⠀⠀⠀⠀⣿⡇⠀⢸⣿⡇⠀⠀⠀⠀

(Episode 6 – Season 4)
#knowmorewithGiovanni
Bitcoin has transformed in recent years into a financial tool relied upon by many entities, including cybersecurity units and certain political groups, whether for funding or for protection from traditional financial constraints.
This shift reflects, at its core, Bitcoin’s appeal as a digital asset that offers freedom and security more than it reflects any negative aspect.
Positives: Why Are These Entities Turning to Bitcoin?
1. Strong security and the absence of central control
Bitcoin’s decentralization provides a high level of protection against intervention or forced shutdown, which is crucial for entities dealing with sensitive information.
2. Network transparency helps reduce misuse
Bitcoin transactions are recorded on-chain and can be traced, making illegal activity more difficult than commonly assumed, and giving authorities better analytic capabilities when needed.
3. Cross-border mobility without restrictions
Bitcoin serves as a practical means for transferring funds in difficult or politically unstable environments without facing account freezes or bureaucratic obstacles.
4. Hedging against inflation and weak financial systems
Many experts rely on Bitcoin to preserve value in the face of unstable monetary policies or depreciating local currencies.
Negatives… with a rational understanding of context
Its occasional use in funding unknown groups
This is not a flaw in Bitcoin itself, but rather a natural stage for any new technology before suitable regulatory frameworks are established—exactly as happened with the internet and telecommunications.
Its decentralization can allow movement outside oversight
Yet this is fundamentally an advantage, providing individuals and independent groups with legitimate financial freedom, while blockchain-analysis tools continue to evolve and reduce misuse.
A crucial perspective to consider:
Why do centralized systems fail to meet people’s needs?
Despite the criticism directed at Bitcoin, centralized financial systems themselves contain structural flaws that push many to search for more just and independent alternatives.
Among the most notable flaws:
Absolute control and unilateral decision-making:
In many countries, the financial authority operates centrally, sometimes in a manner resembling oppressive dictatorship, where individuals’ funds can be frozen, their transactions restricted, or harsh economic decisions imposed without public consent.
Currency manipulation and deliberate inflation:
Some systems print excessive money to solve their crises, destroying citizens’ purchasing power, while Bitcoin maintains a fixed issuance that cannot be manipulated.
Lack of transparency and limited accountability:
Unlike the clear records on the blockchain, centralized systems operate in closed environments where financial decisions are difficult to track, opening the door to corruption and financial injustice.
These flaws make it logical—not unusual—for certain entities to turn to Bitcoin, as it offers an alternative that balances freedom, security, and transparency.
Conclusion
The shift by cybersecurity units and political groups toward Bitcoin reflects recognition of its security, flexibility, and value of independence. And while there are limited negatives, they are manageable and arise naturally from technological evolution, whereas centralized systems continue to show deep problems that may be more dangerous than Bitcoin’s own flaws.
With the advancement of analytical and regulatory tools, Bitcoin is becoming a balanced choice that combines freedom with responsibility.
Written by Giovanni – 19 November 2025
#Binance #PortalLatino #TEAMMATRIX #TinkTank @EarnPii - TEAM MATRIX - TANK TinkTank @FÈS - TEAM MATRIX TinkTank @OVMARS - TEAM MATRIX @KeanuLeafes - TEAM MATRIX @Elex Rocks - TEAM MATRIX @ERiSch - Portal Latino @LUNA MY @Will-123 @Arla VEE369X24