Friends, it's time to shift your focus away from those established privacy projects. Recently, there is a project whose progress bar seems to have been fast-forwarded; it has caught up with the development of many established projects over several years in just a few months, and that project is InitVerse (INI).
1. 500 Bitcoins financing? No, this is a 'gambling-style growth.'
What is InitVerse (INI)? It aims to build a new generation of 'privacy-first' Web3 infrastructure, allowing global users and businesses to securely use private data on-chain for large-scale commercial use. It announced on the 25th that it has raised 500 Bitcoins, roughly 50 million USD.
INI is not an ordinary project; its financing is like 'setting off firecrackers'—once it's done, it's done. INI just acquired 500 BTC; can you guess what it’s doing? It insists that investors treat it as 'installment payments' and must be evaluated based on KPIs. This operation is akin to that new 'overachiever' colleague who not only earns a high salary but also proactively tells the boss, 'Don’t give me all the money right away; let’s talk after I deliver results.'
While others are busy posting, 'We’ve been invested in by certain funds!' INI quietly accomplished three things:
Initiate 'installment payment' mode: 500 bitcoins will not be credited in one lump sum but triggered by meeting conditions. Technical standards met? Money. Ecosystem applications grow? Money. This isn’t financing; it’s tying oneself to a 'KPI performance,' as if to say, 'Can you still doubt that we won't do anything?'
All addresses are public, playing the 'open strategy': the foundation's wallet address is directly disclosed, and every inflow and outflow of money can be seen; anyone can check on-chain. It feels like showing your hand while playing cards and saying, 'I’m playing with my cards face up; are you in or out?' In the information-asymmetrical world of Web3, this kind of 'sincerity' has become the sharpest weapon.
The official backing: the first $10 million from financing has a note stating that part will be used for the repurchase of 50 million INIs. What does this mean? It means the project team is personally stepping in to back the market with nearly $10 million, translated into plain language: 'Don't worry, just come on board; we'll cover the bottom price, and if it drops, we’ll take as much as we need.'
Second, technology? It’s not creating a privacy coin; it’s building a 'data vault.'
Stop comparing INI with ZEC; what we are discussing is fundamentally not the same dimension.
The technology of ZEC is like an 'invisibility cloak,' focusing on making transaction information invisible. The pursuit is 'don't let me be seen,' holding one’s breath in the dark, praying not to be discovered. While ZEC is still working to weave a thicker 'cover,' INI has already abandoned past technical implementations and redefined 'privacy.'
INI is building a 'data vault' that aims for 'you can see it, but you won't understand it, and you can still work inside it.' The self-developed core technology TfhEVM allows data to be computed and processed while being fully encrypted.
Imagine if you could throw any encrypted medical data to train an AI model, allowing the AI to learn to diagnose diseases without ever 'seeing' any patient's private information. This technology upgrades privacy from an 'optional' to a 'fundamental infrastructure.' That's what InitVerse is doing; it aims to become the data privacy foundation in the AI + Web3 era. This narrative is magnitudes larger than mere 'anonymous transactions.'
Third, why is the INI price rising? Because it's playing 'Tetris Pro Max.'
The economic model of general project tokens is 'stacking boxes,' which can easily collapse when piled high. INI plays the advanced version:
Blocks (demand) accelerate downwards: every on-chain interaction, every DApp deployment, every node staking consumes INI. The more vibrant the ecosystem, the faster the blocks fall.
Fancy elimination (deflation): weekly destruction + official buyback, equivalent to having built-in 'sights' and 'bombs' to precisely eliminate downward pressure.
The result is that this game has just entered 'acceleration mode,' and you are already at the table.
Fourth, from $1 to $10, INI's roadmap resembles 'leveling up by defeating monsters.'
INI has currently risen from $0.0209 to $0.131, with a target of $10. This is not just a pie in the sky, but a clear 'upgrade roadmap':
Lv.1: Become the 'top tier' in the circle ($1~$3)
By leveraging the 'no-code development platform' INISaaS and a $100 million ecosystem fund, it attracts developers in batches and spawns the first breakout application. (Currently, there is the MANANA protocol, which has obtained U.S. MSB, RIA international licenses, and SEC exemption filings).
Lv.2: Leverage traditional big players ($3~$7)
Let traditional enterprises (like healthcare, new energy) use the INI chain to process core data, proving that technology can 'break out.'
Lv.3: Become the 'privacy layer' of Web3 ($7~$10+)
Other public chains and projects actively integrate INI's privacy module, making INI an industry standard.
The goal is to surpass the market value of ZEC within three years, becoming the undisputed new leader in the privacy track.
So, what is investing in INI?
You have discovered a team: they have money, technology, and are particularly tough on themselves.
It's about having faith in a future: privacy is no longer optional, but a 'necessity infrastructure' of the digital age.
It's about believing in your vision: vote early for the 'overachiever' who may define the next cycle.
Established projects still deserve respect, but new codes are being rewritten by new 'architects.' This time, INI doesn't just seem like a participant; it looks more like the one setting the new rules.
