GLM vs IOST: One sells 'brainpower', the other competes on 'score', which one is your ideal on-chain model?
If GLM and IOST were brought to the same table for a showdown, the scene would probably look like 'the academic elite vs the athlete', with completely different styles, but each can excel in its own way.
**GLM (Golem)**'s core selling point in one sentence: Turn the world's idle computing power into your '外挂'. It's like Airbnb for shared computing power in Web3—someone else's computer is idle, and you come to rent it. Users engaged in AI, rendering, and computation-intensive tasks love it, feeling like they can upgrade their laptops into supercomputers at any time.
**IOST** focuses on high-performance public chains, not pursuing brainpower, but speed and stability. Its PoB mechanism is like a 'physical selection test' for the blockchain, where nodes rely on performance to earn their keep, maximizing efficiency. IOST gives the impression that: you write good code, and I'll run it faster.
One offers 'computing power freedom', the other offers 'performance freedom'. Do you want to become smarter with GLM, or faster with IOST?
**Join the comments section, don't just sneak away after reading!**$GLM
