Brothers, if player credit, player level, player pricing, and player liquidity are the micro-level value constructions, then the entire industry is being pushed by YGG towards a macro structure — the player economy belt.
The logic of the player economy belt is very simple:
Player value is no longer confined to a single game, but forms a long-distance, high-density, and continuously flowing value corridor across games, regions, and ecosystems.
This is similar to the 'industrial belt' in the real world, except that the production factors here are not land, not capital, but players.
First economic belt: cross-game value belt
This is the most core one.
The contributions made by players in game A will directly affect their treatment in games B, C, and D;
The reputation level of players in a certain game will be inherited to the next game;
Tasks, feedback, and governance records will migrate across ecosystems.
Player value changes from 'points' to 'lines', and the longer this line is, the greater the value.
Second economic belt: regional economic belt
SubDAO is the hub of each region, and players in each area have different capability densities:
Philippines: Strong execution, high task efficiency
South Korea: Competitive players are dense, with strong deep testing capabilities
South America: The strongest community organization capabilities
Europe and America: High feedback quality, deep governance participation
These regional capabilities are integrated into a 'regional value belt'.
Value between regions will flow, enhance, and amplify each other.
Third economic belt: ecological value belt
As more and more games connect to YGG, player value no longer relies on a single ecosystem, but on the entire network.
Your contributions in any game will be automatically recognized across the entire ecosystem.
Your accumulation in different ecosystems will form a 'cross-ecosystem value belt', allowing players to upgrade from local assets to 'global assets'.
Why are these three economic belts so critical?
Because they together create a structure that the previous blockchain game world has never had:
Player value is no longer trapped in a single point, no longer trapped in a single game, no longer trapped in a single area, but continuously accumulates, compounds, and migrates in the network.
This means:
A player with deep contributions is increasingly scarce across more games;
The denser the players in an area, the more likely it is to form a local value center;
The larger the entire ecosystem, the easier it is for player value to spill over into more fields.
Ultimately, YGG is not building a guild, nor a task platform, but is building:
Cross-game value corridor
Cross-regional value network
Cross-ecosystem value system
Cross-chain player economic map
Player value first forms an 'economic zone', rather than scattered fragments.
@Yield Guild Games #YGGPlay $YGG
