The results of PVP these past few days have been a loss @cz_binance1000 @heyibinance415 do you guys know?

Every day there are different new projects, once the big money appears, other projects get drained.

Right now BSC still has too little new money, the old money that can survive is mostly big projects.

Looking at it this way, $GIGGLE is already considered quite good in comparison.

Playing with memes like this definitely won't work, whether it's @Pumpfun495 @bonkfun216 @baseapp481 or your BSC, doing it this way is still like the last wave of white scarf/broccoli, ultimately ending up as scattered sand;

New funds must come from a large consensus and a significant wealth effect, and it should be sustainable. Instead of being so scattered now, it would be better to openly push the new generation of projects to a scale that can definitely attract new funds.

For example: the AXIE of that year, ORDI, even though they are not doing well now.

AXIE pioneered the gaming sector, and its achievements are unattainable for later entrants; moreover, it sustained a long-term wealth effect;

ORDI pioneered the inscription sector, and the logic of fair launch became the direction that various ecosystems wanted to expand at that time. Of course, now we all know that without strong whales, any fair asset issuance method is just scattered sand;

There are even NFTs, although many quickly went to zero due to liquidity, but they were all pioneering, sustainable, and had wealth effects;

@binance923's pioneering spirit is indeed very brave, but the meme sector is definitely not a sector where most people make money. So, you should step out of memes and try something different. Here, $GIGGLE is clearly your most pioneering product. Surrounding @GiggleAcademy208, you should have also tried many different approaches. Now $GIGGLE is here, and it can lead some projects' financing methods;

I hope you can pay attention to this asset, it is the only meme that doesn't feel like a meme.