Brothers, the news front has become lively again. I am your old friend, an analyst who has seen many cycles of ups and downs in the industry. Today, let's talk about the most touching event in the Hong Kong market recently—the stablecoin licenses, and our old friend CFX.
First, let's state the facts. The Financial Secretary, Paul Chan, has already made it clear in the budget proposal at the end of February: Hong Kong's stablecoin licensing system has been implemented, with the first batch of licenses to be issued in March. The Monetary Authority's Chief Executive, Eddie Yue, has also set the tone: the first batch will not be large, aiming for stability. This essentially confirms the government's conclusion, with half of the shoe having dropped.
As we enter mid-March, the market begins to “run ahead.” Rumors suggest there might be around 3 licenses issued first, with HSBC, Standard Chartered, and local player OSL named as popular candidates. Interestingly, as of the time I am writing this (March 15), from the applying institutions to the Monetary Authority, the statements are extraordinarily unified: “no comment,” “waiting for official news.” This silence at the critical moment has instead heightened market expectations. In plain terms, everyone knows that it is going to be issued; they are just waiting for the official signal to sound.
So, what does all this have to do with CFX? My core point is that for Hong Kong's stablecoin to truly play out, it needs a “compliant and usable” underlying public chain as a chessboard, and Conflux (CFX) is currently one of the few, possibly the only option that all parties implicitly recognize as the “chessboard.” This is not a milk statement; it is a judgment based on a series of clear actions and business logic.
Why it? Let's set aside those complex terms and talk about something real.
First, compliance is the admission ticket, and Conflux's “persona” is born for compliance. The regulatory framework for stablecoins in Hong Kong is one of the strictest in the world, focusing on traceability throughout the process, reserve transparency, and anti-money laundering. This is not just a matter for the issuers; the underlying chain's technical capabilities are crucial. From its inception, Conflux's technical architecture has emphasized on-chain traceability and compliance engines, which means its “factory settings” align with Hong Kong's regulatory requirements. More importantly, to my knowledge, almost all teams applying for licenses in Hong Kong have had deep interactions with Conflux. It is not just a technology provider; it is more like a “compliance infrastructure solution provider,” directly participating in the cross-border financial projects led by the Monetary Authority. This positioning is very special; it is not an outsider but part of the “construction team.”
Second, having a license is useless; you need a usable “pipeline.” The license has been issued, but where is the stablecoin issued? It is impossible to issue it on every chain. Conflux has already become a de facto “core issuance layer.” The world's largest stablecoin issuer, Tether, has already natively issued offshore RMB stablecoin CNH₮ and USD stablecoin USDT₮ on Conflux. Note that it is native, not cross-chain, which represents deep cooperation and recognition. At the same time, it has partnered with local institutions like AnchorX in Hong Kong to launch CNHC, directly serving the Belt and Road trade settlement pilot. This means that the main circulation scenarios and assets for Hong Kong's stablecoin may be heavily deployed on the Conflux chain from the very beginning. Its 3.0 version, with high TPS and EVM compatibility, is designed for high-frequency payment settlements.
Third, the ecological closed loop is the key to value. This is the core of CFX's long-term narrative. What is the stablecoin used on the Conflux chain for? Cross-border payments, trade settlements, RWA (real-world asset) transactions—these are all pilot projects that Hong Kong is actively promoting. For example, a batch of goods shipped from Hong Kong to Southeast Asia can use the offshore RMB stablecoin on the Conflux chain for second-level payments, and CFX can be used to pay gas fees for settlement. Alternatively, a company's green bonds (RWA) can be tokenized on the chain, priced and traded in compliant stablecoins, while the settlement layer remains Conflux. Do you see it? Stablecoins are the “water,” the CFX network is the “pipeline” and “faucet,” and various financial scenarios are the “reservoirs.” The more water there is, the greater the flow, the more stable the demand for pipelines and faucets, and the more tangible the value. This is much more solid than mere speculative expectations.
Therefore, the market sees CFX as the “core beneficiary target of Hong Kong's stablecoins,” and this logic holds. Past trends have repeatedly validated that every key progress in Hong Kong's stablecoin and Web3 policies significantly boosts CFX's performance. Because what people are buying is not just that token symbol; they are buying its potential share as the core infrastructure of Hong Kong's digital finance.
But, folks, calm down! As an analyst, I must point out the most critical risk points, which is also the reason I remain cautiously optimistic.
The license has not been officially issued yet. Now is the peak of speculative expectations; everything is waiting for that announcement from the Monetary Authority. If the first batch of names or the rhythm is far below expectations, the market may experience a reversal of sentiment.
CFX itself is not a stablecoin. It is a high-risk digital asset with significant price volatility. Its value realization depends on the flourishing of the entire envisioned ecosystem above, which is a process that takes time, not something that can be solved instantly with a license.
The moat of “core infrastructure” is not a solid block. Although it is currently leading, the tech world has no eternals. It needs to continuously consolidate its collaboration advantages with regulators and various institutions.
To summarize my personal opinion:
The issuance of stablecoin licenses in Hong Kong is a key step for CFX to move from “concept narrative” to “value verification.” It is transforming from an ordinary public chain into a “licensed financial infrastructure” with clear regulatory backing and supported by real financial scenarios. In the short term, prices will inevitably be directly influenced by news of the licenses, with significant volatility. But in the long run, its value will no longer depend on the bull and bear markets of the crypto market itself, but on how much “water” (stablecoins and assets) is willing to flow through its “pipeline” and how much “flow” (transaction volume) can be generated.
The eve of the license landing is a critical moment for observation and decision-making. Remember, investment looks at the realization of logic, not just the frenzy of news. For CFX, the real test begins only after the license is issued.
Follow Raoge's Crypto Diary to learn more about first-hand information and precise points in the crypto world, becoming your navigation in the crypto space; learning is your greatest wealth!#Aave换币风波 #比特币重新站上7万美元大关 $ETH
