central bank launched a consultation on stablecoin regulation in November 2025, outlining proposals for reserve backing requirements and usage limits.
Some of these proposals generated strong reactions from the crypto industry, with several companies arguing that overly restrictive rules could slow innovation in digital finance.
Among the most controversial measures were proposed holding limits on stablecoins, including a cap of £20,000 for individuals and £10 million for businesses accepting stablecoins as payment.
Bank of England Signals Greater Flexibility
Despite the initial criticism, the Bank of England appears increasingly open to revisiting its approach.
Speaking before the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee, BOE Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden said the central bank is willing to reconsider the proposed holding limits if alternative solutions can effectively address financial stability concerns.
Breeden explained that the caps were originally designed to prevent a sudden migration of deposits away from commercial banks into stablecoins, which could potentially destabilize the traditional banking system.
“We proposed holding limits as a way of managing that risk. We are open to feedback on other ways of achieving it,” she said.
However, Breeden also noted that the central bank has been disappointed by the lack of concrete proposals from industry participants.
“The pressure from the industry to do it in a different way is very real,” she said. “But we have not yet seen constructive engagement on alternative solutions.”
Industry Calls for Collaborative Regulation
Industry representatives dispute the suggestion that they have not engaged with regulators.
Tom Rhodes, chief legal officer at UK-based stablecoin issuer Agant, said the industry has spent the past two years actively participating in regulatory consultations.
According to Rhodes, companies and trade associations have reviewed thousands of pages of consultation materials, attended numerous roundtables, and submitted extensive feedback to both the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
He argues that the central challenge lies in the fact that regulators are attempting to design a comprehensive framework for a market that is still rapidly evolving.
“It’s not possible to provide concrete data in these circumstances,” Rhodes said, suggesting that a lighter, principles-based regulatory regime would be more appropriate while the sector is still developing.
Stablecoins at a Critical Turning Point
The convergence of rising adoption and intensifying regulatory scrutiny suggests that stablecoins are approaching a critical stage in their development.
On one hand, transaction volumes such as USDC’s recent surge indicate that digital dollars are becoming increasingly embedded in the global financial system.
On the other, regulators remain cautious about the systemic risks posed by large-scale adoption.
How policymakers and industry leaders navigate this balance may ultimately determine the long-term structure of the stablecoin market.
For now, the competition between USDC and USDT - once defined largely by market capitalization - is increasingly being shaped by real-world usage, institutional adoption, and regulatory frameworks that will define the next era of digital finance.
#USDT #USDC

The U.S.-Israel strike campaign against Iran that began on February 28 sent Brent crude past $100 a barrel and froze tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

Key Takeaways
Only 8-10% of Bitcoin's global hashrate sits in oil-sensitive grids; the other ~90% is largely insulated from the crude price shockThe real miner risk is Bitcoin's price - not electricity bills - as geopolitical stress pushes capital out of risk assetsIran's mining capacity has effectively gone dark, but the network's difficulty adjustment absorbs the hit automaticallyPublic miners are racing to repurpose their infrastructure for AI/HPC workloads, with over $65B in contracts already signed
Energy markets are still digesting the fallout. For Bitcoin miners, the instinct is to worry about power bills. That instinct is mostly wrong.
The Cost Side Is Largely a Non-Story
Crude oil barely touches the electricity that runs Bitcoin mining. According to a new report from Hashrate Index, the hashrate heatmap for Q1 2026 makes the geography plain: the United States leads with 37.5% of global hashrate (400 EH/s), followed by Russia at 16.4% and China at 11.7%. Paraguay runs almost entirely on Itaipu hydroelectric. Ethiopia is over 90% hydro. Kazakhstan, Norway, Iceland - none of these grids move meaningfully in step with crude.

Even in the U.S., where some marginal correlation between oil prices and industrial electricity rates exists, that correlation runs between 0.1 and 0.3. Statistically detectable, practically marginal. And where transmission does occur, it moves slowly through utility rate-setting cycles - months, not days.
The genuinely exposed cohort is the Gulf states. The UAE (3.1%, 33 EH/s) and Oman (3.0%, 32 EH/s) operate grids powered primarily by natural gas derived from oil production. Add Iran's estimated 9 EH/s and smaller contributors across Kuwait and Qatar, and total oil-sensitive hashrate lands around 8–10% of the global network. Real, but not a systemic threat.
Inside Iran, the damage is more immediate. Roughly 700,000 mining rigs have gone offline due to power grid instability and near-total internet disruption. The network's difficulty adjustment - recalibrating every 2,016 blocks - absorbs that capacity drop automatically, redistributing profitability to surviving operators elsewhere.
Where the Shock Actually Lands: Revenue, Not Costs
Analysis from Luxor Technology's Hashrate Index identifies the real exposure: miner profitability is far more sensitive to Bitcoin's market price than to electricity costs. The metric that matters is hashprice - expected daily revenue per unit of hashrate.
February 2026 illustrated the asymmetry clearly. USD hashprice hit a new all-time daily low of $27.89 per PH/s/day on February 24, with a monthly average down 17.9% month-over-month. That collapse wasn't driven by rising power costs. It was driven by a 23.8% decline in Bitcoin's price, from $78,073 to $65,204.
A sustained oil shock above $100 per barrel injects inflationary pressure into global CPI. Central banks respond. Rate-cut expectations get pushed out. Capital rotates away from high-volatility assets toward cash and short-duration instruments. Bitcoin - which has increasingly traded as a risk-on asset during acute stress - gets repriced. The current cycle already saw a roughly 50% drawdown from the October 2025 peak near $126,000. Prior cycles confirm the pattern: COVID crashed BTC 62%, the 2022 tightening cycle produced a 77% peak-to-trough decline.
Some research suggests that if Brent crude sustains between $100 and $150, Bitcoin could face drawdowns up to 45% as monetary policy expectations shift. At current hashprice levels around $30 per PH/s/day, marginal operators running older 20–24 J/TH fleets are already at or near breakeven. A further BTC price decline doesn't stress them - it shuts them down.
For Gulf-based miners, the scenario is a double exposure: rising power costs on one side, potential BTC price compression on the other. Luxor's trailing twelve-month data shows USD-denominated forward hashrate sales outperformed spot mining across the board, with 4-month contracts delivering roughly 8.2% outperformance. In this environment, locking in a fixed hashprice before further deterioration is a straightforward risk management call.
Miners Are Becoming AI Infrastructure
The oil shock arrives at an industry already mid-pivot. Facing structurally low hashprices, public miners have spent the past year repurposing their most valuable asset - large-scale, grid-connected power infrastructure - for artificial intelligence and high-performance computing.
The financial logic is hard to argue with. AI workloads can generate roughly three times the revenue per megawatt compared to Bitcoin mining, with operating margins on secured colocation deals running between 80% and 90%. By October 2025, public miners had announced over $65 billion in AI and HPC contracts with the likes of Google, Microsoft, and Amazon.
The deals have reshaped sector valuations. Core Scientific signed a 12-year, $4.7 billion agreement with CoreWeave and is building 400 megawatts of dedicated AI capacity. Additionally, the company secured an investment from Morgan Stanley to further push their AI agenda.
IREN reached a $14 billion market cap in February 2026 following a near-$10 billion contract with Microsoft. Cipher Mining locked in a 15-year, 300-megawatt lease with AWS projected at $5.5 billion in revenue. Hut 8 partnered with Anthropic and Fluidstack - backstopped by Google - for a $7 billion, 15-year deal at its River Bend campus.
Analysts at CoinShares describe AI revenue as a structural floor - a way for miners to survive crypto winters without forced BTC sales. Wall Street is increasingly pricing these companies as infrastructure plays rather than Bitcoin proxies. That rerating is already reflected in share prices: TeraWulf and IREN both saw their valuations triple through 2025.
What Comes Next
Bitcoin is currently trading around $70,000, with hashprice hovering near $30 per PH/s/day. Luxor's forward market is pricing an average of $29.50 per PH/s/day through August 2026 - the market is not pricing in a quick recovery.
The structural trajectory is clear: operators with large power footprints who can execute the technical shift to GPU-dense infrastructure will capture the AI premium. Those who can't face a prolonged squeeze - one that $100 oil makes somewhat worse, but that started long before any missile was launched toward Isfahan.
The Iran conflict accelerated a stress test already underway. For the mining industry, the verdict is the same regardless of where crude settles: securing block rewards alone, at current economics, is an increasingly difficult business to defend.
#BitcoinMiningNews

A new report from the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime has revealed a growing link between illegal gold mining in the Amazon Basin and cryptocurrency payments.

Key Takeaways
Illegally mined Amazonian gold is reportedly being traded in Venezuela using USDT stablecoins.
Venezuela has become a major regional destination for illicit gold flows over the past two years.The country’s gold sector generated roughly $2.2 billion in revenue last year.Stablecoins provide a fast, borderless payment method that can help actors bypass sanctions or banking restrictions.Crypto firms such as Tether say they continue to cooperate with law enforcement, freezing billions in illicit assets globally.
According to the organization’s latest findings, illegally mined gold from the Amazon is increasingly being traded using the stablecoin Tether in Venezuela, highlighting the expanding role of digital assets in global illicit commodity markets.
The report suggests that over the past two years Venezuela has evolved into a central destination for illicit gold sourced from neighboring countries such as Brazil and Guyana. In several cases, gold traders have reportedly settled transactions using USDT, enabling cross-border payments that bypass traditional banking restrictions and financial sanctions.
The findings illustrate how stablecoins - originally designed to facilitate digital commerce - are increasingly being integrated into physical commodity markets, including sectors connected to organized crime.
Venezuela’s Role in the Changing Gold Trade
For decades, gold smuggling routes in the Amazon region largely moved in one direction - gold extracted in Venezuela was trafficked outward to neighboring countries. However, recent research indicates the flow has reversed. Venezuela is now receiving increasing volumes of illegally mined gold from across the Amazon Basin.
Analysts say several factors explain the shift. Venezuela’s prolonged economic crisis, combined with international sanctions and declining oil revenues, has increased the government’s reliance on gold mining as an alternative source of income. As a result, the country’s mining sector has expanded significantly.
[readmore id="172098"]
Researchers note that Venezuela’s gold economy has become intertwined with political and military networks as well as transnational criminal organizations. These actors control mining zones, transportation routes and cross-border supply chains, forming a complex system that allows illicit gold to flow through the region.
Stablecoins Enter the Commodity Trade
One of the most striking elements of the report is the increasing use of stablecoins in settling gold transactions.
Unlike highly volatile cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, USDT is designed to maintain a stable value pegged to the U.S. dollar. This makes it particularly suitable for trading physical commodities, where price stability is essential for large transactions.
Researchers say that in some cases gold originating from Guyana has been sold in Venezuela directly in exchange for USDT.
This payment method provides several advantages for traders operating in restricted or informal markets:
Speed: Transactions can settle within minutes on blockchain networks.Borderless payments: Funds can move across countries without relying on banks.Sanctions circumvention: Digital wallets can bypass traditional financial controls.Liquidity: USDT can easily be converted into local currency or other crypto assets.
These characteristics have made stablecoins increasingly attractive in regions where access to the global financial system is limited.
Environmental and Security Concerns
The expansion of illicit gold mining has raised significant environmental and social concerns across the Amazon region.
Illegal mining operations often rely on destructive extraction methods that cause large-scale deforestation and water pollution.

Mercury used in gold processing frequently contaminates rivers and ecosystems, posing severe health risks to local communities.
Beyond environmental damage, the gold trade has also become a key funding source for organized crime groups operating in the Amazon Basin.
Researchers warn that the intersection of illegal mining, criminal networks and cryptocurrency payments could create new challenges for regulators and law enforcement agencies worldwide.
Tether Responds to Illicit Use Concerns
The growing role of USDT in illicit transactions has also drawn attention to the responsibilities of stablecoin issuers.
A spokesperson for Tether stated that the company actively cooperates with law enforcement agencies globally and has helped freeze approximately $4.2 billion worth of assets linked to criminal activities.
Tether has increasingly emphasized its ability to track blockchain transactions and block suspicious wallets, arguing that public ledgers can make illicit flows easier to trace compared with traditional financial systems.
Nonetheless, critics argue that the expanding role of stablecoins in global commerce - both legitimate and illicit - requires stronger oversight.
Tokenized Gold and Digital Commodities
The intersection of gold and blockchain technology is not limited to illicit markets. The crypto industry has also introduced tokenized gold products that allow investors to hold digital assets backed by physical bullion.
One such product is Tether Gold (XAU₮), a token backed by physical gold reserves. According to recent disclosures, the custodian holds over 520,000 fine troy ounces of gold, with nearly the same number of tokens in circulation. The market value of those tokens exceeds $2.2 billion, based on current gold prices.
Each token represents at least one fine troy ounce of gold held in reserve, allowing investors to gain exposure to the metal through blockchain-based assets.
While these products operate within regulated frameworks, their existence illustrates how digital finance is reshaping traditional commodity markets.
Outlook: Crypto’s Expanding Role in Global Trade
The report highlights a broader trend in which digital assets are becoming embedded in global commodity markets.
Stablecoins such as USDT are increasingly used in emerging economies as alternatives to unstable national currencies, as well as tools for international payments. This growing adoption creates both legitimate economic opportunities and potential risks.
As cryptocurrency infrastructure continues to expand, regulators and financial institutions are likely to intensify scrutiny over how digital assets intersect with traditional industries - from finance to commodities and natural resources.
The case of Amazonian gold illustrates how rapidly these worlds are converging.
Whether through regulated tokenized assets or illicit trading networks, blockchain technology is increasingly shaping the way commodities are bought, sold and transported across borders.
#Tether

Pi Network's long-anticipated entry into regulated U.S. markets became official on March 13, as Kraken enabled spot trading for PI/USD.

Key Takeaways
Kraken becomes the first major U.S.-regulated exchange to list Pi Network (PI), with spot trading live March 13, 2026The listing triggered a 33% weekly rally, though PI remains ~91% below its all-time high of $2.99Protocol v20.2 upgrade completed; Pi DEX launch expected around Pi Day (March 14)
The move makes Kraken the first major American exchange to support the mobile-mined token - a distinction that carries weight given the project's five-year journey from closed beta to open market.
The timing was deliberate. The listing lands on the eve of Pi Day (March 14), a date the Pi Core Team has historically used for significant announcements. Whether this year delivers on that pattern remains to be seen.
The Listing and What Drove It
Kraken's decision follows Pi Network's Open Mainnet launch in February 2025, which finally unlocked token transferability after years of internal mining. The exchange confirmed the PI symbol under the trading pair PI/USD, with no derivatives or margin products announced at launch.
Markets responded sharply ahead of the listing. PI logged a 33% weekly gain, trading between $0.23 and $0.29 in the days prior - volumes spiking to 60.88M PI. The announcement validated what the project's community, known as "Pioneers," had been waiting for: a path onto platforms with real institutional visibility, and a potential stepping stone toward listings on Binance or Coinbase.

Price targets from analysts range from $0.50 to $0.75 if PI clears the $0.24 resistance level around Pi Day. Whether the catalyst materializes depends heavily on whether buying pressure outlasts the unlock schedule.
Infrastructure Overhaul Running in Parallel
The Kraken listing doesn't exist in isolation. Behind it sits a significant technical restructuring that has been underway through early 2026.
The network completed its mandatory v20.2 protocol upgrade on March 12 - the final preparatory step before smart contract deployment and native DEX functionality go live. This followed the v19.9 migration completed March 8. Together, they represent the backbone of what the Core Team is calling Pi's transition into a functioning Web3 ecosystem.
The broader roadmap targets Protocol 23, aligning Pi's architecture with the latest Stellar Consensus Protocol improvements. Full compatibility is projected for Q2 2026.
Also in development: on-chain rewards for KYC validators - users who have been verifying identity tasks since 2021 - are in final testing and scheduled to deploy by March 31. A new Developer SDK, launched in January 2026, now allows third-party apps to integrate PI payments with settlement times under ten minutes.
The more headline-grabbing development is the Pi DEX, internally referred to as the "Depth Exchange." The native decentralized trading platform is expected to launch around March 14 and would allow Pioneers to trade PI directly from their wallets - reducing reliance on centralized venues like Kraken for day-to-day activity.
On the utility side, the Core Team announced a $100 million ecosystem fund investment in OpenMind, an AI and robotics company. The partnership allows Pi node operators to contribute computing power in exchange for PI, a model aimed at building real-world demand for the token beyond speculative trading.
User Base: Big Numbers, Open Questions
As of March 2026, over 19 million users have completed KYC verification, and more than 16 million have migrated their tokens to Mainnet. The network has begun a second migration wave to move additional balances - referral bonuses, node rewards - accumulated after the initial migration window.
The scale is notable. The user base dwarfs most blockchain projects by raw headcount. But converting that user base into active on-chain participants, rather than passive holders waiting to sell, is the challenge the Core Team has not yet fully answered.
Technical Picture: Rally Built on Fragile Ground
The 4-hour chart tells a story of momentum meeting resistance. PI has climbed sharply above both the 50-period SMA ($0.2234) and 100-period SMA ($0.1968), with the current price at $0.2734. RSI sits at 66.51 on the close and 68.11 on the signal - elevated, approaching overbought territory but not yet there. MACD remains bullish at 0.0047, with the signal line at 0.0123 and histogram at 0.0171, confirming the upward trend has momentum behind it.

The caveat is significant: despite the listing and the rally, PI is currently trading approximately 90.82% below its all-time high of $2.99 reached in early 2025. The "sell the news" dynamic is a genuine risk. Monthly token unlocks of 161 million to 203 million tokens create structural selling pressure from early miners who have been holding since the project had no liquid market whatsoever.
Critics remain vocal. Concerns about token concentration - the Core Team reportedly controls a substantial share of supply - and a development timeline stretching back to 2019 have led some analysts to describe the project's trajectory as overly managed. Whether those concerns are priced in or ignored by retail buyers is, right now, unclear.
What Comes Next
The immediate focus lands on Pi Day. If the Core Team delivers the DEX launch and any additional exchange announcements on March 14, sentiment could sustain the current rally through the week. A clean break above $0.30 would represent the next meaningful resistance level.
Longer term, Protocol 23 completion and validator reward deployment in Q1/Q2 2026 will be the real tests of whether the network's technical promises translate into ecosystem activity. Institutional interest is unlikely to deepen until supply dynamics - the unlock schedule in particular - become more predictable.
#PiNetwork