I want to take a slightly more macro perspective and use a popular real estate metaphor to discuss what Lorenzo Protocol has actually changed.

In the past decade, we have consistently labeled Bitcoin as 'digital gold'. This metaphor has been quite successful, establishing Bitcoin's position as a 'store of value'. What are the characteristics of gold? It is scarce, chemically stable, but it also has a fatal flaw— it does not generate cash flow. If you buy a gold bar and put it in a safe, after ten years, when you open it, it is still a gold bar and will not produce a smaller gold bar.

But with the emergence of infrastructures like Babylon and the Lorenzo Protocol, the attributes of Bitcoin are undergoing a qualitative leap: it is transitioning from 'gold' to 'scarce real estate located in the city center.'

Imagine you have a vacant lot (BTC) in Manhattan or the city center of Shanghai. Previously, due to technological (policy) constraints, you could only fence off the land and wait for it to appreciate. This is certainly good, as the location is prime. But for capital, this is actually a huge waste.

The role played by the Lorenzo Protocol is that of a top real estate developer holding blueprints and construction teams.

It tells you: don't let your land get overgrown with weeds. Hand the land over to me (staking), and I'll help you build a skyscraper (stBTC) on this foundation, then rent out the rooms in those buildings to companies in need of office space.

At this point, your revenue model has completely changed. Previously, you could only earn money from 'land price appreciation,' but now you can also earn a continuous stream of 'rent.'

This is not just about having an additional source of income; it directly changes the valuation logic of Bitcoin. In finance, an asset that generates cash flow is worth much more than a mere commodity. It is like a company that only sells land versus a company that owns mature commercial real estate generating rent; the price-to-earnings ratios given by the capital markets are completely different.

What makes me feel confident about Lorenzo is that it not only helps you 'build buildings' but also takes care of the most complex 'property management.'

Do you know what the biggest fear in real estate is? The fear of unreliable tenants (node maliciousness) and the fear of unfinished properties (technical failures). Lorenzo, through its liquidity re-staking mechanism, has packaged this complex rental process into a standardized financial product. You don't need to negotiate with tenants, nor do you need to personally fix the plumbing; you only need to hold the stBTC certificate to automatically receive your share of the rent.

Looking further, Lorenzo's dual-token model has even created a way to play real estate investment trusts.

If you urgently need money but don't want to sell the land, you can package and sell the future rental rights (YAT). This is a very advanced financial operation in traditional real estate, and now Lorenzo has made it something anyone can complete with just a click of a mouse.

So, when we talk about Lorenzo again, don't just see it as a DeFi project. It is actually the driving force behind the upgrade of Bitcoin's asset attributes. It is transforming Bitcoin holders from mere 'coin hoarders' into 'digital landlords.'

This transformation is irreversible. Once people get used to Bitcoin in their hands generating 'rent' like a house every month, no one will want to simply lock it in a cold wallet to gather dust. In this new era, whoever can provide the most solid houses and attract the highest quality tenants will be the winner. And Lorenzo, it seems, is currently the developer with the best construction quality and property services.

@Lorenzo Protocol $BANK #LorenzoProtocol