#BinanceBlockchainWeek #BTCvsGold
The competition between Bitcoin and tokenized gold is essentially a clash between digital native assets and traditional value storage paradigms. My position is clear: **Bitcoin is the superior future value carrier**.
Tokenized gold (like PAXG) digitizes gold, enhancing liquidity and divisibility, but it remains a "mirror" of physical gold—its value is ultimately anchored in the regulatory and trust system of physical gold reserves, and it does not escape centralized dependence. Bitcoin, on the other hand, is a pure revolution of digital scarcity: a constant total supply, decentralized verification, and global barrier-free transfer. These characteristics enable it to achieve a dimensionality reduction in terms of censorship resistance, programmability, and financial sovereignty.
Gold carries a millennium of consensus, but in the digital age, its physical attributes (storage costs, verification challenges) are precisely the shackles. Bitcoin, born as the internet-native "digital gold," is better suited for a globalized, digital economy. When discussing the future of assets at #BinanceBlockchainWeek, we should embrace not just technological upgrades, but also paradigm shifts—Bitcoin does not replace gold, but rather redefines the new standard of value storage for the new era. $BTC
Do you prefer to choose "digitized old assets" or "new assets born for the digital world"? Welcome to discuss!
