In the current competition of public chains, $SUI it actually shouldn't be such a quiet role. Whether from the technical framework, performance testing, development philosophy, or the financial background behind it, Sui is a chain with 'top potential.' Logically, as long as there are one or two viable applications landed, its ecological voice and market position can quickly rise.

But reality makes people somewhat helpless.


What SUI is most criticized for is not the technology, but its 'talking without action' ability to land.

For many years, the community's evaluation of Sui has always revolved around two phrases:
either 'the game console has no shadow' or 'the big IP has been talking for a long time without any works.' The most typical example is the countless discussions about the Pokemon narrative.


There have always been hints, discussions, and even external communities are expecting Sui to produce a heavyweight game card.


The result is that there has been a lot of noise but little action, and so far there hasn't been a single product that can truly drive traffic.

Sui's problem is not technology, but 'no one can make use of the technology.'

If viewed solely from a performance perspective, Sui's performance is actually strong, with large-scale concurrency, an efficient object model, and low latency, all forming clear competitiveness.

But the problem is:
'Good technology without good products is just paper strength.'

No matter how good a public chain is, if no one can create applications that ordinary users are willing to participate in, it can only remain at the PPT stage.

This has always been the biggest doubt from the outside world regarding Sui:
Resources are available, the background is there, and subsidies are also present, but there is a lack of a team that can truly ground the project and has market capabilities.

Many projects are more like 'rich second-generation':


Born at the top of resources, but lacking market pressure and the ability to self-generate.


Once subsidies stop, the project immediately falls silent. The heat dissipates like a spark, making it difficult to form the true cohesion of the ecosystem.

It was only recently that the community realized: it's not that Sui can't do it, but that there has always been a lack of capable people.

The changes during this period have slowly made the outside world realize a fact:
Sui's problem is not 'unwilling to do,' but rather struggling to find a team that can truly carry the narrative.

And now, the community generally believes that the team most likely to take on this role is not the large projects strongly promoted by the official team, but a team that has truly emerged from the market, with actual revenue capabilities, Jackson.io.

[Jackson.io: Unlike the 'illegitimate child' of a rich second-generation, it is more like the real child of the Sui ecosystem]

If many projects in the ecosystem are like 'rich second-generation' relying on subsidies, resources, and endorsements for support;


Jackson, on the other hand, operates under a completely different logic.

It is more like that kind of illegitimate child that has no support but forces itself to break through from the market:


Starting from scratch, relying on oneself to attract traffic, relying on oneself to generate revenue, and relying on oneself to refine the product. Therefore, Jackson has shown stronger vitality than many official projects within the ecosystem.

  • Can self-generate without relying on subsidies

  • Web2 traffic can truly be drawn into Web3

  • Games, entertainment, and assetization can form a complete closed loop

  • Can withstand transparency and scrutiny

  • The model can run, revenue can be seen, and growth is real

The key point is that the TCG and Pokemon narratives that $Sui has been talking about for a long time without implementation are now being pushed forward by Jackson in a real and tangible way.

The ideas that Sui presented in PPT in the past are now being turned into reality by Jackson.

The pain points that Sui has long been criticized for are now being addressed by Jackson.

Sui's technology is not the problem; the issue lies in the lack of people who can turn technology into products.
Sui's narrative is not the problem; the issue lies in the lack of people who can turn the narrative into business.
Sui's resources are not lacking; what is missing is a team that can truly turn resources into results.

The emergence of Jackson just happens to fill these gaps.

Essentially, Jackson is more like a team that truly belongs to the market, to strength, and to results.
It does not rely on the ecosystem like a rich second-generation but supports the ecosystem through its own efforts.


This is why the outside world would say:


What can truly make Sui 'be seen' may not be those projects strongly supported by the officials, but this illegitimate child that has been hard-won from the market.

If Sui is to usher in a true explosion point, most people have already set their sights on #jacksonio .