As someone who has been observing the international landscape and the crypto market for 8 years, I can say that Putin's recent actions are more impactful than any narrative hype created by project teams. When an Indian journalist asked, 'Will Russia return to the G7?' the Emperor directly delivered a soul-crushing response: 'In Russia, G stands for “Great,” but when measured by real value (PPP), many G7 member countries are less substantial than India. Where does this 'greatness' come from?' Translated, it means: it's not that India doesn't deserve to be in the G7; rather, the 'market value' of the G7 is inflated and cannot support the valuation of 'greatness'!
Here’s a useful point (those who understand, understand): it's like the 'market cap trap' in the crypto circle where some old projects (corresponding to G7) rely on their early first-mover advantage, still holding the 'leading' label, but the actual landing value (corresponding to PPP) has long been surpassed by emerging public chains (corresponding to India), yet they still cling to the old pattern. The G7's 'nominal GDP' is like a project's 'circulating market value,' built up through marketing and consensus; while PPP is the 'real lock-up amount,' reflecting tangible value accumulation. Putin accurately pinpointed this, essentially reconstructing consensus using 'value anchoring logic.' Just like when we choose projects, we never look solely at market value, but also at real application scenarios and capital accumulation; otherwise, no matter how glamorous the 'leading project,' it will eventually be countered by value.
What's even more incredible is the grasp of emotions: how many years has India been hoping to join the G7? It's like small retail investors are obsessed with 'entering the top exchanges', believing that only entering the 'core circle' counts as success. Putin directly overturned this logic: it's not that you are unqualified, but that the 'exchange' itself has outdated admission rules! This move not only fulfilled India's narrative expectations but also burst the 'consensus bubble' of the G7, effectively backing India's 'project value' while undermining the G7's 'valuation system.' Isn't this the classic narrative of 'switching lanes to overtake' in the crypto circle?
One must understand that the underlying logic of the international landscape and the crypto market is interconnected: consensus is more important than hard data, and emotion is the catalyst for consensus. The G7 maintains its barrier based on a 'great' narrative consensus; while Putin's move directly broke this consensus with 'real value anchoring,' similar to suddenly exposing the 'false lock-up' of a certain leading project, instantly shaking market confidence. In contrast, India has effectively received an 'emotional airdrop' backed by the 'emperor's endorsement,' turning its resentment towards the G7 directly into self-recognition of its value. This transfer of consensus is more effective than any trade cooperation.
Finally, a soul-searching question: Is there still a lot of this 'old circle bubble' in the crypto circle? Some old project alliances cling to their 'first-mover advantage,' while their actual value has long been surpassed by emerging ecosystems, yet they continue to rely on 'sentimental marketing' to harvest profits. Who do you think will be the next 'G7-level old circle' to be 'pierced by value'? Is it some old alliance with monopolized resources, or a pseudo-leading project built on marketing?
Follow me! After all, the emperor is using 'cryptographic thinking' to play narrative, and we need to see through the underlying consensus logic when trading coins! Earn cognitive money by following the pattern!
