The period from November 24 to December 2, 2025, became a turning point for the digital asset industry. During these nine days, JPMorgan launched structured notes with leverage linked to ETFs from BlackRock. The investment giant Vanguard lifted its ban on cryptocurrency trading. The Nasdaq exchange quadrupled the limits on IBIT options.

Analyst Shanaka Anslem Perera characterizes this convergence as a fundamental change in institutional capital's access to the market. Leading banks and asset managers have expanded their range of offerings and distribution channels. In fact, they have redefined the role of Bitcoin in the global financial system.

Coordinated expansion of infrastructure

Traditional financial institutions have long observed the industry from the sidelines. However, by the end of 2025, the infrastructure reached a critical development point. The transformation began with the approval of spot ETFs by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in January 2024. This created a regulated gateway for large capital.

JPMorgan's application on November 24 revealed details of launching leveraged structured notes. The instrument provides returns of up to 1.5x the performance of BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The product's term is set until 2028. The securities are aimed at qualified investors seeking enhanced exposure while maintaining legal protection. However, the notes carry significant risks. Investors may lose principal if IBIT quotes fall by approximately 40% or more.

On the same week, November 26, Nasdaq announced an increase in position limits for IBIT options. The threshold rose from 250,000 to 1,000,000 contracts. The exchange acknowledged the growth in market capitalization and trading volumes. Structural analysis shows that the expansion of the options infrastructure allows institutions to manage volatility. Now digital assets fit into standard risk control protocols.

On December 2, Vanguard added to the picture. The second-largest asset manager in the world changed its long-standing position. The company opened access to Bitcoin ETFs for clients holding assets totaling about $11 trillion. The decision was made during a market correction, indicating strategic calculation rather than a speculative chase for price.

Capitulation of retail investors and corporate entry

This turning point coincided with a mass exit of retail players. Redemption of ETF shares sharply increased as private investors sold assets amid falling prices. Institutional capital, on the other hand, took the other side of the trade. Sovereign funds, such as the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, increased their allocations.

Bank of America allowed 15,000 financial advisors to offer Bitcoin to wealthy clients starting January 5, 2026. The recommended allocation in the portfolio is between 1% and 4% for those willing to accept volatility. The bank highlighted four funds: Bitwise, Fidelity, Grayscale Mini Trust, and BlackRock. This is a significant shift for an institution with assets of $2.67 trillion and a network of 3,600 branches.

"2024: CEO Vanguard states that they will not offer Bitcoin ETFs. 2025: Vanguard offers Bitcoin ETFs to 50 million clients. Vanguard and JPMorgan bowed down," published eOffshoreNomad.

BlackRock has also recommended allocating up to 2% of portfolios to digital currency. The risks of the asset are compared to the stocks of the tech giants of the 'Magnificent Seven'. The unified approach of the largest players suggests, if not formal cooperation, then a coordinated information policy. Advisors from competing firms received similar instructions on asset allocation and risk assessment.

Goldman Sachs chose a different path. The bank acquired Innovator Capital Management for about $2 billion. The deal provided immediate access to channels for distributing crypto products and a ready compliance system. This saved years of internal development.

Exclusion from indices and elimination of competitors

While financial institutions developed the ETF infrastructure, alternative models faced obstacles. On October 10, 2025, MSCI announced consultations on excluding firms with large treasury reserves of digital assets from major indices. The preliminary list included Strategy Inc., Metaplanet, and other pioneers of corporate Bitcoin adoption.

The proposal concerns companies whose digital assets constitute an disproportionately large portion of their balance sheet. Removal from MSCI Global Investable Market indices will force passive funds to sell shares of these firms. Consultations will last until December 31, 2025, and a final decision is expected by January 15, 2026.

The timing was notable. Strategy Inc., for example, attracted investors looking for exposure to Bitcoin without financial intermediaries and ETF fees. However, as MSCI offered exclusion, the largest banks introduced new, fee-generating ETF-based options. This created pressure on alternative approaches to gaining exposure.

Transition to a commission-based management model

The nine-day convergence not only brought new products. It established Bitcoin as an asset class that generates fees for traditional finance. Structured notes, options, and ETF management create streams of regular revenue. Direct treasury ownership and self-custody now face barriers in the form of exclusion from indices and regulatory requirements.

With expanded options, institutions can manage volatility. This makes Bitcoin suitable for portfolios with risk parity and strict limits. The infrastructural shift turns cryptocurrency into a portfolio component rather than just a speculative asset. However, pricing is now shifting towards derivatives rather than spot trading.

The institutional system adapted the asset to itself. Allocations and risk disclosures are harmonized. Licensed advisors direct clients, and products have standardized fees. Bitcoin, originally created to bypass the banking system, is now integrated into its architecture.