🇨🇳 Between Empty Lines and Real Learning: My Writing Experience in INJECTIVE Activities
These days—honestly, for several weeks now—I have devoted almost all my time to the Binance Creator Pad activities: I publish content, learn, read technical documents, and strive to create truly valuable articles.
I do this not only to improve my ranking but also because, in the process, I have discovered that what I learned far exceeds expectations: from advanced interoperability concepts to Injective's modular ecosystem, and the architecture based on the Cosmos SDK.
However, while truly learning, there are also some things that make me uneasy. When I look at the top 100 pieces of content, I find that some articles are even less than 20 lines, lacking coherence, technical viewpoints, and even the most basic explanations of Injective as a key foundation for Web3.
Although I do not resent competition, on the contrary, I enjoy it, I do find it difficult to understand why an algorithm would prioritize such superficial content while ignoring creators who strive to provide in-depth analysis.
$INJ is not an ordinary meme coin. It is a blockchain built for high-performance finance. It supports the construction of DEXs, perpetual contract markets, oracle infrastructure, and financial applications without gas fees. Discussing Injective requires at least some technical understanding.
Perhaps my real frustration does not come from the ranking but from the sense of unfairness of spending hours researching orderbook-level MEV protection, WASM smart contracts, and how the Injective bridge works, only to see some posts that are completely devoid of content.
Nevertheless, I still insist on being here. Because I have indeed learned things, because I am growing, and because I am fortunate to read and meet some people who truly share deep knowledge—those who are truly proficient in this field and can provide valuable insights.
Perhaps algorithms cannot measure effort, investment, or learning. But every line I write elevates me on both personal and technical levels.
